Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s education system is broken: here’s how to fix it | Opinion

Published

on

Pennsylvania’s education system is broken:  here’s how to fix it | Opinion


By Elizabeth Stelle

Are Pennsylvania schools underfunded? Before COVID-19, 52 percent of Pennsylvania voters thought so. Then, after voters learned the actual price tag, this number dropped by half.

Three years later, a Franklin & Marshall College poll finds only 44 percent of respondents believe schools lack funding, revealing a subtle yet notable shift in public sentiment. As education spending balloons—soaring 55.7 percent in the last decade—Pennsylvanians are increasingly skeptical of demands for more education funding.

New data from the Pennsylvania Department of Education shows statewide per-pupil funding reached $21,263 last school year, up from $19,966 the year before. That’s $452,260 per classroom and among the highest per-pupil spending in the country.

Advertisement

Per-pupil spending, up 42.9 percent over the last decade, isn’t the only type of education spending rising.

Statewide, school district reserve funds increased to $5.9 billion in 2022, up from $5.2 billion the previous year. Originally intended to help school districts weather economic downturns or unexpected events, these budget reserves are growing so large they dwarf the state’s rainy-day fund. Last year, the rainy-day fund totaled 12 percent of the state budget, and school district reserve funds averaged 24 percent.

Meanwhile, the state treasury is still sitting on more than $3 billion in pandemic-related aid earmarked for schools.

And yet—some school districts use loose-and-fast accounting to justify tax increases. In a January audit, the Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General exposed schools that shifted millions of dollars from their general funds to other funds to justify raising property taxes. Mocked by Auditor Timothy DeFoor as a “shell game,” this practice allowed 12 school districts to raise taxes 37 times and increase their respective general funds accounts to $390 million.

All this money, unfortunately, isn’t improving academic achievement. In fact, Pennsylvania district schools are reporting lower test scores and declining enrollment. According to the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSEA), 77 percent of Pennsylvania eighth graders are not proficient in math, and 44 percent are not proficient in language arts. Additionally, district school enrollment is down 7 percent over the last decade, with a significant drop following the onset of the pandemic.

Advertisement

Our current system is broken—not because district schools don’t work, but because they don’t offer an alternative when a child struggles. Pennsylvania’s public education system doesn’t lack funding; it lacks parental empowerment. Today’s system is designed to maintain buildings, not equip children with the academic skills they need to succeed.

But there are signs of change as more parents choose non-district schools and as lawmakers acknowledge that more money is not the answer.

During his campaign, Gov. Josh Shapiro repeatedly said he supports Lifeline Scholarships, which would redirect the state share of education spending—currently, $7,157 per pupil—to families with students assigned to Pennsylvania’s worst-performing schools for education services and resources customized to these children.

In March, Sen. Kim Ward, arguably the most influential Pennsylvania senator, criticized Shapiro for excluding his campaign promise from his state budget address. “I’m just going to assume he meant Lifeline Scholarships and a chance for children in failing school districts to get out of those school districts,” said Ward.

The Lifeline Scholarship Program, which passed the House in 2022, could become a vital first step toward making K–12 education in Pennsylvania student-focused.

Advertisement

School choice consensus is building, and not just in Pennsylvania. In 2021 (dubbed “the year of choice” by education-choice advocates), 18 states passed new educational-choice programs.

And 2023 is kicking it up a notch. Since January, eight states expanded or created choice programs, like Lifeline Scholarships, where the money follows the child. Increasingly, these programs are expanding and covering all students, making universal choice a reality state by state. These programs will tremendously impact American education for years to come.

Back in Pennsylvania, declining school district enrollment shows more and more Pennsylvanians question the education establishment’s narrative that more funding will improve life for their children. Adding zeros to already-bloated budgets won’t fix our education system—but empowering families can.

Elizabeth Stelle is the Director of Policy Analysis of the Commonwealth Foundation, Pennsylvania’s free-market think tank. Twitter: @ElizabethBryan



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Fire breaks out overnight in Quakertown

Published

on

Fire breaks out overnight in Quakertown


We’re following a developing story out of Quakertown.

Crews have been on the scene of a fire in Bucks County.

The fire was reported around midnight at the 100 block of Pacific Drive in Quakertown.

Advertisement

The fire is reported to have broken out inside a commercial building.

Dispatchers say firefighters from multiple companies were working on putting out hotspots once the bulk of the fire was out.

We are working to learn more details on what caused the fire and if there are any injuries. 

This is a developing story and will be updated. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pa. Consumer Advocate resigns, claiming utilities lobbied for his ouster

Published

on

Pa. Consumer Advocate resigns, claiming utilities lobbied for his ouster


Talk of lobbying against Cicero by utilities

The investor publication speculated Sunday’s win would likely mean a move to a “more moderate” Consumer Advocate.

“We view this as an indicator of the water industry’s strong political influence in Pennsylvania, which is a key factor that has enabled the state to consistently rank among the most attractive states for water utilities to do business,” Northcoast Research wrote.

The letter of support for Cicero includes signatures by the Pennsylvania Municipal Authorities Association, which represents more than 700 municipal authorities statewide, the publicly owned Chester Water Authority, the Pennsylvania Utility Law Project, Community Legal Services and several housing, health and environmental organizations.

In his resignation letter, Cicero said the “utilities’ actions” and Sunday’s decision to open the position to other candidates “cannot be separated.”

Advertisement

“Collectively, they challenge the integrity and independence of the office and erode the public trust in the impartiality of the regulatory process and signal a concerning shift, where public accountability and consumer protection are subordinate to corporate interests,” Cicero wrote.

Sunday’s statement did not directly address these allegations, but said his administration will prioritize “having a capable, unbiased and apolitical” Consumer Advocate to protect the interests of consumers.

“Its work is vital to all Pennsylvanians, especially the most vulnerable among us,” Sunday said. “I look forward to an open and transparent process that includes feedback from all interested parties and individuals.”

A spokesperson for Sunday’s transition team declined to answer questions about whether utilities had asked Sunday to replace Cicero.

Several utilities are represented on Sunday’s transition committee. Members include David Kralle, a registered lobbyist for Peoples Gas, Aqua Pennsylvania and parent company Essential Utilities; David Fisfis, general counsel and vice president of energy policy at Duquesne Light Company; and Carolina DiGiorgio, vice president of government and external relations at PECO.

Advertisement

Sunday is also inviting consumer advocacy organizations to join the transition committee and seeking feedback on what to look for in the next Consumer Advocate, he said in his statement.

PECO and Duquesne Light did not respond to a request for comment.

Aqua America declined to comment on Cicero’s resignation as well as on Kralle’s participation in Sunday’s transition committee.

In a statement, American Water said it was not involved in the process.

“Pennsylvania American Water is committed to transparency and maintaining the trust of our customers and stakeholders,” spokesperson Gary Lobaugh said in an email. “Pennsylvania American Water has not been involved in any efforts to influence the selection or retention of the Consumer Advocate. Our focus remains on providing reliable and high-quality service to our customers, and we respect the independent processes that govern the appointment of the Consumer Advocate.”

Advertisement

A Consumer Advocate who scrutinized the water sale process

Acquisitions of aging municipal water supplies by investor-owned utilities are increasing across the United States and in Pennsylvania as some municipalities struggle to upgrade infrastructure to meet new drinking water standards.

But purchases of municipal systems by companies often come with a higher cost to consumers — something Cicero has not been quiet about. Several states, including Pennsylvania, have passed fair market value laws, which allow companies to factor in the potential future value of a utility when purchasing it, pay above the price and essentially recover the cost of inflated acquisition prices through rate increases.

A Cornell University study of the 500 largest community water systems in the U.S. found that Pennsylvania has some of the highest utility bills following privatization.

Investor-owned utilities often argue privatization is necessary to “save” struggling municipal-owned systems. Though Cicero does not oppose privatization when necessary, he has argued Pennsylvania’s fair market value law allows companies to purchase “perfectly viable” systems for the sake of making more money.

“We are not anti-privatization, and we are not against well-thought-out consolidation and regionalization,” he said during a 2023 state House committee hearing on legislation aiming to amend the state’s fair market value laws. “What we oppose is privatization for its own sake — and privatization and consolidation at any cost or regardless of the cost to consumers.”

Advertisement

On a number of occasions, Cicero has pointed to dramatically increasing water and wastewater costs in Pennsylvania. In fact, fair market value laws have cost consumers more than $85 million more each year than they would have paid without the law.

Cicero’s Office of Consumer Advocate has settled several privatization cases before the PUC, essentially agreeing to allow them to go forward. But he has thrown a wrench in at least two.

In 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court sided with Cicero and reversed the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s approval of Aqua Pennsylvania’s purchase of East Whiteland Township’s sewer system for nearly $55 million. Cicero argued the PUC failed to prove the acquisition would provide a public benefit, and that it would raise wastewater costs for thousands of ratepayers.

Early last year, when Pennsylvania American Water applied to the PUC to buy the borough of Brentwood’s sewer system, Cicero urged the commission to approve the application only if it would provide “substantial, affirmative benefits to the public.” He argued PA American had not met its burden of proof that the acquisition would benefit the public interest. The PUC ultimately denied PA American’s acquisition request.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Body camera video shows Pennsylvania police officers rescue 2 dogs trapped in frozen pond

Published

on

Body camera video shows Pennsylvania police officers rescue 2 dogs trapped in frozen pond


Police in Easttown Township, Pennsylvania, are being called heroes after body camera video captured them saving two dogs from an icy pond.

The daring rescue happened Friday around 3 p.m. on Waynesbrooke Road. 

In the video, you can hear the sad sound of one of the dogs whimpering as the officers spring into action to rescue the animals from the freezing water.

Officers say when they got to the scene they found two black labs. One of them was not far from the bank, they say, but the other needed to be rescued first after swimming to a much deeper end of the pond.

Advertisement

“If they weren’t able to get themselves out, they may have drowned,” said Charles Burdsall, one of the responding officers. 

Burdsall says it was the first call they ever received for a water rescue in Easttown Township. He says their hearts were racing the entire time but they didn’t think twice, knowing every second mattered to save the dogs.

“The only goal at the time was to get the dog out of the pond,” Burdsall said. 

Their focus was not only to get the dogs out but to do so without breaking the ice. Luckily, the officers say neighbors were able to give them a ladder and a pole that proved to be exactly what they needed to pull the dogs out.

“[The dog’s] neck was touching the ice. [Burdsall] couldn’t get too close to the dog. We figured the ice was thinner there and we didn’t want him falling in. It was a pretty amped up situation,” Kevin Oreskovich with Easttown Township Police said. 

Advertisement

The dogs are doing fine and were reunited with their owner, the officers said. 

The officers are now being celebrated as heroes.

“It was rewarding. It felt good,” Oreskovich said.

“Being able to help them when they were in distress,” Burdsall said, “that was big for me.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending