Connect with us

Massachusetts

Statewide 911 service outage cause determined

Published

on

Statewide 911 service outage cause determined


SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WGGB/WSHM) – State officials have been able to determine what happened Tuesday that caused 911 services to be disrupted statewide.

According to the Massachusetts State 911 Department the outage was caused by a firewall.

“A preliminary investigation conducted by the State 911 Department and (911 vendor) Comtech determined that the outage was the result of a firewall, a safety feature that provides protection against cyberattacks and hacking. The firewall prevented calls from getting to the 911 dispatch centers …” the Department said Wednesday morning.

The interruption to the system started at about 1:15 p.m. Tuesday and lasted for about 2 hours.

Advertisement

By 3:15 p.m. the 911 system was back up and running as normal.

[ Statewide 911 service restored across Massachusetts]

“Comtech’s initial review of the incident has confirmed that the interruption was not the result of a cyberattack or hack; However, the exact reason the firewall stopped calls from reaching dispatch centers remains under review,” noted the MA State 911 Dep.

State officials report that Comtech has applied a technical solution to “ensure that this does not happen again.”

“The Massachusetts State 911 Department is deeply committed to providing reliable, state-of-the-art 911 services to all Massachusetts residents and visitors in an emergency. The Department will take all necessary steps to prevent a future occurrence,” explained Frank Pozniak, the Department’s Executive Director.

Advertisement

We’re told while the 911 system was disrupted on Tuesday, there were no reports of any emergencies being impacted.

“The State 911 Department wishes to thank state and local emergency response agencies for their swift response to this matter.”

This marks the second time this year the 911 system has been disrupted in MA.

Back on April 12, several communities across the commonwealth, including Springfield, were impacted by an outage to the 911 system.

In that case, a network issue at one of the 911 Department’s data centers was determined to be the cause.

Advertisement

[READ MORE: Springfield’s 911 system back online following statewide issue]



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Missing infant from Massachusetts found in north Alabama

Published

on

Missing infant from Massachusetts found in north Alabama


ETOWAH COUNTY, Ala. (WIAT) — A 1-year-old child from Massachusetts was found in the custody of his mother in north Alabama following an alleged abduction case.

According to the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA), a law enforcement bulletin was issued on Friday by the Fall River Police Department concerning an endangered missing infant.

FRPD stated Genezza Packett, 22, visited her son, who lives in the custody of her aunt, on Thursday. Packett said she was taking her child to a nearby Dunkin’ Donuts but never returned.

Upon further investigation, Packett and the child were believed to be traveling south by car towards Mississippi. Relevant information was relayed to troopers with ALEA’s Highway Patrol Division.

Advertisement

At around 10:15 a.m. Wednesday, ALEA troopers located the vehicle on Interstate 59 in Etowah County near Attalla. A traffic stop was conducted a traffic stop and the child was recovered safely. Packett faces pending criminal charges by FRPD in Massachusetts.

“I commend the exceptional collaboration and communication of the Intelligence Analysts within our Fusion Center and our Troopers, along with our counterparts in other states, for their instrumental actions in the safe recovery of a missing 1-year-old child,” ALEA Secretary Hal Taylor stated in a press release. “Their dedication to duty and quick thinking resulted in the child’s safe recovery which exemplifies the true spirit of law enforcement and demonstrates the necessity of sharing intelligence with both local and state law enforcement partners.”

No further information is available as the investigation is ongoing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts jurors weigh evidence in a murder trial that challenged police integrity

Published

on

Massachusetts jurors weigh evidence in a murder trial that challenged police integrity


DEDHAM, Mass. — In the heat of early summer, a Massachusetts jury is deciding whether a woman murdered her boyfriend on a snowy winter night, or was framed in a conspiracy concocted by corrupt police involved in the killing of one of their own.

Karen Read is charged with second-degree murder in the January 2022 death of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. She’s accused of dropping him off at another officer’s house party after a night of drinking, and then ramming him with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm. But her defense team argues she was framed, and that the evidence shows O’Keefe was beaten up by someone else inside the house, bitten by a dog and left outside.

It wouldn’t be the first time a turbulent romantic relationship ended in death, and the partner is always a top suspect when an investigation begins. But it also has become easier to question police tactics and integrity after many high-profile cases of misconduct nationwide.

In their second day of deliberations Wednesday, jurors had to consider whether the sometimes tiny bits of evidence — pieces of a broken tail light, a single human hair — point to the girlfriend’s guilt, or a sprawling cover-up by law enforcement officers to plant evidence and protect their own, leaving a killer unpunished.

Advertisement
Officer Killed Girlfriend Trial

Karen Read, center, departs Norfolk Superior Court on Wednesday in Dedham, Mass. Read is on trial, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, in 2022. The jury began deliberations in the trial Tuesday. Steven Senne/Associated Press

What first might have seemed to be an open-and-shut case has drawn outsized attention, fueled by true crime fanatics, conspiracy theorists and Read’s pink-shirted supporters. In closing arguments Tuesday, defense attorney Alan Jackson rattled off the names of more than a half-dozen prosecution witnesses he said lied on the stand.

“You don’t have to wonder if they would lie to support their narrative, you only need to wonder how many times they did lie, over and over,” he said. “And even when they’re caught in their own lies, they won’t blink, they don’t sweat. They’ll just look you in the eye and demand, ’Pay no attention, you folks. Look the other way.’”

While Jackson argued the state’s entire case boiled down to those four words — Look the other way — Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally narrowed it down to three as he began his final statement: “I hit him.”

Lally reminded jurors that four witnesses reported hearing Read say those words when she returned to the house hours later and found O’Keefe unresponsive on the lawn, covered by snow. Lally also replayed a voicemail he said Read sent O’Keefe hours earlier. Read was “seething in rage,” he said.

Advertisement

“John, I (expletive) hate you!” she screamed. Phone records show she left the voicemail moments after her car recorded her driving in reverse at approximately 24 mph and then driving away, Lally said.

Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley College, faces up to life in prison if convicted of second-degree murder. She also is charged with manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving a scene of personal injury and death, which carry maximum penalties of 20 and 10 years, respectively.

The case has divided the community of Canton, the Boston suburb where O’Keefe was raising his niece and nephew after their parents’ deaths and where many of the witnesses and even investigators know one another. And it has attracted hordes of true crime buffs, including some Read supporters who’ve been accused of harassing witnesses.

Prosecutors spent most of the two-month trial methodically presenting evidence including pieces of plastic matching the broken taillight on Read’s SUV. Their witnesses also testified that even before Read returned to the scene and found O’Keefe, she called a friend and screamed “John’s dead!” and raised the possibility that she had struck him.

The defense sought to counter that with evidence that the homeowner’s sister-in-law searched online for how long it takes to die of hypothermia. Jackson said “there’s no innocent explanation” for doing so before the body was found, but the prosecution said she searched for it hours later, and at Read’s request.

Advertisement

The defense called only a handful of witnesses over two days but used cross-examinations to suggest countless conflicts of interest and staggeringly sloppy police work, from a scene left unsecured for hours to blood-stained snow scooped up with red plastic drinking cups and the use of a leaf blower to clear snow. Jackson listed more than two dozen suspicious behaviors, including deleted search histories, destroyed phones and manipulated videos.

“It’s not that it could happen, it’s that every single one of those things I just mentioned did happen,” he said.

Jackson said investigators focused on Read because she was a “convenient outsider” who saved them from having to consider other suspects, including the homeowner, Brian Albert, and other law enforcement officers at the house party. He also pointed to connections between Albert and the state trooper who led the investigation.

“Michael Proctor didn’t draw a thin blue line, he erected a tall blue wall,” Jackson said. “A wall that you can’t scale, a wall that Karen Read certainly couldn’t get over. A wall between us and them. A place you folk are not invited. ‘We protect our own.’”

A block from the court, dozens of Read supporters were glued to their phones awaiting a verdict. Their mood was jubilant, with supporters chanting, waving American flags and getting encouragement from passing motorists who honked their horns.

Advertisement

“She was unjustly charged and we are hoping she can go home today,” said Vicki Walkling, a supporter dressed in pink. “This case has enraptured everybody because it’s unfair. It could happen to any one of us. Any one of us could be framed for a murder we did not commit.”

 

Ramer reported from Concord, New Hampshire. David Sharp in Portland, Maine, also contributed to this report.

« Previous

Advertisement
Romance turned deadly or police frame job? Karen Read trial nears close



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

'Broken' documentary exposes flaws in Massachusetts' child welfare system

Published

on

'Broken' documentary exposes flaws in Massachusetts' child welfare system


Massachusetts Department of Children and Families has consistently ranked among the worst child welfare systems in the United States. The systemic failures are the focus of “Broken,” a documentary film by Bill Lichtenstein.

“Broken” delves into the systems designed to protect children, which too often fall short — sometimes with fatal consequences. In advance of a special concert to raise funds for the film, Lichtenstein joined Boston Public Radio on Tuesday to speak about the documentary.

“The project looks at the state of the Massachusetts child protection, foster care and family court systems set against child welfare nationally. It’s a story that I’ve wanted to do for some time,” Lichtenstein said.

His passion for child welfare issues dates back to his early career at ABC News.

Advertisement

“In the early ’80s, [I] spent nine months undercover in Oklahoma, where they had a system where children, if they couldn’t live at home for any reason, were put into these state institutions … and because of our reporting, completely overhauled the whole system,” Lichtenstein said.

He spoke of the alarming secrecy around child welfare proceedings in Massachusetts.

“You can’t get the names of the attorneys. You cannot get the judges [names]. The attorneys are forbidden to discuss it,” he said. “So that secrecy, I think, creates a system where there’s very little accountability.”

He spoke of a recent case to emphasize the system’s flaws. Harmony Montgomery, a 5-year-old girl, was killed by her father after the court gave him custody despite his violent criminal history.

“The question is, how could that have happened?” Lichtenstein said. “What went on in that custody hearing that the judge decided, despite all that, to give custody to that father? The answer is ‘We can’t tell you. It’s secret.’”

Advertisement

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has since agreed to hear arguments for access to the transcript of Harmony Montgomery’s custody hearing.

“There’ll be oral arguments in October,” Lichtenstein said. “We believe, for the first time, it will help open up the system.”

“Broken” is expected to feature at festivals early next year, followed by a limited theatrical release and a rollout through public television in 2025.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending