New Hampshire
‘We try to make it a very family event’: New England farms open for Christmas tree season – The Boston Globe
Most will open to the public this weekend, some for just a couple of days. The selling season is shorter this year, thanks to a late Thanksgiving. Although heavy rains and a late spring frost recently decimated seedlings for several popular Christmas tree varieties in New Hampshire and parts of New England are experiencing drought conditions, farmers are adapting.
Phillips, a retired software engineer, said his family expects to sell about 300 trees this season from their small 5-acre tree farm. They aim to keep their prices on the low end, at $65 for a tree, and round out the experience with hot cocoa, cappuccinos, homemade cookies, candy canes, and a scavenger hunt for the kids, he said.
“We try to make it a very family event,” he added.
Nigel Manley, program director for the New Hampshire/Vermont Christmas Tree Association, said people have a lot of nostalgia wrapped up in the ritual of choosing their own tree and cutting it down, especially for those who associate fond holiday memories with the distinct scent of a real tree inside a warm home.
“People want to hold onto that,” he said.
Manley, who co-owns South Farm Christmas Trees in the little town of Bethlehem, N.H., on the northern edge of the White Mountains region, said he had initially planned to open the farm’s retail operation after Thanksgiving, but ultimately decided to do so the weekend before, as Thanksgiving fell so late this year.
The farm usually sells about 800 trees per year, Manley said. That includes 200 sponsored through the “Trees for Troops” program, which delivers donated trees to US military bases, he said. The farm also sells about 350 trees wholesale to retailers in southern New Hampshire and in Massachusetts, and the rest are sold to in-person consumers.
Manley said the typical price to claim and cut an average 7.5-foot tree can run from about $65 to $90 or higher in some areas.
“It’s like real estate,” he said. “It depends on location. If you’re close to a lot more people and you sell a lot more trees, the chances are they’ll be more expensive because that’s just the way it is.”
Early signs suggest consumer demand is “really strong” this year, though this weekend’s boom or bust for the retail business is heavily weather-dependent, Manley said. His farm sits north of Franconia Notch, so severe wintry weather can snarl traffic and block would-be customers from reaching him.
Unlike last year, when some conifer species were in short supply or even unavailable from the New Hampshire State Forest Nursery, this year’s extremely dry autumn has prompted some businesses, including Tonry Tree Farm in Hampton Falls, N.H., in the Seacoast area, to warn buyers to take extra care to keep their trees watered and a safe distance from heat sources in their homes.
The impacts of drought or excessive rainfall in any given year will vary from one farm to the next and primarily affect newly planted trees more than those with established root structures, according to Manley, who recently retired from a decades-long post with the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests.
Farmers who experience a particularly bad year for their seedlings can often “catch up” by planting additional trees in subsequent years, since those that people cut down each winter are typically five to 10 years old, Manley said. Even so, farmers here in New England and elsewhere are introducing irrigation systems and mulching techniques to improve the performance of their seedling crops as they adapt to climate change, he said.

Farm-grown trees aren’t the only option for families seeking their Yuletide fix.
The US Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service sells permits online for just $5 to those who wish to find and fell a holiday tree from certain areas in a national forest of their choice, including New Hampshire’s White Mountain National Forest or Vermont’s Green Mountain National Forest.
Manley said he has mixed feelings about consumers plucking trees from the forest. Such specimens won’t be “nicely shaped and groomed” like those that have grown under the watchful eye of a farmer who mows, fertilizes, and prunes throughout the year, he said.
Besides, many buyers appreciate the full experience that comes with stopping by a family business to select a locally grown agricultural product, he said.
For those thinking about swinging by a Christmas tree farm this season, Manley has a few important tips:
First, before heading to a farm — there are hundreds listed on the National Christmas Tree Association website — double check to confirm its hours of operation are up to date. (Nothing ruins a family road trip quite like arriving to find Walley World is closed.)
Source: National Christmas Tree Association
Second, think about any preferences you may have for a particular tree species and height, as well as any additional services you may wish to use. Many farms wrap trees to protect them for the ride home, and some use shakers to reduce the amount of loose needles and debris.
“It just depends on the farm,” Manley said.
Third, come prepared to walk around outside and actually cut down a tree. While the family at Grandpa’s Farm in Loudon said they make hand saws and sleds available, they note you may also bring your own tools — but remember that Christmas tree farms typically prohibit patrons from using power tools.
“Most insurance companies don’t want a lot of people running around with chain saws,” Manley said.
Steven Porter can be reached at steven.porter@globe.com. Follow him @reporterporter.
New Hampshire
Dover SchoolCare ruling could let 89 other NH districts recoup funds
The preliminary injunction ordering SchoolCare to continue paying Dover educators’ health care claims may have implications for the 89 other school districts that paid SchoolCare’s special assessment, according to Anthony Carr of Shaheen and Gordon.
“This could be significant for those 89 other towns and districts,” said Carr, who is representing Superintendent Christine Boston in the lawsuit against SchoolCare.
SchoolCare threatened to stop paying claims on May 1 if Dover failed to pay a special assessment of $1.7 million above and beyond its normal monthly premium in order to cover the insurance risk pool’s losses. Dover refused to pay the special assessment, arguing that it was illegal.
Superior Court Judge John Curran, finding that school employees covered by SchoolCare could face “irreparable harm,” ordered SchoolCare to continue to pay “covered healthcare claims of Dover employees, spouses, dependents, and retirees.”
Curran also found that if the case went to trial, Dover would “likely succeed on the merits” of its case.
Whether the case will go to trial remains an open question, as the judge has not ruled on the claims of SchoolCare and the New Hampshire Secretary of State that the court is not the proper jurisdiction for Dover’s complaint.
“The court will duly consider the important jurisdictional question this case presents in ruling upon those pending motions to dismiss …,” Judge Curran wrote. “For the purposes of this motion, the court finds that the plaintiffs have a sufficient likelihood of establishing jurisdiction at this stage.”
Carr said the order for the preliminary injunction is “very helpful, very favorable.” However, the only “asterisk” is that there is a pending motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Favorable ruling hinges on pending jurisdictional argument
Both New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan, through the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation and its counsel, which intervened, and SchoolCare, have filed motions to dismiss the case with jurisdictional arguments.
“The Bureau respectfully asks this Court to dismiss the District’s Complaint in its entirety because the claims contained therein fall under the Bureau’s exclusive jurisdiction and authority and are best submitted to the Bureau’s administrative enforcement mechanism,” according to court documents.
SchoolCare has argued the plaintiffs can’t show a “likelihood of success on the merits” as the matter needs to be brought before the secretary of state, not the Superior Court.
“Basically, SchoolCare and the Secretary of State are trying to argue that none of these claims brought by Dover, none of these claims brought by Dr. Boston, should be in any court in the state, and these are all issues that should be squarely and solely resolved by the Secretary of State. So that’s really the only lingering issue in that regard,” said Carr.
The lawyer said they’re “hopeful,” based on their comprehension of the law, that a “favorable ruling” will soon come out on the jurisdiction argument.
“Once the jurisdictional issue is resolved, it will be much more clear that the 89 towns and districts likely have causes of action, similar breach of contract actions against SchoolCare to recoup the funds that they were forced to pay under duress, and SchoolCare may not have had a lawful basis to request or receive those funds,” Carr said.
89 members who paid assessment could follow Dover’s lead
Carr explained what the preliminary injunction could mean to the other districts and towns.
“If the jurisdiction were to get resolved favorably, then what those 89 towns and districts would be able to do is piggyback this order, which although it’s directly granting a preliminary injunction, what it’s inherently doing as part of that is saying that we are likely to succeed on the merits of our claim. And one of those claims is the breach of contract claims. So, if we were to be successful on jurisdiction, those other 89 towns and districts would be pretty wise to say that they very well may have viable claims as well,” said Carr.
“This order recognizes that all 89 of those towns and districts may have legal rights to recoup those funds and redeploy them for the betterment of their communities and children, including going toward educational services and staffing. I hope that other towns and school districts will follow the lead of Dover and Dr. Boston and stand up to SchoolCare and demand what’s right,” Carr said in a press release.
He called the judge’s ruling a “huge win for Dover.”
He highlighted one of the immediate results being that district teachers and staff “don’t have to worry about coverage stopping in the middle of a policy period. That’s amazing. We heard stories about a kid who was scheduled to have heart surgery. I believe a staff member needed a kidney transplant. And so, the stakes are very high. And these are people, real humans in Dover, who were worried about how this might go,” said Carr.
“On the flip side, if Dover was forced to pay the ransom, we offered testimony that $1.7 million is the equivalent of about 16 and a half full-time salaries. And we’ve seen in other towns and districts, not just the budget being thrown into crisis, but again, real humans with families being laid off. So it both preserves the status quo for the health coverage for all the fantastic teachers and staff in Dover. And it also, at least for the time being, precludes great teachers and staff within Dover from being laid off,” Carr said.
“I would not want to be the 89th or the 88th town or district that pursues recourse. I think it’s important to act urgently,” said Carr. “I guess I’m on a bit of a personal mission to kind of see all these issues through and to make sure that SchoolCare does not benefit from its own improper conduct. So, we will see what the future holds, but I may very well be representing some of these towns and districts. I would say there’s really no need for any of the towns and districts to wait (for the jurisdictional issue),” said Carr.
Portsmouth agreed to pay assessment ‘under protest’
Trevor McCourt, Portsmouth’s deputy city attorney, said “the city of Portsmouth has not made payment on the $1.57 million assessment at this time. We’ve made arrangement to make that payment by July 15th of this year, and the City Council’s vote was specifically to authorize that payment under protest.”
McCourt said “the last act of the City Council was to agree to make that payment under protest. Certainly, I don’t know what the plan will be moving forward. We plan to make the payment. We continue to make our monthly payments.”
He said they’re “certainly encouraged” by the ruling out of the Strafford Superior Court, and that he personally has already commented “pretty publicly, I agree with the position that Dover is taking.”
What’s next for the case?
Carr said right now, they have “a laser focus on an order on the jurisdictional issue, just so we can make sure that we’ve got the green light to keep these claims in court where we feel like they belong.”
Carr said if they receive a favorable ruling on jurisdiction, they’re attention will be on prosecuting their case and going to trial if needed.
“One of the elements of getting a preliminary injunction is the court has to find a likelihood of succeeding on the merits, meaning that the court is not quite, but kind of pre-adjudicating whether our claims are going to win or not,” said Carr. “So, for the court to find at this early stage that we’ve met that threshold is a great indication, but it doesn’t necessarily mean game over. What it means game over for is that Dover does not have to pay the $1.7 million now. The case will proceed on a 12-month trial track after this, and whether it’s through a jury trial or through pre-trial briefing, we will be hopeful to get a result saying that we never have to pay the $1.7 million.”
New Hampshire
NH Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 Day winning numbers for May 2, 2026
The New Hampshire Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at Saturday, May 2, 2026 results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from May 2 drawing
25-37-42-52-65, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 3
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 2 drawing
Day: 6-4-6
Evening: 0-7-6
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 2 drawing
Day: 6-3-8-5
Evening: 4-4-5-7
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from May 2 drawing
01-07-10-19-32, Megaball: 05
Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 2 drawing
06-17-31-42-50, Bonus: 02
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the New Hampshire Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Pick 3, 4: 1:10 p.m. and 6:55 p.m. daily.
- Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
- Megabucks Plus: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
- Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
- Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a New Hampshire managing editor. You can send feedback using this form.
New Hampshire
State investigation highlights communication lapses over proposed ICE facility in Merrimack
-
World5 minutes agoCruise ship outbreak leaves 3 dead as officials delay medical evacuations and probe hantavirus threat
-
Politics11 minutes agoMarco Rubio spotted behind DJ booth at family wedding as social media reacts to viral clip
-
Health17 minutes agoJane Seymour, 75, shares how she approaches aging with vitality: ‘Best I can be’
-
Sports23 minutes ago2025-26 NBA Title Odds: Thunder, Spurs Favored; East Up For Grabs
-
Technology29 minutes agoUnited Arab Emirates plans AI-run government within two years
-
Business35 minutes ago‘The Devil Wears Prada 2’ steps out to $77 million at the box office
-
Entertainment41 minutes agoFormer Santana vocalist Alex Ligertwood dies at 79
-
Lifestyle47 minutes agoShe’s rich, self-made and wants women to boldly talk about money (and make more)