Connect with us

Maine

Maine approves $63 million CMP power line upgrade over residents’ objections

Published

on

Maine approves  million CMP power line upgrade over residents’ objections


A 2018 artist’s rendering of the Nordic Aquafarms facility deliberate for development beside Little River in Belfast. Courtesy of Nordic Aquafarms

State regulators have authorized a $63.6 million Central Maine Energy transmission line improve within the Midcoast regardless of protests that it’s being undertaken partly to fulfill the longer term power wants of a deliberate industrial-size salmon farm in Belfast.

The Maine Public Utilities Fee on Tuesday put aside residents’ issues concerning the deliberate Nordic Aquafarms land-based salmon farm undertaking and rejected an alternate proposal that the world’s rising power wants may as an alternative be met by deliberate photo voltaic farms and different distributed power assets within the area.

The improve impacts the 115-kilovolt, 23-mile “Part 80” transmission line that runs between substations in Windsor and Warren. As a pooled transmission facility, its price could be shared by the six states below grid operator ISO-New England’s jurisdiction, and Maine’s share of roughly 9 p.c could be paid for by the ratepayers within the type of transmission prices.

Advertisement

Typically, 115-kilovolt strains are liable for distributing energy from bigger transmission programs and technology amenities to finish customers all through the state.

Greater than 300 Maine residents had spoken out in opposition to the improve, calling it a ratepayer-funded subsidy to Nordic Aquafarms, which expects to attract 25 to 26 megawatts at full capability, however CMP and regulators say it’s wanted due to documented energy overloads and different points on the growing older line. 

Nordic Aquafarms plans to construct a $500 million salmon farm on 55 acres beside Little River in Belfast and has acquired all of the wanted regulatory approval together with a U.S. Military Corp of Engineers allow. The corporate has stated the power would produce tens of tens of millions of kilos of salmon per 12 months.

REQUEST DATES BACK TO 2008

The improve was initially proposed by CMP in 2008 however was deferred by a PUC order in 2010, together with an improve to a Portland transmission line, in order that alternate options could possibly be explored.

Advertisement

CMP then requested in January 2020 that the rebuild and improve be reconsidered due to Nordic Aquafarms’ request to connect with the system. It additionally requested an expedited evaluate of Part 80, however later withdrew that request earlier than PUC made a ruling on it.

Whereas the salmon farm’s request created a way of urgency for the undertaking earlier than its development was delayed by authorized challenges, the rebuild would nonetheless be wanted with out it, stated Catherine Hartnett, company communications supervisor for Avangrid, CMP’s mum or dad firm.

“Nordic Aquafarms didn’t enter the image till we had already at the least as soon as requested this due to the expansion within the space,” Hartnett stated. “I don’t imagine that we’d have been in a position to provide them with the facility that they wanted for his or her undertaking with out it, however definitely the necessity predated them, as nicely.”

Erik Heim, president of Norway-based Nordic Aquafarms, stated he has acquired a assure from CMP  – a “capability to serve” certification – that it will possibly present energy to fulfill its wants no matter whether or not Part 80 is rebuilt.

As well as, since fish must be stored alive always, the system can’t be completely reliant on an influence system that’s weak to outages.

Advertisement

The salmon farm plans embody a big biofuels and diesel backup generator on web site that may generate sufficient energy for the salmon farm to function in “island mode” off-grid for a number of days. This additionally would supply the flexibleness to transition to island mode in occasions of excessive power demand within the space to scale back stress on the grid.

Although 25 to 26 megawatts “seems like lots,” Heim stated, “if you evaluate it to the power use of air freighting for salmon within the U.S. that’s generally the case for 90 p.c of the salmon consumed within the U.S. as we speak, it’s a actually good equation. You save in your carbon footprint, and also you save loads of power.”

TORRENT OF OPPOSITION

Heim stated he has come to know the “protest tradition” in Maine, and that every one the opposition to the Part 80 rebuild got here from “our opponents recruited by Belfast.”

The now-approved improve undertaking had acquired a torrent of opposition from residents of Belfast and surrounding areas. Greater than 360 public feedback had been submitted to the PUC, with many citing the aquaculture undertaking as their most important cause for opposing the improve.

Advertisement

“I urge you to heed the Maine Workplace of the Public Advocate and The Effectivity Maine Belief’s recommendation and deny CMP’s request for a $63 million energy grid improve wanted for a proposed ecologically harmful, undesired (by the overwhelming majority) land-based Atlantic salmon torturing manufacturing facility,” wrote Belfast resident Kate Harris in her feedback. “Particularly as their morally bankrupt company welfare scheme is predicated on passing as a lot of the invoice as attainable on to we the overburdened peasantry.”

In response to residents’ claims that the salmon farm undertaking would impression ratepayers, Heim stated Nordic is paying all prices of connecting to the grid, which he stated is within the tens of millions of {dollars}.

“This undertaking began a very long time earlier than we even entered the scene,”  he stated. “These are long-term stability points relating to the grid of New England, not simply in Maine, that must be addressed.”

Michael Lannan, of Northport, was among the many commenters against the improve. He stated the suggestion by CMP and Nordic that the grid wanted to be upgraded anyway is “merely not the case with the present enhancements in battery storage and the potential for a future industrial consumer to offer the distributed technology that was requested of Nordic,” and that the facility plant it permitted is insufficient.

Many submitted the identical remark that approving the transmission line rebuild “would set an unacceptable precedent of the general public subsidizing a nonessential, foreign-owned agribusiness to construct and function its speculative land-based aquaculture enterprise.”

Advertisement

Regulators briefly addressed the opponents’ issues of their deliberations on Tuesday.

“I need to be clear that the proof of the document demonstrates that the rebuild of Part 80 could be wanted even with out the potential future load development from Nordic Aquafarms,” PUC Chairman Philip Bartlett stated.

Bartlett famous that that ISO-New England discovered reliability deficiencies in research performed in 2020 and 2021, and it reaffirmed the necessity for the undertaking in a technical convention in February.

“Furthermore, utilities have been prohibited from unfairly discriminating in opposition to clients, and the fee typically has no function in deciding whether or not a selected buyer shouldn’t be allowed to interconnect electrical programs as long as they’ll accomplish that safely and reliably,” Bartlett stated.

FIRST DECISION UNDER NEW LAW

Advertisement

It was the primary undertaking state utility regulators have dominated on below Maine’s new “non-wires various regulation” authorized in 2019, which requires an evaluation of different methods to fulfill power wants – utilizing such distributed power assets as photo voltaic, wind, hydro, and mills – when including or rebuilding transmission strains is proposed.  It additionally requires that the PUC to provide desire to the choice if it addresses the necessity of the proposed transmission line most affordably.

The Workplace of Public Advocate, which coordinates the choice evaluation, argued that the improve was pointless, and that upkeep and minor upgrades could be ample. The non-wires various proposed that enormous mills and authorized Midcoast photo voltaic farms which can be in CMP’s queue for connection to the grid will likely be ample to fulfill the world’s anticipated wants.

“We’ve come to the conclusion that CMP has not put ahead a justification for what’s a extremely a reasonably costly undertaking,” stated Public Advocate William Harwood. “Lots of it’s to increase the capability of this line. I’m not satisfied that we’d like that expanded capability.”

Nevertheless, the PUC stated it discovered quite a few flaws and unanswered questions within the various proposal. It discovered that its cost-benefit evaluation overlooked important prices, that it didn’t present evaluation of the impacts to the lower-voltage distribution system, and that its reliance on photo voltaic technology wouldn’t be satisfactory for winter peak hundreds.

Bartlett stated that though the general public advocate workplace’s report disputed the necessity to contemplate winter peak hundreds, he believed it was “irresponsible” not to take action. The commissioners concluded that the choice wouldn’t meet the world’s wants reliably, and so it adopted the employees advice to approve rebuild of the transmission line.

Advertisement

“We’re upset with the ruling,” Susan Chamberlin, senior counsel for the Workplace of Public Advocate stated in an e mail Tuesday. “The choice displays disagreement about the way in which utilities decide when greater transmission strains are wanted. Up to date research strategies used within the non-wires various evaluate enable for better accuracy and due to this fact inexpensive options to fulfill system reliability wants.”

Chamberlin stated her workplace will contemplate an enchantment as soon as it sees the written resolution.

Hartnett, of Avangrid, stated development is anticipated to start on  Part 80 in early 2023.


Use the shape under to reset your password. If you’ve submitted your account e mail, we’ll ship an e mail with a reset code.

« Earlier



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending