Connect with us

News

Why Moldova fears it could be next for Putin | CNN

Published

on

Why Moldova fears it could be next for Putin | CNN


London
CNN
 — 

Tensions are mounting in Moldova, a small nation on Ukraine’s southwestern border, the place Russia has been accused of laying the groundwork for a coup that might drag the nation into the Kremlin’s battle.

Moldova’s President, Maia Sandu, has accused Russia of utilizing “saboteurs” disguised as civilians to stoke unrest amid a interval of political instability, echoing related warnings from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has in the meantime baselessly accused Kyiv of planning its personal assault on a pro-Russian territory in Moldova the place Moscow has a army foothold, heightening fears that he’s making a pretext for a Crimea-style annexation.

US President Joe Biden met President Sandu on the sidelines of his journey to Warsaw final week, marking the one-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion.

Advertisement

Though there is no such thing as a signal he has accepted her invite to go to, the White Home did say he reaffirmed help for Moldova’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Right here’s what it’s essential know.

Earlier this month, Zelensky warned that Ukrainian intelligence intercepted a Russian plan to destabilize an already risky political state of affairs in Moldova.

The latest resignation of the nation’s prime minister adopted an ongoing interval of crises, headlined by hovering fuel costs and sky-high inflation. Moldova’s new prime minister has continued the federal government’s pro-EU drive, however pro-Russian protests have since taken place within the capital, Chisinau, backed by a fringe, pro-Moscow political social gathering.

Amid the tensions, Moldova’s President Sandu issued a direct accusation that Russia was looking for to make the most of the state of affairs.

Advertisement

Sandu stated the federal government final fall had deliberate for “a collection of actions involving saboteurs who’ve undergone army coaching and are disguised as civilians to hold out violent actions, assaults on authorities buildings and hostage-taking.”

Sandu additionally claimed people disguised as “the so-called opposition” had been going to strive forcing a change of energy in Chisinau by means of “violent actions.” CNN is unable to independently confirm these claims.

“It’s clear that these threats from Russia and the urge for food to escalate the battle in direction of us may be very excessive,” Iulian Groza, Moldova’s former deputy international minister and now the director of the Chisinau-based Institute for European Insurance policies and Reforms, informed CNN.

“Moldova is essentially the most affected nation after Ukraine (by) the battle,” he stated. “We’re nonetheless a small nation, which has nonetheless an under-developed financial system, and that creates loads of stress.”

Regardless of Moscow’s pleas of innocence, its actions relating to Moldova bear a putting resemblance to strikes it made forward of its annexation of Crimea in 2014, and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine final yr.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Putin revoked a 2012 international coverage decree that partially acknowledged Moldova’s independence, in response to Reuters.

Then on Thursday, Russia’s Ministry of Protection accused Ukraine of “getting ready an armed provocation” towards Moldova’s pro-Russian separatist area of Transnistria “within the close to future,” state-media TASS reported.

No proof or additional particulars had been supplied to help the ministry’s accusation, and it has been rubbished by Moldova.

However the declare has put Western leaders on alert, coming nearly precisely a yr after Putin made related, unsubstantiated claims that Russians had been being focused within the Donbas – the jap flank of Ukraine the place Moscow had supported militant separatists since 2014 – permitting him to forged his invasion of the nation as a problem of self-defense.

“It was the case earlier than – we’ve seen fixed actions of Russia making an attempt to discover and exploit the knowledge house in Moldova utilizing propaganda,” Groza stated.

Advertisement

“With the battle, all these devices that Russia was utilizing earlier than have been multiplied and intensified,” he stated. “What we see is a reactivation of Russian political proxies in Moldova.”

“I do see a lot of fingerprints of Russian forces, Russian providers in Moldova,” Poland’s Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki informed CBS final Sunday. “It is a very weak nation, and all of us want to assist them.”

Central to Russia’s pursuits in Moldova is Transnistria, a breakaway territory that slithers alongside the jap flank of the nation and has housed Russian troops for many years.

The territory – a 1,300 sq. mile enclave on the jap financial institution of the Dniester River – was the positioning of a Russian army outpost over the last years of the Chilly Battle. It declared itself a Soviet republic in 1990, opposing any try by Moldova to change into an unbiased state or to merge with Romania after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

When Moldova turned unbiased the next yr, Russia rapidly inserted itself as a so-called “peacekeeping pressure” in Transnistria, sending troops in to again pro-Moscow separatists there.

Advertisement

Battle with Moldovan forces ensued, and the battle led to impasse in 1992. Transnistria was not acknowledged internationally, even by Russia, however Moldovan forces left it a de facto breakaway state. That impasse has left the territory and its estimated 500,000 inhabitants trapped in limbo, with Chisinau holding just about no management over it to today.

Moldova is a rustic at a crossroads between east and west. Its authorities and most of its residents need nearer ties to the EU, and the nation achieved candidacy standing final yr. Nevertheless it’s additionally dwelling to a breakaway faction whose sentiment Moscow has eagerly sought to rile up.

It has been a flashpoint on the periphery of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the previous yr, with Russian missiles crossing into Moldovan airspace on a number of events, together with earlier this month.

A collection of explosions in Transnistria final April spiked issues that Putin was trying to drag the territory into his invasion.

Russia’s stuttering army progress since then had quickly allayed these fears. However officers in Moldova have been warning the West that their nation may very well be subsequent on Putin’s checklist.

Advertisement

Final month, the pinnacle of Moldova’s Safety Service warned there’s a “very excessive” danger that Russia will launch a brand new offensive in Moldova’s east in 2023. Moldova just isn’t a NATO member, making it extra susceptible to Putin’s agenda.

Ought to Russia launch a Spring offensive that facilities on Ukraine’s south, it could search once more to creep in direction of Odesa after which hyperlink up with Transnistria, primarily making a land bridge that sweeps by means of southern Ukraine and inches even nearer to NATO territory.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

Published

on

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

The Pentagon and U.S. Naval Academy are proceeding with actions in support of the Trump administration’s push to eliminate “woke” initiatives throughout the federal government.

The U.S. Naval Academy said it had ended its use of affirmative action in admissions, reversing a policy it previously defended as essential for diversity and national security, according to a federal court filing on Friday. And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s office has ordered the Naval Academy to identify books related to so-called diversity, equity and inclusion themes that are housed in the school’s Nimitz Library, and to remove them from circulation.

This week, according to a defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy decisions, Mr. Hegseth’s office became aware that the nation’s military service academies did not believe that President Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order to end “radical indoctrination” in kindergarten through 12th-grade classrooms applied to them, as they are colleges. The defense secretary’s office informed the Naval Academy that Mr. Hegseth’s intent was for the order to apply to the academies, and that the secretary expected compliance.

“The U.S. Naval Academy is fully committed to executing and implementing all directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president and is currently reviewing the Nimitz Library collection to ensure compliance,” said Cmdr. Tim Hawkins, a Navy spokesman. “The Navy is carrying out these actions with utmost professionalism, efficiency, and in alignment with national security objectives.”

The academy’s library in Annapolis, Md., houses roughly 590,000 print books, 322 databases, and more than 5,000 print journals and magazines, Commander Hawkins said.

Advertisement

The court filing on the admissions policy, submitted by the Naval Academy, the Department of Defense, Mr. Hegseth and other officials, states that the Naval Academy changed its admissions policy in February in response to federal directives prohibiting the practice of considering race, ethnicity and sex during the admissions process.

The Naval Academy superintendent issued revised internal guidance on Feb. 14, stating that would not be happening, according to the filing. The superintendent, Vice Admiral Yvette M. David, reaffirmed this change on Wednesday, when she testified before a subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“At no time are race, sex or ethnicity considered in the qualification of a candidate,” she said. The Naval Academy did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the admissions policy on Friday.

Thus far, the review of Nimitz Library’s holdings has identified 900 books that may run afoul of the defense secretary’s verbal order. According to a second defense official, they include “The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr.,” “Einstein on Race and Racism,” and a biography on Jackie Robinson.

Mr. Hegseth is scheduled to visit the Naval Academy on Tuesday and to speak to the Brigade of Midshipmen. It is unclear whether the secretary expects the books to be removed before his arrival.

Advertisement

Defense officials said they were unaware whether the United States Military Academy at West Point, the United States Air Force Academy or the United States Coast Guard Academy had received similar orders, or whether the military’s graduate schools, such as the Naval War College and the Army’s Command and General Staff College, were expected to comply.

Continue Reading

News

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Published

on

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Perhaps there is one simple reason why Donald Trump’s agenda is so hostile to Europe. Trump responds to flattery. Europe offers him almost none.

Even as European leaders sometimes try to massage the world’s most thin-skinned man, their publics make no secret of their contempt. Among voters in France, Germany and Spain, two-thirds say that Trump’s election has made the world less safe. Europe is too rowdy for sycophancy.

Trump surely notices this, just as he surely noticed the balloon of a giant orange baby flown on his state visit to London in 2019. His policies — imposing tariffs, threatening Greenland, shredding climate action, betraying Gaza and Ukraine — could hardly be better targeted as payback.

Advertisement

The temptation for Europeans is to go further: to vent not only at him, but America itself. It’s a short jump from decrying the US president as a dictatorial moron to decrying the public who elected him. In February, Canadian ice-hockey fans booed the US national anthem; “Make America Go Away” has made a great baseball cap. But otherwise, anti-Americanism has been notable by its absence.

Compare this to the years of George W Bush, the president who claimed he was misunderestimated before choking on a pretzel, when Americans were routinely mocked as fat, ignorant and arrogant. New Yorkers on holiday were made to feel personally responsible for war crimes. On the eve of the Iraq war, Europeans joked about the difference between yoghurt and Americans. The punchline: after a while, yoghurt develops some culture. 

The then French president, Jacques Chirac, liked to say that he had a simple principle in foreign affairs: “I see what the Americans are doing and I do the opposite. That way, I’m sure to be right.” How they chuckled. This was the zenith not just of anti-American Islamist terrorism, but of anti-imperialist Latin American populists such as Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales.

But anti-Americanism has changed in 2025. Jokes about nationality don’t land as comfortably now. It’s rightly unfashionable to blame citizens for their governments, especially if the Americans we are most likely to encounter are despairing Democrats. 

Anyway, Netflix and social media have bound us all together. You can’t really dismiss American culture when you choose to consume it daily. Go to Paris today, and see how readily people speak English. Go to London, and puzzle at the number of NFL fans. Judging by JD Vance’s and Pete Hegseth’s Signal messages, the Trump team is more anti-European than Europeans are anti-American.

Advertisement

Those repelled by Elon Musk’s X have moved to another West Coast-based network, Bluesky. European car buyers boycott Tesla but would buy a good American alternative. Just as the most effective takedowns of Bush came from an American filmmaker, Michael Moore, the best critiques of Trump and Musk will probably also come from the US itself. America is both thesis and antithesis. 

Diplomatically too, anti-Americanism doesn’t fit the moment. Trump has reconciled with one regime that was fanatically anti-American under Bush — that is, Putin’s Russia — and even makes sporadic gestures to chavista Venezuela. Europeans are hardly in anti-imperial mood: they want American protection, not withdrawal.

The lesson of the Bush years is that presidential idiocy is temporary. Five and a half years after invading Iraq, America elected Barack Obama as president. Anti-Americanism is akin to amputating your broken leg, instead of waiting for it to heal. 

But if it’s wrong to conflate Americans and their president, it’s wrong to disentangle them entirely. Trump reflects half of America. He reflects a society where a democratic majority is prepared to tolerate mass shootings and a warped political system. America provides so much of the world’s cultural backdrop that we sometimes mistake it for our own country. It is not, even when a Democrat is president. 

Just last spring, during Joe Biden’s presidency, the US was seen unfavourably by at least half the public in Greece, Singapore and Australia, and by more than 40 per cent in Britain and Canada. The next time pollsters ask the question, they will doubtless find record western disillusion. 

Advertisement

Europeans — and Canadians and others — are realising that we have our own values and not long to stand up for them. Boycott Philadelphia cream cheese if it makes you feel better. But most Europeans see that the times are now too serious for knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

Henry Mance is the FT’s chief features writer

Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Published

on

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Protesters showed up outside a Tesla showroom and service center in the North Hollywood area of Los Angeles on Saturday, March 15, 2025.

Richard Vogel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Richard Vogel/AP

Tesla facilities worldwide have been the target of protests objecting to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s influential role in the Trump administration. This weekend, organizers who have been leading peaceful protests in recent weeks are staging what they hope to be their biggest day yet.

As part of the “Tesla Takedown” campaign, hundreds of nonviolent demonstrations are planned to take place across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers are calling it a “global day of action” with a goal of 500 protests worldwide.

For weeks, the movement’s organizers have been encouraging people to boycott the EV maker by selling their Tesla cars and stocks. According to Tesla Takedown, thousands of grassroots groups and individuals worldwide are driving the decentralized effort.

Advertisement

Tesla Takedown organizers say the movement is fueled by anger over Musk’s slashing of the federal government, and that it aims to hit the billionaire where it hurts — the electric vehicle company that’s become his main source of wealth.

Joel Lava, who has been helping lead Tesla Takedown protests in Los Angeles, says Musk’s work to dismantle government agencies and workforce through the unofficially named DOGE initiative is the primary motivator for the movement’s members.

“He’s spearheading DOGE, which is spearheading our country’s destruction — literally destroying our country’s infrastructure,” Lava said. “Therefore, we are taking direct aim at his power, which is his wealth, which is Tesla.” 

Musk critics point to a litany of other grievances, including his attacks on diversity, a gesture he made on the Inauguration Day stage that was widely interpreted to be a Nazi salute, and his support for far-right parties.

Musk and the White House did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Since Musk’s political turn, Tesla sales have slumped, and investors have grown uneasy. But market analysts question how much the dip in Tesla sales and shares can be pinned on its CEO’s actions. Tesla has been losing market share to EV competitors for years. And the stock price has fallen in anticipation of auto tariffs. But Trump administration’s recently announced 25% import tariffs on cars made outside the U.S. could give the stock a welcome boost; auto industry analysts say that among domestic carmakers, Tesla will be the least impacted by the tariffs.

Some of the anti-Musk backlash has been violent. Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations across the U.S. and in Europe have been the target of arson and vandalism. Some have taken to spray-painting swastikas on Tesla sedans and Cybertrucks.

Tesla Takedown movement, organizers say its participants are exercising their right to peacefully protest and that they oppose violence and property destruction.

But Musk did not make that distinction when he went after Valerie Costa, a community activist who has helped organize recent peaceful protests in the Seattle area as part of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations.

Musk, in a post on X earlier this month, accused Costa of “committing crimes,” without giving evidence or specific allegations. That was after he claimed that an environmental activist group she cofounded was backed by the ActBlue, a fundraising platform for Democrats.

Advertisement

Costa told NPR that the accusations were false, and that Musk supporters subsequently targeted her in direct messages that included threats of physical violence.

“When one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful person in the world is saying you’ve committed a crime, it doesn’t matter what the truth is,” Costa said.

Tesla Takedown organizers who say they want to chip away at Musk’s power, and that starts with tarnishing Tesla’s brand.

“Trump only likes [Musk] because he’s rich,” Lava, the LA-based organizer, said. “If suddenly Musk becomes just another boring, low-end billionaire, Trump will dump him too, and that will also show the power we have as people to effect change.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending