Connect with us

Vermont

After a Wrenching Debate Over Homelessness, Vermont Legislature Adjourns

Published

on

After a Wrenching Debate Over Homelessness, Vermont Legislature Adjourns


After an impassioned  debate over the impending eviction of homeless people from motels, Vermont lawmakers wrapped up their work in Montpelier late Friday night. But they plan to return in June to override the salvo of vetos expected from Gov. Phil Scott.

Following Thursday’s breakthrough on how to fund a $130 million boost to the state’s childcare system, lawmakers rushed to pass several outstanding bills, including the $8.5 billion state budget.

They passed it knowing full well that Scott will likely veto the budget and other bills in coming days, forcing them to return to attempt to muster the two-thirds majority needed to override.

With Democratic supermajorities in both chambers, that would seem simple. Just this week, the legislature overrode Scott’s veto of the controversial clean heat standard bill meant to accelerate the shift away from fossil fuel heating sources.

Advertisement

But the budget passed the House by a 90-53 vote late Friday, well short of the 100 needed to override — a sign of potential trouble for Democratic leadership. Several Democratic and Progressive lawmakers said they could not support the budget unless more is done to help homeless people facing eviction from motels, suggesting the budget fight is far from over.

click to enlarge
  • Kevin McCallum
  • Speaker Jill Krowinski (D-Burlington)
“The budget before us abandons our most vulnerable Vermonters,” Rep. Brian Cina (P/D-Burlington) said.

Cina said the budget will not prevent a looming crisis when 1,800 households are evicted from motels as the pandemic-era housing program winds down. The number of people being kicked out of the motels in coming weeks was equal to 70 encampments the size of the one that the city of Burlington dismantled on  Sears Lane in 2021, Cina said.


“The mass eviction from hotels is going to create a new public health emergency,” he said.

The worst part is the administration knew the emergency program was ending and had plenty of time to plan to transition people to long-term housing but didn’t, Rep. Mari Cordes (D-Lincoln) said.

“It is not a money problem, but a problem of political will and a disaster in the making,” Cordes said.

Advertisement

Rep. Troy Hedrick (P/D-Burlington) called the budget “a profound disappointment” that was contributing to his disillusionment with the legislative process. He said was stunned to realize that instead of addressing people’s desperate housing needs, the budget “parked” $14 million until 2025 on the premise that it would be needed to match future federal infrastructure dollars.

He said the motel program has been a “very small Band-Aid” on the wound of homelessness in Vermont.

“This budget is simply ripping off that Band-Aid while that wound is still trying to heal,” Hedrick said.

Many lawmakers who expressed disappointment over the motel program nevertheless said they would support the budget because of the spending on housing and number of other initiatives that it does include.

“This budget, while not perfect … still makes over $200 million of investments in helping the most vulnerable Vermonters,” said Rep. Tom Stevens (D-Waterbury) .

Advertisement

The uproar over the ending of the motel program was due in no small part to the relentless lobbying of Brenda Siegel, a homeless advocate and the 2022 Democratic candidate for governor. She posted numerous videos of homeless people in the motel program afraid of what will happen to them if they lose their motel vouchers.

She predicted that by the time lawmakers return in June, hundreds of homeless people will have been forced out of their shelter and into the streets, and then it will hit home for lawmakers.

“It’s going to be pretty brutal to watch,” she predicted.

Despite the differences over that program, Democratic lawmakers nevertheless clearly flexed their newfound power in Montpelier this session, where, for the first time, they enjoy theoretically veto-proof majorities in both chambers. That emboldened them to push forward bills on climate change, child care and guns that in past years might have enjoyed little chance of success.

House Speaker Jill Krowinski (D-Burlington) thanked lawmakers for their hard work and urged them to take pride in the progress they made this session. “Together we have governed with purpose and built a stronger foundation for Vermont, one that moves all 14 Vermont counties forward,” she said shortly before adjourning around 11:30 p.m.

Advertisement

The high-profile bills passed this session include:

Housing
Under tremendous pressure to fix the state’s housing crisis, lawmakers tried to both make big new investments in affordable housing and relax development restrictions in downtowns.

The result was the sprawling S. 100, known as the “Home” bill, which spends $116 million on a wide variety of housing programs. It dedicates $50 million to mixed-income affordable housing, $20 million in grants to fix up rental properties, $20 million to speed the construction of homes of middle-income people, $2 million for first-time home buyers and $500,000 to update mobile home parks.

The changes to municipal zoning and Act 250 in the bill often received more debate than the financing, however. The bill would loosen restrictive zoning that some say blocks the construction of affordable housing. One change is to require communities to allow duplexes wherever single-family homes are allowed.

Related changes to Act 250, the state’s land use and development law, include raising the cap on the number of homes a person can build within five miles within five years without facing review under the law. Instead of 10, the new limit would be 25 units in downtowns and areas designated for growth.

Advertisement
click to enlarge House leaders meeting during a lull in the lengthy floor session Friday - KEVIN MCCALLUM
  • Kevin McCallum
  • House leaders meeting during a lull in the lengthy floor session Friday

Childcare Funding
Most lawmakers agreed the state’s childcare system faces an affordability and staffing crisis and needs a massive infusion of cash to stabilize it. But they disagreed sharply on how to pay for it.

House leaders wanted a combination of higher corporate and personal income taxes to fund much of the $130 million infusion, while senators thought payroll taxes made more sense because employers and workers would benefit most from the system’s expansion and improvement.

A deal struck Thursday and approved Friday afternoon by the House on the bill, H.217, was hailed as a compromise that would lead to a historic investment. Scott, who had proposed a $50 million investment with no tax increase, has vowed to veto the bill.

Clean Heat
Weaning a northern state like Vermont off fossil fuel heating sources is widely viewed as a huge challenge, but lawmakers committed to figuring it out this year. They passed S.5, the clean heat standard, and then overrode Scott’s veto, something they failed to do last year by just one vote. Lawmakers hailed the vote as a crucial step toward cleaning up emissions from burning oil, propane, kerosene and natural gas.

“This is probably one of the most important things I’ve done here and as a parent,” Rep. Laura Sibilia (I-Dover) said after the vote.

The bill requires energy regulators to start crafting a program mandating the state’s fossil fuel dealers to lower the greenhouse gas emissions from their products, either by reducing demand through insulation projects or switching customers to lower-carbon fuels.

Advertisement

Republicans blasted the bill as likely to hurt low income Vermonters who can’t afford to switch, but supporters said reducing the cost of heating for low-income people is the program’s priority.

click to enlarge Senate Secretary John Bloomer discussing adjournment options with House and Senate chiefs of staff - KEVIN MCCALLUM
  • Kevin McCallum
  • Senate Secretary John Bloomer discussing adjournment options with House and Senate chiefs of staff

Bottle Bill
Wine bottles and plastic water bottles will soon be returnable for a deposit under a long-sought expansion of the state’s beverage redemption program. Currently, only certain glass and aluminum beverage containers can be returned for a five-cent deposit.

The bill, H.158, will add a 15-cent deposit on wine bottles and a five-cent deposit on hard cider, water and sports drink containers. Advocates originally wanted to increase the deposit for most bottles from five cents to 10 cents, but that will only happen later if the state misses its recycling goals.

Retailers worry they won’t have the room to handle all the additional containers. Gov. Scott has said he prefers improving the blue-bin recycling system, but it’s not clear whether this bill will be on his veto list.

Lawmaker Pay and Perks
To make it easier for working class Vermonters to serve in the General Assembly, lawmakers will boost members’ pay beginning in 2025 and grant themselves access to the same health benefits state workers receive.

The bill, S.39, will boost salaries during the 18-week session and pay lawmakers one-fifth of that salary when they’re out of session. Rank-and-file lawmakers currently receive $14,616 plus allowances for food and lodging. By 2027, their salary would more than double, to at least $29,766 annually, and they could get health insurance coverage.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Judge dismisses lawsuit against Gov. Scott over secretary of education appointment

Published

on

Judge dismisses lawsuit against Gov. Scott over secretary of education appointment


A judge on Friday dismissed the lawsuit two senators filed in June against Gov. Phil Scott over his appointment of interim Secretary of Education Zoie Saunders. The lawsuit also named Saunders as a defendant.

In the lawsuit, state Sens. Tanya Vyhovsky and Richard McCormack argued that Scott violated the Vermont Constitution when he selected Saunders to fill the interim role after the Senate voted 19-9 against her permanent appointment. Vermont governors must obtain the Senate’s “advice and consent” prior to filling a secretary of state agency’s seat, the senators said.

A month later, the Vermont Attorney General’s Office requested the lawsuit be dismissed, primarily arguing that Scott does have the constitutional authority to appoint interim cabinet positions even after rejection from the Senate, and that he is following precedent set by previous governors. The Attorney General’s Office also contended that the senators’ claim was not “ripe” and they lacked standing and were raising a political question.

Vermont Superior Court Judge Robert A. Mello agreed with the Attorney General’s Office that Scott’s actions were lawful and based on precedent, but disagreed that the senators lacked standing, ripeness or presented a “nonjusticiable political question.”

Advertisement

“To extent that the Senators argue that the Senate’s decision not to confirm Ms. Saunders prevents the Governor from reappointing her, whether on an interim or permanent basis, the court disagrees,” Mellow wrote in his Sept. 27 ruling. “There is no statute that so provides.”

“When the legislature has wanted to so limit the Governor’s appointment power, it has simply said so,” Mellow added, referencing the statute that prohibits governors from appointing a nominee to the Green Mountain Care Board whom the Senate has failed to confirm within the past six years.

Mello’s decision comes just a day after the judge heard oral arguments from both sides.

Saunders’ term as interim secretary of education ends Feb. 28 next year.

Advertisement

Megan Stewart is a government accountability reporter for the Burlington Free Press. Contact her at mstewartyounger@gannett.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Man accused of killing 3 family members had cellphone with searches about serial killers, Vermont police say

Published

on

Man accused of killing 3 family members had cellphone with searches about serial killers, Vermont police say


A New York man accused of killing his father, stepmother and 13-year-old stepbrother in Vermont earlier this month appeared in court in Lake George on Thursday and waived having an extradition hearing, according to the district attorney.

Brian Crossman Jr., 23, of Granville, New York, faces three counts of aggravated murder in the fatal shootings of Brian Crossman Sr., 46, Erica Pawlusiak Crossman, 41, and Colin Taft, 13, in their Pawlet, Vermont, home on Sept. 15, state police said. He will be moved to Vermont to face charges.

The investigation found significant evidence linking Crossman Jr. to the killings, including digital information, statements, injuries and various interviews, Vermont State Police said. His public defender representing him in New York did not return a phone message seeking comment.

A search of his cell phone found multiple internet searches related to serial killers and unresolved murders, police said. Relatives told police that he had a troubled relationship with his father because of Crossman Jr.’s mental health and learning disability.

Advertisement

He was spending the weekend with his father and stepmother while his mother was out of town, according to a police affidavit. The couple had married in July and Erica Crossman told her husband’s friend that didn’t feel safe with Crossman Jr. at the home and she was afraid to be there alone with him, according to a police affidavit. Crossman Jr. called police shortly before 4 a.m. on Sept. 15 to report that he had found the three family members shot, and that the residence was covered in blood, police said.

vermont-qlhs1qp6.jpg
Police identified the victims as Brian Crossman, 46, a selectboard member in Pawlet; Erica Crossman, 41; and Colin Taft, 13. 

WCAX-TV


He then agreed to meet with Vermont State Police Corporal Joseph Duca who said when they met, Crossman Jr.’s clothes were covered in blood, according to the affidavit.

Crossman Jr. said he his clothes had blood on them because he tried to drag his deceased father outside of the house and load him into a utility vehicle to take him to his grandmother’s house across the road, police said.

Advertisement

Police said they found multiple guns and ammunition around the house as they were investigating the killings, including a semi-automatic handgun on an area rug in the mudroom, a 12-gauge shotgun on a table in the dining area, another shotgun on a couch, and an open firearm cabinet and firearm safe.

Crossman Jr. was admitted to a mental health unit of the Glens Falls Hospital on Sept. 15, according to police. New York State Police arrested him on Sept. 19, and he made an initial court appearance in Warren County Court on a charge of being a fugitive from justice on Friday. He is being held without bail.

State police previously said autopsies determined Brian Crossman Sr.’s cause of death was gunshot wounds to the head and torso, Erica Crossman died from a gunshot wound to the head, and Colin Taft’s cause of death was multiple gunshot wounds.

Brian Crossman Sr. was a selectboard member in Pawlet. Mike Beecher, chairperson of the five-member board, said in a statement last week: “Brian Crossman was a friend and neighbor, a hardworking community member who just this year stepped up to join the Pawlet Selectboard.

“This tragedy that struck him and his family has also hit our community hard, and we are shaken and grieving. Our hearts go out to everyone affected by this devastating loss.”

Advertisement

Neighbors told CBS affiliate WCAX-TV that the shooting left them shaken.

“It’s very hard to comprehend. It just hasn’t sunk in. We just visited the family three nights before the deaths,” next-door neighbor Oliver Ihasz told the station.

Brian and Erica Crossman got married in June of this year, the Bennington Banner reported.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Man accused of killing family in Pawlet will be extradited to Vermont

Published

on

Man accused of killing family in Pawlet will be extradited to Vermont


The man accused of a brutal triple murder of his own family in Vermont appeared in court Thursday afternoon.

In a brief court appearance at the Warren County Courthouse, Brian Crossman Jr., 23 of Granville, sat slumped in his chair, his face expressionless as he nodded yes to the judge that he understood his rights, choosing not to fight extradition from New York to Vermont.

By waiving his right to an extradition hearing, it clears the way for him to be transferred to Rutland County, VT to face charges in connection to the death of his father, stepmother, and teenage stepbrother.

He’s charged with three counts of aggravated murder.

Advertisement

On September 15th, Brian Crossman Sr. 46, Erica Crossman, 41, and her son, Colin Taft, 13, were found shot to death in their home in the town of Pawlet.

The judge set a control date of October 23rd to determine if the transfer to Vermont had occurred.

A recently released police affidavit revealed more details about what happened that night and about the 23-year old.

Family told police Crossman Jr, who lives in Granville, NY, was staying at his father’s home that weekend because his mother was out of town.

According to the documents, Crossman Jr. told police he went out for a walk around midnight , looking for deer, and when he returned several hours later, he found his family dead.

Advertisement

“When he returned, he found his father, stepmother, and stepbrother deceased. He advised that he attempted to get his father into a side-by-side and drive him to his grandmother’s house across the street to notify her. He advised he changed his mind about this and only dragged his father outside. He advised he attempted to call 911 several times but was unable to. Crossman Jr. advised he had changed his clothing and there was additional bloody clothing at the residence,” the affidavit read.

According to the affidavit, information from his phone showed calls to 911 placed between 3:25 am and 3:35 am. Those calls went unanswered. An additional 911 call was placed at 3:44 am where he got through to the dispatcher.

Vermont State Police Corporal Joseph Duca responded to the call and met Crossman Jr. at Wells Village School. Duca said he noticed that his shirt and pants were covered in what appeared to be blood.

MORE:Services announced for Vermont man and family, son charged with murder

Crossman Jr. said the blood stained his clothes when he tried to drag his deceased father into a side-by-side vehicle to bring him to his grandmother’s house nearby to notify her, according to the affidavit.

Advertisement

“He advised he changed his mind about this and only dragged his father outside,” read the affidavit.

Police found the bodies in different areas of the home, all suffering from gunshot wounds.

His internet history on his phone revealed searches related to serial killers and unsolved murders.

The family told police the father and son had a troubled relationship due to Crossman Jr.’s mental health and learning disability.

A family member said he has received mental health treatment over the years, adding that he possibly suffers from schizophrenia.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending