Vermont
Earth Day in Vermont: Cleanup, sales and celebration
Vermont’s snow-covered peaks and plush woodlands are celebrated by extra than simply ski lovers and nature lovers, which is why Earth Day observations throughout the state work to tell and provides again to the attractive Inexperienced Mountain State.
Earth Day is Friday, April 22, however many occasions happen throughout the weekend.
From “plogging” to composting, this is how and the place Vermonters can get entangled.
He ‘had a imaginative and prescient’:The Burlington architect behind Church Road Market has died at 85
Pandas, movie screening
For an opportunity to see pandas on the massive display screen, catch this IMAX authentic documentary which follows a captive-born large panda and its journey again into the wild.
Higher Valley resident Ben Kilham of the Kilham Bear Heart is featured within the movie, sharing rehabilitation methods with Chinese language scientists to organize the panda for all times within the wild. Kilham will converse earlier than and after the screening to current the movie and reply questions from the viewers.
When: 7-8:30 p.m. Friday, April 22
The place: Vermont Institute of Pure Science Nature Heart’s Neale Pavilion; 149 Natures Method, Quechee
Value: $13, $11 for VINS members.
Extra info might be discovered at vinsweb.org.
Earth Day on the Market
Instructional displays, video games and giveaways are all featured at this occasion, from digital actuality to electrical automobiles. For a listing of presenters and distributors, go to churchstmarketplace.com.
When: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Saturday, April 23
The place: Church Road Market, Metropolis Corridor block; Burlington
Will Shelburne Street cemetery shut?:What to know in regards to the graveyard subsequent to Carter’s Automobiles
Fjallraven Plogging in Burlington
“One of many best methods you may make a distinction in your neighborhood is to plog,” Earthday.org says on its web site. Plogging combines jogging or strolling with selecting up trash in an effort to stop litter kind ending up in waterways.
The outside sports activities retailer Fjallraven is internet hosting an occasion that begins with Swedish fika (espresso and treats), strikes into plogging and ends with a raffle. Plogging kits will likely be supplied, and all contributors will likely be entered to win 1 of 5 Nationwide Park passes.
When: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. Saturday, April 23
The place: 50 Church St., Burlington
To register, go to eventbrite.com.
Scale back, reuse and recycle:Can rooster bones be composted? How and why to compost the precise means in Chittenden County
Inexperienced Mountain Compost bin sale
This compost firm is discounting its soil savers and composting bins for a one-day solely sale. Pricing and particulars are at greenmountaincompost.com.
When: 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday, April 23
The place: Inexperienced Mountain Compost; 1042 Redmond Street, Williston
Earth Day Open Home at The Nature Museum
The museum is providing a fill day of free actions, with no sign-up essential. The actions are donation-based solely and embody constructing wildflower “seed bombs,” doing indoor and outside scavenger hunts, and exploring the Pure Playscape.
When: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, April 23
The place: The Nature Museum; 186 Townshend Street, Grafton
For extra info, go to nature-museum.org.
Vermont Institute of Pure Science Celebration
When: 10 a.m. to five p.m. Saturday, April 23
The place: Vermont Institute of Pure Science; 149 Natures Method, Quechee
For extra info, go to https://vinsweb.org/
Inexperienced-Up Day will happen Saturday, Could 7 this yr in continued effort to wash up Vermont. Members will take to neighborhood roadsides and waterways, amassing any trash alongside the best way.
Summer time Sorg is a reporter for the Burlington Free Press. Contact her at ssorg@freepressmedia.com.
Vermont
Vermont becomes 1st state to enact law requiring oil companies pay for damage from climate change
(AP) — Vermont has become the first state to enact a law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the damage caused by climate change after the state suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather.
Republican Gov. Phil Scott allowed the bill to become law without his signature late Thursday, saying he is very concerned about the costs and outcome of the small state taking on “Big Oil” alone in what will likely be a grueling legal fight. But he acknowledged that he understands something has to be done to address the toll of climate change.
“I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways,” Scott, a moderate Republican in the largely blue state of Vermont, wrote in a letter to lawmakers.
The popular governor who recently announced that he’s running for reelection to a fifth two-year term, has been at odds with the Democrat-controlled Legislature, which he has called out of balance. He was expected by environmental advocates to veto the bill but then allowed it to be enacted. Scott wrote to lawmakers that he was comforted that the Agency of Natural Resources is required to report back to the Legislature on the feasibility of the effort.
Last July’s flooding from torrential rains inundated Vermont’s capital city of Montpelier, the nearby city Barre, some southern Vermont communities and ripped through homes and washed away roads around the rural state. Some saw it as the state’s worst natural disaster since a 1927 flood that killed dozens of people and caused widespread destruction. It took months for businesses — from restaurants to shops — to rebuild, losing out on their summer and even fall seasons. Several have just recently reopened while scores of homeowners were left with flood-ravaged homes heading into the cold season.
Under the legislation, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, would provide a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.
It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as upgrading stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
Maryland, Massachusetts and New York are considering similar measures.
The American Petroleum Institute, the top lobbying group for the oil and gas industry, has said it’s extremely concerned the legislation “retroactively imposes costs and liability on prior activities that were legal, violates equal protection and due process rights by holding companies responsible for the actions of society at large; and is preempted by federal law.”
“This punitive new fee represents yet another step in a coordinated campaign to undermine America’s energy advantage and the economic and national security benefits it provides,” spokesman Scott Lauermann said in a statement Friday.
Vermont lawmakers know the state will face legal challenges, but the governor worries about the costs and what it means for other states if Vermont fails.
State Rep. Martin LaLonde, a Democrat and an attorney, believes Vermont has a solid legal case. Legislators worked closely with many legal scholars in crafting the bill, he said in statement.
“Most importantly, the stakes are too high – and the costs too steep for Vermonters – to release corporations that caused the mess from their obligation to help clean it up,” he said.
Vermont
Vt. Police Academy holds graduation for new recruits
PITTSFIELD, Vt. (WCAX) – More than 30 new police recruits Friday traded their training gear for badges as they were sworn in as the 117th recruit class to graduate from the Vermont Police Academy.
“Born to serve, trained to protect” were the words recited by the 117th basic recruit class at the Vermont Police Academy Friday.
The 31 recruits officially walked out the doors on their way to serve as the state’s newest law enforcement officers.
“It’s a great feeling to graduate. I’m excited to get back out on the road and help my community. It’s a building block. I’ve learned that without the people I’ve had here, without my fellow classmates, there’s no way we would have been as successful as we were,” said Hinesburg Police Ofc. Andrew Thomas.
Inside, each recruit was given a certificate while family members helped to pin on their badge. Class president and newest Vermont State Trooper Michael Robidoux told his classmates that the work they’re going to do will have an impact. “Never forget that it matters — giving back to this great state and the community, protecting some of the most vulnerable members of society, and showing up on potentially the worst day of someone’s life. It matters,” he said.
This graduation comes as many departments throughout the state say they’re still struggling to recruit new officers. The VSP says they welcomed in four new troopers with this class but it will take more to fill all their vacancies. “Our goal is consistently to put out as big of a class as possible, and we try to get up to 20 people per class. Seeing back-to-back or repeated classes of that size will definitely start to put a dent in the problems with retention or attrition,” said VSP Lt. Robert McKenna.
While these recruits have completed their training at the academy, they’ll now go through additional training at their respective departments
Copyright 2024 WCAX. All rights reserved.
Vermont
Vermont’s ‘Climate Superfund’ Bill Just Became Law
But will a wet, hot, climate change-driven summer be enough to tilt the election in someone’s favor?
We know that climate-related issues can swing elections — clean air and water, cheap energy, and creating new high-paying jobs all poll exceptionally well. Voter interest tends to drop off, however, when these things are framed as climate issues. And on the darker flip side, the realities of living in a hotter world, including “unchecked migration, economic stagnation, and the loss of homeland,” are “precisely the kind of developments that have historically fomented authoritarian sentiments,” Justin Worland argued in Time earlier this year. Donald Trump, meanwhile, has repeatedly proved eager to go toe-to-toe with President Joe Biden on things like clean energy, electric vehicles, and climate science.
But how much extreme weather events themselves could swing the November election is far less clear. Research suggests that even living through a traumatic event like a wildfire or hurricane isn’t necessarily enough to convert you into a climate voter. “Experience matters, but I don’t know that it matters in the way that people wishcast it to,” Matto Mildenberger, a political scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara who has studied the relationship between proximity to wildfires and pro-environmental voting, told me.
As Mildenberger explained, “In order to experience a wildfire or a heat wave or a flood and have that galvanize you into wanting to see more ambitious climate action, you’d have to experience and understand yourself as a victim of climate change.” For decades, fossil fuel interests have worked to undermine the scientific narrative and cast doubt on the links between extreme weather and climate, which is why even Republicans who experience disasters firsthand still “fall back onto stories about how there have always been wildfires, there have always been droughts.”
In other words, this is not a chicken-or-egg enigma. How voters already think about climate change is what shapes their ensuing narratives about disasters. Peter Howe, a professor of geography at Utah State University who studies public perceptions of climate change, conducted a survey of research on behavioral outcomes in relation to extreme weather that reinforced this idea. He found that “extreme weather may reinforce opinions among people who are already worried about climate change, yet be misattributed or misperceived by those who are unconcerned.”
There is evidence that linking climate change with extreme weather could actually backfireat the ballot box for green-minded candidates. A 2022 study led by Rebecca Perlman, a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley, found that Republicans who saw references to climate change after a wildfire became less likely to support an energy tax that would “protect against future wildfires and other natural disasters.” Concerningly, this pattern even showed up (albeit with “weaker and generally nonsignificant effects”) among Democrats and Independents, leading Perlman and her coauthor to suggest that “on the margin, attributing weather-related natural disasters to climate change may be a losing political proposition with voters.”
Perlman confirmed that she would be “surprised” if extreme summer weather had “much impact on voting at the national level” when I reached her via email. But that “doesn’t mean it will be precisely zero,” she went on.
Mildenberger made a similar point. Though a hurricane or a wildfire is unlikely to peel Republican voters away from Trump (and might even push some deeper into his arms), if you take a more regional lens, then you could “easily expect extreme weather events to reshape how people are prioritizing their vote, or their likelihood of volunteering, or how they’re talking to their friends and family about the current administration.”
But while hurricanes, droughts, wildfires, and heat waves can confirm Democratic priors and motivate liberals who wouldn’t otherwise have voted, Matthew Burgess, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder, warned me against lumping all conservatives together as uniformly undisturbed. “Even deep red parts of Colorado get worried about drought and water scarcity,” he pointed out.
Burgess’ research has found that Independents and liberal-to-moderate Republicans worry about climate change only slightly less than moderate-to-conservative liberals do; it’s conservative Republicans who are set far apart from the rest of the electorate, sometimes skewing results. In other words, while many studies look at extreme weather events and climate change attribution and frame the results as Republicans versus Democrats, the actual split in how voters interpret extreme weather events might be better framed as between the mostconservative Republicans and everyone else.
The bigger question, in Burgess’s mind, is whether extreme weather could ever rival issues like crime or inflation, which generally affect a greater portion of the electorate, for a place in voters’ hearts. “If you had a really big natural disaster that directly affects a broad swath of people, and whose link to climate change is really clear — that would be the type of thing I would expect to have an effect” on voters, Burgess said.
Admittedly, it’s scary to imagine what exactly that event might be. A massive wildfire season with smoke that blankets the entire country or breaks out in a place we don’t expect? Hurricanes that pummel both the East Coast and the West Coast? So much flooding that whirlpools appear in the streets of American cities? Or something we haven’t already experienced and maybe haven’t even anticipated?
If there were ever a summer to find out, it’d be this one. It’s another “hottest year ever” on Planet Earth, and even if Americans don’t ultimately vote like it, that truth will remain.
-
World1 week ago
€440k frozen in Italy over suspect scam by fake farmers
-
News1 week ago
Buy-now, pay-later returns and disputes are about to get federal oversight
-
World1 week ago
Ombudsman probes Commission's senior staff 'revolving door'
-
News1 week ago
Read the I.C.J. Ruling on Israel’s Rafah Offensive
-
News1 week ago
Video: Protesters Take Over U.C.L.A. Building
-
Technology1 week ago
Super Mario Maker 64 exists, thanks to a new ROM hack
-
World1 week ago
Hoping to pave pathway to peace, Norway to recognise Palestinian statehood
-
Politics1 week ago
Fauci adviser's alleged destruction of COVID origin docs must be probed by AG: Rand Paul