Connect with us

Politics

California brings in over $760 million in new congressional earmarks

Published

on

California brings in over 0 million in new congressional earmarks

After a decadelong prohibition, congressional earmarks make their return this week, sending greater than $760 million in transportation, army, healthcare and different tasks to California.

President Biden signed into legislation a $1.5-trillion authorities spending invoice on Tuesday that features financing for initiatives particularly written by lawmakers in search of to spice up their native universities, roadways or parks with federal {dollars}. Almost 500 of the tasks will probably be in California.

The largest tasks within the state’s $766-million pot contain army development at naval bases in Coronado and Ventura County requested by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). Different undertakings embrace $15 million to dredge Channel Islands Harbor in Oxnard, written by Rep. Julia Brownley (D-Westlake Village); $15 million to replenish seashores from Anaheim Bay to Newport Bay, pushed by Rep. Michelle Metal (R-Seal Seaside); and $10 million to stabilize the Coaster commuter rail alongside the Del Mar Bluffs, led by Feinstein.

Different Southern California tasks funded within the invoice embrace $2 million to transform a Santa Monica parking construction into inexpensive housing for folks experiencing homelessness, written by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), and $1.5 million for Kids’s Hospital Los Angeles to purchase a high-performance coronary heart MRI scanner.

Advertisement

Orange County seashores will quickly be shored up with federal funds. Pictured is North Star Seaside in Newport, which well being officers briefly closed to swimming in 2019.

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Occasions)

Earmarks had been banned on Capitol Hill 11 years in the past on the behest of Home Republicans and then-President Obama in response to scandals surrounding how lawmakers had been utilizing them. Democrats introduced pork barrel spending again final 12 months with reforms that they are saying will forestall abuse. Some lawmakers, significantly conservatives, say earmarks can result in wasteful spending.

Democrats, who renamed earmarks the extra politically palatable “neighborhood undertaking funding,” say lawmakers know what their districts want higher than a Washington-based bureaucrat who would in any other case determine what receives funding. And lawmakers from each main events like to advertise the spending to their constituents.

Advertisement

Inside moments of the spending invoice’s passage within the Home final week, many lawmakers had been broadcasting the federal pork they had been delivery again residence. Republican Rep. Don Younger of Alaska — a state with an extended historical past of successful earmarks — boasted that he had “proudly secured” funding for a fireplace station and well being heart.

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Santa Barbara) equally bragged about utilizing earmarks “to ship actual outcomes for Central Coast residents.”

In an indication of the political efficiency of such earmarks, most of the most susceptible Home Democrats secured sizable pots of cash. Amongst California’s most endangered incumbent Democrats on this fall’s midterm election, Rep. Mike Levin of San Juan Capistrano landed $21 million for eight tasks and Rep. Josh Tougher of Turlock received greater than $11 million for a minimum of eight.

Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, probably the most conservative Senate Democrat and a swing vote on a number of Biden administration priorities, counted up a whopping $166 million in earmarks for his state.

Congressional leaders like earmarks as a result of a lawmaker who has a undertaking tucked into a bigger invoice is extra prone to vote sure. Such spending be a potent type of political grease within the complicated legislative course of. However that’s not all the time the case.

Advertisement
A white truck near a structure engulfed in flames.

A home burns throughout final 12 months’s River fireplace in Nevada County, Calif. Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) voted in opposition to the earmarks he bought for the world, together with $1 million for a fire-suppression system within the county.

(Xavier Mascarenas / Sacramento Bee)

Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) obtained hundreds of thousands in earmarks, together with $4 million to develop broadband in Plumas and Sierra counties. He additionally bought $1 million for a fire-suppression system in Nevada County. But he voted in opposition to the portion of the invoice contained that funding.

LaMalfa stated he supported “many particular person items” of the laws, however criticized Home leaders for giving lawmakers lower than a day to learn the two,741-page measure. He was additionally frightened concerning the total price ticket.

Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Huge Bear Lake) equally secured hundreds of thousands in earmarks, together with cash to enhance the streets within the cities of Highland and Hesperia, however voted in opposition to that portion of the laws.

Advertisement

The invoice “will increase spending over earlier years at a time when our nationwide debt is already over $30 trillion, which is $90,000 per American … with out together with any measures to scale back the nationwide debt,” he stated in an evidence of his opposition.

It wasn’t simply Republicans who voted in opposition to parts of the invoice containing their pork spending.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) pushed for $1.5 million for a seawall within the metropolis of Alameda and $500,000 for the Youth Alive violence prevention program. However she voted in opposition to that a part of the invoice, which additionally coated protection spending.

Lee had advocated for the earmarks as a member of the committee that crafts spending payments. However as a longtime antiwar advocate, she has traditionally opposed protection spending payments. It was “unlucky procedural circumstances” that led protection spending to be mixed with earmarks that she supported, an aide stated.

Not all lawmakers included earmarks within the invoice.

Advertisement
A beach alongside a harbor full of boats.

Rep. Julia Brownley (D-Westlake Village) scored an earmark for $15 million to dredge Channel Islands Harbor in Oxnard.

(Paul Harris / Getty Pictures)

A number of Republicans didn’t request any earmarks. They included California Reps. Darrell Issa of Bonsall and Tom McClintock of Elk Grove and Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield.

When Democrats introduced again the follow final 12 months, they applied new guidelines to scale back the probabilities of requests being utilized in corrupt methods.

Lawmakers keenly bear in mind the scandal involving former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-Rancho Santa Fe), who resigned after pleading responsible in 2005 to receiving $2.4 million in bribes from protection contractors in change for together with earmarks in laws. And former Home Appropriations Committee Chairman John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) was beneath investigation for utilizing his submit to steer earmarks to his brother’s lobbying agency, the Washington Publish reported after the lawmaker died in 2010.

Advertisement

Below the brand new guidelines, lawmakers should publicly disclose their requests and certify that they and their households would not have any monetary curiosity in them; and for-profit entities can not obtain funding from earmarks.

Just one Home Democrat, Rep. Katie Porter of Irvine, didn’t search to incorporate earmarks within the invoice, saying they invite corruption and wasteful backroom offers.

“Pork-barrel spending ought to stay banned,” Porter wrote in a Wall Avenue Journal opinion piece final 12 months.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

Published

on

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

When President Abraham Lincoln first proclaimed Thanksgiving a national holiday, little did he know he was spelling the beginning of the end to the prominence of the original patriotic celebration held during the last week of November: Evacuation Day.

In November 1863, Lincoln issued an order thanking God for harvest blessings, and by the 1940s, Congress had declared the 11th month of the calendar year’s fourth Thursday to be Thanksgiving Day.

That commemoration, though, combined with the gradual move toward détente with what is now the U.S.’ strongest ally – Great Britain – displaced the day Americans celebrated the last of the Redcoats fleeing their land.

Following the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia in 1776, New York City, just 99 miles to the northeast, remained a British stronghold until the end of the Revolutionary War.

Captured Continentals were held aboard prison ships in New York Harbor and British political activity in the West was anchored in the Big Apple, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Advertisement

GEORGE WASHINGTON’S SACRED TRADITION

Gen. George Washington parades through Lower Manhattan on Evacuation Day on Nov. 25, 1783 (Library of Congress lithograph via Getty)

However, that all came crashing down on the crown after the Treaty of Paris was signed, and new “Americans” eagerly saw the British out of their hard-won home on Nov. 25, 1783.

In their haste to flee the U.S., the British took time to grease flagpoles that still flew the Union Jack. One prominent post was at Bennett Park – on present-day West 183 Street near the northern tip of Manhattan.

Undeterred, Sgt. John van Arsdale, a Revolution veteran, cobbled together cleats that allowed him to climb the slick pole and tear down the then-enemy flag. Van Arsdale replaced it with the Stars and Stripes – and without today’s skyscrapers in the way, the change of colors at the island’s highest point could be seen farther downtown.

Advertisement

In the harbor, a final blast from a British warship aimed for Staten Island, but missed a crowd that had assembled to watch the 6,000-man military begin its journey back across the Atlantic to King George III.

SYLVESTER STALLONE CALLS TRUMP ‘THE SECOND GEORGE WASHINGTON’

John_van_arsdale_evacuation_day_nyc

John Van Arsdale replaces the Union Jack with the American flag as the British evacuate New York on Nov. 25, 1783. (Getty)

Later that day, future President George Washington and New York Gov. George Clinton – who had negotiated “evacuation” with England’s Canadian Gov. Sir Guy Carleton – led a military march down Broadway through throngs of revelers to what would today be the Wall Street financial district at the other end of Manhattan.

Clinton hosted Washington for dinner and a “Farewell Toast” at nearby Fraunces’ Tavern, which houses a museum dedicated to the original U.S. holiday. Samuel Fraunces, who owned the watering hole, provided food and reportedly intelligence to the Continental Army.

Washington convened at Fraunces’ just over a week later to announce his leave from the Army, surrounded by Clinton and other top Revolutionary figures like German-born Gen. Friedrich von Steuben – whom New York’s Oktoberfest-styled parade officially honors.

Advertisement

“With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy, as your former ones have been glorious and honorable,” Washington said.

Before Lincoln – and later Congress – normalized Thanksgiving as the mass family affair it has become, Evacuation Day was more prominent than both its successor and Independence Day, according to several sources, including Untapped New York.

Nov. 25 was a school holiday in the 19th century and people re-created van Arsdale’s climb up the Bennett Park flagpole. Formal dinners were held at the Plaza Hotel and other upscale institutions for many years, according to the outlet.

An official parade reminiscent of today’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade was held every year in New York until the 1910s.

Advertisement
Fraunces_Tavern_NY

Fraunces’ Tavern, at Pearl and Broad Streets in New York City. (Getty)

As diplomatic relations with the United Kingdom warmed heading into the 20th century and the U.S. alliance with London during the World Wars proved crucial, celebrating Evacuation Day became less and less prominent.

Into the 2010s, however, commemorative flag-raisings have been sporadically held at Bowling Green, the southern endpoint of Broadway. On the original Evacuation Day, Washington’s dinner at Fraunces Tavern was preceded by the new U.S. Army marching down the iconic avenue to formally take back New York.

Thirteen toasts – marking the number of United States – were raised at Fraunces, each one spelling out the new government’s hope for the new nation or giving thanks to those who helped it come to be. 

An aide to Washington wrote them down for posterity, and the Sons of the American Revolution recite them at an annual dinner, according to the tavern’s museum site.

“To the United States of America,” the first toast went. The second honored King Louis XVI, whose French Army was crucial in America’s victory.

Advertisement

“To the vindicators of the rights of mankind in every quarter of the globe,” read another. “May a close union of the states guard the temple they have erected to liberty.”

The 13th offered a warning to any other country that might ever seek to invade the new U.S.:

“May the remembrance of this day be a lesson to princes.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Published

on

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Donald Trump posted notable gains in Orange County during the November election, but it was not enough to win the increasingly purple county that has become a suburban battleground between Republicans and Democrats — and a reflection of the demographic political realignment unfolding across the nation.

Kamala Harris won Orange County, but by a much tighter margin than either Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Joe Biden in 2020. When it comes to presidential politics, Orange County has backed Democrats since 2016, with increasingly blue areas such as Santa Ana, Anaheim and Irvine besting more red areas such as Huntington Beach and south Orange County.

But experts say the 2024 results offer some warning signs for Democrats.

“What the early numbers indicate is that Donald Trump made inroads with minority voters including probably substantial gains with Latino and Asian voters,” said Jeff Corless, a former strategist for Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer. “What we’re hearing is that he made those same kinds of gains in other communities similar to Orange County across the country. He also made gains with traditional suburban voters, which he struggled with in 2020.”

Paul Mitchell, a Democratic data specialist, said Trump probably did better in the county because of lower Democratic turnout this year compared with 2020, as well as voters being familiar — and potentially comfortable — with Trump because of their experience during his prior tenure.

Advertisement

“It may also be Trump has been normalized, in an odd way,” Mitchell said. “He’s been in our political eyesight for the last decade now. Maybe voters like the economy better under Trump.”

In 2016, Clinton received roughly 100,000 more votes in Orange County than Trump, making her the first Democrat county voters selected for the presidency in 80 years. In 2020, Biden fared even better, besting Trump by more than 137,500 votes. Now, Harris has edged out Trump, but the margin of victory is on trend to be much tighter than seen in past elections.

Votes in Orange County are still being counted and final numbers aren’t required to be certified by the county until Dec. 5 and by the state until Dec. 13. But it’s clear, experts say, that Trump harnessed the disillusionment felt by voters who are unhappy with the direction of the country and the economic pains that have beset many living in the suburbs.

“People in the press and people like me still so often take Trump literally, whereas voters lived through this once and the apocalypse didn’t happen and they liked the economy better,” said Rob Stutzman, a veteran GOP strategist and Trump critic who previously advised former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He noted that Trump’s improved performance in Orange County was not an outlier.

“He did better — look at how he did in New York, on the Eastern Seaboard, in Massachusetts,” Stutzman said. “There are red dots that never existed the last few decades.”

Advertisement

Still, there were some bright spots for Democrats, notably being able to hold on to a congressional seat that became open because Rep. Katie Porter of Irvine pursued an unsuccessful Senate bid, and flipping the 45th Congressional District. In that race, first-time candidate Derek Tran defeated Republican Rep. Michelle Steel of Seal Beach in a hotly contested race that became one of the most expensive in the country.

A UC Irvine poll released last year conveyed discord among Orange County voters, particularly Republicans and those who choose not to identify with a political party, who said despite their optimism about Orange County and somewhat about California, they did not have a good feeling about the future of America.

“The [election] results are much more a statement about people’s dissatisfaction with the current national administration than some grand statement about Trump or Republicans,” said Jon Gould, dean of the university’s School of Social Ecology.

“This is not a sign that Orange County is suddenly a red county,” Gould said. “This is exactly what it means to be a purple county.”

Michele Monda, a Republican who lives in the deep-blue city of Laguna Beach, voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 with her son and grandchildren in mind. The high housing costs and general lack of affordability have made it a challenge for middle-class couples, like her son and daughter-in-law, to build a life in many parts of California, including Orange County.

Advertisement

“Who is looking out for them?” Monda said. “They’re barely getting by, and quite honestly, the Democrats don’t seem to care. While I know Trump is a billionaire, I think he understands the needs of a middle-class person.”

Economics and Trump’s stance on immigration were the two main drivers that motivated her to vote for him. While she’s not always a fan of Trump’s behavior, she loves his policies. It’s not surprising, she said, that others in Orange County were swayed to his side as well.

“I think people have had enough of the Democrat party line, enough of the economy, enough of the whole platform. The things they espouse they just don’t work,” Monda said. “I think people in California are waking up.”

Trump’s improvement in the county has generated excitement among California Republicans who for years have tried to strengthen its hold on Orange County as Democratic voter registration grew and elections became more competitive.

For decades, Orange County was a conservative stronghold — the birthplace of former President Nixon, the cradle of Ronald Reagan’s ascent to the governor’s mansion and then the White House, and, for decades, a virtual synonym for the Republican Party of California.

Advertisement

The county’s shift over the last decade from deeply red to a more politically and demographically diverse region has fascinated the public for years.

“Orange County is a battleground,” said Jon Fleischman, a Republican campaign strategist and former executive director of the California GOP.

Trump’s popularity boost among Latinos and Asian Americans seen nationally could very well also be at play in swing counties such as Orange County. Republicans in the county for years have sought to attract Latinos and Asian Americans to their party with mixed success, and Trump’s performance could signal gains among these voter blocs, as well as Black Americans. He also won back some suburban women who turned against the Republican Party during his 2016 campaign and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn federal protection for abortion access in 2022.

Democrats leaned heavily into messaging about the loss of reproductive rights during this year’s campaign, in television ads and during their convention when they nominated Harris. However, Stutzman contended that the argument failed to resonate with suburban women in affluent areas such as Orange County as much as Democrats expected it to.

“Most women in America still have access — an overwhelming majority have access to abortion,” he said. “I just don’t know if there’s a connection, any real existential threat that their rights are being further eroded than they have been.”

Though Harris won the majority of votes across deep-blue California, Trump was on track to win Butte, Stanislaus, Fresno, Inyo, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, all areas that Biden carried in 2020. Trump also gained ground in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles County compared with 2016 and 2020.

“In order for Trump to win Orange County, he had to make inroads with minority voters, and he did that through issues that mattered to them and the struggles they’re facing,” Corless said.

Democrats’ ability to register voters in Orange County has also slowed.

Between October 2022 and October 2024, the Democratic Party in Orange County grew by just over 3,100 voters. At the same time, the Republican Party’s numbers swelled by 31,000 people, according to data from the California secretary of state.

Advertisement

In the years that the GOP voter registration waned, the number of nonparty-preference voters grew. Many longtime Republicans in Orange County, irritated by Trump’s outlandish speaking style and policy positions, branded themselves as “Never Trumpers.” But Republicans in Orange County have made a concerted effort this cycle to reregister former GOP voters and push early voting and mail ballots, a recognition of how much Trump’s opposition to such efforts harmed the party in 2020.

“When Trump was first elected, he was not everybody’s favorite flavor of ice cream, and I think you saw a lot of Republicans who decided to become independent,” Fleischman said. “I think as people have decided that they’re OK with Trump, they’ve been coming back to the party.”

The Republican Party of Orange County went as far as hosting a ballot collection day on Oct. 11 in which Republican Party offices served as designated ballot-drop locations. The move, it said at the time, makes voting more accessible while “maintaining the highest level election integrity.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

Published

on

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that Texas has the right to build a razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration into the Lone Star State. 

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the ruling on X, saying President Biden was “wrong to cut our razor wire.” 

“We continue adding more razor wire border barrier,” the Republican leader wrote. 

Wednesday’s 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals clears the way for Texas to pursue a lawsuit accusing the Biden administration of trespassing without having to remove the fencing.

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO WILL STOP FLOW OF MIGRANTS AFTER SPEAKING WITH MEXICAN PRESIDENT FOLLOWING TARIFF THREATS

Advertisement

It also reversed a federal judge’s November 2023 refusal to grant a preliminary injunction to Texas as the state resisted federal efforts to remove fencing along the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas.

U.S. Border Patrol agents cut an opening through razor wire after immigrant families crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee during the president-elect’s first term, wrote for Wednesday’s majority that Texas was trying only to safeguard its own property, not “regulate” U.S. Border Patrol, and was likely to succeed in its trespass claims.

LIBERAL NANTUCKET REELS FROM MIGRANT CRIME WAVE AS BIDEN SPENDS THANKSGIVING IN RICH FRIEND’S MANSION

Duncan said the federal government waived its sovereign immunity and rejected its concerns that a ruling by Texas would impede the enforcement of immigration law and undermine the government’s relationship with Mexico.

Advertisement
TEXAS BORDER RAZOR WIRE

A Venezuelan immigrant asks Texas National Guard troops to let his family pass through razor wire after they crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

He said the public interest “supports clear protections for property rights from government intrusion and control” and ensuring that federal immigration law enforcement does not “unnecessarily intrude into the rights of countless property owners.”

Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton called the ruling a “huge win for Texas.” 

“The Biden Administration has been enjoined from damaging, destroying, or otherwise interfering with Texas’s border fencing,” Paxton wrote in a post on X. “We sued immediately when the federal government was observed destroying fences to let illegal aliens enter, and we’ve fought every step of the way for Texas sovereignty and security.”

Texas border

Migrants attempt to cross the southern border in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, in February. (David Peinado/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The White House has been locked in legal battles with Texas and other states that have tried to deter illegal immigration. 

In May, the full 5th Circuit heard arguments in a separate case between Texas and the White House over whether the state can keep a 1,000-foot floating barrier on the Rio Grande.

Advertisement

The appeals court is also reviewing a judge’s order blocking a Texas law that would allow state officials to arrest, prosecute and order the removal of people in the country illegally.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending