Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Should Pennsylvania abolish the death penalty? | Pro/Con

Published

on

Should Pennsylvania abolish the death penalty? | Pro/Con


Gov. Josh Shapiro has referred to as on state lawmakers to finish the demise penalty in Pennsylvania and vowed that he would prolong the moratorium on executions instituted by his predecessor, Gov. Tom Wolf.

Help for capital punishment amongst U.S. adults has steadily declined over the a long time, however most People nonetheless imagine the demise penalty is justified for folks convicted of homicide, whilst a majority of U.S. adults perceive there’s some danger of an harmless individual being executed.

We requested two folks on both facet of the difficulty to weigh in: Ought to Pennsylvania abolish the demise penalty?

Advertisement

No: There are some crimes that demand the demise penalty, together with the killing of a police officer.

By Raymond J. Tonkin

Within the early morning hours of Sept. 13, 2014, my telephone rang. On the opposite finish of the road was an emergency dispatcher saying the state police had been requesting me in my position as a prosecutor as a result of two state troopers had been shot on the Blooming Grove Barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police.

I shortly dressed and headed to a neighborhood church lower than a mile from the barracks. This was the middle of operations for the state police. The barracks had been vacated, with a sniper nonetheless free within the woods. Upon coming into the church, I noticed a number of troopers within the pews with grim appears on their faces.

I used to be knowledgeable that two troopers had been shot outdoors the barracks. Cpl. Bryon Dickson was shot as he was leaving to move residence. As he lay helpless on the bottom, he was shot once more. Trooper Alex Douglass was shot when he moved to assist Dickson. Each had been focused as a result of they had been uniformed state troopers.

Douglass survived, however Dickson was lifeless by the point emergency responders arrived.

Advertisement

With members of the state police, I traveled to the barracks in an armored automobile to look at the scene, which is significant to any prosecutor who might later have to explain it to a jury. That day, simply contained in the door from the foyer of the barracks, I noticed Dickson’s physique lined by a yellow emergency blanket.

He had been moved from the surface of the barracks by fellow troopers, who bravely risked their lives in what turned out to be a futile try to save lots of him. Simply earlier than Dickson’s physique was eliminated by the coroner, then-Lt. Christopher Paris, who’s now commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police, led the group of troopers, myself, and my first assistant, Bruce DeSarro, within the Lord’s Prayer.

Forty-eight days later, Eric Matthew Frein was arrested. He was charged with the homicide of Cpl. Dickson and the taking pictures of Trooper Douglass. Frein stood trial, and a jury of 12 unanimously convicted him.

The jury decided {that a} sentence of demise was the suitable punishment.

Gov. Josh Shapiro, along with his name to abolish the demise penalty in Pennsylvania, would launch Frein from demise row and into the overall jail inhabitants. Normally inhabitants, Frein can be allowed out of his cell for a lot of the day. Throughout this time, he might play chess or checkers, or take pleasure in staff sports activities, reminiscent of softball, soccer, or basketball. He might bask within the solar and even buy ice cream from the commissary.

Advertisement

In the meantime, Tiffany Dickson continues to bear the burden of her husband’s loss. His two sons develop up with out their father. Trooper Douglass has undergone numerous surgical procedures, suffered the lack of his decrease proper leg, and makes use of a service canine, Peter, to help him each bodily and emotionally.

The choice to impose a sentence of demise is left to the sound judgment of a dozen residents referred to as to function jurors. There may be little doubt they might fairly not. Nonetheless, they carry out their responsibility and make their resolution underneath the steering of legislation in our system of justice.

Over time, the demise penalty has withstood constitutional scrutiny and has been deemed by the courts as an acceptable sentence in circumstances of intentional homicide. Most People perceive that, with about 60% of U.S. adults supporting capital punishment, in keeping with a Pew Analysis Heart ballot.

There are circumstances the place a homicide is so heinous, so calculating, so evil, that justice is rightfully served by the imposition of the demise penalty. These circumstances embrace the intentional homicide of a police officer.

Not too long ago, we’ve got seen three officers killed by gunfire right here in Pennsylvania, together with Temple police officer Christopher Fitzgerald. Every officer was doing their responsibility to guard their neighborhood once they had been slain. Each police officer pledges to put down their life within the safety of others, and it’s the legislation that protects them.

Advertisement

To offer that sense of safety, Pennsylvania ought to retain the demise penalty.

Raymond J. Tonkin is the Pike County district legal professional.

Sure: Pennsylvania’s demise penalty course of has been a failure.

By Jules Epstein

Gov. Josh Shapiro’s resolution to proceed the moratorium on executions and name for laws to finish the demise penalty deserves reward and assist as being simply, sensible, ethical, and good legal justice coverage.

Advertisement

Because the governor mentioned, “The system is fallible, and the end result is irreversible.”

Pennsylvania’s demise penalty course of has been a failure. It has not eradicated the consequences of racial bias, it’s error-prone, it has swept up these ineligible for essentially the most extreme punishment there’s, and it continues to position in danger the actually harmless. Pennsylvania’s personal knowledge show every of those factors.

After years of examine, the bipartisan Joint State Authorities Fee issued a report in June 2018 titled “Capital Punishment in Pennsylvania.” Race was the “thumb on the scales” in demise penalty circumstances. White sufferer circumstances outcome within the imposition of a sentence of demise at over twice the speed the place the sufferer is Black: Demise sentences returned at penalty trials had been at 45% (31/69) in circumstances with white victims and 20% (15/74) with Black victims.

Though the Eighth Modification categorically excludes these with extreme mental incapacity, as of 2018, between 4% and 15% of the state’s demise row inhabitants had IQs that will make them ineligible for demise sentences. The “system” merely didn’t display them out.

These with mental disabilities could also be factually responsible of the homicide costs, however Pennsylvania has had one other danger of error: executing the actually harmless. Eleven folks sentenced to demise have been exonerated after courts reviewed their circumstances and upheld their sentences. These exonerations had been typically opposed by prosecutors who claimed that “the system works.”

Advertisement

After which there are the legal professionals. It’s honest to name demise penalty apply the “mind surgical procedure” of legal legislation. However Pennsylvania depends on underresourced legal professionals with no state funding and a ensuing 150 circumstances overturned due to errors by judges or prosecutors that protection counsel missed, or errors they themselves made. The whole variety of circumstances overturned for one type of error or one other? Properly over 300.

Ending capital punishment can also be sensible legal justice coverage. There stays no proof that the demise penalty is a deterrent. With out it, circumstances will go to trial rather more shortly, the alternatives for error are fewer, and the appeals course of won’t run for many years, bringing some closure to a sufferer’s household and associates.

There are additionally immense cost-savings to getting rid of capital punishment. Demise penalty trials value extra and demise row incarceration prices extra. One estimate was an added value to Pennsylvanians of $2 million per capital case leading to a demise sentence. The demise penalty doesn’t make us safer, and the cash saved might go to sensible crime discount insurance policies or sufferer providers.

However what a couple of sense of justice for the victims’ survivors?

Some oppose execution whereas others are for it, research present that an execution typically brings no closure, and no honest capital punishment system can relaxation on whether or not a sufferer’s household needs a specific punishment. There are different methods to assist household and family members, together with extra funds for sufferer counseling, bringing circumstances to trial sooner, and having a way more abbreviated appellate overview course of.

Advertisement

All of those are compelling coverage causes to finish capital punishment in Pennsylvania. They’re additionally ethical causes: One can’t assist legal guidelines that result in biased judgments, danger executing innocents, and tolerate excessive charges of error.

Gov. Shapiro mentioned it most eloquently: “The Commonwealth shouldn’t be within the enterprise of placing folks to demise. Interval. I imagine that in my coronary heart. This can be a basic assertion of morality. Of what’s proper and improper. And I imagine Pennsylvania should be on the correct facet of this subject.”

The earlier we get there, the higher.

Jules Epstein is the Edward D. Ohlbaum Professor of Legislation and director of advocacy packages at Temple College Beasley College of Legislation. He has litigated capital circumstances and taught demise penalty case legislation for 3 a long time.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania TV station airs test graphic showing Harris winning, starting flurry of conspiracies

Published

on

Pennsylvania TV station airs test graphic showing Harris winning, starting flurry of conspiracies


A Pennsylvania television station ignited a flurry of conspiracy theories when it aired the statewide presidential election results on a graphic, though the election is days away.

The mistake happened on Sunday, but it picked up speed on Wednesday when conservative media outlets, social media skeptics and conspiracy theorists got wind of it, many claiming that this is “proof” the election is rigged.

The flub occurred while the station was airing a Formula 1 race. Viewers then noticed at the bottom of their screen a graphic showing Vice President Kamala Harris winning Pennsylvania by 52% compared to former President Donald Trump’s 47%. This stirred confusion and concern, with even Elon Musk, the chairman of X, weighing in, calling it a Freudian slip.

However, the station that was responsible says the mistake was simply a test that accidentally made it on the air and that there is no evidence of any fraud.

Advertisement

In a statement, WNEP-TV says the numbers were “randomly generated test results set out to help news organizations make sure their equipment is working properly in advance of election night.” WNEP said it “regrets the error and apologizes apologized for any confusion.” It said it has taken steps to ensure the mistake is not repeated.

RELATED STORY | Republicans ask US Supreme Court to block counting of some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania

WNEP-TV also went on to note that it wouldn’t have been able to have access to vote counts anyway, as Pennsylvania law doesn’t allow mail-in ballots to be taken out of their envelopes until 7 a.m. on Election Day and no votes can be counted until after polls closed at 8 p.m.

This mistake is also not unprecedented. A Detroit TV station made a similar error back in 2020, and in 2022, it occurred in Arizona.

Still, the error is being held up as “evidence” of election fraud and misconduct, mostly by Trump and his allies, with no proof. Many supporters of the former president also pointed to the Pennsylvania station being an ABC-affiliated station, as they’ve often criticized the friendship between Harris and Dana Walden, an executive of Disney Entertainment who oversees ABC News. However, the error only aired in the local market and was not affiliated with Disney ABC News.

Advertisement

In the weeks and days leading up to the election, officials around the country have had their hands full fighting this disinformation like this. They insist that despite those isolated incidents though, the integrity of the election system in this country is intact.





Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Donald Trump gets warning sign among white voters in Pennsylvania

Published

on

Donald Trump gets warning sign among white voters in Pennsylvania


Former President Donald Trump may be facing unexpected challenges in Pennsylvania, where new polling shows a dip in his support among white voters—a crucial demographic in the battleground state.

According to the latest Fox News poll, conducted between October 24 and 28 among 1,310 registered voters in Pennsylvania, Trump is leading white voters by only 4 points, 52 percent to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 48 percent. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus percentage points.

White voters are central to Trump’s base. In 2016, 54 percent of the demographic voted for him nationally, giving him a 15-point edge over Hillary Clinton, while 55 percent voted for him in 2020, giving him a 12-point advantage. His lead among white voters was just as large in Pennsylvania in 2020, when he won the demographic by 15 points, according to CNN exit polls.

But polls suggest Trump’s white voter base may be shrinking in Pennsylvania. According to AtlasIntel’s latest poll, conducted between October 25 and 29, Trump leads among white voters by just 6 points. The latest CNN/SSRS poll, conducted between October 23 and 28, showed Trump leading among white voters by just 4 points.

Advertisement
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Rocky Mount Event Center on October 30 in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Trump’s base of white voters is shrinking in Pennsylvania.

Steve Helber/AP

Meanwhile, Quinnipiac University’s latest poll, conducted between October 24 and 28, showed Trump leading among white voters by a larger margin, but still by a smaller amount than previous years, with an 11-point lead. Newsweek has contacted the Trump and Harris campaigns for comment via email.

With the national race tight, Trump’s narrowing base of white voters in Pennsylvania could jeopardize his path to victory in the state—and potentially in the overall election. Pennsylvania, with its 19 critical Electoral College votes, has historically been a bellwether, voting for the winning candidate in 48 of the past 59 elections.

Meanwhile, Pennsylvania’s population is predominantly white and working class, with this demographic making up 75 percent of the state’s residents—making it a crucial component of Trump’s base.

Overall, polls remain extremely tight in Pennsylvania. Harris was leading in the Keystone State after becoming the Democratic nominee, but in the last two weeks Trump has taken the lead, according to 538’s poll tracker, which shows Trump with a slim 0.4-point edge. Pollster Nate Silver’s data similarly puts Trump up by 0.6 points, while RealClearPolitics has him leading by 0.7 points.

But there is still potential for the state to flip in Harris’ favor following remarks by comedian Tony Hinchcliffe at Trump’s rally in Madison Square Garden in New York on Sunday that sparked a firestorm of criticism and dominated news headlines.

Advertisement

Hinchcliffe joked that Puerto Rico was a “floating island of garbage.” While Trump campaign adviser Danielle Alvarez said Hinchcliffe’s controversial remarks “do not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign,” the joke went over badly. The backlash could hit Trump especially hard in Pennsylvania—the swing state with the highest percentage of Puerto Rican residents with 3.7 percent of the population. In 2020, Joe Biden won the state by 1.2 points after Trump won it in 2016.

On the same day as the Madison Square Garden rally, Harris was in Allentown, Pennsylvania, and used the visit to release a video on her plan for Puerto Rico, which Puerto Rican music icon Bad Bunny shared on his Instagram account.

Early voting data from Pennsylvania shows that more Democrats than Republicans have voted, with registered Democrats making up 57 percent of early voters, compared with 32 percent for Republicans, according to the University of Florida’s early vote tracker. It is unclear what this means for the election since the early vote data reveals only whether voters are registered with a party, not who they are voting for.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Finally! It’s time for Pennsylvania’s `only poll that counts’ | John Baer

Published

on

Finally! It’s time for Pennsylvania’s `only poll that counts’ | John Baer


John Baer is the Keystone State’s most recognized government and politics columnist. Sean Simmers | ssimmers@pennlive.com

We’re down to days and still don’t know who wins the state most say is most needed to win White House. It’s that kind of year.

Not because candidates are so good. But because neither one’s convincing a majority of Pennsylvanians that they’re good enough. That’s just how we see it. And have seen it.

Check this out. I looked at 70 Pennsylvania polls on Kamala Harris or Donald Trump (and, yeah, and I know you’re thinking, geez, get a life). But guess how many times either got above 50%?

Advertisement

Remember, this is in the oh-so-split Keystone State, in polling from the start of the race — right after President Biden got out and backed Harris in July — to the dwindling days of the campaign.

Okay, you don’t have to guess. I’ll tell you. Harris topped 50% just four times. And not by much. She hit 51% in a Bloomberg Poll in August. Then, in September, 52% in a Boston-based MassINC poll, 51% in another Bloomberg Poll, and 51% in a Quinnipiac Poll.

Trump? Topped 50% only once. He got 51% in a September AtlasIntel Poll out of Sao Paulo, Brazil (I don’t know, maybe somebody said, `Just find me a good poll. I don’t care if it’s in South America!’).

The latest of the 70 polls were just before Trump’s Madison Square Garden “lovefest” last Sunday. So, they don’t reflect any impact a speaker calling Puerto Rico “a floating island of garbage” has on the state’s 620,000 eligible Hispanic voters. Nor any effect of Joe `that’s-not-what-I-meant’ Biden then calling Trump supporters “garbage.”

But of the 70 polls, all showing a tight race, 20 were ties, Harris led slightly in 32, Trump led slightly in 18. And the average of the last seven had Trump up, 48.1% to 47.7%. A Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday shows Trump 47%, Harris 46%. Or, as we say in the biz, a virtual tie possibly trending toward Trump.

Advertisement

Now what? Well, now it’s what every election’s about, turnout. Who votes? How much of each candidate’s reliable base shows up? And what about the intangible, slippery, maybe-not-even-voting undecideds? I mean this in the sense of who votes Tuesday and by mail: 1.3 million mail-ins are in; about 2 million mail ballots were requested.

State polls point to candidates’ strongest support: for Harris, women, Blacks and college-educated voters aged 30-to-44 in Philadelphia and Allegheny County; for Trump, white men without college degrees, aged 45-to-64 in central and western counties. Generalizations, I know, and maybe over-stated. But what in politics isn’t?

Plus, this is a squirrely race. And speaking of squirrely, national Democratic guru James Carville, who made his bones in Pennsylvania, wrote in The New York Times he’s “certain” Harris wins. Meanwhile, national polling expert Nate Silver wrote in The Times on the same day he has a “hunch” Trump wins.

As for me, I’m not certain of anything. But I have a hunch. Since this is Pennsylvania – Land of Low Expectations — things won’t go smoothly. I hope I’m wrong.

But there’s mail-in ballot processing, which, thanks to the feeble minds writing our state laws, can’t begin until Election Day. That flaw, left unfixed by our Legislature for four years, could cause conspiracy-inspiring delayed results, as it did in 2020.

Advertisement

State officials expect fewer mail-ins this year (no pandemic), and note county election boards got state grants for more personnel and new equipment to speed the process. We’ll see.

There’s also litigation over improperly filed mail-ins. The state Supreme Court recently ruled voters whose mail-ins are rejected for errors such as being undated can cast “provisional” ballots which can still count. State and national Republicans sought a stay of that court order pending an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

And this stuff we know about. Who knows what else lurks out there?

I keep wondering how history judges this election. U.S. voters chose wisely? U.S. voters chose poorly? Seems it’s up to Pennsylvania voters to write that history.

John Baer may be reached at baer.columnist@gmail.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending