Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Special 140th Legislative Election: What You Need To Know

Published

on

Special 140th Legislative Election: What You Need To Know


LOWER BUCKS COUNTY, PA —A new state representative of the 140th Legislative District will be chosen as voters in four Lower Bucks County communities go to the polls Tuesday.

But then on Friday, State Rep. Joe Adams (R-Pike/Wayne) announced that he is resigning from his position representing the 139th District in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. There will be a special election for his seat sometime in the future.

That means that Democrats once again hold control of the House, 101-100. A Republican victory would once again split the House.

Who are the Candidates?

Cabanas was nominated by the Bucks County Republican Party in December to run for the seat. She stated that she would help families make ends meet, support law enforcement efforts, fight rising healthcare costs, and provide quality education to children.

Advertisement

Prokopiak was selected as the Bucks County Democratic Party nominee.

“The people of Lower Bucks County need a voice in Harrisburg who is willing to fight for them,” Prokopiak told Patch after his announcement in December. “For too many people, the American dream is drifting further away — housing and healthcare are too expensive, and many jobs don’t provide for those basic needs. Our schools are not properly funded, and college and technical training are too expensive.”

How To Vote in the Special Election

Mail-in/absentee ballots are available in-person, on-demand at the Doylestown and Levittown offices of the Bucks County Board of Elections through Tuesday. (ballot applications must be submitted by the above deadline)

  • Doylestown Office 55 E. Court St, Second floor Doylestown, PA 18901
  • Levittown Office 7321 New Falls Road Bristol Township, PA 19055

Ballots can be returned by mail, to a BOE employee at a Board of Elections Office or one of the two Official Ballot Drop Boxes operating for this special election. Click here for drop box hours and locations.

Voting in person

  • Click here for a list of all 33 polling places included in the Feb. 13 special election.
  • Because of availability issues, some polling place locations have changed for this special election; those locations have been highlighted on the list of polling places.
  • If you’re unsure of where you vote, use the Department of State’s “Find Your Polling Place” tool.

Unofficial results will begin appearing after polls close at BucksCounty.gov/Elections.

Contact the Bucks County Board of Elections with any questions at 215-348-6154.



Source link

Advertisement

Pennsylvania

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania: Sportsbook promo codes, odds, spread, over/under – February 23

Published

on

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania: Sportsbook promo codes, odds, spread, over/under – February 23


The Pennsylvania Quakers (9-15, 1-8 Ivy League) will attempt to break an eight-game losing run when they visit the Dartmouth Big Green (5-17, 1-8 Ivy League) at 7:00 PM ET on Friday, February 23, 2024. The Big Green have lost five games straight.

Find odds, spreads, over/unders and more from multiple sportsbooks in this article for the Pennsylvania vs. Dartmouth matchup.

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Game Info

  • When: Friday, February 23, 2024 at 7:00 PM ET
  • Where: Edward Leede Arena in Hanover, New Hampshire
  • How to Watch on TV: ESPN+
  • Live Stream: Watch this game on ESPN+

Watch live college basketball games from all over the country, plus ESPN originals and more NCAA hoops content on ESPN+!

Sportsbook Promo Codes

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Odds, Spread, Over/Under

Check out the odds, spread and over/under for this matchup across multiple sportsbooks.

Advertisement

Dartmouth vs. Pennsylvania Betting Trends

  • Dartmouth is 7-12-1 ATS this year.
  • The Big Green have been an underdog by 6.5 points or more 10 times this season, and covered the spread in four of those matchups.
  • Pennsylvania has compiled an 8-14-0 ATS record so far this year.
  • Quakers games have gone over the point total 10 out of 22 times this season.

Check out all the futures bets available at BetMGM!

Not all offers available in all states, please visit BetMGM for the latest promotions for your area. Must be 21+ to gamble, please wager responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact 1-800-GAMBLER.

© 2023 Data Skrive. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Colorado-based company forced to pay $25,000 settlement to Pennsylvania for illegally selling consumer information

Published

on

Colorado-based company forced to pay $25,000 settlement to Pennsylvania for illegally selling consumer information



CBS News Pittsburgh

Live

HARRISBURG (KDKA) – Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry on Thursday announced a settlement with a Colorado company accused of selling Pennsylvanians’ information to telemarketers. 

Advertisement

According to Henry’s office, Shopgala LLC, a Colorado-based lead generator, also operates Surveys2cash and they took consumer information from people who registered to get free samples or payment for completing online surveys. 

The company then allegedly failed to disclose to those people that their information could be sold to telemarketers. 

“Do Not Call means just that, and my office will continue to do all we can to aggressively target those who illegally and carelessly cross those boundaries,” Attorney General Henry said. “Thousands of consumers registering for free samples had no idea they were also signing on for invasive and disruptive telemarketing calls.”

The settlement requires Shopgala to pay $25,000 and that money will be used for “public protection and educational purposes,” according to the Attorney General’s Office. 

Also, the company is now enjoined from selling or sharing customer data unless the data was acquired in accordance with the requirements set under the Federal Telemarketing Sales Rule. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Court Rejects Red Book Pricing in Workers' Compensation 

Published

on

Pennsylvania Court Rejects Red Book Pricing in Workers' Compensation 


In the case of Federated Insurance Co. v. Summit Pharmacy, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court challenged the state’s method of calculating pharmaceutical costs in workers’ compensation cases.  

In the case of Federated Insurance Co. v. Summit Pharmacy, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court challenged the state’s method of calculating pharmaceutical costs in workers’ compensation cases.  

The court objected to the use of Red Book values, which are similar to the manufacturer’s suggested retail price of a car, to determine the average wholesale price (AWP) of drugs. 

Federated Insurance Co. sought a review of an order from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Workers’ Compensation that required the insurer to pay Summit Pharmacy approximately $72,500 to reimburse the cost of generic drugs provided to a claimant for her work-related injuries.  

Advertisement

The hearing officer used the Red Book values to calculate this reimbursement amount, a practice adopted by the Bureau for resolving disputes over pharmaceutical costs. 

The insurer argued that the Bureau’s use of Red Book values was inconsistent with Pennsylvania’s Workers’ Compensation Act, which limits the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals to 110% of the AWP. The insurer also contended that the Bureau’s ongoing use of the Red Book represented an improper delegation of legislative authority to a private entity. 

Summit Pharmacy, on the other hand, argued that AWP is a term of art used within the pharmaceutical industry, which regards the Red Book as an accepted source of AWP. According to Pennsylvania precedent, AWP is intended to be an objective estimate of drug acquisition costs derived on a national basis. 

The court sided with the insurer, ruling that Red Book values did not reflect AWP as required by the Workers’ Compensation Act. The court directed the Bureau to identify and publish a different, nationally recognized schedule to determine AWP, reasoning that AWP should be an industry average price, not one charged by a single manufacturer. It noted that the Red Book’s publisher followed a policy under which AWP was reported by manufacturers, calculated based on a markup specified by the manufacturer and suggested wholesale price was reported by the manufacturer. 

Advertisement

Scorecard: The court ruled that the use of Red Book values to calculate prices for pharmaceuticals in workers’ compensation cases is inconsistent with the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act. The Bureau has been directed to identify and publish a different, nationally recognized schedule for determining AWP. 

Takeaway: This ruling underscores the importance of insurers understanding and challenging the methodologies used to calculate reimbursements in workers’ compensation cases. It may prompt a review of similar practices in other jurisdictions, potentially leading to more accurate and fair reimbursement rates. &





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending