Connect with us

News

With less access to paid leave, rural workers face hard choices about health, family

Published

on

With less access to paid leave, rural workers face hard choices about health, family

With restricted paid household go away provided by her job, Ruby B. Sutton, an environmental engineer at a mining web site in northeastern Nevada, determined to remain residence along with her new child full time.

Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez/KHN


disguise caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez/KHN


With restricted paid household go away provided by her job, Ruby B. Sutton, an environmental engineer at a mining web site in northeastern Nevada, determined to remain residence along with her new child full time.

Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez/KHN

ELKO, Nev. — When Ruby B. Sutton discovered she was pregnant in late 2021, it was onerous to examine how her full-time job with match with having a new child at residence. She confronted a three-hour round-trip commute to the mine web site the place she labored as an environmental engineer, 12-plus-hour workdays, costly youngster care, and her need to be current along with her new child.

Sutton, 32, mentioned the minimal paid maternity go away that her employer provided did not seem to be sufficient time for her physique to heal from giving start or to bond along with her firstborn. These considerations had been magnified when she wanted an emergency cesarean part.

Advertisement

“I am a really career-driven particular person,” Sutton mentioned. “It was actually troublesome to make that call.”

Sutton give up her job as a result of she felt even further unpaid day off would not be sufficient. She additionally knew youngster care following maternity go away would price a considerable portion of her wage if she returned to work.

Tens of tens of millions of American employees face related choices when they should take care of themselves, a member of the family, or a child. Wild variations in paid go away laws from state to state and regionally imply these decisions will be additional sophisticated by monetary elements.

And employees in rural areas face much more challenges than these in cities, together with larger distances to hospitals and fewer medical suppliers, exacerbating well being and revenue disparities. Corporations in rural areas could also be much less more likely to voluntarily provide the profit as a result of they are typically smaller and there are fewer employers for employees to select from.

Whereas a rising variety of states, cities, and counties have handed legal guidelines guaranteeing paid sick go away or basic paid day off in recent times, most states the place greater than 20% of the inhabitants is rural have not, leaving employees weak. Vermont and New Mexico are the one states with a large rural inhabitants which have handed legal guidelines requiring some type of paid sick go away.

Advertisement

Specialists say the gaps in paid go away necessities imply employees in rural areas usually battle to take care of themselves or family members whereas making ends meet.

“The issue is, as a result of it is a small proportion of the inhabitants, it is usually forgotten,” mentioned Anne Lofaso, a professor of legislation at West Virginia College.

The COVID pandemic steered consideration towards paid go away insurance policies as tens of millions of individuals contracted the virus and wanted to quarantine for 5 to 10 days to keep away from infecting co-workers. The 2020 Households First Coronavirus Response Act briefly required employers with fewer than 500 workers and all public employers to present employees a minimal of two weeks of paid sick go away, however that requirement expired on the finish of 2020.

The expiration left some employees to depend on the Household and Medical Depart Act of 1993, which requires corporations with 50 or extra workers to supply them with as much as 12 weeks of unpaid day off to take care of themselves or members of the family. However many employees cannot afford to go that lengthy with out pay.

By March 2022, 77% of employees at non-public corporations had paid sick go away by means of their employers, in line with the Bureau of Labor Statistics — a small enhance from 2019, when 73% of employees in non-public trade had it. However employees in sure industries — like development, farming, forestry, and extraction — part-time employees, and lower-wage earners are much less more likely to have paid sick go away.

Advertisement

“Paid go away is offered as a high-cost merchandise,” mentioned Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor schooling analysis on the Faculty of Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell College.

However with out it, individuals who really feel strain to go to work let well being circumstances fester and deteriorate. And, in fact, infectious employees who return too early unnecessarily expose others within the office.

Advocates say a stronger federal coverage guaranteeing and defending paid sick and household go away would imply employees would not have to decide on between pushing by means of sickness at work or dropping revenue or jobs.

A latest report by New America, a left-leaning assume tank, argues that creating coverage to make sure paid go away might increase employment numbers; cut back financial, gender, and racial disparities; and customarily raise up native communities.

Help for paid sick and household go away is fashionable amongst rural Individuals, in line with the Nationwide Partnership for Ladies & Households, which present in 2020 polling that 80% of rural voters supported a everlasting paid household and medical go away program, permitting folks to take day off from work to care for youngsters or different members of the family.

Advertisement

However lawmakers have been divided on making a nationwide coverage, with opponents worrying that requiring paid go away could be too massive a monetary burden for small or struggling companies.

In 2006, voters in San Francisco authorized the Paid Sick Depart Ordinance, making it the primary U.S. metropolis to mandate paid sick go away. Since then, 14 states, the District of Columbia, and 20 different cities or counties have accomplished so. Two different states, Nevada and Maine, have adopted basic paid day off legal guidelines that present time that can be utilized for sickness.

Federal employees are provided 12 weeks of paid parental go away within the Federal Worker Paid Depart Act, adopted in October 2020. It covers greater than 2 million civilian employees employed by the U.S. authorities, although the legislation have to be reapproved every fiscal yr and workers are usually not eligible till they’ve accomplished one yr of service.

The patchwork of legal guidelines nationwide leaves employees in a number of largely rural states — locations like Montana, South Dakota, and West Virginia the place greater than 40% of residents stay outdoors cities — with out mandated paid sick and household go away.

Sutton mentioned she “would have positively beloved” to remain at her job if she might’ve taken an extended paid maternity go away. She mentioned she desires to return to work, however the future is unclear. She has extra issues to contemplate, like whether or not she and her husband need extra kids and when she would possibly really feel wholesome sufficient to attempt for a second child after final summer season’s C-section.

Advertisement

Sutton recalled a buddy she labored with at a gold mine years in the past who left the job a number of months after having a child. “And I perceive now all of the issues she was telling me at the moment. … She was like, ‘I am unable to do that,’ you realize?”

KHN (Kaiser Well being Information) is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points. Along with Coverage Evaluation and Polling, KHN is without doubt one of the three main working packages at KFF (Kaiser Household Basis). KFF is an endowed nonprofit group offering data on well being points to the nation.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Target scales back on its LGBTQ+ merchandise ahead of Pride Month 2024

Published

on

Target scales back on its LGBTQ+ merchandise ahead of Pride Month 2024

Target confirmed that it won’t be carrying its LGBTQ+ merchandise for Pride month this June in some stores after the discount retailer received backlash last year. Here, Pride month merchandise is displayed at a Target store in Nashville, Tenn, in May 2023.

George Walker IV/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

George Walker IV/AP


Target confirmed that it won’t be carrying its LGBTQ+ merchandise for Pride month this June in some stores after the discount retailer received backlash last year. Here, Pride month merchandise is displayed at a Target store in Nashville, Tenn, in May 2023.

George Walker IV/AP

Target says it will no longer sell its 2024 Pride Month collection in all of its stores following last year’s conservative backlash over its LGBTQ+-themed merchandise.

The retail giant said in a press release last week that it plans to offer its collection of products to celebrate Pride Month — including adult clothing and home decor — during the month of June both online and in “select stores,” depending on “historical sales performance.”

Advertisement

In a statement to NPR, a spokesperson for the retailer says it is committed to supporting the LGBTQ+ community not only during Pride Month but year-round.

The retail giant says it will continue to offer benefits and resources for the community and its more than 400,000 employees, adding that the company will have a presence at local Pride events near its Minneapolis headquarters.

For years, Target has carried Pride-themed merchandise in its stores — including clothes, cups, champagne, accessories and even pet costumes.

But last year, the retailer faced heavy criticism after it announced plans to remove some of its Pride Month merchandise from store shelves following a backlash against the products — including threats to employees’ safety.

“Given these volatile circumstances, we are making adjustments to our plans, including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior,” the retailer said in a previous statement addressing the backlash.

Advertisement

At the time, when asked which items were removed and whether security was being increased at its stores, Target not respond to NPR’s inquiry.

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said in a statement to NPR that Target’s decision to limit its Pride Month merchandise this year is “disappointing,” saying the move “alienates LGBTQ+ individuals and allies at the risk of not only their bottom line but also their values.”

“Pride merchandise means something. LGBTQ+ people are in every zip code in this country, and we aren’t going anywhere. With LGBTQ+ people making up 30% of Gen Z, companies need to understand that community members and allies want businesses that express full-hearted support for the community. That includes visible displays of allyship.”

News of Target’s scaled-back efforts for Pride Month comes as the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security issued a warning on Friday that foreign terrorist organizations may potentially target LGBTQ+ events and venues during Pride Month in June.

The joint statement does not discuss any specific threats or intelligence suggesting that a specific event, celebration or individuals are subject to being targeted.

Advertisement

NPR’s Joe Hernandez contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Joe Biden plans to send $1bn in new military aid to Israel

Published

on

Joe Biden plans to send $1bn in new military aid to Israel

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The Biden administration has told Congress it plans to send a $1bn package of military aid to Israel despite US opposition to the Israeli military’s plans for a full assault on Rafah, the city in southern Gaza.

The move by the White House comes after the US paused one shipment of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel over concerns about their use in densely populated areas of Gaza, which risks further increasing the Palestinian civilian death toll.

While that step marked the first time Biden had withheld weapons in an effort to restrain Israel’s military conduct since the war with Hamas began in October, the $1bn package in the works shows that Washington is not seeking to restrict its arms supply to Israel more broadly.

Advertisement

The signal from the Biden administration that it wanted to proceed with the $1bn weapons package was conveyed this week, according to a congressional aide. It is expected to include mostly tank ammunition and tactical vehicles.

“We are continuing to send military assistance, and we will ensure that Israel receives the full amount provided in the supplemental,” Jake Sullivan, Biden’s national security adviser, told reporters on Monday, referring to $95bn foreign security aid bill for Ukraine, Israel and the Indo-Pacific enacted last month.

“Arms transfers are proceeding as scheduled,” another US official said on Tuesday.

The state department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the Biden administration’s plans for a new $1bn weapons transfer to Israel.

Advertisement

Biden decided to freeze the transfer of some of its most lethal bombs as it sought to deter the Israel Defense Forces from a full assault on Rafah, the city in southern Gaza where more than 1mn Palestinians are estimated to be sheltering. The US is also seeking to finalise a temporary ceasefire deal and secure the release of hostages held by Hamas.

The state department last week warned that US-made weapons might have been used in the conflict in a way that violated humanitarian rights.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted with defiance to Biden’s arms suspension, saying Israel would “stand alone” in the absence of support form the US, its closest ally.

While some Democrats were relieved to see Biden make more aggressive use of US leverage over Israel, the president also faced a backlash from lawmakers within his party who were upset about the move, including Jacky Rosen, the Nevada senator, and John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania senator.

Rosen said the US needed to provide Israel with “unconditional security assistance”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

W. Va. AG known for opposing Obama and Biden policies wins GOP primary for governor

Published

on

W. Va. AG known for opposing Obama and Biden policies wins GOP primary for governor

West Virginia voters chose their nominees in primaries with the key posts of governor and a U.S. Senate seat coming open.

Jack Walker/West Virginia Public Broadcasting


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jack Walker/West Virginia Public Broadcasting


West Virginia voters chose their nominees in primaries with the key posts of governor and a U.S. Senate seat coming open.

Jack Walker/West Virginia Public Broadcasting

After a campaign focused on national culture war issues, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey won the state’s Republican nomination for governor, according to a race call by The Associated Press.

In a state that voted heavily for Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020, Morrisey will start as the frontrunner for the November election. He’ll face the one contender in the Democratic primary, Steve Williams, who’s in his third term as the mayor of Huntington. Unopposed in the Democratic primary, Williams has been able to wait and focus his efforts on the upcoming general election.

Advertisement

They’re seeking to replace Republican Gov. Jim Justice, who has reached his two-term limit on that office.

Meanwhile Justice, according to the AP, won an expected victory in the GOP primary for the nomination to replace Democratic U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, who is retiring. Justice, owner of a vast array of businesses and son of a coal magnate, is the dominant figure in the state’s politics and was endorsed by Trump. As governor, he has helped pass income tax cuts and a near-total ban on abortion.

He’ll start as a likely favorite against Democrat Glenn Elliott, the mayor of Wheeling, who the AP called as the winner of that party’s primary. With the Democratic Sen. Manchin leaving, the race could be key in determining whether Republicans can take control of the Senate.

In the Republican primary for a U.S. House seat, incumbent Carol Miller has defeated Derrick Evans, according to the AP. Evans served three months in prison on a civil disorder charge for participation in the storming of the U.S. Capitol building Jan. 6, 2021. He was a delegate to the West Virginia House at the time.

The new GOP gubernatorial nominee, Morrisey, was elected attorney general in 2012 and used the office to spearhead lawsuits against federal policies from the Obama and Biden administrations. He recently led other state attorneys general in suing to block rules by the Environmental Protection Agency requiring cuts in emissions from coal and gas-fueled power plants.

Advertisement

Much of the primary campaign saw the candidates for the GOP nomination competing for who was the more conservative and the biggest Trump supporter. They touted their support for the state’s coal industry, backing fossil fuels as still key to the U.S. energy supply as the country transitions to renewable sources. But much of the media campaigning was focused on their opposition to transgender rights.

“Because our candidates don’t have a lot, frankly, of policy alternatives they want to talk about, it’s easier to play the culture wars game and to gin up fear,” said Marybeth Beller, associate professor of political science at West Virginia’s Marshall University.

Though he grew up in New Jersey and moved to West Virginia in 2006, Morrisey beat contenders with deeper ties to the state’s political establishment. Moore Capito, a former delegate to the West Virginia Legislature, was on track to come in second. He is the son of U.S. Senator Shelley Capito and grandson of late Gov. Arch Moore. He was backed by Gov. Justice.

Another contender was auto dealership owner Chris Miller, who’s mother is U.S. Rep. Carol Miller. The other candidate was current Secretary of State Mac Warner.

Randy Yohe covers state government for West Virginia Public Broadcasting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending