Connecticut

CT universal paid sick leave a top priority for labor, Democratic leaders

Published

10 months ago

February 3, 2024

CT universal paid sick leave a top priority for labor, Democratic leaders

The strength of labor and the political left in Connecticut, one of 17 states where Democrats hold control the executive and legislative branches of government, will be tested this year as a coalition seeks to expand the state’s limited mandate on paid sick days into a nearly universal benefit.

Watered-down sick days legislation passed in 2011 touches only a thin sliver of workers, but it packed a political punch as the first mandate of its kind in the U.S., branding Connecticut as favorable terrain for laws and benefits unattainable in Congress or by collective bargaining.

“Connecticut likes to lead. And unfortunately, this is an area where we were leaders in 2011, but we have fallen behind,” said Sen. Julie Kushner, D-Danbury, co-chair of the Labor and Public Employees Committee since taking office in January 2019, the same day as Gov. Ned Lamont.

An expansion bill passed by the Senate and favored by the governor failed in the House last year, a frustrating session for a labor movement that had scored major victories in previous years, including a $15 million minimum wage and a paid family and medical leave program financed by mandatory payroll deductions.

Kushner, who was a UAW official leading a coalition pushing paid sick days in 2011, and Senate President Pro Tem Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, pronounced paid sick leave expansion a top priority Friday. House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, said he sees passage as likely.

The current law exempts manufacturers, some non-profits and any employer with fewer than 50 employees. It places no added burden on companies that already offer at least 40 hours in paid time off over the year, regardless of whether it is considered vacation, personal days or sick time.

Eligible workers accrue one hour of leave time for every 40 hours worked, with a maximum state-mandated benefit of five days off.

With every Republican opposed and four Democrats absent, the Senate voted 20-12 last year for a bill that would have eliminated the 50-employee threshold and the non-profit exemption. Any company with at least one employee would have been required to offer one hour off for every 30 hours worked. The bill also doubled the maximum benefit from 40 hours to 80.

The Lamont administration had proposed a bill lowering the threshold from 50 to 11 workers, but it agreed to the Senate version. The measure never came to a vote in the House.

“I think we’ll get there,” Ritter said Friday in an interview.

House Democrats last year proposed compromises, including one expanding coverage in phases over several years, bringing down the employee threshold from 50 to 25 immediately, then 20 next year, 15 the year after that and so on.

Janée Woods Weber, the director of Connecticut Women’s Education and Legal Fund, an advocacy group that led the campaign for passage and has since been renamed as She Leads Justice, rejected the phase-in because it never reached universal coverage.

Woods Weber said Friday that anything less than universal coverage was non-negotiable.

“A good policy would cover all workers,” she said. “We’re committed to passing good policy, not policy that we have to then come back and try to fix like, we’re trying to fix the 2011 law, which left out many, many workers.”

The state’s largest business group, the Connecticut Business and Industry Association, remains opposed, though less about the particulars of the bill as the statement that passage would make about the business climate.

“That’s what is most concerning to me, the larger message,” said Chris DiPentima, the president and chief executive of CBIA. With every new mandate comes regulations in a state where CBIA says businesses already are over-regulated.

Lamont is generally deemed to be supportive of business, especially in the area of spending and taxes, but the Democratic governor has sided with labor over the minimum wage and paid family and medical leave, among other issues.

The governor intends to propose his own version of a bill to expand paid sick days. While his bill last year only would have applied to businesses with at least 11 workers, the version planned this year will have a threshold of only one.

With unions representing fewer than 10% of private-sector workers in Connecticut, labor and its allies have long looked to achieve in legislation what is beyond the reach of collective bargaining.

Looney, the Senate leader, said that is appropriate for government to intervene in providing something he sees as a basic right — sick days.

“We see these as just so basic and fundamental in terms of the social compact and equity that the state has to step in,” Looney said. “This is so critical because it benefits people who are living without a margin, living without a net, living day to day.”

Source link

Related Topics:connecticut CT Mirror CT News Democrats employment Featured legislative session Local News pay universal sick leave

Click to comment

Connecticut

Tractor-trailer carrying thousands of gallons of fuel catches fire on I-91 in Wethersfield

Published

7 hours ago

November 22, 2024

Press Room

Tractor-trailer carrying thousands of gallons of fuel catches fire on I-91 in Wethersfield

A tractor-trailer hauling thousands of gallons of fuel caught fire on Interstate 91 North in Wethersfield on Friday morning.

State police said state troopers responded to I-91 North near exit 24 around 7:42 a.m. and found the cab of a tractor- trailer carrying 7,500 gallons of fuel on fire.

The driver was able to get out of the truck and was not injured, according to state police.

The fire departments from Wethersfield and Rocky Hill responded to the scene to extinguish the fire and troopers shut down I-91 North and South as well as oncoming traffic from Route 3 to I-91 South.

Because the truck was hauling fuel, troopers worked to move drivers who were nearby, state police said.

I-91 South reopened shortly after the fire was out.

The left two lanes of I-91 North have been reopened and the state police Fire & Explosives Investigation Unit is also responding to assist with the investigation.

State police said the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection later responded to the scene.

Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut couple charged in alleged Lululemon theft spree that netted up to $1 million

Published

15 hours ago

November 22, 2024

Press Room

Connecticut couple charged in alleged Lululemon theft spree that netted up to million

A Connecticut couple has been charged in connection with an elaborate two-month theft spree at Lululemon stores across the country that an investigator with the retailer estimates netted about $1 million worth of product.

Jadion Richards, 44, and Akwele Lawes-Richards, 45, were arrested on Nov. 14 in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul, Minnesota suburb of Woodbury. The couple, from Danbury, Connecticut, were charged with organized retail theft after a Lululemon retail crime investigator contacted local authorities in Minnesota.

But Lululemon’s investigator said evidence shows their crimes go back to September and took place in states like Utah, Colorado, New York and Connecticut, according to the criminal complaint.

Attorneys representing Richards and Lawes-Richards did not immediately respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment Thursday.

Richards claimed he was racially profiled, complaint says

Richards and Lawes-Richards were stopped after exiting the Lululemon store in Roseville, Minnesota, on Nov. 14 when the security alarm went off, according to the criminal complaint. Richards allegedly claimed store employees racially profiled him and the two were allowed to leave afterward.

The Lululemon investigator later alleged the two visited the store the day before on Nov. 13 with an unidentified man and stole 45 item valued at nearly $5,000. That same day, the pair had allegedly conducted four other thefts in Minneapolis, Edina and Minnetonka.

Officers arrested the couple at the Lululemon in Woodbury. The two denied any involvement in the theft, with Lawes-Richards allegedly claiming they were staying with her aunt and had only been in Minnesota for a day.

Officers found several credit and debit cards on the couple, as well as an access card to a Marriott hotel room. Using a search warrant, officers found 12 suitcases in their room, including three filled with Lululemon clothing with tags attached worth over $50,000, according to the complaint.

In all, the company investigator estimated the couple has taken up to $1 million in stolen product, according to the complaint, which does not detail how he arrived at the high figure.

Couple blocked cameras among other tactics: Investigator

The Lululemon investigator said one of the couple’s alleged tactics was for one of them to distract associates while another stuffed product in the clothes they were wearing, according to the complaint.

Another technique involved the two strategically exiting the store, with one of them holding a cheap item they had bought and the other carrying more expensive products that had sensors, according to the complaint. When the alarm would sound off, only the person with the cheap, purchased item would stay behind and show a receipt, while the other would keep walking with the stolen product, the complaint says.

The pair are accused in eight Colorado theft incidents between Oct. 29 and 30, and seven thefts in Utah on Nov. 6 and 7, according to the complaint.

The pair are currently being held at the Ramsey County jail in Minnesota, court records show. Their next court appearance is set for Dec. 16.

Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut readers get the shaft from newspaper’s vulgar Jets headline blunder

Published

1 day ago

November 21, 2024

Press Room

Connecticut readers get the shaft from newspaper’s vulgar Jets headline blunder

Ouch!

A newspaper in Connecticut had an unfortunate typo involving Jets linebacker C.J. Mosley’s herniated disc on Monday.

This past Monday, The Chronicle, a newspaper covering Eastern Connecticut, published an AP story on the front page of its sports section in the print edition that referred to Mosley’s “herniated d–k.”

Mosley has missed the Jets’ four games with the injury — the one in his neck, that is.

Jets linebacker C.J. Mosley speaks with the media before practice in Florham Park, NJ. Bill Kostroun/New York Post

In the copy, Mosley’s injury was not shafted, getting described correctly in the nut graph.

The unfortunate phallacy did not go unnoticed: in an extra twist, the error went viral when it was posted on the X account of David Coverdale, the 73-year-old singer of Whitesnake.

An editor for The Chronicle told The Post that the newspaper would be issuing a correction in the paper.

Last week, prior to the Jets’ loss to the Colts, Mosley spoke about how he hoped to return after the Jets’ bye, when they host the Seahawks on Dec. 1.

<br />

“That’s definitely the goal,” he said. “I’m in a position where I’ve played a lot of football. Me missing this time won’t hurt me as much as another guy that might need this opportunity. It’s about safety at the end of the day. When I go home, I’m Clint Mosley. I’m C.J. I’m not the football player.”

Mosley said the birth of his daughter, who arrived the week after his injury, put things in perspective for him.

“I had a full week of having a normal neck and ever since then every time I’m looking down, my neck’s hurting,” Mosley said. “It puts things in perspective. There’s a lot of life after football. When I’m done playing, I want to make sure I’m 100 percent.”

From head to toe and everywhere in between.

Source link