Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: Abortion providers need appreciation, protection, support

Published

on

Opinion: Abortion providers need appreciation, protection, support


In this post-Dobbs era, those dedicated to reproductive freedom face mounting threats to their safety, livelihood, and ability to provide care. Thanks to an ever-shifting legal landscape and an anti-abortion federal administration, providers across the country are not only left to navigate legal chaos, but they are also becoming direct targets of political and personal attacks. 

On March 10 we recognized Abortion Provider Appreciation Day, a day to celebrate the bravery, compassion, and resilience of those who provide abortion care. While recognition is important, it is not enough. If we truly value these essential health care providers, we must fight to protect them.

Liz Gustafson and Cassie Lehr

Here in Connecticut, our legislature is presented with a critical opportunity to take bold, decisive action to safeguard abortion providers and expand access to care.

In anticipation of Roe v. Wade being overturned, Connecticut led the way in 2022, becoming the first state to pass a shield law to protect providers and patients from legal threats posed by anti-abortion extremists in other states. This law ensures that providers in Connecticut can care for out-of-state patients seeking safe, legal abortion services —without fear of prosecution from their patients’ home states.

Advertisement

Today, 19 states have enacted near-total abortion bans, leaving more than 25 million reproductive-age Americans without access to care. In 2023, the total number of patients who traveled to Connecticut for abortion care is estimated at 840, but countless others could not—barred by financial, logistical, or legal obstacles.

For those who cannot travel, medication abortion is a lifeline. It is safe, effective, and accessible, accounting for 63% of all U.S. abortions in 2023. Many patients receive medication abortion via telehealth, making it a crucial alternative for those who face travel barriers.

Yet, Connecticut’s shield law does not explicitly protect telehealth providers—leaving doctors who may want to help out-of-state patients unable to do so.

The solution? H.B. 7135, a bill that would strengthen Connecticut’s shield provisions law to ensure telemedicine abortion providers are protected. This provision is already included in the strongest shield laws nationwide, including those in California, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Colorado, and Maine. Connecticut must follow suit.

Beyond legal protections, Connecticut must also invest in the ecosystem of sexual and reproductive health care. ‘Safety-net providers,’ such as Hartford GYN Center and Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, serve a patient population where the majority rely on Medicaid or are underinsured. These providers are an essential lifeline, ensuring access to care regardless of a patient’s income, insurance status, or background. However, they face unsustainable financial burdens due to insufficient Medicaid reimbursement rates, all while the cost of delivering care continues to rise.

Advertisement

Even though family planning clinics received a Medicaid reimbursement rate increase in the 2023 budget, abortion services were excluded. This means that abortion providers in Connecticut are operating under unsustainable financial conditions—on top of enduring relentless political and legal attacks.

Organizations like The REACH Fund, Connecticut’s only abortion fund, directly support clinics because they trust providers to deliver the best care possible. Connecticut’s state government should do the same by increasing Medicaid reimbursements and fully funding abortion services.

Abortion providers deliver critical, life-saving care —but they can’t do it alone. Here’s how you can support abortion providers in Connecticut:

  • Call your legislators. Urge them to support H.B. 7135 and ensure abortion providers have the legal and financial support they need. Reproductive Equity Now can guide you—sign up for updates here.
  • Donate. Support abortion clinics, funds, and advocacy organizations that are fighting to expand access.
  • Know your local providers. Learn about clinics in your community so you can help others find safe, trusted care.
  • Express gratitude. Thank a provider, a front desk staffer, a clinic escort, or a friend who supported someone through their abortion journey.

Remember, abortion care is community care. Be part of that community. Support those who make reproductive freedom possible—today and every day.

Liz Gustafson is Connecticut State Director with Reproductive Equity Now and Cassie Lehr is a Board Member of The REACH Fund of Connecticut.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen

Published

on

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen


CONNECTICUT (WTNH) — Connecticut officials and officials from 35 other states have agreed to a settlement with automakers Hyundai and Kia to come up with a plan to help prevent vehicles from being stolen. 

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong (D) and 35 other states call the settlement, which has been several years in the making, a matter of public safety. The issue concerns the number of Hyundai and Kia vehicles that have been reported stolen and crashes related to these thefts.

The settlement provides up to $4.5 million in restitution for customers whose cars had been stolen.

“This settlement points us back in the right direction to help address some of the underlining issues that have made it easier to steal vehicles,” Meriden Police Chief Roberto Rosado said.

Advertisement

Tong said that groups of young people known as “Kia Boys” were aware that Kia and Hyundai vehicles did not possess modern anti-theft technology, making those brands of vehicles more vulnerable to theft.

One such example is a 2023 incident in which a group of teens reportedly stole and crashed a Hyundai in Waterbury, resulting in the death of a 14-year-old girl. 

“Connecticut State Police have been saying for some time that they needed some assistance, that they needed help in reducing the opportunity for these vehicles to be stolen,” Connecticut Department of Emergency Services Commissioner Ronnell Higgins said.

Several states have attempted to get Hyundai and Kia to alter the way their vehicles are built in the United States, finally coming to an agreement with the two automakers to provide an anti-theft device to protect the vehicles. 

“At some point, they started offering excuses,” Tong said. “You can do just a software update, that will fix it. That didn’t work. We advocated for a recall, they refused. This settlement requires that, for all future vehicles sold in the United States, Hyundai and Kia will install, as part of their standard package, industry engine immobilizer anti-theft technology.”

Advertisement

The technology is linked to the key fob, which means that the car will not start if the smart key is not present.

Connecticut is requiring Kia and Hyundai to provide customers with a free zinc-reinforced engine cylinder protector for vehicles already on the road that are not equipped with the anti-theft technology.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won $50,000

Published

on

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won ,000


There were two $50,000 Powerball winning tickets sold in Connecticut for Monday’s drawing.

The winning numbers were 23-35-59-63-68 and the Powerball was 2.

The Powerplay was X4, but neither ticket had that option.

The tickets matched four white balls and the Powerball.

Advertisement

No information was available on where it was sold.

No one won the jackpot on Monday night, sending it soaring to $1.25 billion for Wednesday’s drawing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action

Published

on

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action


My generation grew up thinking we would be the ones to bring teen smoking to an end. But then came the cotton candy vapes.

They were, and still are, everywhere you look. Back in middle and high school, I remember friends had them in their backpacks and hoodie sleeves, they even used them in the school bathrooms.

This past summer, I witnessed firsthand the real impact it has had. My friends and I took a girls’ trip, and one day, we decided we wanted to blow up a pool floatie. Given that we didn’t have an air pump, the only option was to do it manually. One of my friends, who has vaped regularly for years, couldn’t get more than three breaths in before giving up. She began coughing and ran out of breath. It was funny for a second…until it wasn’t.

This was the moment that made me realize how this epidemic is hurting the people closest to us. 

Advertisement

When e-cigarettes first hit the market, companies claimed that they were safer than smoking real cigarettes and that they would help adults quit smoking, when in reality, they’ve only really done the opposite for young people. Vaping may look harmless because of the fun flavors, names, and colors on the packaging, but the reality of it is way darker. E-cigarette use can lead to cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, and even long term damage to the airways that can make something as simple as inhaling a serious struggle. These devices push harmful chemicals deep into young people’s lungs, disrupting their bodies in ways they’re not even aware of until it’s too late. 

A Yale-led study found that one in four Connecticut high school students and one in 30 middle schoolers had already tried vaping. This may not seem like much at first glance, but the fact of the matter is that a vast majority of adolescents know at least one peer who vapes, at the very minimum. A large portion of the teens from the study preferred sweet and fruity flavors, and many students who had never smoked cigarettes before began experimenting with nicotine through vapes, which demonstrates that flavored e-cigarettes are a gateway, not a solution.

Kiara Salas

 The problem is not just about curiosity. The brain is not finished developing until about age 25. This time is critical in the development of areas like attention, memory, and decision making. The CDC mentions that nicotine exposure during these earlier years of development can impair brain chemistry, having outcomes that linger into adulthood.

Despite this, vape companies continue to sell what seems like nicotine candy to minors, disguised in bright packaging and flavors like “blue razz” or “mango blast.” When you think about it, it makes sense that as soon as companies began seeing a decline in sales, they had to figure out a way to create new products that were trendy, tasted good, and addictive. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending