Connect with us

Maine

The price of picking blueberries in rural Maine

Published

on

The price of picking blueberries in rural Maine


This story was originally published by Ambrook Research, which publishes original research and stories on issues facing modern agriculture. Its stories are editorially independent but backed by Ambrook, a company making sustainability profitable in natural resource industries, starting by providing back-office financial tools for farmers.

Milbridge is pretty quiet for a lot of the year. A handful of businesses dot the downtown, which runs for less than half a mile along Route 1 as the road winds its way toward the Canadian border.

With fewer than 1,400 residents, Milbridge doubles its size in the late summer and then again in the fall — first for blueberry season and then for wreath processing in October. Another key industry is the nearly year-round processing of sea cucumbers, which can help make stocks for stews.

When Juana Rodriguez-Vazquez got here with her family in 1998, she was in elementary school — one of only about 150 kids her age in Milbridge at the time — but she’d already seen much of the U.S. Orange season in Florida, apple harvest in Michigan, blueberry picking in Maine.

The farms around Milbridge are dependent on people like the Rodriguez-Vazquez family because there aren’t enough residents to support the workload.

Advertisement

“When I was a kid, when we were traveling, I remember being out there in the fields with apples and oranges and green beans,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “A lot of the housing for employees, their housing is pretty much out in the fields.”

This October, about 1,000 workers arrived in the Millbridge area for the wreath season, just as the state’s Department of Labor (DOL) was hosting hearings and discussions on whether farmworkers should be included in the state’s minimum wage law.

They have long been excluded from the state’s regulations for minimum wage, an issue that lawmakers sought to address by passing a law that would have raised the base pay from the federal rate of $7.25 per hour to $13.80 per hour.

But although the law passed, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills vetoed it earlier this summer, opting instead to write an executive order that would create a committee to make recommendations about how to compromise on the issue by increasing the minimum wage while maintaining industry desires, like a potential youth exception.

It’s the second time Mills has vetoed a bill that would have added minimum wage protections for farmworkers.

Advertisement

But advocates for workers argue the process is flawed from the start, failing to provide legal protections for workers that speak out — favoring employers, who have freedom to speak publicly about their needs and who have the legal ability to fire workers who advocate for higher wages.

As a teenager, Rodriguez-Vazquez worked during each season that came up. Raking blueberries, making wreaths for a company that at the time supplied L.L. Bean, and processing sea cucumbers.

“They’re still getting the same pay that I got when I was 15,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said of the wreath workers working in Washington County.

She doesn’t work in the fields anymore. Since 2012, she’s been working with the Milbridge-based nonprofit Mano en Mano, which provides basic services to the local population of migrant farmworkers — this past year she was named executive director.

In the past few months, she said, the state government has put farmworkers in a position where they can’t speak up.

Advertisement

“I think we all know there are some power dynamics played by employers in terms of their ability to speak up, and if they do, there is retaliation in terms of loss of employment,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “Farmworkers haven’t had the ability to do that in a way that would feel good for them.”

Blueberry barrens near Main Street in Columbia Falls. Photo by Kate Cough.

The issue of minimum wage exemptions for farmworkers certainly isn’t unique to Maine. At the federal level, farms have to pay the $7.25 per hour minimum wage only if they employ “500 man-days” within a three-month period, and family members are exempt from minimum wage — a major benefit for Maine farmers, given that many are family owned and operated.

According to the National Agricultural Law Center (NALC), 22 U.S. states don’t mandate a minimum wage higher than the federal rate. Seven of those are states that actually have passed higher minimum wage laws for the state in general, but exempt agricultural workers. Massachusetts splits the difference: It generally requires employers to pay workers $14.25 per hour, but farmworkers only get $8.00.

In New York, the question of wages has pitted workers against employers in a battle that has played out in both state budget proposals and federal court rooms. In Washington and Oregon, workers won the right to overtime — in Washington, they sued the state to achieve this — and were met with strong opposition from industry groups. And at the federal level, advocacy groups like Farmworker Justice want to end the exemption that keeps farm laborers from getting minimum wage nationally.

In Maine, farmworkers find the starkest wage contrast in the nation, according to NALC’s data. The minimum wage was just increased to $15.00 per hour this summer, but farmworkers have once again been excluded. Despite the exemption, workers are still coming to Maine.

Advertisement

“They’re coming here and they’re able to make more than back home most of the time,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “They’re grateful and they don’t want to mess up anything. That can be hard as an advocate and not have a lot of say because we follow the lead of the community.”

Thom Harnett worked with migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the 1980s as a lawyer with United Farm Workers, then later pivoted to local and state politics. He was serving in Maine’s House of Representatives in 2019 when he initially introduced two bills to deal with this problem.

The first would have included agriculture in the state minimum wage and added overtime protection. The second would have allowed workers to participate in collective bargaining without fear of reprisal.

On his first try, the bills didn’t even reach a vote. It was only after several key worker protections were removed, he said, that the bills were able to be passed after being reintroduced early this year.

“The minimum wage bill was continually amended by us giving up issues like overtime,” Harnett said. “It would also have made available to farmworkers an unpaid 30-minute rest period every six hours, which is what all employees in the state of Maine get … and it would have limited overtime to no more than 80 hours of mandatory overtime in a two-week period, meaning that you could not force people to work more than 160 hours in a two-week period.”

Advertisement

The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (MOFGA) put out a statement after Mills’ summer veto saying they were “astounded” at her decision and casting doubt on her desire to find a compromise, noting that her opposition came from the amendments to the bill and not the plan to increase the minimum wage itself.

“It is impossible to accept this explanation of her action,” said MOFGA executive director Heather Spalding. “It is disingenuous for her to say that she supports minimum wage for farmworkers when she won’t even allow a stripped-down bill with many exemptions for agricultural employers to pass into law.”

The DOL declined several requests for an interview on the topic, and the governor’s spokesperson did not respond to an interview request. The state is in the middle of hearing input in its committee about how to resolve the issue. They are hearing from farmers, the AFL-CIO, MOFGA, and lobbyists from associations that represent every major crop in the state.

But to Rodriguez-Vazquez, there is a fundamental flaw in the approach: Without protections for workers themselves, they can’t actually speak about their own experience.

“I think it’s hard when there’s a system where you see the resources, the power, the protection, the privilege that farm owners, farm employers have over their employees,” she said. “They’re working for an employer that basically has a lot of power over their hours, their housing, their wage, everything … Farmers, they can speak up, they have nothing to lose in terms of being able to speak up.”

Advertisement

The Maine AFL-CIO has been participating in the DOL’s committee hearings, and executive director Matt Schlobohm said he felt the executive order Mills issued indicated a desire to include farmworkers in the state minimum wage.

That said, the issues he’s noticed in hearings so far is the way farms and lobbyist groups are concerned about specific circumstances, like wanting to carve out an exception for youth workers. He said farmers and agricultural lobbyists have also voiced a desire to ensure that the minimum wage protection isn’t included in the same section of state law that covers minimum wage generally.

blueberries growing in the wild
Courtesy: University of Maine Extension

Lobbying groups have routinely pointed to pressure from clients like grocery stores as the price fixers in agriculture, saying that meeting the minimum wage will drive farms out of business because they can’t raise the prices supermarkets and restaurants will pay.

The Maine Farm Bureau, one of the groups that opposed the bill before it was vetoed, has used the committee process to advocate for carve-outs rather than fully opposing a minimum wage increase.

Julie Ann Smith, the bureau’s director, told the Maine Morning Star in September that her group supported the effort in general but wanted there to be a smaller minimum wage for youth workers and protection for piece-rate systems where they exist. She also opposed overtime protections for workers.

To Schlobohm, the fundamental economics of agriculture — particularly in a state like Maine with shorter harvest seasons — can exacerbate tensions for workers.

Advertisement

“It in part translates into certain farmers getting pitted against farmworkers that muddies the more systemic issues: that our model of food economics are just incredibly brutal to farmworkers and small farms alike,” he said. “There are times where I’m frustrated, at times I don’t feel like I have an answer. Obviously we should have a minimum wage, but how can we have a healthy, sustainable food system? Because that’s obviously not what we have now.”

Beyond the industry perspective being heard in Augusta, Maine’s deeply mixed political environment can also prove complicated.

Jeff Spinney owns the small family-run Albee Farm in Alna that his wife has managed since they bought it several years ago. He primarily has family work on the property to cultivate fruits and veggies, which they sell locally, but regularly brings in outside employees when there is a larger project.

“You cannot artificially — from the government — say that you have to pay a certain rate for a certain thing that just isn’t worth it,” Spinney said, arguing the market for farm labor couldn’t sustain $15 per hour. In his view, he said, farmworkers simply aren’t worth that amount of money.

“You can make all the compelling, feel-good arguments you want, but certain things are just worth certain amounts. You can’t force it.”

Advertisement

He called the problem one of entitlement and argued that it was less about the economics of agriculture and said it was employees “own fault” if they were stuck in a job that didn’t pay well.

“Those workers need to figure out if it’s sustainable to them,” he said. “If it’s not sustainable to them, then quite frankly they shouldn’t do it, they should go do something else.”

Despite the challenges of operating on tight margins, not all Maine farmers share Spinney’s view. MOGFA and other Maine farming groups have come out in support of the wage increase, while farmer Glenn Shourds of Bowdoinham told a local CBS affiliate, “If they’re going to work as hard as they do, they deserve equal pay.”

“They’ve never really been treated as employees. They’ve been a class of their own. And that’s not fair,” he continued.

The final committee hearing took place in Augusta on December 11, and the DOL will put together a report with suggestions.

Advertisement

Schlobohm said he thinks the 2024 legislative session will end with farmworkers included in the minimum wage, even if other worker protections are still missing. Both Schlobohm and Rodriguez-Vazquez noted the state hadn’t provided a way for farmworkers to speak in support of the minimum wage without fear or retaliation.

Rodriguez-Vazquez, in reflecting on her own journey from working on farms to educating the children of migrant workers — and now advocating for them formally — said she still fears reprisal when she speaks out due to the mentality that protection for workers is bad for business.

“I think for me it’s hard, my family is a business-owning family in the town of Milbridge,” she said. “For me to speak up, there is retaliation even to me and my family. There are employers that are against this … Anything that’s out there that I’ve said can come back to hurt my family and I don’t want to do that.”





Source link

Advertisement

Maine

As Democrats pick up the pieces after Graham Platner, many wonder: how did this happen?

Published

on

As Democrats pick up the pieces after Graham Platner, many wonder: how did this happen?


Almost exactly one year ago, Graham Platner, who has no political experience, was cherry-picked by out-of-state political activists.

According to a person familiar with the campaign, Daniel Moraff and Leanne Fan, who have made a name for themselves by recruiting populist candidates across the country, traveled to Maine and rented a house near Platner’s home in Sullivan to convince him to run for the US Senate. Throughout the process, Moraff became Platner’s “right-hand man”, the person described, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of backlash.

But homing in on Platner as a newcomer to oust long-serving Republican Susan Collins came at a cost. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Moraff asked for an expedited, cheaper background check to be completed in a matter of days. The firm Moraff and his team contracted with also did not do a candidate interview or questionnaire, per the Journal’s report.

Volunteer Rebecca Hartwell before a town hall in Ogunquit, Maine, on 22 October 2025. Photograph: Sophie Park/Getty Images

The fallout of those decisions happened on a colossal scale. In a midterm year with record spending across the country, the Democratic party had come to pin its hopes on Platner to help clinch Senate control with his meteoric campaign and ability to unite independent and progressive voters alike with a clear, anti-establishment message.

Advertisement

Controversies ensued, bringing with them straight-to-camera videos of Platner explaining and denying various scandals. Finally, an allegation that broke the dam this week: a woman he dated accusing him of sexual assault, of drunkenly forcing her to have sex with him after coming to her house uninvited. Asked in an interview on CNN whether Platner raped her, the woman, Jenny Racicot, replied: “By definition, yes, absolutely.”

His support collapsed. Platner waited days as calls grew for him to withdraw. Then on Wednesday, he released an 11-minute video announcing the end of his campaign that left Maine voters scrambling and betrayed, and the country wondering: how did this happen?

A primary election night watch party after Platner won the Democratic nomination, on 9 June in Blue Hill, Maine. Photograph: Robert F Bukaty/AP

“It feels like some of the first rules of politics may have been broken here,” said Andrew Feldman, a national progressive strategist. “We were seeing rookie mistake after rookie mistake, and now we find ourselves in this situation.”

David Farmer, a Democratic strategist based in Maine, said the vetting process for Platner was tantamount to “malpractice”.

“I’ve had to have these conversations with candidates in the past – where you sit down and you ask them really tough questions,” Farmer said. “What drugs have you used? Have you ever had an affair? You ever cheated on your wife? You ever cheated on anybody? It’s really uncomfortable and probing, and a miserable event for everybody involved.”

Advertisement

The person familiar with the campaign said that Moraff and Fan “fell in love with an aesthetic without knowing the state” that ultimately did a “disservice” to Maine’s working-class voters.

Platner’s campaign did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment on the methods used to check the former nominee’s background.

A rising star and an early redemption arc

Platner’s early campaign days – after he announced his run in August of last year – saw a rare rush of grassroots excitement as he criss-crossed the state for town halls, with backing from Bernie Sanders and an ad produced by Zohran Mamdani’s 27-year-old media strategist, Morris Katz.

An oyster farmer and marines veteran, Platner issued plain-spoken warnings that Maine’s working class had been hollowed out – healthcare was unaffordable, young people couldn’t buy homes – and said he’d survived only because of the veterans’ benefits he receives from being “blown up” too many times in combat. His searing indictment of the political establishment matched the anti-Washington mood and anger many Democrats felt toward their party’s leaders.

“His tone, his look, his voice, his message captured a frustration with Washington, a frustration with economic injustice,” Farmer noted.

Advertisement
Bernie Sanders and Graham Platner in Orono, Maine, on 24 May. Photograph: Robert F Bukaty/AP

Democratic leaders had someone else in mind: the 78-year-old term‑limited governor Janet Mills. But Mills hadn’t yet announced her run. In the meantime, 41-year-old Platner positioned himself as the gruff local businessman hardened by tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, pushing for generational change. Once Mills entered, he quickly framed her as emblematic of the status quo, arguing that a Chuck Schumer‑backed candidate would mirror Collins‑style “fake moderation”.

The Democratic establishment was skeptical of Platner from the outset, concerned that he brought too much baggage to the race against a seasoned incumbent. But progressives say the party is also to blame for pushing Mills as an alternative. If she had been elected, Mills would have been the oldest freshman in Senate history.

Platner brushed off his earlier scandals: Reddit posts from 2013 to 2021 where – among other things – he called white rural Americans “stupid” and “racist”, questioned why “Black people didn’t tip” and said sexual‑assault survivors should “take some responsibility … and not get so fucked up”. While apologetic, he characterized the posts as side-effects of severe PTSD and disillusionment from combat.

He tried to get ahead of more controversy by revealing a covered-up skull-and-crossbones tattoo that resembled a Totenkopf, a symbol known for its use by the Nazi SS. Platner said it came from a night drinking with military buddies in Croatia 18 years earlier. “I’m not a secret Nazi,” he told the Pod Saves America hosts.

In this photo provided by WGME, Platner points to a cover-up tattoo that had previously been an image recognized as a Nazi symbol, in Portland, Maine, on 22 October. Photograph: AP

Platner and his allies in Congress argued the uproar was overblown. At the time, Platner told the Guardian that Mainers related to his struggle and didn’t see the posts or tattoo as disqualifying. Many voters also said they could look past his mistakes and viewed his redemption arc as genuine. “If what the voters wanted were people who were grown in vats and had never done or said anything that they might regret their entire lives, we’d have a very different country,” Moraff told the Journal in May.

Advertisement

But inside his campaign, cracks had started to appear. In October, Platner’s political director, Genevieve McDonald, and his finance director both left his team. The latter, Ronald Holmes III, said his “professional standards” no longer “fully aligned with those of the campaign”. McDonald said Platner’s failure to fully disclose the extent of his Reddit posts led to her departure. She went on to question whether Platner really didn’t know the meaning of his tattoo.

Bracing for the worst

There was lingering concern among Maine locals and political operatives that more would come out about Platner’s past. One voter at a town hall in April asked him – point‑blank – if there were examples of sexual misconduct in past relationships that could emerge and endanger his chances. Another said that she was extremely wary about how untested Platner was.

Ultimately, his star continued to outshine the septuagenarian governor’s lackluster campaign. Mills, citing dwindling financial resources, eventually dropped out of the race, giving Platner a glidepath to the nomination.

And then – 10 days before the Democratic primary – reports revealed that Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, had confided in McDonald about sexually explicit messages he’d sent outside their marriage, disclosures she made in an attempt to get ahead of any opposition research.

Platner with his wife, Amy Gertner, during a primary election night watch party, on 9 June in Blue Hill, Maine. Photograph: Robert F Bukaty/AP

In extraordinary fashion, Platner was summoned to Washington DC to answer lawmakers’ questions about the latest controversy. Shortly after the meeting, the New York Times reported that previous partners described “unsettling” and “toxic” behavior. One of the women, Lyndsey Fifield, a conservative operative who dated Platner from 2013 to 2015, alleged he frequently grabbed her by the shoulders, once yanked her out of a taxi by her wrist, and during one argument twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom and held the door shut until she was “calm”. Fifield also cast doubt on Platner’s claim that he was unaware that his tattoo was a Nazi symbol, telling the Times that he referred to it as “my Totenkopf”.

Advertisement

Platner rejected Fifield’s claims and branded them as “politically motivated”.

While some voters were deterred, Platner still ended up clinching more than 70% of the vote in the primary. National Democrats, however, were left to grapple with a catch‑22: what would be an insurmountable scandal? And would it be worse than if Collins, who had helped overturn Roe v Wade and backed several key Trump policies, was re‑elected to a sixth term?

“It’s like a frog being in a pot of boiling water. If you raise the temperature slowly, you don’t know it’s boiling until it’s too late,” said Farmer.

The final straw

When Politico published their story on Monday, outlining Jenny Racicot’s claims that Platner raped her nearly five years ago, the condemnation came hard and fast. Endorsements evaporated and calls for Platner to withdraw were immediate. As he denied the allegations in a lo-fi self tape, it became clear this would be the red line for those who had stood by him until this point.

“The messenger was not the right person to match the inspiring message,” said Adam Green, executive director of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. “It is really unfortunate for the overall project of trying to challenge corporate power and shake up a broken political system.”

Advertisement
Platner during an interview in South Portland, Maine, on 6 March. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images

It would be another two days before Platner published another video announcing his decision to end his campaign, claiming the allegations against him were part of a coordinated political attack.

Troy Jackson, who campaigned alongside Platner while running for the Democratic nomination in the Maine gubernatorial race, and is now one of several candidates running to replace him, told MS Now: “Graham told me point-blank that there was nothing in his past that I had to worry about. And he lied to me. And he lied to a lot of us.”

Now, as Democrats battle with the feeling of deja vu from Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race, it’s left some unnerved about whether the Maine Senate race is still winnable. “It’s so upsetting because it feels like we’ve been completely bamboozled by a candidate that so many people believe in,” said Feldman.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Resiliency Center launches survey to gauge Lewiston shooting’s impact

Published

on

Maine Resiliency Center launches survey to gauge Lewiston shooting’s impact


LEWISTON (WGME) Nearly three years after the Lewiston mass shooting, the Maine Resiliency Center is asking the public to share how the tragedy has affected them and the community.

The nonprofit has launched a survey to better understand the impacts of the mass shooting in October 2023 and to help guide future support efforts.

The director of the Maine Resiliency Center said the ripple effects have spread widely and the organization wants to hear from anyone who has been affected.

“You could have been a service provider who is providing therapy or counseling for people; you could have been a funeral home director or city employee; you could be someone who lives in this community and knows somebody who is directly impacted or you could be directly impacted yourself. All of those opinions and information are really valuable to us as we look to support the broader community moving forward,” the director said.

Advertisement

To take part in the survey, go to maineresiliencycenter.org.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine’s high court keeps transgender athlete referendum off 2026 ballot

Published

on

Maine’s high court keeps transgender athlete referendum off 2026 ballot


Politics
Our political journalists are based in the Maine State House and have deep source networks across the partisan spectrum in communities all over the state. Their coverage aims to cut through major debates and probe how officials make decisions. Read more Politics coverage here.

AUGUSTA, Maine — The Maine Supreme Judicial Court on Friday upheld Secretary of State Shenna Bellows’ decision to keep a referendum banning transgender girls from female school sports off the November ballot.

The high court ruled Bellows was “not only authorized but was constitutionally bound” when she moved in May to throw out more than 1,500 signatures gathered by out-of-state circulators who never agreed to submit to Maine’s jurisdiction.

Advertisement

The unanimous ruling from the six-justice panel closes out a monthslong legal fight that began when Bellows’ office invalidated more than 12,000 signatures submitted by Protect Girls’ Sports in Maine, leaving the petition 532 signatures short of the 67,682 needed to qualify.

The group, backed heavily by Republican megadonor Richard Uihlein, had argued Bellows overstepped her authority by enforcing a settlement that ended a 2023 First Amendment lawsuit over Maine’s ban on out-of-state circulators, rather than letting Maine voters decide whether to loosen the state’s residency rules for petition circulators.

The court rejected that argument, finding Bellows was bound by the Maine Constitution’s residency requirement for circulators except where a federal injunction narrowly excused her from enforcing it, and that four nonresident circulators who never checked a box consenting to Maine jurisdiction fell outside that carveout.

Justices also rejected the campaign’s fallback argument that one circulator’s belated affidavit, filed months after the Feb. 2 filing deadline, should have salvaged her roughly 61 signatures, citing a state law requiring circulator affidavits to be filed when the petition is.

The decision effectively ends the campaign’s bid for the 2026 ballot, though the court noted proponents could still gather the roughly 500 additional signatures needed to try again for the 2027 ballot.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending