Connect with us

New York

It’s a Dog’s Life, if You Want It

Published

on

For a lot of my 20s, my information of life in New York Metropolis, typically in neighborhoods I may by no means hope to afford, was partially the results of my willingness to look after different individuals’s canine.

That is how I realized about doormen, and cleansing providers, and rubbish chutes. The politics of canine runs. The off-leash hours in Central Park. The truth that some buildings nonetheless have elevator operators. The truth that the listing of directions that accompany pet care are sometimes twice so long as those that include kids.

Even now, in my 40s, when a few of the city luxuries are nearer in attain, I nonetheless say sure to most canine requests. I’m a canine individual and not using a canine, and canine sitting is the candy spot the place all the enjoyment meets not one of the value.

Throughout the pandemic, these requests all however disappeared for the apparent causes: Folks weren’t leaving their canine, ever.

Certainly, if it had been doable to assemble a warmth map of happiness within the spring of 2020, it’s possible the most well liked spot would have been Riverside Park on the Higher West Aspect of Manhattan in the course of the daytime.

Advertisement

Whereas a lot of the world, together with New York Metropolis, was struggling by way of the primary, brutal wave of Covid-19, a sure section of the native canine inhabitants was residing their greatest life (a step up from their already superb ones).

Free of the every day group stroll — that iconic picture of 10 or extra canine, leashes intertwined, in good, if considerably begrudging, lock-step, being walked by a laser-focused skilled — these pups had been getting sustained particular person consideration from their locked-down, stressed-out house owners. Secret lifetime of pets no extra.

Now that borders have reopened and folks can journey as soon as once more, I’ve personally skilled an uptick in requests (and have noticed the resigned canine, relinquished as soon as once more to the group stroll). Little doubt a few of that is due to the quantity of people that turned canine house owners in the course of the pandemic. In March 2020, there was a pointy rise in foster purposes. Final 12 months, the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Affiliation reported that 45 p.c of households now personal canine, in contrast with 38 p.c in 2016.

It’s not simply me. The repercussions of the Nice Doggy Surge of 2020 are being felt nationally, mentioned Amy Sparrow, the president-elect of the Nationwide Affiliation of Skilled Pet Sitters. “It’s exploded in all places.”

Now all these puppies are having to be taught to be alone, and house owners are having to be taught to go away them.

Advertisement

“There’s main separation anxiousness,” mentioned Jamie DeChristopher of LuckyDog in Brooklyn who has been boarding canine for 20 years. “Canine will begin to destroy issues in the home. They’ll howl and bark. They’re hastily left alone, and so they don’t perceive that. All people was house and now persons are going again to the workplace or don’t have the time for his or her canine that they did.”

So who’re you going to name? Canine sitters. However are the nonprofessionals — associates or household, let’s say — completely happy to return? Not essentially.

The less-than-enthused canine sitters, or those that outright refuse to do it, exist, although they are often laborious to pin down. In the middle of reporting this text, I heard from loads of individuals who wished nothing to do with the doggy care enterprise, however the minute they had been requested to go on the document, they instantly rescinded. Quite a few individuals instructed me they leaned on their “allergy symptoms” when declining requests.

“You’ll be able to’t inform individuals you don’t like canine,” mentioned Melanie Nyema, 41, a performer who lives in New York Metropolis. “They mechanically suppose it makes you some sort of psychopath. Chances are you’ll as effectively have mentioned you wish to kick infants.”

For the document, Ms. Nyema has nothing towards different individuals’s pets — and likes infants very a lot — however is, merely put, “simply not into canine.”

Advertisement

“I don’t contact escalator handrails or maintain poles within the subway, both. You’ll be able to’t know the place individuals’s canine have been.”

Jason Duffy, 48, a producer in Los Angeles mentioned canine sitting was akin to ““driving a good friend to LAX.” “I really like you, however woof,” he mentioned.

And, for the house owners, it’s not at all times straightforward to ask. Bryn Diaz, 43, lives in Alpine, Utah, owns two canine and feels extra comfy having somebody she is aware of deal with them. The one hitch, she mentioned, is “I hate to impose and don’t need associates to really feel like they’re obligated to assist.”

The explanations some leap on the likelihood are higher documented: Lots of people love canine, and the emotional assist they supply works two methods. Nikita Char, 22, a latest graduate of Binghamton College, who lives within the Bay Ridge part of Brooklyn along with her dad and mom, in a constructing that doesn’t permit canine, discovered reassurance within the two feminine German shepherds she stays with and cares for ceaselessly.

“They actually helped me in the course of the pandemic to get my psychological state again,” she mentioned. “Simply the consolation of a canine is actually typically higher than a human.”

Advertisement

Julian Weller, 31, an podcast producer in New York agreed. “It’s like one other approach of socializing, however you need to use muscle mass that haven’t been drained out in the identical approach,” he mentioned. “You’ll be able to play another way.” The additional advantage of staying in one other residence: “It was an effective way to take notes, for what life may appear like.”

Allison Silverman, 50, a tv author and producer in Brooklyn, took in Ziggy, a 10-year-old Labradoodle over the vacations partly as a trial run to see if her household ought to make the leap to getting the pet her 10-year-old daughter had been begging for.

However a part of their reasoning “was that we would have liked a pick-me-up,” Ms. Silverman mentioned. “It simply felt so terrible being in that lockdown house once more in New York Metropolis in December and January. Ziggy was such a temper booster. She made a giant distinction.” (They’re now getting a canine of their very own.)

After which there are those that will do it, however maybe not of out of doggy devotion. When a good friend requested Mia Cayard, 24, an occasions producer who just lately moved to New York from Florida, to look after her pup, Ms. Cayard mentioned she did some calculations.

“It is determined by three components,” she mentioned. “Who requested you,” in addition to “how a lot you take care of that individual and the way a lot you’re keen to vary or compromise to cope with the state of affairs.”

Advertisement

Ms. Cayard ended up taking the canine. “I figured this might be a rising expertise,” she mentioned. “I can positively do it. It’s not a toddler, it’s a canine. So something I do improper, it can’t rat me out.”

In the long run she was glad she did. “I wish to reset throughout my time house and simply to have one other being there identical to laying and I used to be like, oh you’re cute, you’re pleasant,” she mentioned. “And it appears over you with these little eyes … I really like that.”

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Published

on

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Violent confrontations at a pro-Palestinian rally in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, on Saturday reflected what some local officials and protest organizers called an unexpectedly aggressive Police Department response, with officers flooding the neighborhood and using force against protesters.

At the rally, which drew hundreds of demonstrators, at least two officers wearing the white shirts of commanders were filmed punching three protesters who were prone in the middle of a crosswalk. One officer had pinned a man to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the ribs, a 50-second video clip shows. Another officer punched the left side of a man’s face as he held his head to the asphalt.

The police arrested around 40 people who were “unlawfully blocking roadways,” Kaz Daughtry, the department’s deputy commissioner of operations, said on social media on Sunday.

Mr. Daughtry shared drone footage of one person who climbed on a city bus, “putting himself and others in danger.” The Police Department, he wrote, “proudly protects everyone’s right to protest, but lawlessness will never be tolerated.”

Neither Mr. Daughtry nor the police commented on the use of force by officers. A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the police response. The Police Department’s patrol guide states that officers must use “only the reasonable force necessary to gain control or custody of a subject.”

Advertisement

Bay Ridge has a significant Arab American population and hosts demonstrations in mid-May every year to commemorate what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe” — when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to Israel’s founding in 1948.

Andrew Gounardes, a state senator and a Democrat who represents the area, said local politicians had been in touch with the commanding officer of the 68th police precinct before the preplanned protest and said there had been no indication that there would be such a heavy police response. He called the videos he saw of the events “deeply concerning.”

“It certainly seems like the police came ready for a much more aggressive and a much more confrontational demonstration than perhaps they had gotten,” he added.

Justin Brannan, a Democrat who is the city councilman for the area, said the protest was smaller than last year’s but that officers had come from all over the city to police it. He said their approach appeared to be directed by 1 Police Plaza, the department headquarters in Manhattan.

“These were not our local cops. Clearly, there was a zero-tolerance edict sent down from 1PP, which escalated everything and made it worse,” Mr. Brannan said.

Advertisement

“I’m still waiting on information and details about the arrests that were made,” he added, “but from my vantage point, the response appeared pre-emptive, retaliatory and cumulatively aggressive.”

The Republican state assemblyman whose district includes parts of Bay Ridge, Alec Brook-Krasny, had a different perspective. He said an investigation would determine whether the officers’ actions were warranted, but he said some protesters were “breaking the law” by refusing to clear the street.

“I think that those bad apples are really hurting the ability of the other people to express their opinions,” Mr. Brook-Krasny said.

Some local residents supported the police and said they were tired of the protests’ disruptive impact. “Enough is enough,” said Peter Cheris, 52, a 40-year resident of Bay Ridge, who said he had viewed the videos of the protest. “If you’re going to break the law, you deserve it,” he said.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, singled out the presence of the Police Department’s Strategic Response Group, a unit that is sometimes deployed to protests and has been the subject of several lawsuits brought by the civil liberties union and other groups.

Advertisement

The police unit’s handling of the demonstration “was a violation of New Yorkers’ right to speak out and risks chilling political expression,” Ms. Lieberman said in a statement. “N.Y.C.L.U. protest monitors witnessed violent arrests, protester injuries, and even arrests of credentialed members of the press.”

She added: “The continual pattern of N.Y.P.D. aggression against pro-Palestine demonstrators raises important questions about the city’s disparate treatment of speakers based on their message.”

Abdullah Akl, an organizer with Within Our Lifetime, the pro-Palestinian group that organized the protests, said the response took organizers aback, particularly for a demonstration that occurs every year in Bay Ridge and is known to be frequented by families with children.

“It was really an unusual and unprecedented response,” Mr. Akl said.

He said he witnessed two men being pushed to the ground. One of them can be seen in a video with blood streaming down the side of his face. Nerdeen Kiswani, chair of Within Our Lifetime, said three protesters — including the two who can be seen being punched — were treated for their injuries at hospitals.

Advertisement

The Police Department has arrested hundreds of demonstrators since street protests began shortly after the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza. The protests have been largely peaceful, with few injuries or violent clashes.

In a turning point, on April 30 officers cleared Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, which had been occupied by protesters for 17 hours. Many officers showed restraint during the arrests, though a handful were filmed pushing and dragging students as they removed them from the building.

On Sunday, Ms. Lieberman said police response to the protests in Bay Ridge underscored the importance of implementing the terms of a $512,000 settlement the civil liberties union and the Legal Aid Society reached with the city this month. The settlement set new terms for how the Police Department manages protests, creating a tiered system that dictates how many officers can be sent to demonstrations and limits the use of the Strategic Response Group. It will take years to put into practice.

The settlement is one of several that stemmed from the George Floyd racial justice protests in 2020. Last year, the city agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that claimed unlawful police tactics had violated the rights of demonstrators in Manhattan and Brooklyn. In March, the city agreed to pay $21,500 to each of roughly 300 people who attended another Black Lives Matter protest in 2020 in the Bronx. Those people were penned in by the police, then charged at or beaten with batons, according to a legal settlement.

Andy Newman and Camille Baker contributed reporting.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending