Massachusetts
Massachusetts should ban third-party electric suppliers – The Boston Globe
In communities across the Commonwealth, third-party electric suppliers have preyed on those they claim to be helping. That’s why we are working with State Representative Frank Moran and State Senator Brendan Crighton to pass legislation that would ban suppliers from signing up more residential customers. To protect Massachusetts families, the Legislature should pass it this session and send it to the governor’s desk.
Today, residents can choose between receiving electricity from their utility, their local municipal aggregation program (for the towns and cities that have them), or third-party electric suppliers. Of these options, only third-party suppliers have a track record of deploying aggressive, deceptive marketing tactics, making misleading promises about savings and clean energy, and enticing residents with lower initial rates that often skyrocket after a few months.
The reality is that, during the seven-year period between 2015 and 2022, third-party suppliers have never been consistently cheaper than a utility’s basic service. Variable rates can be several times higher than promotional prices at the beginning of the contract, and just one month of a high variable rate can be enough to send a financial shock through a household’s budget, canceling out any initial savings.
And the damaging impact of third-party suppliers’ price hikes are not evenly distributed.
Forty percent of residents in Dorchester and Mattapan, two Boston neighborhoods with a high proportion of low-income residents, are enrolled with one of these suppliers. Compared to the city’s Community Choice Electricity program, residents have paid suppliers as much as $300 extra per month. Boston is one of 176 municipal aggregation programs in Massachusetts in which cities and towns supply electricity on behalf of their residents. Customers enrolled in the city’s Community Choice Electricity program, which offers residents the option to purchase 100 percent renewable energy, saved more than $111 million in the first six months of this year compared to Eversource’s basic service.
Third-party suppliers also routinely claim that the energy they sell helps Massachusetts achieve its clean energy goals. But nothing could be further from the truth: Their supply is commonly backed by cheap out-of-state energy credits that do nothing to help the Commonwealth or region achieve its ambitious and critical greenhouse gas reduction goals.
To convince consumers to sign up for what will likely be a bad deal, third-party suppliers rely on predatory, high-pressure tactics that appear to target seniors, low-income communities, people of color, students, and non-English native speakers. The volume of complaints we receive from residents reporting false claims about savings, agents pretending to represent the local utility, or harassing customers with aggressive telemarketing speaks to the scale and severity of the problem. Ten years of rigorous enforcement by the Attorney General’s Office secured approximately $19 million from suppliers — but that’s still only a little more than 3 percent of the $525 million residents have lost since 2015. And suppliers often make investigations difficult, even declaring bankruptcy to avoid accountability.
Other states with deregulated electricity markets like New York, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania experience the same problems with third-party suppliers. They’ve added more oversight, but the problems have persisted. Regulation has not succeeded in changing the behavior of the industry. Many, if not most, third-party suppliers continue to aggressively resist transparency reforms and attempts by regulators to hold them accountable.
Years of data and the ongoing exploitation of residents make clear that this portion of the industry cannot be successfully transformed into a business that delivers net benefits rather than net harm to its customers. The only way to truly protect consumers is to ban third-party suppliers from the Massachusetts individual residential electric market.
The Legislature is considering our bill to prohibit third-party suppliers from entering into new contracts or renewing existing ones with individual residential electric customers. Passing this legislation will protect current third-party suppliers’ customers, ensure that no more residents fall victim to suppliers’ misleading tactics, and safeguard consumer choice while advancing our clean energy goals.
Former Governor Charlie Baker’s administration supported banning suppliers, and Governor Healey’s administration has supported the legislation as well. The solution is clear. The Legislature should send the governor a bill to end this industry once and for all.
Andrea Campbell is attorney general of Massachusetts. Michelle Wu is mayor of Boston.
Massachusetts
New Bedford MS-13 Member, Illegal Alien Pleads Guilty to Role in Brutal Murders In Massachusetts, Virginia
Frankli
Massachusetts
Police shoot and kill man armed with knife in Lexington, DA says
Police shot and killed a man who officials say rushed officers with a knife during a call in Lexington, Massachusetts, on Saturday.
Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan said the situation started around 1:40 p.m. when Lexington police received a 911 call from a resident of Mason Street reporting that his son had injured himself with a knife.
Officers from the Lexington Police Department and officers from the Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council (NEMLEC), who were already in town for Patriots’ Day events, responded to the call.
Police were able to escort two other residents out of the home, initially leaving a 26-year-old man inside. According to Ryan, while officers were setting up outside, the man ran out of the home and approached officers with a large kitchen knife.
She added that police tried twice to use non-lethal force, but it was not effective in stopping him. The man was shot by a Wilmington police officer who is a member of NEMLEC. The man was pronounced dead on scene and the officer who fired that shot was taken to a local hospital as a precaution.
The man’s name has not been released.
Ryan said typically in a call like this where someone was described as harming themselves, officers would first try to separate anyone else to keep them out of danger, which was done, and then standard practice would be to try to wait outside.
“It would be their practice to just wait for the person to come out. In the terrible circumstances of today, he suddenly rushed the officers, still clutching the knife,” Ryan said.
The investigation is still in the preliminary stages and more information is expected in time. Ryan said her office will request a formal inquest from the court to review whether any criminal conduct has occurred, which is the standard process.
This happened around the same time as the annual Patriots’ Day Parade, and just hours after a reenactment of the Battle of Lexington, which drew large crowds to town.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Massachusetts
‘An impossible choice’: With little federal help to combat rising costs, Head Start looks to Massachusetts for more help – The Boston Globe
In Massachusetts, roughly 1,300 slots for children across Head Start’s 28 agencies have been eliminated in the last three years because federal funding has plateaued over that time, while the cost of running the program continues to rise, according to the Massachusetts Head Start Association. Nationally, Head Start enrollment dropped from 1.1 million kids in 2013 to around 785,000 in 2022, according to research by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
“If they didn’t get into a Head Start program, they would be sitting at home,” said Brittany Acosta, a Head Start parent in Dorchester.
It’s teachers are drastically underpaid, and there’s a serious need for a rainy day-type fund should the federal government shut down again, the association says. As they’ve done in years past, state lawmakers have offered to provide financial relief, but the Massachusetts Head Start Association’s request for 3 percent above the amount it received last year, an additional $4.6 million to help its staff keep up with the state’s rising cost of living, so far has not been allocated.

Last year, President Trump’s leaked budget proposal revealed he considered eliminating Head Start entirely. Then, in the summer, he cut off Head Start enrollment for immigrants without legal status. And during the fall’s government shutdown, four Head Start centers in Massachusetts closed because they couldn’t access their funding.
Trump’s latest budget proposal shows a fourth year without increasing funding for the program, which was established in the mid-1960s.
Michelle Haimowitz, executive director of the Massachusetts Head Start Association, said the program doesn’t want to eliminate more child slots than it already has, but paying teachers a competitive salary is equally important in order to keep them from leaving for higher paying jobs. Head Start teachers make under $50,000 annually compared to over $85,000 for the average Massachusetts kindergarten teacher.
“It’s an impossible choice,” Haimowitz said. “When we reduce the size of our programs, we’re not reducing the size of the need.”

Massachusetts is one of few states that supplements federal funding for Head Start, and last year it increased the program’s state grant from $5 million to $20 million, adding to the $189 million in federal aid it receives in this state.
“We can’t run a program without giving staff a raise for three years,” Haimowitz said. “Our next fight now is not just for survival, but it’s for thriving and growth.”
The Massachusetts House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday released its budget, which doesn’t grant Head Start’s request of a 3 percent boost. But state Representative Christopher Worrell filed an amendment for additional funding. Worrell, whose district covers parts of Dorchester and Roxbury, said he loves Head Start’s embrace of culture, recalling one visit to a center where he could smell staff cooking stew chicken, a traditional Caribbean dish.
“I’ve been to dozens of schools throughout the district, and you don’t get that home-cooked meal,” Worrell said. “[The state is] stepping up and doing the best we can with what we have.”


At the Action for Boston Community Development’s Head Start and Early Head Start center in Dorchester, the children of Classroom 7 arrived one Monday morning and dove into bins of magnetic tiles before their teachers, Paola Polanco and Leolina Rasundar Chinnappa, served breakfast. Acosta dropped off her 4-year-old daughter, Violeta, before reporting to her teaching position at the center, where several other Head Start parents also work.
“It’s important for all Head Start parents to have the opportunity to give their child an experience in a learning environment before they actually start kindergarten,” Acosta said.
Beyond providing early education and care to children of low-income families, from birth to age 5, the program helps them access other resources, including mental health services, SNAP benefits, homelessness assistance, and employment opportunities.
It also serves as daycare for parents who might not be able to afford it, while they’re at work.
Research has shown the importance of preschool in a child’s development with one 2023 study, focused on Boston public preschools, finding that it improves student behavior and increases the likelihood of high school graduation and college enrollment.

For Rickencia Clerveaux and Christopher Mclean, the Dorchester Head Start center is the only place they feel comfortable sending their 3-year-old son, Shontz, who is on the autism spectrum. Shontz’s stimming — repetitive movements that stimulate the senses — has reduced, and his speech has improved since he joined the center in 2024, Clerveaux said.

His parents say he’s also come out of his shell. Mclean now drops his son off and gets a simple “bye” as Shontz joins his classmates, he said.
He and Clerveaux said they appreciate the specialized attention Shontz can receive from teachers, such as when staff identified that Shontz might have hearing issues. His parents were able to follow up with their doctor and get Shontz to have surgery to improve his hearing.
“It’s a safe net for parents,” Clerveaux said. “There’s so many ways that him being here helps him grow better.”
Without Head Start, Clerveaux said a lot of pressure would be put on parents to find care for their children, “knowing that they’re already struggling or not getting the ends to meet.”
“That’s a burden for everybody in the community,” she said. “If there’s no funding, there’s no daycare and parents cannot work.”

Lauren Albano can be reached at lauren.albano@globe.com. Follow her on X @LaurenAlbano_.
-
Milwaukee, WI5 minutes ago
One person injured following early Sunday morning shooting in Milwaukee
-
Atlanta, GA11 minutes agoPlay Fair ATL kicks off ‘The People’s Cup’ in Candler Park
-
Minneapolis, MN17 minutes agoBetween Minneapolis And Lake Superior Is The ‘Agate Capital Of The World’ With Cozy Charm And A State Park – Islands
-
Indianapolis, IN23 minutes ago1 dead after shooting on Indy’s near south side
-
Pittsburg, PA29 minutes agoGame #22: Tampa Bay Rays vs. Pittsburgh Pirates
-
Augusta, GA35 minutes agoWhat is the cheapest city in Georgia to live with a roomate?
-
Washington, D.C41 minutes ago12th Honor Flight Tallahassee returns home from successful trip to Washington D.C.
-
Cleveland, OH47 minutes agoSupercross: Results From Cleveland, OH