Connect with us

Boston, MA

Union: Boston hotel workers at 35 hotels preparing for potential strike over wages and workloads

Published

on

Union: Boston hotel workers at 35 hotels preparing for potential strike over wages and workloads


After months of unsuccessful negotiations over wages and workloads, hotel workers in Boston are preparing for a potential strike at 35 hotels, the union representing the city’s hotel workers said Tuesday.

Plans for a potential strike comes less than a week before contracts expire, UNITE HERE Local 26, the union representing hotel workers in Boston, said in a statement.

Hotels that could see a potential strike include the Hilton Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Boston Logan Airport, and the Fairmont Copley Plaza. Hotel workers are registering for strike benefits, signing up for picket duty, and assembling “On Strike” signs, the union said.

These actions come after an overwhelming 99% vote to authorize a historic citywide strike, which could happen anytime after contracts expire on August 31st.

Note: Workers and union officials are available for interviews at 26 West Street in Boston, 7am to 7pm, through Friday August 30th. Please call to coordinate.

Advertisement

“I’m ready to strike because we’re all struggling to pay our monthly bills,” Susana Coelho, a PBX Operator at the Hilton Boston Logan Airport Hotel for 21 years, said in a statement. “Groceries, even basic items like eggs and pasta, are three times more expensive than before. Many of my co-workers are facing the same problems, and they’re getting ready to strike, too.”

“We’ve been in negotiations for months, but the hotels don’t want to help us out in these hard times,” Coelho said. “I’m ready to show the hotel that I’m serious about winning a livable wage and securing a better future for myself and my daughter.”

“Hotel workers are preparing in earnest for a historic Citywide strike in Boston and across the U.S.,” Carlos Aramayo, president of UNITE HERE Local 26, said in a statement. “It’s unacceptable that hotel workers often struggle to afford basic necessities despite working for a big brand like Hilton or Marriott. Our work of providing high quality guest services and amenities should be protected, and guests should know they can expect the same experience that they had before Covid-19. After months of unsuccessful negotiations, hotel workers are ready to fight for what we deserve, and we’re going to win.”

Hotel workers across the U.S. are calling for higher wages, fair staffing and workloads, and the reversal of COVID-era cuts, according to the union. Many hotel workers are struggling to make ends meet with insufficient pay, often juggling multiple jobs to support their families.

Union officials said that too many hotels took advantage of the pandemic by cutting staffing and suspending guest services that were never restored, causing workers to lose jobs and income – and creating painful working conditions for those who carry the increased workload.

Advertisement

Last year, UNITE HERE members won record contracts after rolling strikes at Los Angeles hotels and a 47-day strike at Detroit casinos, union officials said.

UNITE HERE Local 26 has a history of successful labor strikes, including a 22-day strike at Harvard in 2016, a 46-day strike at Marriott hotels in 2018, and a 79-day strike at the Battery Wharf hotel in 2019, union officials said.

In June 2023, casino workers at Encore Boston Harbor in Everett voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike; it was averted when a tentative agreement was reached less than two days before the strike deadline.

UNITE HERE Local 26 represents workers in the hospitality industries of Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Its members work in Boston and Providence’s best hotels, restaurants, and university dining halls in addition to the Boston Convention Centers, Fenway Park, and Logan International Airport.

“We clean hotel rooms, greet guests, and prepare and serve food for hundreds of thousands of travelers to Boston and the northeast,” union officials said in its statement.

Advertisement

This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.

Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW





Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Families of two killed in US boat strikes near Venezuela file wrongful-death suit in Boston – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Families of two killed in US boat strikes near Venezuela file wrongful-death suit in Boston – The Boston Globe


The lawsuit against the federal government was filed Tuesday morning by lawyers from the political advocacy group American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Samaroo’s sister, Sallycar Korasingh, and Joseph’s mother, Lenore Burnley.

Maritime lawsuits can be filed in any federal court in the US, the ACLU noted, and they said they chose Boston because of the long history of such suits here.

The complaint alleges the deaths amount to extrajudicial slayings, or the unlawful killing of an individual by a government.

“I miss him terribly. We all do,” Burnley said of her son, in a statement announcing the lawsuit. “We know this lawsuit won’t bring Chad back to us, but we’re trusting God to carry us through this, and we hope that speaking out will help get us some truth and closure.”

Advertisement

The strike that allegedly took both men’s lives came on Oct. 14, as they made the short journey to the island that’s only a handful of miles off Venezuela’s coast.

For Joseph, according to the lawsuit, it was to be a long-delayed homecoming. The farmer and fisherman had been in Venezuela since April for work, as sometimes happened with him. On top of that, the suit said, he had a hard time finding a boat back to the small fishing village on Trinidad’s north coast where he lived with his common-law wife and three children.

On Oct. 12, he called his wife to tell her the 20-mile boat trip was finally happening: He’d be back in two days, according to the lawsuit.

He’d be with Samaroo, a coworker and fishing buddy who had moved to Las Cuevas a year earlier after his release from prison. He was imprisoned for 15 years for his role in a killing, according to the lawsuit. Media reports say it was the homicide of a street vendor, but don’t provide further detail about what happened.

Samaroo told his sister he was returning on the Oct. 14 boat because he wanted to see their mother, who had fallen ill.

Advertisement

Neither man, their families and the Trinidadian government claim, was involved in the drug trade.

Korasingh, Samaroo’s sister, said he had “paid his debt to society and was just trying to get back on his feet again” when the strike killed him.

“If the U.S. government believed Rishi had done anything wrong, it should have arrested, charged, and detained him, not murdered him,” she said in a statement. “They must be held accountable.”

On Oct. 14, the news came in the form of a social-media post from the president of the United States.

Trump posted that he’d authorized a “lethal kinetic strike on a vessel affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization (DTO) conducting narcotrafficking” in international waters near Venezuela. “Intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking narcotics, was associated with illicit narcoterrorist networks, and was transiting along a known DTO route.” Six “male narcoterrorists,” Trump said, died in the strike.

Advertisement

If was the latest of what would ultimately be more than 30 such strikes on boats near Venezuela, whose leadership Trump has blamed for the influx of drugs coming into the United States. Ultimately, tensions escalated to the point that US military forces entered Venezuela and arrested its president, the dictator Nicolas Maduro, in a raid earlier this month.

In the Oct. 14 post announcing the strike, the president attached a video of the men’s last moments. A small boat appears to sit in the middle of the frame. Suddenly, a dart of light comes from off the screen above, striking the boat, which explodes into a fireball.

Joseph’s mother, Burnley, saw the reports of the strike on the news and called her son’s wife.

“They immediately feared that Mr. Joseph was aboard this boat, as the timing of the strike directly coincided with Mr. Joseph’s journey by boat from Venezuela to Las Cuevas,” lawyers wrote in the lawsuit.

They called his phone, but it was dead. And, the complaint said, “The line remains dead to this day.”

Advertisement

Their remains were not found. Both families have filed missing-persons reports and sought more information, but non has been available. Both families, according to the lawsuit, have held funerals.

As justification, Trump has said that the US is essentially in conflict with the large drug-trafficking organizations that smuggle drugs into the United States.

In the lawsuit, the families allege the strike was illegal because drug traffickers — even violent ones — do not qualify under international law as an entity that a country can claim it’s in armed conflict against. But even if that were the case, the suit claims, the government should not target civilians.

“As a result, even in the context of an armed conflict, the killings of Mr. Joseph and Mr. Samaroo would constitute a grave breach of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and thus a war crime, making its perpetrators punishable under federal and international law,” the complaint states.

The lawyers are suing under the century-old Death on the High Seas Act, which allows family members of people killed in international waters to sue for wrongful death.

Advertisement

Ultimately, this suit is seeking unnamed monetary damages for the families. The complaint is not seeking an injunction ordering the government to change its behavior.


Sean Cotter can be reached at sean.cotter@globe.com. Follow him @cotterreporter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Blazers Have No Luck Against Celtics in Boston

Published

on

Blazers Have No Luck Against Celtics in Boston


The Portland Trail Blazers lost an ugly game to the Boston Celtics on Monday night, with a final score of 102-94. The game seemed over before it began as Boston took a massive lead early. Portland was able to make a couple pushes to make the game closer, but were never able to take the lead or seriously threaten to steal it.

The Blazers were led in scoring by Jerami Grant’s 19 points, 10 of which came from the free throw line. Toumani Camara added 18 points and Jrue Holiday had 14. Only two Blazers shot 50% or better from the field: Robert Williams (3-3) and Sidy Cissoko (1-2).

The Celtics were led by 23 points from Payton Pritchard, including buzzer-beaters to end both the first and second quarters. They also got 20 points from Jaylen Brown and 18 points from Derrick White.

Donovan Clingan finished the game with 9 points, 15 rebounds and 4 blocks. He made three of his four shots from inside the arc, but attempted five threes and made just one. His rebounding and shot-blocking abilities were on full display and he was very important for Portland’s pushes throughout the game.

Advertisement

Clingan’s effectiveness inside the paint takes a hit in Deni Avdija’s absence, as he doesn’t get quality shots. However, he was still efficient with the attempts he did get.

It’s hard to win games when you lose the first quarter 32-11. A 4-21 shooting performance from the field and 1-12 from deep in the quarter put the Blazers in a massive hole from the get-go. Boston didn’t do anything incredible, 54% from the field and 29% from three, but it was enough to go up huge on Portland.

It marked the second straight game that the Blazers set a season low in first quarter points after logging just 12 points in the first frame against the Toronto Raptors. They also set a new season low for points in a first half with just 37.

Portland just could not get the lid off the basket in this game. They shot just 42% from the field, 26% from deep and 67% from the free throw line. Without any consistency scoring the ball, every run quickly ended as the misses began to pile up.

While the Blazers played good defense throughout the game, Boston was able to win by just making a couple more shots and ride their huge first quarter to survive every push Portland made.

Advertisement

Portland stays on the road to face the Washington Wizards tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. PST.



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

How much snow has Boston gotten so far? What we know Monday

Published

on

How much snow has Boston gotten so far? What we know Monday


play

Many Boston residents awoke Monday, Jan. 26, to over 18 inches of thick, white snow outside their windows after the strongest part of the highly anticipated winter storm moved through overnight.

It’s the biggest snowstorm Boston has seen for nearly four years. According to the National Weather Service, the last time Boston got more than 8 inches of snow from a single storm was on Feb. 25, 2022.

Advertisement

Boston’s Logan International Airport reported a total of 18.6 inches of snow as of 7 a.m., and the city was expected to get at least 3 to 4 more inches from the storm.

And the snow on the ground is supposed to stick around.

“We’re looking at temperatures falling back into the teens and single digits overnight, so we’re not really expecting the snow to go really anywhere,” said Francis Tarasiewicz, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Norton.

The massive storm dumped several inches of snow onto most of the state Sunday and early Monday, according to the National Weather Service. Check out the snow totals for several Massachusetts communities.

Advertisement

Massachusetts snow totals so far

Here are the most recent snowfall totals reported in several Massachusetts cities and towns as of Monday, Jan. 26, according to the National Weather Service:

  • Amherst: 13.5 inches (as of 12:40 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Boston: 18.6 inches (as of 7 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Braintree: 16 inches (as of 11:07 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Dighton: 16 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Duxbury: 8.5 inches (as of 5:14 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Eastham: 13 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Fitchburg: 17 inches (as of 10:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Foxboro: 11 inches (as of 10 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Greenfield: 7.5 inches (as of 6:32 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Ipswich: 17.2 inches (as of 10:35 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Lowell: 16.8 inches (as of 10:46 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Marston Mills: 12 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Martha’s Vineyard: 10 inches (as of 6 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Nantucket: 8 inches (as of 5:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)
  • Norton: 12.8 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Plymouth: 17.5 inches (as of 6:53 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Shrewsbury: 19 inches (as of 8 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Springfield: 16.5 inches (as of 12 a.m. on Jan. 26)
  • Worcester: 10.9 inches (as of 6:30 p.m. on Jan. 25)

What does the weather look like in Massachusetts on Monday, Jan. 26?

Now that the bulk of the storm has passed, light to moderate snow is expected to fall in Massachusetts throughout Monday, Jan. 26, and into Tuesday, Jan. 27, according to NWS.

Eastern Massachusetts, including Boston and Lawrence, could see up to 3 to 4 more inches of snow, the weather service said.

Worcester, Provincetown, and Fitchburg could see 2 to 3 inches, Greenfield could see 2 inches, and Hyannis, Springfield, Pittsfield, and Great Barrington could see 1 to 2 inches, NWS said.

New Bedford, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket could see less than an inch of snow on Monday, Jan. 26, according to NWS.

Advertisement

“Any lingering snow showers should be wrapped up by around 11 p.m. or so,” Tarasiewicz said.

Temperatures are expected to be below freezing throughout much of the state on Monday and Tuesday.

MA weather watches and warnings

Massachusetts radar

Sign up for weather texts



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending