Connect with us

Pennsylvania

A Pennsylvania Supreme Court primary could offer clues about the GOP’s direction in a key presidential battleground | CNN Politics

Published

on

A Pennsylvania Supreme Court primary could offer clues about the GOP’s direction in a key presidential battleground | CNN Politics




CNN
 — 

Tuesday’s primary election in Pennsylvania will give Republican voters the opportunity to choose either a candidate for the state Supreme Court supported by the GOP establishment or one who briefly halted the certification of the state’s 2020 election results and has the backing of a key Donald Trump ally.

Political observers say the largely under-the-radar primary could offer an early test of the organizing strength of the GOP’s ultra-conservative wing in this crucial presidential battleground.

Four candidates – two Republicans and two Democrats – are vying for an open seat on Pennsylvania’s high court, following the death of former Chief Justice Max Baer, a Democrat, in 2022. Each party’s winner will advance to a general election in November.

Advertisement

In the GOP primary, Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Carolyn Carluccio is facing Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough. Democrats, meanwhile, are picking between Superior Court Judges Daniel McCaffery and Deborah Kunselman. McCaffery, a former assistant district attorney in Philadelphia, has the endorsement of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party.

The outcome of the race will not tip the partisan balance on the high court, where Democrats currently hold a 4-2 majority on the seven-member body, but it could narrow the gap and start to lay the foundation for a shift in power in future election cycles, experts say.

“It could create a situation where, very shortly, the partisan balance on this court could be up for grabs,” said Douglas Keith, who researches judicial elections at the liberal-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s law school.

State supreme courts are the final arbiters on key issues, ranging from election ground rules to abortion policies. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld the state’s no-excuse mail voting law, and last year selected the state’s congressional map, breaking an impasse between the then-Republican controlled legislature and the state’s Democratic governor.

Justices on Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court serve 10-year terms. After the first election, they run in so-called retention elections without opponents.

Advertisement

Much of the attention in the Pennsylvania contest has centered on the GOP primary between Carluccio and McCullough, who halted certification the results – including Joe Biden’s victory in the state – in a ruling that was swiftly overturned by the state Supreme Court.

A committee tied to state Sen. Doug Mastriano – who pushed the falsehood in his failed 2022 bid for governor that election fraud led to Trump’s loss in the state – contributed $10,000 to her campaign, state records show. Last year, the Trump-endorsed Mastriano bested the Republican field to win his party’s nomination in the governor’s race. He lost the general election to Democrat Josh Shapiro by nearly 15 percentage points, and now is weighing running for the US Senate next year.

McCullough, who lost a 2021 bid for the Supreme Court, calls herself “a strict constitutionalist judge,” and touts her rulings against pandemic restrictions and the state’s mail-in voting law.

Carluccio, meanwhile, has the backing of the state Republican Party, and a national GOP group that’s active in judicial elections, the Republican State Leadership Committee’s Judicial Fairness Initiative, which has weighed in with $600,000 in advertising to boost Carluccio. A recent ad touts Carluccio’s “unmatched experience” and “unquestioned integrity.”

An earlier ad from the group highlighted a controversy that shadowed McCullough’s previous campaign for the high court: The sentencing of her husband in 2021 in a case that involved directing money from an elderly person’s trust fund to benefit political campaigns and a charity tied to Patricia McCullough.

Advertisement

In an interview with CNN, McCullough said she could not comment on her husband’s legal issues.

“He’s not the one running; I am,” she said.

And she described the advertising against her as coming from “Republican elites” who oppose her because “they know I will not compromise to their agenda.”

McCullough said her decisions, including one that blocked the state from taking further steps to certify the 2020 election results, show she hews closely to the state constitution. In her view, the state legislature erred in passing a no-excuse mail-in voting law in 2019, known as Act 77 – rather than putting the issue to voters to decide whether to amend the state’s constitution.

The law was passed with bipartisan support but became the target of criticism from some Republicans after it was employed in the contentious 2020 election that saw Biden flip the state. The state Supreme Court overturned McCullough’s order and last year upheld the law in a separate legal challenge.

Advertisement

McCullough said she respects the high court’s rulings in those cases: “They have the last say, so now it is the law of the land.”

Carluccio’s campaign did not make her available for an interview, but in a statement to CNN she said she would leave “personal and political opinions at the door and look at each case without bias and only determine the constitutionality of what’s before me.”

Carluccio said she hasn’t questioned the outcome of any election, but she said she is concerned by what she called the “conflicting, and sometimes unclear,” decisions on the state’s mail-in voting law in recent years by the state Supreme Court. (The court has weighed in on aspects of the law multiple times. In 2020, for instance, the court ruled that ballots in two counties with missing dates on the outside of the ballot return envelope could be counted. In the 2022 election, however, the court ordered that mail ballots with missing or improper dates on the return envelopes should be kept out of the count and deadlocked on the underlying legal questions.)

“Our election laws must be applied consistently across all counties, regardless of the election year,” Carluccio said in her statement. “And, when part of our electorate has concerns about the integrity of our elections, rather than dismiss their concerns, the response should be bold transparency in the administration of our elections.”

The modest Pennsylvania spending to date stands in sharp contrast to the record-setting spending that candidates and outside groups plowed into a Wisconsin Supreme Court election last month that, in the end, flipped control of that state’s high court to liberals. (A Kantar Media/CMAG analysis for the Brennan Center found that the ad spending for the Wisconsin high court seat hit $28.8 million as of early April, and some estimates put the likely final tally of all spending in that election even higher.)

Advertisement

Given its relatively low profile, Tuesday’s primary in the Keystone State offers a “good opportunity to get a sense of where the energy in the (Republican) party is, what segment of the party is able to get their people to go on the polls on a random Tuesday in May when there hasn’t been wall-to-wall television advertising,” said Michael Nelson, a political scientist at Pennsylvania State University, who is following the contest.

“Given that the Mastriano wing of the Republican Party was so dominant in the elections last fall, it will be interesting to see whether they can keep up that momentum or whether the standard-issue conservative wing of the party is able to rebound,” he added.

The Pennsylvania Bar Association Judicial Evaluation Commission rated Carluccio, McCaffery and Kunselman “highly recommended” and McCullough “not recommended” because she did not participate in the evaluation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Fire breaks out at Pennsylvania high school auditorium

Published

on

Fire breaks out at Pennsylvania high school auditorium


Fire breaks out at Pennsylvania high school auditorium – CBS Pittsburgh

Watch CBS News


A fire broke out in the auditorium of West Mifflin Area High School on Monday evening.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Missing Man, 87, Found: State Police

Published

on

Missing Man, 87, Found: State Police


Crime & Safety

Pennsylvania State police said 87-year-old Vito D’Amore was found Monday in Delaware after he was reported missing in Delco last week.

DELAWARE COUNTY, PA — An 87-year-old man reported missing last week has been found, according to Pennsylvania State Police.

Authorities Monday initially told Patch Vito D’Amore, 87, bad not been found after he was reported missing at about 5:07 p.m. Wednesday.

At about noon Monday, authorities provided an update on D’Amore, telling Patch he was found in Delaware.

Find out what’s happening in Radnorwith free, real-time updates from Patch.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

To request removal of your name from an arrest report, submit these required items to arrestreports@patch.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Josh Shapiro wasn’t on the ballot this year, but still spent millions campaigning. Here’s where the money went.

Published

on

Josh Shapiro wasn’t on the ballot this year, but still spent millions campaigning. Here’s where the money went.


HARRISBURG — His name wasn’t on the ballot in 2024, but Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro still spent more than $5.5 million campaigning this year. Much of that money, however, didn’t go directly to the Democrats up for election in the commonwealth.

A review of Shapiro’s campaign finance reports for the year shows that he spent almost $1.3 million on pricey consultants, and almost $1 million on a combination of private airfare, hotels, and event planning in 13 states, including Pennsylvania, alongside smaller expenditures on new cameras and online clothing retailers.

Shapiro’s spokesperson, Manuel Bonder, said these expenses were all for the good of Democrats inside and outside Pennsylvania.

“Throughout the 2024 election cycle, Governor Shapiro was a top surrogate for candidates up and down the ballot and campaigned tirelessly across the Commonwealth and in key swing states — working to defend every single seat of the State House Democratic majority and elect pro-freedom candidates at every level,” Bonder said in a statement.

Advertisement

Shapiro raked a lot of donations into his already strong campaign account during and after his time as a vice presidential contender this summer. Newly filed reports show that he ended November with more than $10.6 million on hand.

Recent big donors included former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, California developer and stem cell research advocate Robert Klein, and Los Angeles-based talent manager Scooter Braun.

The cash puts Shapiro in a strong financial position heading into what could be a competitive 2026 reelection race while allowing him to continue to build a national brand.

Where exactly did Shapiro’s money go?

Shapiro spent more than $5.5 million out of his campaign account this year.

Of that, about $1.7 million went to Pennsylvania candidates. The rest went toward consultants, private flights, hotels, events and meals for his campaign in 13 states including Pennsylvania, among other expenses.

Advertisement

Of the $1.3 million the campaign put toward consulting, the biggest chunks went to Denver-based political advertising firm Ascend Digital Strategies and to California fundraising advisor Cooper Teboe. Each received $570,000 in fees.

Teboe, who connects major Silicon Valley donors to Democratic candidates, has worked with Shapiro previously. The governor’s financial reports routinely show millions of dollars from tech moguls like Reid Hoffman, who co-founded LinkedIn. He also receives donations from Hollywood producers and celebrities, and other West Coast megadonors like Karla Jurvetson and Jennifer Duda, who are both physicians.

Of the almost $1 million Shapiro spent on travel and accommodations, the majority — $641,000 — went toward private flights. He also spent at least $121,000 on hotels and $27,000 on meals.

Some of those expenses, such as $180 at an Michigan gastropub and $725 at Atlanta’s Ritz-Carlton, illustrate his frequent stops in other swing states in the lead-up to the presidential election.

Shapiro also spent at least $185,000 to attend the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Nearly 80% of that tab went toward renting an event space at a renovated church where he hosted attendees during the four-day affair.

Advertisement

Shapiro also spent $18,000 on hotels in California and $14,000 on lodging in Florida. Most of the latter paid for time at the five-star Eau Palm Beach Resort & Spa, which advertises that “guests are welcomed with champagne, breathtaking ocean views and cooling tropical breezes.”

His campaign also spent more than $34,000 on hotels in Philadelphia — though he lives just outside of the city — including $13,000 at the swanky Four Seasons, where guests can “revel in breathtaking, unobstructed views” of the city from the 60th floor of the Comcast Center.

Bonder told Spotlight PA that the Four Seasons expense was related to Shapiro hosting an annual policy conference for the Democratic Governors Association.

How did Shapiro help Pa. Dems?

Many of the candidates down the ballot foundered in the commonwealth this year.

While Democrats narrowly kept their majority in the state House and didn’t lose ground in the GOP-controlled state Senate, Republicans easily won races for Pennsylvania’s three row offices — attorney general, auditor general and treasurer.

Advertisement

Democrats told Spotlight PA that they don’t blame Shapiro, or any other single person, for those losses. However, several operatives for the party said they wished the governor had used some of the millions he still has on hand to boost state candidates a little more.

Most spoke on condition of anonymity because of Shapiro’s power within the party.

The money Shapiro donated to state-level Democrats on the ballot in 2024 amounted to about 30% of his total campaign spending for the year.

He gave $1.25 million and $350,000 to the state House and Senate campaign committees, respectively. He also gave $100,000 to attorney general candidate Eugene DePasquale and $25,000 to auditor general candidate Malcolm Kenyatta.

Shapiro’s predecessor, Democrat Tom Wolf, spent just $210,000 on down-ballot Pennsylvania races in 2016, though he ended the year with much less on hand than Shapiro — $1.7 million.

Advertisement

But in 2020, without a reelection race to run, Wolf poured $2.6 million into lower-level Democratic general election campaigns, particularly for legislative seats in the then GOP-controlled General Assembly.

Chuck Pascal, who chaired the campaign of Democratic treasurer candidate Erin McClelland and runs the Armstrong County Democratic Committee, told Spotlight PA that additional money from Shapiro likely would have made little difference given the party’s weak performance across the board.

Shapiro gave no money to McClelland, a political outsider. She raised far less than Kenyatta, for instance, but ultimately got only 20,000 fewer votes than he did.

But Pascal, who noted he was speaking for himself and not McClelland, does think there’s at least one area where Shapiro could have done more.

“The one glaring thing in the results was that turnout was down in the Southeast, and particularly in Philadelphia and Montgomery Counties,” he said.

Advertisement

Shapiro is from Montgomery County. He previously represented a state House district there and served as county commissioner.

“Given the governor’s political strength in the southeast,” Pascal added, more spending there to increase voter engagement “could have been a place where he could at least have saved Bob Casey.”

Casey, Pennsylvania’s senior Democratic U.S. Senator, lost his race by just more than 15,000 votes.

According to Shapiro’s campaign, the governor appeared at 25 public events in Southeast Pennsylvania between late July — when President Joe Biden dropped his reelection bid — and Election Day.

The extent of the work that a governor, or any other political figure, does for their party during an election doesn’t all show up in public reports. A governor can join fundraising calls to help persuade donors, appear at national events to talk about important races in their state, or share intelligence about likely donors with various campaign committees — among other intangibles.

Advertisement

Bonder, Shapiro’s spokesperson, said that’s what Shapiro was doing. “His work to make key endorsements, stump at events, raise money, film digital and TV ads, and more was unmatched in Pennsylvania,” he said.

For instance, the Saturday before the election, Shapiro appeared at two canvass kickoffs for swing district Democratic candidates — one in Bucks County and one in Northampton County.

At the former, Shapiro warmed up the dozens-deep crowd gathered in a suburban park for state Rep. Brian Munroe, D-Bucks, extolling them that “you have the power in your hand” to ensure that Democrats win up and down the ballot before introducing Munroe to cheers.

Munroe would go on to win by 1,100 votes, one of the key wins that preserved House Democrats’ majority. He told Spotlight PA he thinks there were a number of reasons he came out on top — but having Shapiro in his corner definitely didn’t hurt.

When Munroe was knocking doors in the weeks leading up to the election, he got a strong sense of the governor’s broad appeal.

Advertisement

“I met a significant number of Republicans who said when (Shapiro) was in the running for vice president, they would have loved to see him in the role,” Munroe said.

Of complaints that Shapiro could have done more, Bonder said, “While I understand that some people in politics level bad faith criticisms in order to see their names in the paper, the reality is no one in this commonwealth worked harder than Gov. Josh Shapiro this fall to show up, raise money, film ads, and support and elect candidates who will protect real freedom and get stuff done.”

Jeff Coleman, a Republican operative, argued that Shapiro’s national visibility gave his donors exactly what they wanted: They wrote checks because they believe in his long-term political prospects.

“When you are writing a check to Gov. Shapiro, you are writing it to whatever the next chapter looks like,” Coleman said. “You are writing a check with the hope you are going to be part of history. That’s the type of brand his team built.”

Consultants also noted that the big cash reserve Shapiro has could allow him to put dollars into next year’s judicial retention elections, during which three justices elected as Democrats will run for new 10-year terms.

Advertisement

Kate Huangpu of Spotlight PA contributed reporting for this story.

Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds power to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania. Sign up for our newsletters at spotlightpa.org/newsletters.

Before you go, if you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending