Connect with us

News

Xi’s climate goals boost China’s nuclear industry

Published

on

Xi’s climate goals boost China’s nuclear industry

At Karachi’s Paradise Point, on the coastline of Pakistan, China’s long-term ambition for a world-leading nuclear energy industry is coming into view.

For nearly half a century, power at the site — Pakistan’s first nuclear operation — was delivered by Canadian-designed reactors. But, last year, Pakistani nuclear officials gave their final approval for new Hualong-1 reactors, which represent the first exports of China National Nuclear Corporation’s third-generation power station technology.

By March, Xu Pengfei, chair of the China Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation, was able to tell CGTN, China’s state broadcaster, that the units were “operating successfully”, and had demonstrated a “collaborative effort at innovation”, with domestic suppliers providing more than 90 per cent of the equipment.

Nuclear power remains a growth industry in China. Over the past decade, the capacity of installed plants has more than doubled, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration and the International Atomic Energy Agency. As of April this year, China had 55 reactors with installed capacity of 53 gigawatts, up from fewer than 20GW in 2014.

At present, the US is still the world’s biggest user of nuclear power, with 94 operational reactors with an installed capacity of 96GW. However, China is building new reactors at a faster pace than any other country. It has 26 reactors under construction, with an installed capacity of about 30GW.

Advertisement

While Beijing’s original rationale for expanding nuclear power was energy security, the technology’s potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions has become increasingly important to policymakers, according to researcher Philip Andrews-Speed in an analysis for the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES).

A key moment came in September 2020, when Chinese leader Xi Jinping announced that the country’s carbon emissions would peak before 2030 and hit net zero by 2060.

Policymakers in Beijing believe nuclear power can help replace coal-fired plants, which are still the main source of China’s electricity despite a rapid growth in renewables. And they are on track to deliver: China’s policy is in line with International Energy Agency estimates that global nuclear power capacity will have to double by 2050 to hit net zero goals.

In recent months, nuclear power technology has also been heralded in China as a “new productive force” — part of Xi’s vision of long-term economic growth underpinned by increasingly advanced manufacturing industries.

Michal Meidan, head of China energy research at OIES, says that nuclear energy is “definitely part of the solution” for China’s decarbonisation plans, especially given the country has its own nuclear industry that could generate revenues and growth internationally.

Advertisement

But the rapid expansion of the nuclear industry in China has raised questions over resource security, safety, regulation, and export plans as geopolitical tensions rise. Meidan notes that Chinese attempts to export nuclear technology have “faced resistance”, mainly in Romania and the UK, amid a wider backlash against China in Europe and the US.

“Globally, nuclear is quite a divisive question,” Meidan says. “It clearly has environmental attributes that can help but safety, fuel reprocessing and uranium availability are concerns . . . It’s unclear how big a role nuclear will play in China’s energy transition.”

Last year, nuclear power accounted for about 5 per cent of total electricity generation in China but investment in construction of new plants reached $13.1bn — the highest in five years.

As more reactors swing into production, nuclear’s contribution to China’s electricity generation mix is expected to rise to about 10 per cent by 2035 and 18 per cent by 2060, according to the China Nuclear Energy Association.

$13.1bnInvestment in new nuclear power construction in China in 2023 — a five-year high

Advertisement

David Fishman, an analyst at The Lantau Group, a consultancy, says the pace of growth of nuclear power in China over recent years means that the country is probably at “maximum capacity for the industry”, with regulatory agencies and the supply chain at particular risk of strain.

“To staff all the plants, you need to have nuclear . . . and chemical engineering graduates . . . and then the equivalent number of people in Beijing, at the regulatory end, who are able to manage all the plants, who are able to do safety inspections, and checks and reviews,” he says.

Fishman also notes that China is reluctant to become reliant on the “vagaries of the international markets” for its long-term uranium supply. China has a policy of sourcing roughly one-third of its uranium domestically, one-third from Chinese companies’ holdings in foreign mines, and one-third from the international spot market.

“But the fact still remains that they don’t have a lot of domestic uranium, so that could be a concern at some point,” Fishman says.

Li Shuo, director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute, a think-tank, says a key domestic question is whether Beijing decides to expand its nuclear energy capacity from the eastern and southern coastline — where it is currently concentrated — into the country’s vast inland areas. Experts suggest that such plans could be included in the country’s 15th Five-Year Plan period, from 2026-2030.

Advertisement

Li, who previously led Greenpeace’s China climate change team in Beijing, says that, while public perception of nuclear power in China is “neutral”, in the early 2010s a debate on whether to expand the industry inland drew furious responses from the provinces concerned.

“Nuclear is certainly not as controversial as in some of the continental European countries, such as Germany, or in Japan,” Li observes. “Having said that, inland power plants will be very controversial, simply because, if an accident happens, it will have a very large-scale impact for downstream provinces.”

Still, China’s advances in nuclear technology, thanks to lavish state support, mean that — like the country’s solar, wind and electric vehicle industries — its nuclear power sector is also looking outward, to reshape global energy markets.

Although there is resistance to Chinese nuclear projects in many western countries, the Chinese-made reactors at Karachi’s Paradise Point are just the start of an export push.

Over the next decade, China has plans to build and finance reactors across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, according to Lami Kim, director of the Asian Studies Program at the US Army War College. She says this strategy could have “significant implications”, as Beijing shapes global nuclear governance and shifts the balance of power away from the US.

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading

News

Manhattan Building’s Columns Buckled Beneath New Addition, Images Show

Published

on

Manhattan Building’s Columns Buckled Beneath New Addition, Images Show

At least two structural columns buckled and failed in a 37-story office tower in Midtown Manhattan on Tuesday, prompting evacuations of nearby streets and buildings. While city officials asserted that the tower was in no danger of collapsing completely, outside engineers said further failures in the structure could not be ruled out.

A pair of columns that failed completely were part of the tower’s existing structure. A New York Times review of images and videos from inside the building has found that several floors were added atop these columns.

Advertisement

City officials said in a news conference on Tuesday that the building was continuing to move, while they simultaneously assured the city that the building would not suffer “total collapse.” “The way this building is constructed, it’s a steel-frame building,” John Esposito, a chief in the Fire Department in New York, said at the afternoon news conference. “So, it would not be a total collapse. It would be more of a localized collapse.” Still, he said, “that remains our concern, that it’s moved.”

Advertisement

Engineers said that the movement itself was cause for concern. In a properly designed steel building, they said, loads should redistribute quickly to surviving structural supports if columns failed.

Joe DiPompeo, a former president of the Structural Engineering Institute at the American Society of Civil Engineers, said that if the structure had been overloaded, he would expect any movement “to happen very quickly,” rather than gradually.

“Generally when a column buckles, it’s a sudden failure,” Mr. DiPompeo said. He said that a full collapse remained unlikely given the redundancies built into the building codes.

Advertisement

Engineers often refer to the most dangerous possibility as a progressive collapse, a process in which structures near the initial failure become overstressed and also fail, potentially bringing down the building if the sequence continues. While unlikely, it cannot be ruled out, Mr. DiPompeo said.

Footage recorded from inside the building shows at least two structural columns appear to have failed completely, Mr. DiPompeo said. Other nonstructural, interior walls — or at least the metal “studs” that were in place to hold them up — also appear to have deformed.

Advertisement

“The only way that really happens is if the floor above them dropped. It looks like the floor above could have dropped a foot or two, which is obviously not a good situation,” Mr. DiPompeo said.

@fernando40tiktok.commarc via Storyful

Advertisement

Advertisement

Image from @fernando40tiktok.commarc via Storyful

Advertisement

Image from @Bogs4NY via X

Advertisement

The 37-story building is in the process of being converted from office space into residential units. Four new floors and a large vertical portion were added onto the existing building in recent months. The vertical portion consists of a stack of over a dozen new floors cantilevered out over the existing building below.

Engineers said that there was nothing inherently wrong with adding residential floors or the cantilevered section above the columns that failed, as long as the original structure and the modifications had properly accounted for the added weight and wind loads.

“The cantilever alone doesn’t change anything,” Mr. DiPompeo said, but it does put additional load on the columns underneath — a factor that should have been reflected in the design.

Advertisement

Nathan Berman, managing principal and founder of MetroLoft, the developer overseeing the conversion, said on Tuesday that “this incident is nothing more than a typical construction mishap.”

He said two columns near the northwest corner of the tower had bent under the weight of additions to the building above, most likely because those columns had not been properly reinforced, though he said an investigation would determine the cause. The rest of the columns, he said, “picked up the weight.” He estimated the affected floors above the failed columns had sagged by a maximum of four inches.

Advertisement

Mr. Berman said that he expected the problems to be fixed and the project to be completed with, at most, a slight delay.

On Tuesday evening, installation of temporary shoring was set to begin shortly, in order to help stabilize the 20th and 21st floors of the building.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

DOJ warns of criminal charges for state election officials if noncitizens vote

Published

on

DOJ warns of criminal charges for state election officials if noncitizens vote

The Justice Department sent letters warning election officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia that they could face criminal prosecution over noncitizen voting, a spokesperson for the Justice Department confirmed Tuesday.

The letters, signed by Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who heads up the department’s Civil Rights Division, give states five days to explain how they will comply with federal voter eligibility laws and how they will maintain “clean voter lists.”

Advertisement

“The Department sent these letters to all 50 states and the District of Columbia, asking for voluntary compliance in a timely manner with their obligations under federal law to ensure only citizens vote in federal elections,” a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement.

Noncitizen voting in federal elections is extremely rare, but Trump and his administration have falsely portrayed it as a widespread issue.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar and Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson are among those who said they received the letters from the Justice Department.

The letters say state election officers “could be criminally prosecuted for aiding and abetting” noncitizen voting. They further specify that any election officer who knowingly retains noncitizens on a statewide voting registration list or who facilitates noncitizens’ receiving and casting ballots could be subject to criminal liability.

“An intentional act that is aimed at diluting the votes of citizens could also constitute a violation” of federal law, the letters said.

Advertisement

Henderson wrote on social media that the threats constitute “truly bizarre behavior.”

“Got another love letter this morning from the DOJ sprinkled throughout with threats of criminal prosecution,” she wrote. “I’m sure I’m not the only chief election officer of a state who is being targeted for following state and federal laws by resisting DOJ’s demands for private voter data that have thus far been ruled illegal by at least a dozen courts.”

The letters are the latest move in the Justice Department’s campaign to assert more federal control over state elections.

While some states have complied with the administration’s demands that they hand over voter roll data, the Justice Department has sued 30 states and Washington, D.C., for resisting. So far, 11 different federal courts have dismissed the Justice Department’s efforts to seize voter rolls.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending