Connect with us

Rhode Island

Only on 10: Rhode Island family speaks out after wrong body was buried

Published

on

Only on 10: Rhode Island family speaks out after wrong body was buried


A Providence family has filed a lawsuit against Rhode Island Hospital and Bell Funeral Home, alleging a devastating mistake that led them to bury the wrong person after a loved one died following a Christmas Day fire.

Emilia Severino died Dec. 30 at Rhode Island Hospital, days after the fire, according to her family.

Her niece, Joselyn, spoke exclusively with the NBC 10. She asked that her face be concealed during the interview.

“She did not deserve nothing that happened to her, not the fire. Not the way she was buried. She did not deserve that,” Joselyn said.

Advertisement

According to a Superior Court lawsuit, when Bell Funeral Home went to retrieve Severino’s body from Rhode Island Hospital, the hospital released the wrong remains.

The Severino family told the NBC 10 I-Team that Emilia Severino died at Rhode Island Hospital on Dec. 30 from smoke inhalation after a Christmas Day fire. (Severino)

The family held a closed-casket, graveside burial on Jan. 19.

Advertisement

Joselyn said she asked her father to identify her aunt’s body before the casket was closed but was told by the funeral home that the body was not viewable because of its condition.

“The director of the funeral home was trying to close the casket, and we’re all there witnessing this,” Joselyn explained. “And in that moment, I look and I see a black bag. I was confused as to what was going on.”

The family prayed over the casket and watched it lowered into the ground.

“And it wasn’t her,” Joselyn said.

Days later, Joselyn said she received a call from the cemetery.

Advertisement

“I thought it was a joke. I honestly thought it was, I was like, there’s just no way,” she said.

The lawsuit states that on Jan. 20, Rhode Island Hospital’s chief pathologist notified the family of the error. The lawsuit also alleges the hospital and funeral home initially wanted to “switch” the bodies without informing the family, but the cemetery would not exhume the body without the family’s permission.

Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2024. (WJAR)

Joselyn said she initially refused but eventually agreed. When they returned to the cemetery, the casket had already been raised.

“We were just a mess,” she said. “We prayed over somebody. I don’t know what their religious beliefs are. I don’t know what their family’s going through.”

Advertisement

Joselyn said her aunt’s body had remained at Rhode Island Hospital the entire time the other person was buried.

When the correct body was returned to the family, Joselyn said Severino was still in the condition she was in at the hospital.

“She was naked. It was just horrible,” Joselyn said. “You should not have IVs still in your body with blood in it. That’s horrible to see that.”

She said only two family members were present for the final burial.

“We have to re-grieve everything,” she said.

Advertisement

Both Rhode Island Hospital and Bell Funeral Home are named in the lawsuit.

Rhode Island Hospital confirmed that an error occurred.

In a statement to NBC 10, the hospital said:

An error occurred in Rhode Island Hospital’s morgue on January 15th where a decedent was released to the wrong funeral home. The hospital contacted the families impacted by this incident to extend our deepest sympathies and apologies. Once we became aware of this error, the hospital immediately initiated a comprehensive internal review. As a result of that review, the employee involved was let go. While Rhode Island Hospital has strict policies and procedures governing all morgue operations, we are committed to strengthening our processes, including implementing additional safeguards, to ensure this does not happen again. Due to patient privacy laws, Rhode Island Hospital is unable to provide additional details at this time.

“An error occurred in Rhode Island Hospital’s morgue on January 15th where a decedent was released to the wrong funeral home. The hospital contacted the families impacted by this incident to extend our deepest sympathies and apologies.

Advertisement

Once we became aware of this error, the hospital immediately initiated a comprehensive internal review. As a result of that review, the employee involved was let go. While Rhode Island Hospital has strict policies and procedures governing all morgue operations, we are committed to strengthening our processes, including implementing additional safeguards, to ensure this does not happen again.

Due to patient privacy laws, Rhode Island Hospital is unable to provide additional details at this time.”

“I don’t know what their protocols are in their hospital, but I can tell you that much that day, it wasn’t it.” said Joselyn.

Bell Funeral Home Director Christine Cardozo told the NBC10 I-Team that when staff arrived at the hospital, employees searched multiple morgue locations before producing a body.

“We went to Rhode Island Hospital to pick up the body and when we got there, they went into morgue number one and they couldn’t find her,” Cardozo said in an interview with NBC10s Tamara Sacharczyk.

Advertisement

Cardozo said she relied on hospital paperwork and identification tags.

“On the paperwork that we signed, stated that she is the person inside of that body bag,” she said.

 Bell Funeral Home. (WJAR)

Bell Funeral Home. (WJAR)

Cardozo said the body was decomposed and unrecognizable and that she believed Severino had died from smoke inhalation, not severe burns.

When asked who was at fault, Cardozo responded, “The hospital. They’ve admitted fault they’re the ones who bring you the body.”

Advertisement

Joselyn blames them both.

“Bell didn’t take accountability Rhode Island Hospital is saying it’s Bell and I say it’s both,” she said.

Joselyn said the mistake has compounded the family’s grief.

“It’s hard for the whole entire family,” Joselyn said. “They all need to do better. They really, really, really do.”

The lawsuit remains pending in Superior Court.

Advertisement



Source link

Rhode Island

R.I. grandparents fighting for visits with 4-year-old granddaughter rest their case – The Boston Globe

Published

on

R.I. grandparents fighting for visits with 4-year-old granddaughter rest their case – The Boston Globe


Naso’s in-laws, Dr. Siavash Ghoreishi and Dr. Jila Khorsand, took him to Family Court in July 2024, three months after their daughter, Shahrzad “Sherry” Naso, died from metastasized breast cancer.

Naso had refused to let them see Laila, their only grandchild of their only daughter, saying he wasn’t comfortable with their behavior and was alarmed by their medical care of Sherry and Laila.

Scott Naso and his daughter, Laila, in their Portsmouth, R.I., home.Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff

The retired physicians used a little-known state law that allows grandparents whose children have died or divorced to petition the Family Court for the right to visit with their grandchildren.

It’s led to a bitter trial that began in October and has continued off and on over the last six months, with testimony about medical negligence, abuse, and control.

Naso, a Middletown narcotics detective, accuses his in-laws of prescribing dozens of medications and providing poor medical care, which he believes contributed to Sherry’s death and sickened Laila. Ghoreishi and Khorsand deny any wrongdoing.

“We love that child with every fabric of our beings and have never harmed her in any way or shape,” Khorsand testified in October. “I love that child to death and would never do anything to harm her. … Why would she be deprived of this love?”

Naso has argued that the expense of the trial and the state law allowing grandparents to sue parents for visitation violates his constitutional parental rights.

Advertisement

But Gill said on Monday that the state law was “narrowly tailored” to respect the constitutional rights of parents, and he denied Naso’s motions to dismiss or stay the ongoing trial.

Now that Michael Ahn, the lawyer for Ghoreishi and Khorsand, has rested his case, Naso’s lawyer will argue that the grandparents haven’t met their burden under the law and the case should be dismissed.

Veronica Assalone told the judge that she will argue for the dismissal on Thursday.

If her motion is denied, and the Supreme Court justices reject the emergency motion, the trial proceedings will resume, with at least a dozen witnesses expected to testify on Naso’s behalf.

On Wednesday, the court heard more testimony from Cheryl Allspach, the former longtime office manager for Ghoreishi’s pediatric practice and a close friend of the family. She had testified glowingly on Tuesday about Ghoreishi and Khorsand’s relationship with Laila.

Advertisement

She also testified about Ghoreishi’s recordkeeping at his practice and his medical treatment of Scott, Sherry, and Laila Naso, and explained the process for billing and filing for insurance claims.

Assalone questioned her about Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island’s payment policy, since 2009, regarding self-treatment and treatment of immediate family members. The insurer’s policy follows the American Medical Association code of ethics, which warns physicians not to treat or prescribe medications for themselves and close family members, and does not cover those services.

Allspach read the two-page policy aloud for the court. “Why did you bill?” the judge asked when she concluded.

“I just did it as part of normal billing, and truly I didn’t realize that,” Allspach said. “If I realized, I would have said to [Ghoreishi], ‘you cannot treat your family members.’”

The judge quickly stopped more detailed questions about billing practices, chart-keeping, and whether Allspach was aware that it was a felony for physicians to prescribe narcotics to relatives.

Advertisement

“It’s a grandparent visitation case, not a medical malpractice case,” Gill snapped at Assalone. He added that she should take her claims about illegal prescriptions to the state police, “not here.”

Julie Emmer, the owner of Strengthening Family Foundations, testified that Naso had alleged “serious things” about his in-law’s medical care when she was handling the supervised visits between Laila and Ghoreishi and Khorsand.

Emmer testified that Naso told her “there were prescriptions in different names for his late wife” and that his in-laws were being investigated by the US Drug Enforcement Administration and the state police.

“He thought they shouldn’t have visits,” Emmer said. “He thought they were responsible for what happened to his wife.”

Emmer began supervising visits in September 2024, after then-Family Court Judge Debra DiSegna temporarily ordered one-hour supervised visits every other week. The visits continued until late January 2025 and were suspended after Naso filed a complaint with the Department of Children, Youth, and Families. The investigation was closed, but Naso has refused to resume visits.

Advertisement

Emmer supervised nine visits, all at public places, and performed a home inspection at the grandparents’ condo in Jamestown at Ahn’s request in December 2023. They wanted to visit with Laila at their home, but Naso refused, Emmer said, and he is the custodial parent.

Emmer testified that the grandparents abided by the court order not to give Laila any gifts or medication.

Khorsand played with the little girl, while Ghoreishi stayed in the background, filming them or taking pictures, Emmer said. (Some of the photos and videos have been entered as evidence in the trial.)

Emmer said she noticed over time that Laila was anxious at the start of the visits and said she didn’t want to go. During one visit, she said, Laila whispered to her over and over “they are bad people.” At another visit, Laila was late because she vomited on the way over, she said.

She told the court that Laila would eventually warm up to her grandparents.

Advertisement

Emmer said she saw Naso crying and shaking, but that he was careful to compose himself so Laila didn’t see him becoming emotional. She testified that she didn’t hear him make any derogatory comments about his in-laws in Laila’s presence.

She said that Laila was reluctant to leave her father during the visits, but he encouraged her to go. “He often made comments, ‘Go have fun with Miss Julie. You’ll be safe,’” she said.


Amanda Milkovits can be reached at amanda.milkovits@globe.com. Follow her @AmandaMilkovits.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island shifts its primary to Wednesday, Sept. 9, easing a Labor Day poll setup crunch

Published

on

Rhode Island shifts its primary to Wednesday, Sept. 9, easing a Labor Day poll setup crunch


PROVIDENCE, R.I. – Rhode Island’s primary elections will now be held on Wednesday, Sept. 9, moving it back from the typical Tuesday election day because it fell too close to Labor Day.

Gov. Dan McKee, a Democrat, signed off on the change earlier this week. The primary election had been scheduled for Sept. 8, which is the day after the holiday weekend.

State and local officials had requested the change after raising concerns about having enough time to set up polls for voters. However, under the legislation enacted, the filing deadlines will remain the same.

“We have to set up over 400 polling places around the state on the day before the election,” Nick Lima, the registrar and director of elections for the city of Cranston, told lawmakers at a hearing in January. “That’s very difficult to do on a holiday because many of our polls are schools, social halls and churches.”

Advertisement

It’s not unusual for states to change their election day. Lawmakers in neighboring Massachusetts changed the state’s 2026 primary election day from Sept. 15 to Sept. 1, arguing that doing so will help improve voter turnout.

Only four states hold their primary elections in September: Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Delaware, which has the latest primary date in the U.S., taking place this year on Sept. 15.

Legislation seeking to move up Delaware’s primary election by several months has been introduced in the statehouse, but previous attempts to do so have stalled.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI State Police investigating Cumberland crash

Published

on

RI State Police investigating Cumberland crash


CUMBERLAND, R.I. (WPRI) — Rhode Island State Police are investigating a crash that happened on I-295 North in Cumberland Tuesday night.

The crash happened in the right lane near Exit 22 just before 9 p.m.

It’s unclear exactly what caused the crash or if anyone was injured.

12 News has reached out to Rhode Island State Police for more information but has not heard back.

Advertisement

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending