Connect with us

Boston, MA

Is Boston’s liquor license process broken?

Published

on

Is Boston’s liquor license process broken?


BOSTON – About 30% of new restaurants fail in their first year. It’s even harder to survive without a liquor license. But in Boston, you can’t get one unless you have a lot of money.

Is the process broken?

Bob Marley towers over Sonia Satchell’s restaurant, Irie, but she isn’t so sure “that everything is going to be alright.”

“Irie means everything good. Everything positive. So, we want to keep it that way,” Sonia said.

Advertisement

Sonia and her sister have been restaurant owners for 24 years. Six months ago, they moved their Caribbean style restaurant to Dorchester.

She loves the new space, but it’s missing something. A liquor license. Sonia, like so many restaurant owners, has applied and gotten nowhere, told there are no licenses available. Boston has reached its limit. It’s capped out.

“Aggravating. I would describe the process as being really, really aggravating,” Sonia said.

She knows finding a Black restauranteur with a liquor license is incredibly rare.

The numbers back her up. There are about 1,100 liquor licenses in Boston. About 2% are held by Black owned businesses.

Advertisement
Liquor licenses
Available liquor licenses in Boston (source OFFSITE)

CBS Boston


“In Mattapan where I live, there is no sit-down restaurant where you can go and grab a drink,” said Boston City Councilor Ruthzee Louijeune. “Not one. It does not exist.”

Louijeune and other city leaders want to secure more licenses for neighborhoods like Mattapan, Roxbury and Hyde Park. And it’s not like the city is flooded with licenses. In fact, one study found there were more after Prohibition than there are now.

“I love coming downtown for a drink, but I’d also like to stay in my neighborhood,” Louijeune said.

Advertisement

If there are enough leaders in City Hall who think this cap on licenses is a problem, why don’t they just fix it? Well, these decisions are actually made at the State House. It is lawmakers that need to make these changes, and let’s just say things don’t always move quickly under the golden dome.

“It’s just a very long, drawn out process,” said Republican State Rep. Paul Frost of Auburn. He says the entire process is a mess. Cities and towns get a capped amount of licenses. When those are gone, they have to propose a Home Rule Petition to get a few more.

The request goes to the legislature, then to a committee or two, then to the Alcohol Beverage Control Commission, then a vote in the House and Senate, before it goes to the governor, who usually goes back and asks the ABCC.

Home Rule petition
Home Rule Petition Process

CBS Boston

Advertisement


 

It can take a year. Representative Frost thinks communities should just decide for themselves what the cap should be.

“We have plenty of other things that we can be doing than getting bogged down with these sorts of requests that can be handled in a more efficient manner,” Frost said.

The most efficient and most expensive way to get a license is to buy one from a restaurant that’s getting out. One was recently posted online for $450,000.

Joandry Vasquez can’t afford that. He owns El Barrio, a small Mexican restaurant with two locations. His spot in Dorchester can sell beer and margaritas, but he can’t get a license for his spot in Roxbury.

Advertisement
Joandry Vasquez
Joandry Vasquez, owner of El Barrio

CBS Boston


 Vasquez can only laugh at the application process. “I’m doing great. But they don’t have any more,” he said. Which is tough on business. “We are dead. After let’s say 6 p.m. this place is dead,” he said.

Vasquez said there should be no caps on licenses. Let everyone compete. But if you paid to get one you wouldn’t like that.

“So many of my friends actually are restaurant owners, either in the North End, or East Boston and Hyde Park and they fought really hard and got the financing and they have this asset that is now worth a half million dollars, and so we are very sensitive to not devaluing that, but want to increase the pie for everyone at the same time,” Louijeune said

Advertisement

She thinks the answer is to gradually get a couple hundred neighborhood specific licenses that are non-transferable. Your business closes, the license goes back to the city.

“It can’t be just one neighborhood that we are setting up for success,” Louijeune said. “It really has to be all of our neighborhoods.”

As for liquor licenses being sold on the open market, we asked the ABCC for the most recent sale prices. Most sold for over $500,000 and one on Boylston Street recently sold for $600,000. 

If you have a question you’d like us to look into, please email questioneverything@cbsboston.com.  

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Boston University Terriers travel to take on the UMass Lowell River Hawks – WTOP News

Published

on

Boston University Terriers travel to take on the UMass Lowell River Hawks – WTOP News


Boston University Terriers (5-4) at UMass Lowell River Hawks (2-8) Lowell, Massachusetts; Thursday, 6 p.m. EST BOTTOM LINE: Boston University…

Boston University Terriers (5-4) at UMass Lowell River Hawks (2-8)

Lowell, Massachusetts; Thursday, 6 p.m. EST

BOTTOM LINE: Boston University travels to UMass Lowell for a Division 1 Division matchup Thursday.

Advertisement

The River Hawks are 1-2 in home games. UMass Lowell ranks eighth in the America East with 6.3 offensive rebounds per game led by Maddie Rice averaging 1.9.

The Terriers are 1-2 on the road. Boston University is 2-3 against opponents over .500.

UMass Lowell’s average of 3.1 made 3-pointers per game is 3.9 fewer made shots on average than the 7.0 per game Boston University allows. Boston University has shot at a 40.1% rate from the field this season, 1.3 percentage points greater than the 38.8% shooting opponents of UMass Lowell have averaged.

TOP PERFORMERS: Rayne Durant is shooting 41.0% and averaging 11.0 points for the River Hawks.

Alex Giannaros is averaging 14.8 points for the Terriers.

Advertisement

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Copyright
© 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston Mayor Wu knocks Senate for killing tax shift bill, City Council sets rates

Published

on

Boston Mayor Wu knocks Senate for killing tax shift bill, City Council sets rates


Boston Mayor Michelle Wu took a swipe at the state Senate for killing her plan to hike commercial tax rates, while the City Council swiftly opted to set tax rates based on a conciliatory recommendation from the city’s chief financial officer.

The City Council voted unanimously to set the residential tax rate at $11.58 per $1,000 of value and the commercial tax rate at $25.96 per $1,000 of value, with the maximum shift of the tax burden allowed by state law, or 175%, onto businesses.

The average single-family homeowner will see a year-over-year property tax hike of about 10.5%, and will experience a 21% quarterly hike in their January third-quarter bills, city officials have previously said.

The Council also opted to set the residential exemption at the maximum rate allowed by state law, at 35%, which computes to a roughly $3,984 deduction from a qualifying homeowner’s tax bill.

Advertisement

“This all falls under current state law,” Council Vice President Brian Worrell, chair of the Ways and Means Committee, said at Wednesday’s meeting. “If the state wants to change those laws, this body already has an income-eligible senior tax exemption petition at the State House that can be taken up.

“If they are seeking a way to work on targeted tax relief for homeowners, we also have that; it’s the home rule petition that was just declared dead.”

Worrell was referring to the mayor’s eight-month bid to hike commercial tax rates, which was approved in two iterations by the City Council and House of Representatives.

Wu’s plan died Monday in the Senate, however, upon the city’s release of final state Department of Revenue-certified valuation numbers that showed homeowners would not be hit with the dramatic tax increase the city had originally projected.

“The sky is not falling,” Worrell said at a Council hearing earlier in the day where the administration recommended the later-approved rates, echoing what state Sen. Nick Collins, a South Boston Democrat said when blocking the mayor’s tax plan for a third and final time on Monday.

Advertisement

Collins on the Senate floor Monday, prior to Senate President Karen Spilka opting to formally kill the mayor’s tax bill, hammered the city for the discrepancy in the less dire final numbers that he said represented a “campaign of fear and manipulation” that was proven to be a “farce.”

Wu hit back on GBH’s Boston Public Radio on Wednesday, accusing the Senate of playing games, and Collins of making “misleading or misinformed” statements.

“We don’t have time at the city level to play games,” Wu said. “I took this process — and many, many residents, seniors, neighborhood leaders, advocates, union workers — took this process very seriously.”

Wu maintained that she had not been aware of the concerns of Collins or other senators ahead of time, saying that those senators did not reach out to her office to share their concerns or try to work with her on addressing them.

She said she was operating under the impression, based on the meeting she had with Spilka, Boston senators and the business groups to restart negotiations after a prior version of the bill stalled in the Senate this past summer, that the instructions that would lead to its passage in that chamber were clear.

Advertisement

“The instruction” from those senators was, Wu said, “work it out with the business groups, and we’re good with that.”

Those talks led to a compromise bill with four business groups who withdrew their opposition contingent upon a lower tax shift onto commercial properties that would result in an annual tax hike for homeowners that was in line with the average increase over the past five years, or about 9%.

Wu’s administration in October released valuation projections that pointed to a 14% annual tax hike for the average homeowner without the legislation, but final certified numbers showed the year-over-year increase if the bill should fail would be in line with the past several years, or about 10%.

The legislation would lead to a lower annual tax hike for homeowners of about 5%, leading senators and the four business groups to back away from the deal.

Wu, for her part, maintained that the final numbers were in line with the range her administration had been projecting and that the higher numbers her team had been citing represented a “worst-case scenario.”

Advertisement

Her chief financial officer, Ashley Groffenberger, insisted that without the legislation and based on the contingency tax rates the administration recommended, homeowners will see a “very, very significant increase in taxes.”

Groffenberger also said there was no time for other options, given the deadline her cabinet and departments were under to send out tax bills this month.

Councilor Erin Murphy, during the day’s Council meeting, had introduced a home rule petition to increase the residential exemption to 40%.

“By increasing the residential exemption, we can offer immediate financial relief, helping to stabilize tax bills and protect them from sudden increases,” Murphy said. “This measure is especially crucial as we continue to face rising housing costs and economic challenges.”

Murphy’s proposal was criticized by a city spokesperson on Tuesday for having the potential to shift more of the tax burden from homeowners onto renters, and was referred to a Council subcommittee for further discussion.

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Chicago Cubs Trade Target Garrett Crochet Acquired by Boston Red Sox

Published

on

Chicago Cubs Trade Target Garrett Crochet Acquired by Boston Red Sox


The Chicago Cubs have been linked in trade rumors to Chicago White Sox star starting pitcher Garrett Crochet.

While the rumors had been swirling about the Cubs being a potential landing spot, he has now been traded elsewhere.

According to a report from ESPN MLB insider Jeff Passan, Crochet has been traded to the Boston Red Sox.

Julian McWilliams of The Boston Globe has been credited for reporting the news first that the Red Sox were on the verge of trading for Crochet.

Advertisement

Crochet is a massive addition for Boston. He has legitimate superstar potential and a move to the Red Sox will certainly help him develop and place him on a team that can contend.

While Crochet would have been a very intriguing pickup for Chicago, Jed Hoyer is not known for making super aggressive moves.

Trading with the White Sox is never an easy thing to do for the Cubs. They usually have to pay a premium due to the crosstown rivalry.

During the 2024 MLB season, Crochet ended up making 32 starts. He compiled a 6-12 record to go along with a 3.58 ERA, a 1.07 WHP, a 6.3 K/BB ratio, and 146.0 innings pitched.

Ahead of the 2024 MLB trade deadline, Crochet was widely expected to end up being moved. That didn’t end up happening, but clearly Chicago was ready to move on.

Advertisement

At just 25 years old, Boston is getting a piece that they can build their rotation around. He has legitimate ace potential if he reaches his ceiling.

Moving forward, Chicago will continue looking to make some moves. The Cubs have been heavily connected as a trade suitor for Houston Astros star outfielder Kyle Tucker.

Hoyer may end up making a splash move this offseason, but no one should be shocked that Crochet wasn’t the addition.

Expect to continue hearing rumors swirl around surrounding Chicago.

The Cubs are still being rumored to have interest in moving both Cody Bellinger and Nico Hoerner.

Advertisement

It’s going to be an interesting next few weeks.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending