Maine
Trump appeals Maine ruling barring him from ballot under insurrection clause
Former US president Donald Trump has appealed a ruling by Maine’s secretary of state barring him from the state’s 2024 ballot over his role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.
Key points:
- Donald Trump’s lawyers argue his removal from the Maine ballot was “due to her bias”
- He is also expected to appeal a similar decision in Colorado
- Mr Trump contends he incited no riot, never swore to “support” the constitution and was not a government officer
On Tuesday, he contended she had no authority, that he incited no riot, never swore to “support” the constitution and was not a government officer as stipulated in the constitutional amendment she cited.
Mr Trump appealed the Maine decision by Democrat Shenna Bellows, who became the first secretary of state in history to bar someone from running for the presidency under the rarely used Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits those who “engaged in insurrection” from holding office.
Mr Trump’s appeal on Tuesday asks that Ms Bellows be required to place him on the March 5 primary ballot and argues that she abused her discretion and relied on “untrustworthy evidence”.
“The secretary should have recused herself due to her bias against President Trump, as demonstrated by a documented history of prior statements prejudging the issue presented,” Mr Trump’s lawyers wrote.
Ms Bellows reiterated to The Associated Press on Tuesday that her ruling was on pause pending the outcome of the appeal, which had been expected.
“This is part of the process. I have confidence in my decision and confidence in the rule of law,” she said.
“This is Maine’s process and it’s really important that first and foremost every single one of us who serves in government uphold the Constitution and the laws of the state.”
Colorado appeal expected
Mr Trump is expected to appeal a similar ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court directly to the US Supreme Court, which has never issued a decision on Section 3.
The Colorado court’s 4-3 ruling that it applied to Mr Trump was the first time in history the provision was used to bar a presidential contender from the ballot.
Mr Trump’s critics have filed dozens of lawsuits seeking to disqualify him in multiple states.
None succeeded until a slim majority of Colorado’s seven justices — all of whom were appointed by Democratic governors — ruled against Mr Trump.
A week after Colorado’s ruling, Ms Bellows issued her own. Critics warned it was even more perilous because it could pave the way for partisan election officials to simply disqualify candidates they oppose.
Ms Bellows, a former head of Maine’s branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, has previously criticised Mr Trump and his behaviour on January 6.
History of Section 3
The constitution’s Section 3 has been barely used since the years after the Civil War, when it kept defeated Confederates from returning to their former government positions.
The two-sentence clause says that anyone who swore an oath to “support” the constitution and then engaged in insurrection cannot hold office unless a two-thirds vote of Congress allows it.
Mr Trump’s lawyers argue the provision isn’t intended to apply to the president, contending that the oath for the top office in the land isn’t to “support” the constitution but instead to “preserve, protect and defend” it.
They also argue that the presidency isn’t explicitly mentioned in the amendment, only any “officer of the United States”.
Mr Trump made the opposite argument defending against his prosecution for falsifying business records by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, contending the case should move to federal court because the president is “an officer of the United States”.
The prosecutors argued that language only applies to presidential appointees — Mr Trump’s position in Maine.
The contention that Section 3 doesn’t apply to the president drew a scathing response from the Colorado Supreme Court last month.
“President Trump asks us to hold that Section 3 disqualifies every oath breaking insurrectionist except the most powerful one and that it bars oath breakers from virtually every office, both state and federal, except the highest one in the land,” the court’s majority opinion said.
“Both results are inconsistent with the plain language and history of Section 3.”
Section 3 recently returned to use. In 2022, a judge used it to remove a rural New Mexico county commissioner from office after he was convicted of a misdemeanour for entering the US Capitol on January 6.
Liberal groups sued to block Republican Representatives Madison Cawthorn and Marjorie Taylor Greene from running for re-election because of their roles on that day. Mr Cawthorn’s case became moot when he lost his primary in 2022, and a judge ruled to keep Ms Greene on the ballot.
Some conservatives warn that, if Mr Trump is removed, political groups will routinely use Section 3 against opponents in unexpected ways.
Mr Trump and his allies have attacked the cases against him as “anti-democratic” and sought to tie them to President Joe Biden because the Colorado case and some others are funded by liberal groups who share prominent donors with the Democratic president. But Mr Biden’s administration has noted that the president has no role in the litigation.
Those who support using the provision against Mr Trump counter that the January 6 attack was unprecedented in American history and that there will be few cases so ripe for Section 3.
If the high court lets Mr Trump stay on the ballot, they’ve contended, it will be another example of the former president bending the legal system to excuse his extreme behaviour.
AP
Maine
Maine inmate arrested after walking off Thomaston jobsite, corrections officers say
THOMASTON, Maine (WGME) — A Maine inmate is behind bars after corrections officers say he walked off a jobsite nearly a week ago.
45-year-old Brian Day was arrested.
He was being held at Bolduc Correctional Facility before he left a jobsite in Thomaston on Monday.
45-year-old Candice Fisher was also arrested.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
She was wanted by the Rochester, New Hampshire Police Department.
Maine
Tuition-free degrees are a boon for Maine | Opinion
John Baldacci served as Maine’s governor from 2003 to 2011. He led the effort to establish the state’s community college system in 2003. John McKernan was Maine’s 71st governor from 1987 to 1995. He has served as chair of The Foundation for Maine’s Community Colleges since its inception in 2010.
Making the Maine Free College Scholarship permanent for the high school graduates of the Class of 2026 and beyond delivers on a promise the two of us made decades ago — and maintained since — to keep a community college education affordable to as many Mainers as possible.
Now Gov. Janet Mills is working to secure that same promise for future generations, by making permanent the Maine Free College Scholarship. Her plan invests $10 million in state funds annually to guarantee recent high school graduates in Maine a tuition-free community college education. It is a sound and profound decision.
If passed by legislators in Augusta, the investment will pay off for not just for students and their families, but for the state’s coffers in the form of more tax revenue, for local businesses in the form of more skilled labor available and for communities that will have more vibrant, engaged and employed residents.
Already, more than 23,000 Maine Free College Scholarship-eligible students have participated since the last-dollar scholarship program began in 2022.
The two of us have worked tirelessly, and across party lines, over the past quarter century to evolve the community colleges. As public leaders, we are partners in helping the state’s public two-year colleges find and secure the resources and tools they need to fulfill their state-ordered mandate of creating the educated, skilled and adaptable workforce Maine needs to fill jobs in Maine’s economy.
That was the vision when Gov. Baldacci led the effort to evolve what were then vocational technical colleges into a true community college system that expanded its academic offerings and offered an affordable pathway to four-year colleges.
At the same time, Gov. McKernan started his tenure as chairman of The Foundation for Maine’s Community Colleges, leading fundraising and making connections to strengthen the colleges. To date, the Foundation has raised over $147 million in support of the colleges’ programs, infrastructure, and scholarships — and the Maine Free College Scholarship will allow those philanthropic and grant dollars to stretch even further.
As a state, we committed long ago to making local, affordable access to quality postsecondary education a priority in Maine. Despite having the lowest tuition in New England, affordability remains one of the greatest barriers to higher education for Mainers. Making the Maine Free College Scholarship permanent is the logical, practical and necessary next step to true affordability.
We now applaud and welcome Gov. Mills into our mutual efforts to keep growing and strengthening Maine’s community colleges and making sure they remain affordable and accessible to the largest number of Mainers possible.
We urge today’s lawmakers to support this economic engine for Maine, giving young people the opportunity to pursue a tuition-free degree — while knowing their state believes in them and their potential.
Maine
Who visited Maine in 2025, and how much did they spend?
Fewer visitors came to Maine last year, but those who did spent more than $9 billion in the state.
The Maine Office of Tourism reported there were 14.15 million visitors in 2025, down 4.4% from the year before. Visitors last year spent $9.37 billion, up 1.4% from 2024, according to the agency’s annual report. That number is not adjusted for inflation, Deputy Director Hannah Collins said.
“While overall visitor counts declined, those who did travel tended to stay slightly longer, travel in larger parties, and demonstrate strong spending patterns,” the report said. “This dynamic contributed to total direct spending growth despite fewer arrivals.”
The state conducted more than 4,600 interviews online and in person with visitors at local attractions, parks, hotels, visitor centers, service plazas, shops and other destinations between December 2024 and November 2025 to reach its findings.
So who came to Maine, and where did they go?
Here are four takeaways from the report.
MANY VISITORS WERE ALREADY HERE
Most people drove from the East Coast, although more flew in 2025 than in 2024. Nearly 20% of visitors came by plane, mostly to the Portland International Jetport or Boston Logan International Airport. That percentage has been steadily increasing in the years since the COVID-19 pandemic, the report says. In 2022, just 13% flew.
The state found that more than 80% of visitors to Maine last year came from 16 U.S. states and Canadian provinces. According to the report, 15% of visitors came from Massachusetts. New York and New Hampshire were also high on the list.
Which was the top state? Maine.
Nearly 20% of people, or 2.9 million, counted as visitors last year were residents exploring the state. That’s more than double the number of people who live in Maine because the report counts single trips, not unique visitors.
MANY WERE RETURN VISITORS
Nearly 40% of visitors had been to Maine more than 10 times, the tourism office said. Many return to the same region on every trip. The data shows that 18% of visitors were traveling in Maine for the first time last year. An overwhelming majority — 95% — said they definitely or probably would return for another vacation.
THERE WERE FEWER CANADIAN VISITORS
A sign on a motel in Old Orchard Beach welcomes tourists back in both English and French in February 2025. The town hosts a large number of Canadian tourists each summer. (Gregory Rec/Staff Photographer)International travelers account for a small percentage of Maine’s overall tourism.
Less than 5% of visitors came from other countries in 2025, according to the report. Most — 3.6% — came from Canada. That number is down from 2024, a drop attributable to political tensions and economic pressures. In 2024, 5.4% of visitors came from Canada.
A GREATER PERCENTAGE WENT INLAND
Popular regions to visit last year included Greater Portland, the Midcoast, the beaches and islands. More than a quarter visited Down East Maine, including Acadia National Park.
Still, inland regions saw a small increase in their share of visitors, the report shows.
In summer 2024, 3% of the state’s visitors went to Aroostook County, 9% went to the Kennebec Valley and 16% went to the lakes and mountains. Last summer, 7% went to Aroostook County, 12% went to the Kennebec Valley and 20% visited the lakes and mountains.
Across the state, most people said they came to Maine to relax and unwind, the report says. The most popular activities included enjoying ocean views, eating lobster and other seafood, sightseeing, visiting local breweries, driving for pleasure and hiking.
-
New York14 minutes agoRail tickets to New Jersey World Cup matches will be $105, not $150.
-
Detroit, MI44 minutes agoDetroit Tigers lose fifth straight, Kerry Carpenter injured
-
San Francisco, CA56 minutes agoFallen tree downs powerlines in SF, delays Muni line
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoFC Dallas vs Real Salt Lake: Lineup notes 📝
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoYour 2026 Miami Dolphins Draft Picks Expectations
-
Boston, MA1 hour ago
Texas A&M SS Boston Kellner suffers orbital bone fracture
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoPedestrian fatally hit by Frontier airplane departing Denver for Los Angeles, flight canceled after
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoSeattle beer garden employee found fatally shot inside business