Connect with us

Boston, MA

Recovering from the gut punch game

Published

on

Recovering from the gut punch game


Ugh. That was tough.

I’m going to take a short break right here from analyzing the sport, partly as a result of I simply can’t proper now. And that’s a part of what I’m speaking about. Everybody has a distinct means of dealing with this sort of loss as a fan. So, I assumed I’d check out followers on this second.

Some individuals are likely to lash out and rage. It isn’t arduous to search out them, simply leap on Twitter or tune into speak radio. They need their pound of flesh and if anybody will get of their means with a cheery disposition, their heads will roll. My solely beef with these followers is that generally they take it too far and wind up hurting people who had nothing to do with the end result of the sport.

A step down from there’s the people who simply need to course of every thing by getting it off their chest: what went fallacious, who was responsible, what it means within the close to and long run future. In some ways, that’s the center of running a blog and I completely relate.

Advertisement

On the entire flip facet are the true believers. I hesitate to name it “blind religion” as a result of that generally has a unfavorable connotation. This group admits that it was a tricky loss, however it doesn’t shake their core perception within the group. The glass is perpetually half full, each unhealthy play was simply unhealthy luck, and each good play is proof that greatness is simply across the nook. Clearly there are levels to this.

Some individuals (like me) are likely to shut down after a foul loss. Like, actually energy down the pc, flip off the TV, and go do one thing utterly completely different. Personally, I’ve discovered this to be therapeutic (although admittedly it isn’t best for working a weblog).

Different individuals can’t let it go and have to interrupt all of it down till it has been analyzed and dissected right down to the smallest element. I’ve been there earlier than, too.

Whilst I lay out these completely different persona sorts, I absolutely admit that I’m oversimplifying rather a lot. To actually map this out, you’d want to make use of Venn diagrams, the place completely different features of the entire above intersect and overlap. Then it’s a must to account for the truth that individuals change. Generally slowly over time, and generally dramatically from recreation to recreation.

So what? Why am I even speaking about this? I don’t know. Perhaps in my outdated age, I’m getting extra introspective. Perhaps I simply wish to attain out and assist individuals type by means of their very own confused emotions. I even have a younger son who is actually moving into watching sports activities and I’m attempting to navigate him by means of these ups and downs in a wholesome means.

Advertisement

Regardless, I’m a agency believer within the idea of “you do you.” No matter means you wish to be a fan is your prerogative. The one concern I’ve is with individuals who search to do hurt to others or themselves (bodily or emotional). These individuals I might strongly urge to hunt assist and/or discover a higher means of working by means of feelings. At CelticsBlog, you all ought to know by now that every one I ask is that you simply be respectful to everybody else. Allow them to be the fan that they wish to be.

The loss final night time was intestine wrenching. No sugar coating it. I’m undecided precisely what it means in regards to the character of this group or the season as an entire. I don’t know the way they’ll reply within the subsequent recreation(s). I simply know I’ll be tuning in.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Josh Kraft supports Boston sanctuary policy defended by Mayor Wu, his opponent, in DC

Published

on

Josh Kraft supports Boston sanctuary policy defended by Mayor Wu, his opponent, in DC


Boston mayoral candidate Josh Kraft, left, and incumbent Mayor Michelle Wu. Both are Democrats. (Tréa Lavery/MassLive)Tréa Lavery

As Boston Mayor Michelle Wu departed Capitol Hill on Wednesday, her challenger in this year’s mayoral race, Josh Kraft, said he supported the immigration policy that Wu had defended to congressional Republicans.

In an hours-long hearing, Wu maintained that Boston’s policy of limited cooperation with the federal government on civil immigration enforcement was both legal and beneficial for the city, helping immigrants feel comfortable interacting with local police without fear of deportation.

Kraft supports “Boston’s policy of handling immigrants,” his campaign said in a statement Wednesday night.

Advertisement

That included support for Boston’s Trust Act, the law that directs police to cooperate with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officials on criminal matters, such as investigating drug or weapons trafficking or arresting violent offenders, but prohibits police involvement with civil immigration enforcement, such as holding someone at ICE’s request without a criminal warrant.

  • Read more: 5 takeaways from Mayor Wu’s Congressional testimony on sanctuary cities
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 05: (L-R) Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and David J. Bier, Director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute, are sworn in during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on sanctuary cities’ policies at the U.S. Capitol on March 05, 2025 in Washington, DC. The hearing comes as President Donald Trump looks to implement key elements of his immigration policy, while threatening to cut funding to cities that resist the administration’s immigration efforts. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)Getty Images

To some, it’s known as a sanctuary city policy.

The campaign pointed to Kraft’s statement last week in which he said he “strongly opposes” the mass deportation plan pitched by President Donald Trump and Tom Homan, his acting director of ICE. Kraft denounced Homan’s “inflammatory rhetoric about a city he does not know,” referring to the border chief’s repeated shots at Wu and pledge to “bring hell” to Boston by way of an immigration crackdown.

  • Read more: Boston Mayor Wu parries GOP jabs in tense Capitol Hill hearing where theater ruled | John L. Micek

“It is outrageous to think about ICE officers raiding schools or places of worship to round up undocumented immigrants who are not engaged in criminal activity,” Kraft said.

“I know these people,” Kraft continued. “I’ve spent my life working with the immigrant community in and around Boston. I know their character and the contributions they make to the city of Boston. I also understand — and have great respect for — the important work that the Boston Police Department and other first responders do every day to keep Boston’s neighborhoods livable for all of our residents.”

Josh Kraft

Josh Kraft, son of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft and former CEO of the Boys and Girls Clubs of Boston, speaks at a campaign launch event announcing his candidacy for mayor of Boston at Prince Hall in Dorchester, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2025. (Tréa Lavery/MassLive)Tréa Lavery/MassLive

In an X post Tuesday, Kraft also said he supported Wu going to Washington, D.C., to defend Boston, but he questioned the use of up to $650,000 in taxpayer funds, as reported by the Boston Herald, spent on a “show trial hearing.”

Advertisement
  • Read more: Watch: Boston Mayor Wu introduces baby daughter before Capitol Hill hearing

Wu was one of four Democratic mayors to appear Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. She was joined by New York City Mayor Eric Adams, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, all of whom observe some form of sanctuary policy enshrined in local law.

The mayors have put “criminal illegal aliens back onto the streets” to commit violent crimes, U.S. Rep. James Comer, a Kentucky Republican and chair of the committee, insisted.

  • Read more: Florida Republican vows to report Boston Mayor Wu to DOJ for criminal investigation

Wu and the other mayors pushed back on that and similar claims.

Asked by Comer if Boston is a sanctuary city, Wu replied: “Boston is a safe city.”

“A sanctuary city clause does not mean our city will ever be a safe haven for violent criminals,” Adams said.

Wu used her opening statement to the committee to detail Boston’s recent public safety success, including its lowest homicide rate in decades last year.

Boston is safe, she said, “because all of our residents trust that they can call 911 in the event of an emergency or to report a crime. This federal administration’s approach is undermining that trust.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu and Boston could face legal repercussions after much-hyped hearing

Published

on

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu and Boston could face legal repercussions after much-hyped hearing


The much-hyped hearing, Wu’s first time on the national stage, turned out not to be so much of a show but more of a legal grilling of the mayor and three other city mayors aimed at getting them to admit under oath they weren’t following federal immigration law. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu clashes with Rep. James Comer during

Published

on

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu clashes with Rep. James Comer during


Boston Mayor Michelle Wu clashes with Rep. James Comer during “sanctuary city” hearing – CBS Boston

Watch CBS News


Democratic mayors, including Boston’s Michelle Wu, testified before Congress about “sanctuary city” policies.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending