Culture
Why tennis media is a fragmented mess, from Grand Slam broadcast rights to social media highlights
Alexandra Eala had the biggest week of her tennis career at the Miami Open in March. She beat three Grand Slam champions — Jelena Ostapenko, Madison Keys and Iga Świątek — on her way to the semifinals, where she had 2024 U.S. Open finalist Jessica Pegula on the ropes in what was ultimately a three-set defeat. Eala, 19, who has been making tennis history for the Philippines for most of her life, was the most surprising star of the tournament.
More surprising, for anyone familiar with the uneasy relationship between tennis and media, was how quickly she became a star on the women’s tennis tour’s YouTube, too. By the Monday after her incredible run, Eala was front and center for “Rally the World,” the WTA’s series of videos in which players declare how the sport lets them express their full selves, launched as part of a rebrand in late February.
“This is my stage to rally a nation,” Eala, who became the highest-ranked Filipino player in WTA history at the end of March, says.
Eala used the Miami Open’s teal and blue courts as her living room for most of that tournament, but the wider stage on which tennis broadcasts itself — across television, streaming and social media — is more often an exercise in restricted views and convoluted entry points. When world No. 3 Coco Gauff, who has as much star power on TikTok as she does on the tennis court, was asked about what she wanted the WTA to improve, she focused on user-generated content: the clips, highlights packages, memes and other media that players and fans make, separate from the official output of the tennis tours or rights holders. The WTA cannot create this itself, because then it wouldn’t be user-generated, but it can follow the outlines of what makes it so compelling.
“Obviously I’m someone who is on social media a lot. A lot more TikToks and following the trends that a lot of the other sports are doing, which I know that WTA has a plan in place … they ask for feedback and that was the main thing I noticed,” Gauff said in a news conference at Indian Wells.
The tension between official and unofficial content — and how the rights and deals are made that decide which is which — are at the center of tennis’ future.
If a tennis fan in the United States wants to watch the next Grand Slam, the French Open at Roland Garros, Paris, they have a few choices. They can buy in-person tickets; they can watch on television; they can watch on a streaming service; or they can watch highlights, either on those services or on a social media channel like YouTube.
Buying in-person tickets is expensive, even before factoring in travel to France. To watch on cable television, they will need to use a Warner Bros. Discovery network, after the company signed a 10-year, $650 million (£503.2m) deal for U.S. broadcast rights to the tournament in June 2024. In April, it announced that eight-time Grand Slam champion Andre Agassi will join as an analyst, for coverage that will air on TNT Sports and TBS. It will also stream on Max. It had previously aired across a fragmented combination of NBC, the Tennis Channel, Tennis Channel+ (its streaming service) and Peacock.
That’s for one Grand Slam. The other three are variously broadcast across ABC, ESPN and the Tennis Channel. For the next rung down, ATP and WTA 1,000 tournaments, the fan could use Tennis Channel. Or, to just watch men’s tournaments, they could subscribe to Tennis TV, the ATP-run streaming service from ATP Media. It launched as a combined service in 2009, but the WTA left the platform in 2016. The WTA has its own WTA TV platform, but it does not operate in the United States.
For highlights, the fan could use television or streaming, or they could use YouTube — through the French Open’s own channel.
This combination of platforms, subscription costs and split services is a feature, rather than a bug, because of how central broadcast media rights are to tennis’ financial ecosystem. ESPN will pay $2.04 billion (£1.58 bn) to air the U.S. Open through 2037, while Wimbledon’s broadcast deal with ABC and ESPN networks comes in at $52.5m per year as of 2024, according to SP Global. Those revenues, along with ticket sales and sponsorships, form the three pillars of how tennis tournaments make money.
At the upper echelons of tennis, media rights revenues take up more of that three-way split; moving down the pyramid of events, they take up less. For the biggest events, that means their value requires protection, which means being officious about broadcast restrictions. One of the main limitations to Gauff’s desire for more social content? Players, who create the product for which media companies pay so much, can’t even share footage of themselves.
At Wimbledon last year, the Australian player Daria Saville launched a petition against the restriction. “It pains me that Grand Slams do not currently permit players and fans to share footage and highlights from matches on their social media platforms,” she wrote. “The opportunity for us to self-promote and inspire a broader audience, particularly young and aspiring athletes, is being denied by this outdated copyright policy.”
Daria Kasatkina, the world No. 12 who recently switched allegiance from Russia to Australia, runs “What The Vlog.” It’s a YouTube channel, produced with Kasatkina’s partner, Natalia Zabiiako, which gives fans an insight into life on the tour and interviews Kasatkina’s fellow players. Kasatkina has also criticized the fact that players can’t share footage of themselves in action. “This is something I a bit don’t agree with, because it’s not like we’re streaming,” she told a couple of reporters at the Australian Open.
“It’s something that happened two weeks ago, plus, it’s me. Goddamn, it’s me playing the match. I was waiting there outside running, and now I cannot use the footage of myself.”
The Grand Slams were contacted for comment. A spokesperson for the All England Lawn Tennis Club, which organizes Wimbledon, said: “It’s important to strike a balance between encouraging fan engagement with The Championships, the players and the sport, while at the same time tackling the growing issue of illegally pirated content and protecting the contractual agreements that are in place with our rights-holding broadcasters who bring a significant amount of value into the tennis ecosystem.”
A spokesperson for the United States Tennis Association (USTA) added: “Our broadcast partnerships are vital to the growth and success of the U.S. Open and the game of tennis in many ways. Together they are the platform through which the US Open is seen by hundreds of millions of fans around the world each year. We understand the evolving universe of player and fan-shared content, and we support athletes’ desires to promote themselves. We’re constantly evaluating how we can make changes and enhancements in these areas to maximize the promotion and growth of our sport, while also ensuring that our agreements with our partners, and their copyrighted material, are protected.”
Myriad tennis players like Coco Gauff have used social media to build a connection with fans beyond the court. (Robert Prange / Getty Images)
Kasatkina said that the WTA has been more permissive about sharing match footage from its events. Marina Storti, chief executive of WTA Ventures, the tour’s commercial arm, said in an interview in February that what players can and can’t share will be a discussion point in future rights negotiations.
The WTA has also introduced “Inside the Tour,” a video series designed to emulate the popularity of player vlogs like Kasatkina’s, on its own YouTube channel.
One Grand Slam has even circumvented its own broadcast agreements in order to attract a wider audience. In January, the Australian Open showed matches for free live on its YouTube channel, but instead of the actual match footage, it used animated characters, like something from a video game. It was a hit, with the viewership increasing from 246,542 over six days for a more basic 2024 version to 1,796,338 in the same timeframe this year.
Innovation in how tennis is broadcast is not easy in a sport with an often traditionalist audience. “I think broadcasting in all sports has stayed the same,” said Farzeen Ghorashy, president at Overtime, in a video interview in February.
“What innovation has there been in broadcasting broadly? The camera angles are the same. The commentators are mostly the same. There’s more simulcasts and visual sort of things, but that doesn’t bring fans into the sport.
“I think if you’re any league that has sold your media rights and it lives on linear television, the average age of the linear television viewers is older, so therefore the fan is going to be older as well.
“So I think all the leagues and rights holders are now thinking about, how do I age down … (and) reach a new audience in a different way.”
Overtime is a media company aimed at Gen Z sports fans which focuses on the NFL and NBA, and claims to have an audience of over 100m people. The ATP Tour recently signed a content partnership to bring its clip-microphone interviews with players to tennis. These kinds of clips, which can be shared endlessly by fans across social media platforms, are a key access point for people who may know someone like Gauff, Ben Shelton, Carlos Alcaraz or Aryna Sabalenka as someone they have seen on social media doing a dance, rather than a champion tennis player.
Other sports, including Formula One, have embraced drivers’ prominence in other spaces, especially on streaming platforms like Twitch. Amazon, which owns Twitch, had a five-year deal for the U.S. Open between 2018 and 2023. It did not renew the deal, and the cross-over opportunity went away. Golf has made strides in embracing YouTube. Direct-to-consumer streaming services, like the one the Tennis Channel launched in November last year, could yet add single-match subscriptions, or one-off payments for compelling rivalries, or other introductory offers. Even a relatively modest monthly payment is not a good deal for someone who only wants to follow one player or just the odd final. But these things don’t yet exist.
Another key entry point is controversy, something which official rights holders don’t always want to lean into. At last year’s Madrid Open, a short clip of Daniil Medvedev asking if the “Illuminati” were responsible for roof closure decisions went viral. It is still up on the Tennis Channel and Tennis TV YouTube channels, but it was copyright-striked on X. These kinds of clips, like the above player interviews, are ways into tennis for fans unfamiliar with the sport and its protagonists, but more often than not rightsholders’ contracts are written so restrictively that they limit discoverability.
Fans generating these kinds of entry points meet similar obstacles. The Sabinelisickifansss YouTube account racked up 27,000 subscribers before being shut down last July for repeated copyright strikes, in which the official rightsholder for a clip makes a complaint to YouTube. The account started as a way of sharing footage of the German player and former Wimbledon finalist Sabine Lisicki, but grew into a showcase for controversial moments on the WTA Tour more widely.
It became popular with videos like “Top 10 most HATED WTA tennis players” and “Double Bounce in WTA Tennis (No Sportsmanship at all…) ( (DRAMA),” but sailed close to the wind with the amount of footage it used without actually owning any rights. After a series of complaints from Wimbledon, and previous copyright strikes from other tournaments and governing bodies, it was shut down.
The account was first set up by Jacky, 25, who lives in Hong Kong. He started it seven years ago, when he was a student. In a phone interview in February, he said he was “shocked” when the account was closed down, despite receiving several warnings. Last year, a letter sent to the European Union and signed by the Premier League, Sky and Warner Bros Discovery, among others, claimed that the total cost of piracy to sports rights holders is $28.3bn each year. That complaint was primarily about the live streaming of events on unofficial streams, rather than short clips from matches that happened, in some cases, years ago.
Jacky said that the tours’ limits on what they will post don’t serve fans’ desire for controversy. “They will not put up negative things like the worst player in history. But I think the WTA audience wants to know which player played really badly in a Grand Slam or what’s the biggest losing streak on the WTA Tour.
“This tennis YouTube is doing something official YouTube accounts cannot provide, and Grand Slam highlights are often only like two or three minutes long.”
He decided to start a new version of his YouTube account after around a month away. He said that he’s a lot more careful now about sharing footage from Grand Slams, but feels strongly that tennis fans are often underserved by the quality and quantity of highlights that is freely available from the majors. Highlights on the ATP and WTA channels are made using artificial intelligence, which can capture exciting points but often leads to a package that gives a fan absolutely no idea of how a match played out, jumping from halfway through with one player leading to the other player having match point.
They are also very short (official Grand Slam channels, most often the Australian Open, do offer longer packages and sometimes full matches) and big matches sometimes don’t get full fanfare. Last year’s Madrid Open final between Świątek and Sabalenka, widely regarded as the best match of the year and a rare final meeting for the two best women’s players in the world, got the full-match treatment…
…On Christmas Day, almost eight months after it was played.
Joint broadcast rights for the ATP and WTA Tours would simplify all of this. This is in place at the four Grand Slams, but a long-discussed commercial merger between WTA Ventures and the ATP into a new company called Tennis Ventures is yet to be finalized. The proposed merger would not come with a 50-50 revenue split between the two tours at present, with the ATP slated to receive closer to 80 percent of revenue from tournaments, media rights and sponsorships.
“Everyone sees the opportunity to align more closely the men and the women sport both commercially, but also from a marketing perspective,” Storti said, adding that talks remain ongoing. “And we know we see the opportunity to help grow the sport. I think it would benefit everyone — the players, the tournaments.”
Tennis is also not alone in reaching a sports media inflection point, as media companies try to figure out how to balance the decline in what has made them money in the past (linear broadcast and cable) and the rise of what could make them money in the future, but largely hasn’t yet (streaming.) MLB and ESPN will terminate their broadcast deal, which was supposed to run until 2028, at the end of the 2025 season. Sources briefed on ESPN’s thinking told The Athletic that ESPN, which would have paid the league $550 million for the three remaining seasons, saw that figure as too far above market value.
The sport is also still recovering from the impact of Covid-19, which was financially ruinous; the renewal of media rights deals in its wake has been vital.
In the short-term, tennis tournaments and tours can see that high-value rights deals plus intense media restrictions equals high demand for pay television and in-person tickets. But in the long-term, as streaming inevitably overtakes cable, those restrictions — which shut out fans from discovering the sport, as well as consistently watching it — could come home to roost.
If those broadcast deals decline in value, and other services don’t fill the shortfall — because their figures show there are fewer fans waiting to watch on the other side of that decline, because their routes into the sport have been closed off — tennis tournaments will suddenly find themselves at the head of a broken system.
The WTA’s increased focus on its players’ stories, and acting with speed when a new one emerges, like with Eala in Miami, is one example of a move to fight against that tide. The Australian Open’s cartoon players and the ATP’s Overtime partnership are another; so are the social media accounts of players like Gauff and Kasatkina.
It’s the friction between these on-ramps for fans and the full tournament experience that will be critical for tennis, if it really does want to “rally the world.”
(Illustration: Kelsea Petersen / The Athletic / Getty Images)
Culture
Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books
Literature
‘Romola’ (1863) by George Eliot
Who knew that there’s a major George Eliot novel that neither I nor any of my friends had ever heard of?
“Romola” was Eliot’s fourth novel, published between “The Mill on the Floss” (1860) and “Middlemarch” (1870-71). If my friends and I didn’t get this particular memo, and “Romola” is familiar to every Eliot fan but us, please skip the following.
“Romola” isn’t some fluky misfire better left unmentioned in light of Eliot’s greater work. It’s her only historical novel, set in Florence during the Italian Renaissance. It embraces big subjects like power, religion, art and social upheaval, but it’s not dry or overly intellectual. Its central character is a gifted, freethinking young woman named Romola, who enters a marriage so disastrous as to make Anna Karenina’s look relatively good.
It probably matters that many of Eliot’s other books have been adapted into movies or TV series, with actors like Hugh Dancy, Ben Kingsley, Emily Watson and Rufus Sewell. The BBC may be doing even more than we thought to keep classic literature alive. (In 1924, “Romola” was made into a silent movie starring Lillian Gish. It doesn’t seem to have made much difference.)
Anthony Trollope, among others, loved “Romola.” He did, however, warn Eliot against aiming over her readers’ heads, which may help explain its obscurity.
All I can say, really, is that it’s a mystery why some great books stay with us and others don’t.
‘Quiet Dell’ (2013) by Jayne Anne Phillips
This was an Oprah Book of the Week, which probably disqualifies it from B-side status, but it’s not nearly as well known as Phillips’s debut story collection, “Black Tickets” (1979), or her most recent novel, “Night Watch” (2023), which won her a long-overdue Pulitzer Prize.
Phillips has no parallel in her use of potent, stylized language to shine a light into the darkest of corners. In “Quiet Dell,” her only true-crime novel, she’s at the height of her powers, which are particularly apparent when she aims her language laser at horrific events that actually occurred. Her gift for transforming skeevy little lives into what I can only call “Blade Runner” mythology is consistently stunning.
Consider this passage from the opening chapter of “Quiet Dell”:
“Up high the bells are ringing for everyone alive. There are silver and gold and glass bells you can see through, and sleigh bells a hundred years old. My grandmother said there was a whisper for each one dead that year, and a feather drifting for each one waiting to be born.”
The book is full of language like that — and of complex, often chillingly perverse characters. It’s a dark, underrecognized beauty.
‘Solaris’ (1961) by Stanislaw Lem
You could argue that, in America, at least, the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem didn’t produce any A-side novels. You could just as easily argue that that makes all his novels both A-side and B-side.
It’s science fiction. All right?
I love science and speculative fiction, but I know a lot of literary types who take pride in their utter lack of interest in it. I always urge those people to read “Solaris,” which might change their opinions about a vast number of popular books they dismiss as trivial. As far as I know, no one has yet taken me up on that.
“Solaris” involves the crew of a space station continuing the study of an aquatic planet that has long defied analysis by the astrophysicists of Earth. Part of what sets the book apart from a lot of other science-fiction novels is Lem’s respect for enigma. He doesn’t offer contrived explanations in an attempt to seduce readers into suspending disbelief. The crew members start to experience … manifestations? … drawn from their lives and memories. If the planet has any intentions, however, they remain mysterious. All anyone can tell is that their desires and their fears, some of which are summoned from their subconsciousness, are being received and reflected back to them so vividly that it becomes difficult to tell the real from the projected. “Solaris” has the peculiar distinction of having been made into not one but two bad movies. Read the book instead.
‘Fox 8’ (2013) by George Saunders
If one of the most significant living American writers had become hypervisible with his 2017 novel, “Lincoln in the Bardo,” we’d go back and read his earlier work, wouldn’t we? Yes, and we may very well have already done so with the story collections “Tenth of December” (2013) and “Pastoralia” (2000). But what if we hadn’t yet read Saunders’s 2013 novella, “Fox 8,” about an unusually intelligent fox who, by listening to a family from outside their windows at night, has learned to understand, and write, in fox-English?: “One day, walking neer one of your Yuman houses, smelling all the interest with snout, I herd, from inside, the most amazing sound. Turns out, what that sound is, was: the Yuman voice, making werds. They sounded grate! They sounded like prety music! I listened to those music werds until the sun went down.”
Once Saunders became more visible to more of us, we’d want to read a book that ventures into the consciousness of a different species (novels tend to be about human beings), that maps the differences and the overlaps in human and animal consciousness, explores the effects of language on consciousness and is great fun.
We’d all have read it by now — right?
‘Between the Acts’ (1941) by Virginia Woolf
You could argue that Woolf didn’t have any B-sides, and yet it’s hard to deny that more people have read “Mrs. Dalloway” (1925) and “To the Lighthouse” (1927) than have read “The Voyage Out” (1915) or “Monday or Tuesday” (1921). Those, along with “Orlando” (1928) and “The Waves” (1931), are Woolf’s most prominent novels.
Four momentous novels is a considerable number for any writer, even a great one. That said, “Between the Acts,” her last novel, really should be considered the fifth of her significant books. The phrase “embarrassment of riches” comes to mind.
Five great novels by the same author is a lot for any reader to take on. Our reading time is finite. We won’t live long enough to read all the important books, no matter how old we get to be. I don’t expect many readers to be as devoted to Woolf as are the cohort of us who consider her to have been some sort of dark saint of literature and will snatch up any relic we can find. Fanatics like me will have read “Between the Acts” as well as “The Voyage Out,” “Monday or Tuesday” and “Flush” (1933), the story of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s cocker spaniel. Speaking for myself, I don’t blame anyone who hasn’t gotten to those.
I merely want to add “Between the Acts” to the A-side, lest anyone who’s either new to Woolf or a tourist in Woolf-landia fail to rank it along with the other four contenders.
As briefly as possible: It focuses on an annual village pageant that attempts to convey all of English history in a single evening. The pageant itself interweaves subtly, brilliantly, with the lives of the villagers playing the parts.
It’s one of Woolf’s most lusciously lyrical novels. And it’s a crash course, of sorts, in her genius for conjuring worlds in which the molehill matters as much as the mountain, never mind their differences in size.
It’s also the most accessible of her greatest books. It could work for some as an entry point, in more or less the way William Faulkner’s “As I Lay Dying” (1930) can be the starter book before you go on to “The Sound and the Fury” (1929) or “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936).
As noted, there’s too much for us to read. We do the best we can.
More in Literature
See the rest of the issue
Culture
6 Poems You Should Know by Heart
Literature
‘Prayer’ (1985) by Galway Kinnell
Whatever happens. Whatever
what is is is what
I want. Only that. But that.
“I typically say Kinnell’s words at the start of my day, as I’m pedaling a traffic-laden path to my office,” says Major Jackson, 57, the author of six books of poetry, including “Razzle Dazzle” (2023). “The poem encourages a calm acceptance of the day’s events but also wants us to embrace the misapprehension and oblivion of life, to avoid probing too deeply for answers to inscrutable questions. I admire what Kinnell does with only 14 words; the repetition of ‘what,’ ‘that’ and ‘is’ would seem to limit the poem’s sentiment but, paradoxically, the poem opens widely to contain all manner of human experience. The three ‘is’es in the middle line give it a symmetry that makes its message feel part of a natural order, and even more convincing. Thanks to the skillful punctuation, pauses and staccato rhythm, a tonal quality of interior reflection emerges. Much like a haiku, it continues after its last words, lingering like the last note played on a piano that slowly fades.”
“Just as I was entering young adulthood, probably slow to claim romantic feelings, a girlfriend copied out a poem by Pablo Neruda and slipped it into an envelope with red lipstick kisses all over it. In turn, I recited this poem. It took me the remainder of that winter to memorize its lines,” says Jackson. “The poem captures the pitch of longing that defines love at its most intense. The speaker in Shakespeare’s most famous sonnet believes the poem creates the beloved, ‘So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, / So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.’ (Sonnet 18). In Rilke’s expressive declarations of yearning, the beloved remains elusive. Wherever the speaker looks or travels, she marks his world by her absence. I find this deeply moving.”
“Clifton faced many obstacles, including cancer, a kidney transplant and the loss of her husband and two of her children. Through it all, she crafted a long career as a pre-eminent American poet,” says Jackson. “Her poem ‘won’t you celebrate with me’ is a war cry, an invitation to share in her victories against life’s persistent challenges. The poem is meaningful to all who have had to stare down death in a hospital or had to bereave the passing of close relations. But, even for those who have yet to mourn life’s vicissitudes, the poem is instructive in cultivating resilience and a persevering attitude. I keep coming back to the image of the speaker’s hands and the spirit of steadying oneself in the face of unspeakable storms. She asks in a perfectly attuned gorgeously metrical line, ‘what did i see to be except myself?’”
‘Sonnet 94’ (1609) by William Shakespeare
They that have power to hurt and will do none,
That do not do the thing they most do show,
Who, moving others, are themselves as stone,
Unmovèd, cold, and to temptation slow,
They rightly do inherit heaven’s graces
And husband nature’s riches from expense;
They are the lords and owners of their faces,
Others but stewards of their excellence.
The summer’s flower is to the summer sweet,
Though to itself it only live and die;
But if that flower with base infection meet,
The basest weed outbraves his dignity.
For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.
“It’s one of the moments of Western consciousness,” says Frederick Seidel, 90, the author of more than a dozen collections of poetry, including “So What” (2024). “Shakespeare knows and says what he knows.”
“It trombones magnificent, unbearable sorrow,” says Seidel.
“It’s smartass and bitter and bright,” says Seidel.
These interviews have been edited and condensed.
More in Literature
See the rest of the issue
Culture
Classic and Contemporary Literature From France, Japan, India, the U.K. and Brazil
Literature
FRANCE
According to the writer Leïla Slimani, 44, the author of ‘The Country of Others’ (2020).
Classic
‘Essais de Montaigne’ (‘Essays of Montaigne,’ 1580)
“France is a country of nuance with a love of conversation and freedom and an aversion to fanaticism. It’s also a country built on reflexive subjectivity. Montaigne reveals all that, writing, ‘I am myself the matter of my book.’”
Contemporary
‘La Carte et le Territoire’ (‘The Map and the Territory,’ 2010) by Michel Houellebecq
“Houellebecq describes France as a museum, where landscape turns into décor and where rural areas are emptying out. He shows the gap between the Parisian elite and the rest of the population, which he paints as aging and disoriented by modernity. It’s a melancholic and yet ironic novel about a disenchanted nation.”
JAPAN
According to the writer Yoko Ogawa, 64, the author of ‘The Memory Police’ (1994).
Classic
‘Man’yoshu’ (late eighth century)
“‘Man’yoshu,’ the oldest extant collection of Japanese poetry, reflects a diversity of voices — from emperors to commoners. They bow their heads to the majesty of nature, weep at the loss of loved ones and find pathos in death. The pages pulse with the vitality of successive generations.”
Contemporary
‘Tenohira no Shosetsu’ (‘Palm-of-the-Hand Stories,’ 1923-72) by Yasunari Kawabata
“The essence of Japanese literature might lie in brevity: waka [a classical 31-syllable poetry form], haiku and short stories. There’s a tradition of cherishing words that seem to well up from the depths of the heart, imbued with warmth. Kawabata, too, exudes more charm in his short stories — especially these very short ‘palm-of-the-hand’ stories — than in his full-length novels. Good and evil, beauty and ugliness, love and hate — everything is contained in these modest worlds.”
INDIA
According to Aatish Taseer, 45, a T contributing writer and the author of ‘Stranger to History: A Son’s Journey Through Islamic Lands’ (2009).
Classic
‘The Kumarasambhava’ (‘The Birth of Kumara,’ circa fifth century) by Kalidasa
“This is an epic poem by the greatest of the classical Sanskrit poets and dramatists. The gods are in a pickle. They’re being tormented by a monster, but Shiva, their natural protector, is deep in meditation and cannot be disturbed. Kama, the god of love, armed with his flower bow, is sent down from the heavens to waken Shiva. Never a wise idea! The great god, in his fury, opens his third eye and incinerates Kama. But then, paradoxically, the death of the god of love engenders one of the greatest love stories ever told. In the final canto, Shiva and his wife, the goddess Parvati, have the most electrifying sex for days on end — and, 15 centuries on, in our now censorious time, it still leaves one agog at the sensual wonder that was India.”
Contemporary
‘The Complex’ (2026) by Karan Mahajan
“This state-of-the-nation novel, which was published just last month, captures the squalor and malice of Indian family life. Delhi is both my and Mahajan’s hometown and, in this sprawling homage to India’s capital, we see it on the eve of the economic liberalization of the 1990s, as the old socialist city gives way to a megalopolis of ambition, greed and political cynicism.”
THE UNITED KINGDOM
According to the writer Tessa Hadley, 70, the author of ‘The London Train’ (2011).
Classic
‘Jane Eyre’ (1847) by Charlotte Brontë
“Written almost 200 years ago, it remains an insight into our collective soul — or at least its female part. Somewhere at the heart of us there’s a small girl in a wintry room, curled up in the window seat with a book, watching the lashing rain on the window glass: ‘There was no possibility of taking a walk that day. …’ Jane’s solemnity, her outraged sense of justice, her trials to come, the wild weather outside, her longing for something better, for love in her future: All this speaks, perhaps problematically, to something buried in the foundations of our idea of ourselves.”
Contemporary
‘All That Man Is’ (2016) by David Szalay
“Though he isn’t quite completely British (he’s part Canadian, part Hungarian), Szalay is brilliant at catching certain aspects of British men — aspects that haven’t been written about for a while, now updated for a new era. Funny, exquisitely observed and terrifying, this novel reminds us, too, how absolutely our fate and our identity as a nation belong with the rest of Europe.”
BRAZIL
According to the writer and critic Noemi Jaffe, 64, the author of ‘What Are the Blind Men Dreaming?’ (2016).
Classic
‘Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas’ (‘The Posthumous Memoirs of Brás Cubas,’ 1881) by Machado de Assis
“Not only is it experimental in style — very short chapters mixed with long ones; different points of view; narrated by a corpse; metalinguistic — but it also introduces an extremely ironic view of the rising bourgeoisie in Rio de Janeiro at the time, revealing the hypocrisy of slave owners, the falsehood of love affairs and the only true reason for all social relationships: convenience and personal interest. After almost 150 years, it’s still modern, both formally and, unfortunately, also in content.”
Contemporary
‘Onde Pastam os Minotauros’ (‘Where Minotaurs Graze,’ 2023) by Joca Reiners Terron
“The two main characters — Cão and Crente — along with some of their colleagues, plan to escape and set fire to the slaughterhouse where they work under exploitative conditions. The men develop sympathy for the animals they kill, and one of them becomes a sort of philosopher, revealing the sheer nonsense of existence and the injustices of society in the deepest parts of Brazil.”
These interviews have been edited and condensed.
More in Literature
See the rest of the issue
-
Technology4 minutes agoiPhone and Samsung flashlight tricks you should know
-
Business10 minutes agoDavid Ellison hits CinemaCon, vowing to make more movies with Paramount-Warner Bros.
-
Entertainment16 minutes agoLarry David discusses ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm,’ ‘Seinfeld’ legacies and new HBO series
-
Lifestyle22 minutes agoNine non-negotiable items for a well-designed life
-
Politics28 minutes agoSupreme Court weighs phone searches to find criminals amid complaints of ‘digital dragnets’
-
Sports40 minutes agoRyan Ward has a solid debut, but bullpen blows it again as Dodgers lose to Rockies
-
World52 minutes agoSchools, shops shut in northern Israel to protest the Lebanon ceasefire
-
News1 hour agoCommunities launch cleanup after severe weather and tornadoes churn across Midwest