Connect with us

Connecticut

Ballots in question in North Stonington due to missing signatures

Published

on

Ballots in question in North Stonington due to missing signatures


Hundreds of ballots that were cast in North Stonington in recent weeks may not count after local election officials instructed voters not to sign their names on ballot envelopes, a step that is required during early in-person voting.

North Stonington’s Republican and Democratic Registrars of Voters issued a press release on the town’s website on Saturday afternoon instructing voters who cast a ballot via early in-person voting between Oct. 21 and Oct. 31 to return to their voting location to “correct their ballot.”

“Through October 31, voters were inadvertently misinformed about the need to sign their early voting ballot envelope,” the release said. “As a result, it is believed that ballot envelopes submitted during this period went unsigned by voters, which is required by law.”

The release does not state how many voters in North Stonington failed to sign their ballot envelopes.

Advertisement

But in a phone interview, Connie Berardi, the town’s Democratic Registrar of Voters, said around 1,000 ballots lacked the required signature.

In this year’s election, the ballots in North Stonington include choices for president, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, two legislative seats and the local registrars of voters.

For perspective, a little over 3,000 voters in North Stonington cast a ballot during the last presidential election in 2020.

Berardi referred other questions about the ballot mistakes to the Connecticut Secretary of the State’s office, which is in charge of overseeing the state’s elections.

The Secretary of the State’s office did not immediately respond to questions for this story.

Advertisement

Connecticut’s new early voting law, which lawmakers passed in 2023, clearly states that voters casting a ballot during the 14-day early voting period need to sign the envelope that they receive with their ballot.

It’s unclear how voters will be able to “correct their ballot,” as the town’s release states.

Connecticut does not have a ballot curing process, which allows voters to fix signature issues and other mistakes after their ballot is received.

Sen. Heather Somers, who is running for reelection this year in the state Senate district that includes North Stonington, learned of the ballot errors late Saturday afternoon.

“I’m very upset,” Somers said.

Advertisement

Somers said she was told that any ballot that does not have a signature on the envelope may not be counted, and she said voters are being advised to return to the North Stonington Education Center, the town’s early voting location, to cast a brand new ballot.

With only a couple days remaining before election day, Somers said she is very concerned that some of the impacted voters may not be able to make it back to the polls to cast a new ballot.

“That’s a huge issue for me because people came in good faith to cast those votes,” said Somers, who is the Republican candidate in Senate District 18.

Her concern is that the people who cast those ballots won’t be available on Nov. 3 — the final day of early voting — or on Election Day itself.

“Some people may be out of town. Some people may be in surgery,” Somers said. “They early-voted for a reason.”

Advertisement

The mistake is the second to potentially disenfranchise voters in the 43rd House District of North Stonington and portions of Stonington and Ledyard.

“It’s frustrating,” said Rep. Greg Howard, R-Stonington, who is seeking reelection from the 43rd.

Roughly 519 ballots were previously sequestered in Stonington after officials learned that some voters had received the wrong ballot on Oct. 22, the second day of early voting. Stonington spans the 41st and 43rd House Districts.

The mistake in North Stonington involved each of the 1,100 ballots cast in 13 of the 14 days of early voting, he said.

“Now, you’re talking about 1,600 votes. They are both in places where I win by big numbers,” said Howard, a police officer who was elected in 2020 and reelected in 2022.

Advertisement

If the 1,100 early voters in North Stonington do not return to cast new ballots on Sunday, the last day of early voting, or on Election Day, those ballots will not be counted, Howard said.

Howard said the impact of the single-day, wrong-ballot problem is relatively limited. No one expects the majority of the sequestered ballots from Oct. 22 in Stonington were the wrong ones.

Voters who cast ballots that day have been urged to vote again. If they do, the original ballots, which are sealed in envelopes with the voters’ names, will be discarded. 

The other sequestered ballots will be opened and hand-counted on Election Day, with officials checking to ensure the voter had received the correct ballot.

Only the two House districts are affected, and only one is contested. Rep. Aundre Bumgardner, D-Groton, has no opponent in the 41st of Groton and Stonington. If a vote was cast for the wrong House contest, that vote will not be counted. But the votes cast for the other offices will be tallied.

Advertisement

“I don’t think anybody did anything malicious or on purpose,” Howard said. “I am trying to be reasonable. But at some point, you say, ‘Enough is enough.’”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages

Published

on

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages


Connecticut is taking a step to make sure workers are paid fairly.

On June 30, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Public Act 26-17, which enables the State Comptroller to issue a stop work order and withhold state funds to contractors that are not properly paying their employees.

The bill was signed on the construction site for Greeneville Elementary School, which is one of the four new elementary schools being built in Norwich. The State of Connecticut is reimbursing the city for 80% of the project, and the law applies to “any place where the state is making a payment,” Lamont said.

Advertisement

Wage theft can take many forms

It matters because wage theft can take many forms, from money taken from base pay, to money not given in benefits, Kimberly Glassman, director of compliance and government affairs for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478, said.

Local 478 also has a presence in the Norwich school building project, with 10 to 20 union members working at each site daily, Glassman said.

What do state leaders think of the Greeneville site’s progress?

Lamont is impressed with how quickly the work is going.

Advertisement

“They told me that the walls went up in the last two weeks, so a lot of progress is happening,” he said.

During the bill signing, Norwich Mayor Swarnjit Singh touted the importance of using union labor and the value of project labor agreements.

“We are on time and on budget,” he said.

After the bill signing, Singh said its possible the Greeneville School building could be complete as soon as the first quarter of 2027, he said.

Advertisement

“They’re not wasting any time,” Singh said.

State Rep. Derrel Wilson attended the original Greeneville School as a kid, and still lives in Greeneville. He was credited as being one of the driving forces for getting the workers bill passed.

“It’s exciting seeing this revitalization for our neighborhood, seeing active construction and watching individuals rebuild our community,” Wilson said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it will take up an appeal challenging bans on the AR-15 and other semi-automatic firearms, including the ban in Connecticut and in the Chicago area.

Similar bans are in place in about a dozen states. The case is expected to be heard in the fall.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said the state’s assault weapons ban is lawful and that his office is prepared to fight the challenge in court.

“Connecticut’s assault weapon ban is lawful, lifesaving, and broadly supported. The gun lobby has flooded the courts in states across the country to get an assault weapons case up to this Supreme Court. We are prepared for this fight, and we are going to go in with everything we’ve got to keep these weapons of war off our streets, out of our schools, and away from our families,” said Attorney General Tong.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt

Published

on

CT poised to invest again in childcare, pay down pension debt


Having racked up its ninth hefty budget surplus in a row, Connecticut is poised to expand a record investment in affordable childcare while taking another big chunk out of its legacy pension debt.

The $27.2 billion state budget for the fiscal year that closes Tuesday is on pace for a $412 million operating surplus — all of it earmarked by legislators and Gov. Ned Lamont for a special endowment for early childhood education.

A special savings program outside the formal budget should capture another $1.3 billion in income and business tax receipts. Most of that, roughly $1 billion to $1.1 billion, will go toward shrinking the state’s pension debt. The rest will boost Connecticut’s emergency reserve or “rainy day fund” to almost $4.5 billion — 18% of annual operating expenses, the maximum allowed by law.

Advertisement

“Making Connecticut more affordable means making it easier for families to live, work and raise children here,” Lamont wrote in a statement. “High-quality early childhood education gives children the strongest possible start in life while helping parents pursue careers, grow their incomes and contribute to our economy.”

Connecticut’s early childhood commissioner, Elena Trueworth, added in the statement that “This endowment represents a transformational commitment to Connecticut’s youngest children and the families who depend on high-quality early childhood education.”

Eligible families are expected to begin receiving no-cost childcare or partial assistance subsidized by the endowment starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year.

Saving for childcare was challenging this past year

The governor and his fellow Democrats in the legislature’s majority launched the Early Childhood Education Endowment with $300 million in June 2025. With a goal of adding thousands of affordable childcare program slots by 2030, officials dedicated future operating surpluses toward this effort. Separately, the special savings program outside the formal budget would remain focused on reducing pension debt.

That strategy hit a snag earlier this year.

Advertisement

While officials planned for another $300 million-plus operating surplus, rising Medicaid and fringe benefit costs — and smaller-than-anticipated corporation tax receipts — wiped out the entire projected fiscal cushion.

Lamont and lawmakers responded by raiding the off-budget savings program, moving hundreds of millions of dollars into the General Fund. That transfer, coupled with a last-minute surge in tax receipts, created the $412 million surplus now headed into the childcare endowment.

“We’re making a smart, long-term investment that will lower costs for families, strengthen our workforce, and ensure this support is available for generations to come,” Lamont said. “This is exactly why we have managed the state’s finances responsibly, so that when we have the opportunity to make transformational investments, we can do so without raising taxes or compromising our long-term fiscal stability.”

Officials dedicated $11 billion in surplus since 2020 to pay pension debt

Even with those adjustments to the off-budget program, the administration estimates Connecticut will still have saved $1 billion to $1.1 billion to deposit into its pension funds for state employees and municipal teachers. A final tally won’t be known until the comptroller’s office completes its formal audit of the last budget cycle in September.

Once that’s done, officials will have dedicated a total of about $11 billion from special savings to reduce pension debt since 2020.

Advertisement

Still, analysts project the state won’t have eliminated all unfunded pension liabilities before the 2040s.

Connecticut entered this fiscal year with more than $33 billion in unfunded pension obligations, according to analysts, and the state remains one of the most indebted per capita in the nation.

Most of that debt stems from inadequate saving by legislatures and governors for more than seven decades between 1939 and 2010, according to a 2015 report prepared for the state by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. By not saving properly, the state government severely restricted the potential investment earnings, forfeiting billions of dollars across seven decades.

As a result, mandatory pension contributions continue to place heavy pressure on state finances, drawing resources away from other programs and services.

Watershed debate on CT savings program expected next term

Meanwhile, Lamont’s critics say the savings program he embraces is too aggressive.

Advertisement

Between operating surpluses and off-budget savings programs, Connecticut has left an average of $1.8 billion unspent — roughly 8% of the General Fund — since new budget caps were enacted in 2017. By comparison, the two prior decades of state budgets produced an average annual savings of 0.1% of the General Fund.

In other words, critics say, the new system is forcing a single generation to retire a pension debt problem created by three — and that education, health care, municipal aid and other core programs are suffering as a result.

Many of Lamont’s fellow Democrats in the legislature — including state Rep. Josh Elliott of Hamden, who is challenging the governor for the party’s gubernatorial nomination — say Connecticut could retire debt at a more modest pace and invest far more in programs and direct aid to cities and towns.

The Republican gubernatorial nominee, state Sen. Ryan Fazio of Greenwich, called earlier this year for the state to reduce savings efforts in order to dramatically expand tax cuts for Connecticut’s middle class.

Legislative leaders from both parties have said they expect a debate over state government’s savings habits to dominate the next General Assembly term, which covers the 2027 and 2028 sessions.

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1172734&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/30/ct-to-invest-surplus-in-childcare-pay-down-pension-debt/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending