Connect with us

New Hampshire

Commentary: New Hampshire’s housing crisis: Protect renters, stop HB 60

Published

on

Commentary: New Hampshire’s housing crisis: Protect renters, stop HB 60


Did you know that a recent survey on housing costs found that 87% of rental properties in New Hampshire are unaffordable? The truth is undeniable: affordable housing is the most urgent issue facing our state today. And make no mistake, even if you’re not a renter, this statewide crisis is driving up your property taxes. For renters, finding an affordable place to live is nearly impossible. Many are paying more in rent than they would for a mortgage. When the majority of housing is out of reach, and there’s nowhere else to turn, renters are forced into debt and poverty just to secure basic shelter — or worse, face homelessness. This situation is unacceptable. The priority of legislators in Concord should be expanding access to affordable housing, reducing rent costs, and keeping Granite Staters out of poverty. Yet, instead of focusing on this critical issue, Republicans are, for the fourth time in three years, attempting to change the law that has protected tenants from unjust evictions for the past 40 years.

House Bill 60, which will be presented in the House Committee on Housing this week, would allow landlords to evict tenants without cause, dismantling 40 years of tenant protections. If passed, this bill would expose renters to sudden displacement, regardless of whether they’ve paid their rent on time or abided by their lease terms. We have to address the elephant in the room, vulnerable populations — like families with young children, seniors, and people with disabilities — would bear the brunt of this change. Imagine being evicted from a home you’ve rented in good standing for years simply because your child’s laughter was a little too loud or because a landlord wanted a tenant they deemed more “suitable.”

The consequences of eviction are far-reaching. Without stable housing, children face disruptions in their education, hindering both academic performance and social development. Adults struggle to maintain consistent employment, leading to increased turnover rates for businesses. At the same time, municipalities, already strained by tight budgets, are left to shoulder the financial burden of homelessness through welfare programs and emergency services—costs that ultimately fall to property taxpayers.

Advertisement

Between 2022 and 2023, homelessness in New Hampshire surged by an alarming 52.1%, vastly outpacing the national increase of 12%. This isn’t just a statistic — it’s a humanitarian crisis impacting families and individuals across the state. Behind every number is a person who has lost their home, stability, and sense of belonging. Housing is not a mere commodity; it’s a fundamental necessity. Without it, nearly every aspect of life becomes a struggle.

Those opposed to tenant protections often argue that such policies place undue burdens on landlords. However, this viewpoint overlooks the larger social and economic costs of widespread evictions and homelessness. Existing “for cause” eviction laws already offer landlords a way to address legitimate concerns like unpaid rent or property damage. Allowing evictions without cause only exacerbates the imbalance, leaving every single tenant in New Hampshire vulnerable and unprotected.

Addressing this crisis requires bold action to increase access to affordable housing and protect renters from unjust displacement. Policymakers must prioritize investments in affordable housing initiatives, strengthen enforcement of fair housing laws, and resist attempts like HB 60 to erode tenant protections. These steps are not just ethical obligations but also practical necessities. A healthy housing market benefits everyone by creating stronger, more resilient communities, boosting local economies, and alleviating the strain on public resources and local property taxpayers to pick up the tab.

In New Hampshire, we take pride in our resilience and commitment to community. But resilience alone cannot solve systemic problems. It’s imperative that we advocate for policies ensuring every resident has a safe and affordable home. The time for action is now. Let’s unite to confront this housing crisis with the compassion and resolve it demands, not pass legislation like HB 60 to make the problem worse. Together, we can build a state where everyone has the foundation they need to thrive.

Advertisement

State Reps. David Paige, D- Conway, and Rep. Ellen Read, D-Newmarket, serve as ranking and deputy ranking members of the New Hampshire House Committee on Housing, respectively.



Source link

New Hampshire

Judge strikes down challenge to NH absentee voting law

Published

on

Judge strikes down challenge to NH absentee voting law


A superior court judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of visually impaired New Hampshire voters who argued a newly passed absentee voter law violates the state constitution.

In a lawsuit filed this summer, the plaintiffs alleged the measure, which was backed by state Republicans, places a disproportionate burden on people with disabilities by making it harder to vote.

On Friday, New Hampshire Superior Court Judge David Ruoff dismissed the case, ruling that the new policies are reasonable.

The new law requires people requesting an absentee ballot to prove their identity in one of three ways: either mail in a photocopy of an ID, along with their ballot application; have their ballot application notarized; or show an ID at town hall prior to an election.

Advertisement

In his opinion, Ruoff said, “The identification requirements impose ordinary burdens on all absentee voters, and the possibility that it may cause additional burden on a subset of absentee voters does not render the entire statute unconstitutional.”

It isn’t clear if the plaintiffs will appeal the ruling to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

“We appreciate the Court’s recognition that the identification requirements for absentee voters are reasonable, constitutional, and consistent with New Hampshire’s long-standing election practices,” said New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella, who defended the law in court.

New Hampshire residents who vote in person are already required to show an ID at the polls when requesting a ballot. Supporters of the new law say the same safeguards should be in place for those voters who request an absentee ballot.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Reduced federal funds to boost broadband in New Hampshire – Valley News

Published

on

Reduced federal funds to boost broadband in New Hampshire – Valley News


Despite some angst that the Trump Administration might vaporize the money, funds are coming to New Hampshire to expand broadband internet access throughout the state, although the amount isn’t what was originally allocated.

The recently announced funding is $18.6 million, significantly less than the original $196.5 million.

The news was, nevertheless, greeted with bipartisan enthusiasm.

“New Hampshire is proud to be No. 1 in the nation for internet connectivity, and this new federal funding we have secured will help us reach our goal of delivering reliable broadband access to everyone in our state,” Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte said in a statement.

Advertisement

“Having worked on the broadband provisions in the bipartisan infrastructure law, I know how important internet connectivity is for small businesses to grow and compete, for students to learn and thrive and for those in remote areas to access health care,” said Democratic U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen.

The broadband funding is $18.6 million. It comes from the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program (BEAD), part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, bipartisan legislation passed and enacted during the President Joe Biden administration.

Originally, the state was slated to get $196.5 million from BEAD for 9,527 locations across the state, especially in rural areas where access to broadband internet can be difficult because of distance, terrain and lack of infrastructure.

With the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, given his disdain for the Infrastructure Act, he signed an executive order that paused a disbursement of all funds related to the bill, pending a review by his new administration.

Subsequent policy changes from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce, worried the state’s Democratic congressional delegation that the changes could derail the disbursement of the state’s $191 million in BEAD funds.

Advertisement

“The administration has now removed discretion from state and local communities, instead requiring that BEAD funds be allocated solely to the lowest-cost projects — even if those projects deliver extremely low-quality internet service to rural areas. This change is especially harmful to rural Granite Staters, who may now be limited to slow, weather-dependent internet,” the delegation wrote in August to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick.

And, indeed, the changes meant that the $191 million originally slated for the Granite State had been trimmed to the newly announced $18.6 million, reducing the new broadband locations from 9,527 to 5,250.

The Trump Administration saw the policy changes as a means to distribute the money in a more cost-effective manner. That was recognized by the administration with the completion of the state’s application process for the funds.

“Congratulations to New Hampshire for getting their BEAD Final Proposal over the finish line,” said U.S. Department of Commerce Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information and NTIA Administrator Arielle Roth. “The state’s commitment to cutting excessive costs and technology diversity resulted in a strong deployment plan that will achieve universal connectivity across the Granite State.” Roth’s statement was provided by the governor’s office.

The state’s approved plan accelerates the timeline for implementation, with the hope that the state will be fully broadband wired by the end of next year.

Advertisement

The state’s proposal for upgrades includes a mix of coax, fiber, and satellite connections provided by Comcast, Consolidated Communications, New Hampshire Electric Co-op, and SpaceX.

Contracts for the work still have to be approved by the governor’s Executive Council.

Congressional Democrats at least seem happy that they got what they could get. And everyone seems to be putting a happy face on the news of the reduced funding.

“Everyone deserves access to high-speed, reliable internet no matter where they live,” said U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan. “I worked with my colleagues to negotiate and pass the bipartisan infrastructure law to help expand access to reliable internet, and am glad to see our state one step closer to ensuring that everyone has access to broadband. I will continue to push for federal funding that supports Granite state families and small businesses and ensures that communities across our state, including in rural areas, can grow and thrive.”

“Under the bipartisan infrastructure law, Congress worked together to approve critical investments that are making our communities safer, stronger, and more prosperous. Access to high-speed internet is a necessity for every city and town, and it helps businesses compete, ensures students can learn, and allows patients to see a provider. This funding should never have been threatened or delayed, and I’m relieved that it will soon be delivered to New Hampshire,” said 1st District U.S. Rep. Christopher Pappas. “I will continue working to secure resources that modernize our infrastructure and improve Granite Staters’ quality of life.”

Advertisement

“Access to reliable, high-speed internet is not a luxury. It is a lifeline and economic driver for hardworking families, small businesses, farmers, and rural communities across our state,” said 2nd District U.S. Rep. Maggie Goodlander. “I look forward to seeing these federal dollars put to work quickly and effectively to deliver for New Hampshire.”

Ayotte pointed to a recent report that shows New Hampshire is the No. 1 internet connected state in the country.

Reviews.org used census data and reported in October that 95.37% of all households in the Granite State are connected to the internet.

“Expanding broadband will help keep our communities safe, grow our economy, improve access to health care in our rural communities, and more. I thank the Department of Commerce for helping us continue to get more Granite Staters connected,” Ayotte said in her statement.

The state’s broadband application process and oversight are the work of the state Department of Business and Economic Affairs (BEA).

Advertisement

“This investment is critical in reaching the last mile in bringing high-speed service to rural towns, which will support small businesses, enable remote work, and increase access to educational opportunities, healthcare, and other facets of our quality of life,” said Matthew Conserva, program manager of the BEA Office of Broadband Initiatives.

These articles are being shared by partners in The Granite State News Collaborative. For more information visit collaborativenh.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Hudson, NH Police arrest four following drug trafficking investigation

Published

on

Hudson, NH Police arrest four following drug trafficking investigation


HUDSON, N.H. — A monthslong investigation into drug trafficking resulted in multiple arrests, the seizure of various narcotics — including fentanyl and methamphetamine — and the recovery of firearms.

The Hudson Police Department announced in a press release on Thursday that the four charged were Kenny Eustate, 40, of Hudson; Matthew Williams, 42, of Manchester, New Hampshire; Sarah LaFond, 36, of Manchester, New Hampshire; and Karen Makela, 41, of an unknown address.

On Oct. 30, the Hudson Police, working alongside the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Southern New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, executed a search warrant at a residence in their town. Police said officers discovered fentanyl, methamphetamine, prescription medications, firearms, and other evidence linked to drug distribution.

Three individuals were taken into custody at the scene, including Eustate, arrested on active warrants for sale of controlled drugs and failure to appear. Police said that evidence recovered during the search led to additional charges levied against Eustate, including being a felon in possession of a deadly weapon.

Advertisement

Williams and LaFond were both arrested on outstanding burglary and theft warrants issued by the Manchester Police Department.

The investigation continued, leading to the arrest of Makela on Dec. 3. Makela faced charges of sale of controlled drugs and two counts of breach of bail. According to police, at the time of her arrest, she was found in possession of fentanyl and methamphetamine, resulting in additional drug possession charges.

Makela was arraigned on Dec. 4 in the 9th Circuit Nashua District Court and held on preventative detention.

Eustate was also arraigned in the 9th Circuit Nashua District Court and held on preventative detention.

Williams and LaFond were booked by the Hudson Police before being released to authorities in Manchester.

Advertisement

“The Hudson Police Department would like to thank the DEA, and the Southern New Hampshire Special Operations Unit for their continued assistance and support throughout the investigation,” police said in the release.

Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending