Follow us on social media:
J.H. Snider is the editor of The Rhode Island State Constitutional Convention Clearinghouse.
Many have correctly said that Donald Trump has weird obsessions with crowd sizes and other matters. Well, Rhode Island government has a weird obsession with constitutional convention costs, albeit one that merely mimics the talking points of convention opponents who oppose a “yes” vote on Rhode Island’s Nov. 5 referendum on whether to call a convention.
Experts who do serious public policy analysis usually try to explicitly balance the potential benefits and costs of a proposed policy. But that’s not how Rhode Island’s legislature, via its appointed and constitutionally mandated “preparatory commission,” has framed the problem. The same goes for the secretary of state, who is responsible for summarizing the convention referendum in a voter handbook mailed at taxpayer expense to all registered voters.
More: Should RI have a Constitutional Convention? The cases for and against
In their 2004 and 2014 reports to Rhode Island’s people, the last two preparatory commissions quantified the potential costs but not benefits of a convention. Rhode Island’s secretary of state then mimicked that type of biased analysis in his ballot summary mailed to all Rhode Island voters.
The government’s cost findings were then ubiquitously cited in the media and, most influentially, cited in the “no” side’s pervasive advertising in the weeks before the referendum. The message was: if a convention has only costs and risks, only a fool would vote for one.
I don’t object to the government’s attempt to quantify a convention’s potential costs if it makes a similar attempt to quantify its potential benefits. For example, the state’s budget for the 2025 fiscal year, excluding local government, is $14 billion, which translates to $140 billion over the 10-year budgeting cycle between convention calls. This should raise the question: what is a convention’s break-even point if it reduces government waste? For example, how much waste could a truly independent inspector general eliminate? (The legislature has repeatedly refused to create such an inspector general.)
More: Rhode Island is no stranger to calls for constitutional conventions | Opinion
Using the current preparatory commission’s heroic assumptions to arrive at a top $4.8 million cost for a convention, that would imply a convention break-even cost of just .000034%. Thus, if a convention’s efforts at improving democratic accountability reduced government waste by just .1%/year, that would result in a 292 times (29,200%) return on investment. And this, mind you, when the Gallup poll has found that Americans think their state governments waste 42% of every dollar spent.
So what’s the strategy used to justify discounting a convention’s potential benefits? The primary one is the claim that the legislature can do everything a convention can without those costs. But this is a bald-faced distortion of both the convention’s democratic design and purpose since Massachusetts pioneered the first convention in 1779. This convention featured independently elected convention delegates to propose constitutional changes followed by popular ratification because the people recognized their legislature would have a blatant conflict of interest designing its own powers and those of competing branches of government. This argument was so compelling that Congress soon mandated conventions for all new states.
Even in the current era of constitutional amendment rather than inauguration, the convention process remains, in most states, the legal gold standard for constitutional change-making. To take the extreme example, New Hampshire, which had 10 unlimited conventions during the 20th century, wouldn’t even allow the legislature to propose constitutional amendments until 1964. U.S. states have held 236 conventions.
More: RI lawmakers conclude final constitutional convention report
As evidenced by a 2023 University of Rhode Island poll that found only 10% of Rhode Islanders had a lot or great deal of trust in the state legislature, there remains a compelling reason for this institution, which, like the popular initiative available in 24 states, prevents the legislature from having monopoly power over constitutional change proposals. The preparatory commission’s just-released 2024 report has once again studiously ignored this legislature bypass purpose of a convention.
So the legislature’s taxpayer-funded obsession with a constitution’s cost should be called out as not only weird but biased to preserve its power at the people’s expense.
How will RI be different in 2050? Forecast on hitting climate targets
Sen. Dawn Euer, who was an architect of the Act on Climate, still firmly believes that Rhode Island can and will get to its goal of net-zero emissions by 2050.
Two years ago, the state Senate approved legislation that aimed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from heating and cooling buildings in Rhode Island, but the measure was held up in the House.
Last year, roles were reversed, and with the Senate demurring, it was the House’s turn to pass a version of the bill that advocates say is necessary to meet the net-zero by 2050 mandate of the Act on Climate.
The Building Decarbonization Act is set to be reintroduced again this year in the General Assembly and once again, it will most likely be on the list of legislative priorities for the coalition that represents leading environmental groups across the state.
“I could see that getting a lot of support,” said James Crowley, president of the Environment Council of Rhode Island. “We haven’t taken much action yet on the heating sector despite it accounting for a third of emissions.”
As the new legislative session kicked off last week, Crowley and other advocates have measured hopes for environmental action in the General Assembly. Many believe this is a pivotal time for Rhode Island, just four years out from the Act on Climate’s next interim target, a 45% reduction of planet-warming emissions from 1990 levels by 2030.
But they also know that the lack of support for anything climate-related from the Trump administration will complicate state efforts. And with a gubernatorial race on the cards, state leaders will be wary of doing anything that potentially raises costs for Rhode Islanders, especially as they look for ways to fill gaps in federal funding for things like health care and education.
“We have to be mindful of the moment that we’re operating in,” said Jed Thorp, director of advocacy for Save The Bay. “That will make it relatively hard for environmental issues to break through.”
After years of inaction on environmental priorities, the General Assembly appeared to turn a corner in 2021 with the passage of the Act on Climate, a law that underpins all policymaking in the state around transitioning away from fossil fuels. It was followed a year later with a commitment to offset all electric usage in the state with wind, solar and other renewable sources by 2033.
But there’s been little movement since then in the legislature to address emissions from buildings, transportation and other sectors of the Rhode Island economy, leading to questions about the state’s commitment to its climate goals.
At a meeting last month of the state Executive Climate Change Coordinating Council, Emily Koo, Rhode Island director of the Acadia Center, a clean energy advocacy group, spoke of a “vacuum of climate leadership” across state government.
Meg Kerr, vice chair of the climate council’s advisory board, urged greater urgency.
“We really need a whole-of-government approach and a whole-of-economy approach to achieve the Act on Climate,” she said. “We need state leadership and state vision.”
They spoke at a Dec. 18 meeting of the council, which is made up of agency directors and staff and directs the state government’s climate policy. Its members were meeting to approve a strategy that had been in the works for more than a year and is supposed to lay out the ways the state could meet the Act on Climate’s goals.
But some critics said the plan fell short of expectations, with too much focus on the federal government’s hostility to climate policy. Bill Ibelle, a member of Climate Action Rhode Island, described the tone of the report as “defeatist.”
While the report assumed big upticks in the adoption of heat pumps and electric cars and projected the state would reach the 2030 target, it didn’t lay out a plan to get to later goals, he and others complained.
“It’s really important that these are things that we should push hard on,” Ibelle said. “What I’d like to see this group do is do more then mention them, but endorse them.”
In a statement, Terry Gray, director of the state Department of Environmental Management and chair of the climate council, said that state agencies are “fully committed to action” and that they are already implementing parts of the strategy while also looking at alternatives in the absence of federal backing.
“Recent federal rollbacks of clean-energy initiatives, disruptions to offshore wind, and the loss of critical federal funding have significantly altered the policy and financing landscape that many states, including Rhode Island, have relied on,” he said. “As those impacts continue to unfold, states must reassess how best to advance their climate goals under these new conditions.”
Amid the uncertainty, Sen. Meghan Kallman said she believes the General Assembly needs to do more on climate issues.
The Pawtucket Democrat was the lead sponsor in the Senate of the Building Decarbonization Act in 2024 and 2025 and plans to introduce it again this year. Last year’s version required that new buildings be constructed so that they’re able to switch from heating systems that burn fossil fuels to electric heat pumps. (The House version that won passage, introduced by Rep. Rebecca Kislak, was amended so that it required only that large buildings track and report their energy usage.)
Kallman said she’s also working on a separate bill focused on new hospital construction and electrification, as well as other measures.
“My expectation is that the Senate will continue to lead on these issues,” Kallman said. “The federal landscape is challenging, but that’s a reason why the state needs to take leadership.”
While Crowley, a staff attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation, said that the Environment Council won’t vote on its priorities for several more weeks, he thinks Kallman’s bill would almost certainly be on the list again. So, too, would a move to reduce reliance on cars by finding more funds for the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority. A bottle bill aimed at improving recycling would also be a priority if it’s proposed again.
On the latter, the legislature voted last year to study the costs of implementing the redemption system for used bottles and cans that the bill calls for. The report is due by the end of the year, so Thorp doesn’t expect approval of the new recycling program in the meantime but he expects a bill to be filed to keep discussions going.
Koo said she’s hoping for more attention in the General Assembly on reducing the state’s reliance on natural gas. She mentioned a proposal to limit new spending on the gas delivery system. She also said that reduced electric rates for heat pump users and variable rates that could make it cheaper to charge electric cars would also help.
Crowley said there’s hope that with a new Congress after the mid-term elections and a new president in three years, the political landscape could change once again.
“Even in this difficult climate we can still do the work,” he said.
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — Indivisible R.I. is holding a rally on Sunday as part of the “ICE Out for Good” demonstrations taking place this weekend nationwide.
The rally is in response to the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent on Wednesday in Minneapolis.
In a release, the organization said the rally will “honor the life lost, make visible the human cost of ICE`s actions, and demand that state and federal leaders reject local contracts with ICE, take every action possible to stop ICE from operating in Rhode Island, and hold ICE agents accountable when they break the law.”
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
Follow us on social media:
The Rhode Island Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Jan. 10, 2026, results for each game:
05-19-21-28-64, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 3
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
17-24-36-38-43, Lucky Ball: 17
Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Midday: 6-3-1-0
Evening: 3-7-1-4
Check Numbers payouts and previous drawings here.
10-13-27-37-38, Extra: 19
Check Wild Money payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Rhode Island editor. You can send feedback using this form.
2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
Power bank feature creep is out of control
Anti-ICE protest outside Dallas City Hall follows deadly shooting in Minneapolis
MERR responds to dead humpback whale washed up near Bethany Beach
Defensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
Pat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
Service door of Crans-Montana bar where 40 died in fire was locked from inside, owner says
Viral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits