Connect with us

News

Viktor Orbán’s ‘Cardinal Richelieu’ takes hit from premier’s new rival

Published

on

Viktor Orbán’s ‘Cardinal Richelieu’ takes hit from premier’s new rival

For more than a decade, Viktor Orbán’s “illiberal” rule in Hungary has seemed ironclad. But recent European elections have shown that the Hungarian prime minister and his right-hand man are struggling to contain an unlikely challenger from within.

Antal Rogán, who has been by the premier’s side for three decades and is dubbed his “Cardinal Richelieu” by opponents, is currently in charge of the government’s media strategy. His wide-ranging ministerial portfolio includes secret services and checks on foreign funding received by opposition politicians, independent outlets and rights groups.

In his first interview with international media, Rogán sought to downplay his party’s setback in the European parliament vote, in which the ruling Fidesz party received 45 per cent, its lowest vote share since Hungary joined the EU in 2004.

“You can’t always be in a winning position in government,” Rogán told the Financial Times. “Very often someone else communicates more powerfully.”

Rogán was referring to a former Fidesz member-turned-rival, Péter Magyar, who joined a small party called Tisza this year and propelled it to 30 per cent at the ballot boxes, a first indication that the Orbán base is fracturing.

Advertisement
© Laszlo Balogh/FT

Magyar was never a prominent member of Fidesz, but his former wife Judit Varga was Orbán’s justice minister. They divorced in 2023. Magyar quit Fidesz this year on the day Varga was forced to resign as the party’s lead candidate for the European parliament amidst a child abuse scandal.

Rogán dismissed the idea that Magyar posed a serious challenge to Orbán. He expressed confidence that the prime minister, who is Europe’s longest-serving premier after taking office 14 years ago, would stay in power after the next general elections in 2026.

But Rogán himself, who is not as popular as the PM, could turn into a liability for Orbán. Magyar has accused the premier’s éminence grise of corruption and toxic disinformation campaigns, including about the west’s role in aiding Ukraine.

“This is Waterloo for Fidesz,” Magyar said after the EU election results came out on June 9. “All the billions wasted on propaganda, the war psychosis that the prime minister tried to build with Antal Rogán . . . this is the beginning of the end for Fidesz.”

Magyar, 43, told the FT that he would not pull any punches with Rogán, who “lost his appeal as a politician” and “is unaccountable . . . a Richelieu”, in reference to the 17th-century political mastermind who served as chief minister to Louis XIII, king of France.

Advertisement
© Akos Stiller/Bloomberg

Little known outside Hungary, Rogán has stayed out of the limelight, running what he calls the “government back office”. But he has gradually amassed power in the media and public administration, influencing sectors such as banking and information technology.

His National Information Centre, an umbrella organisation for intelligence and counter-intelligence agencies, was founded in 2022. Rogán’s secret services could also feed an investigation into foreign funding allegedly received by Magyar, which Rogán described as “a question that must be answered soon”. Magyar has called the probe a joke.

“Secret services are politicised and subjugated to propaganda,” said Márta Pardavi, co-chair of the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, a rights group, calling the practice “outrageous”.

An economist by training, the 52-year-old Rogán defended the National Information Centre’s work and said reorganisation of the Hungarian intelligence services had been prompted by the war in neighbouring Ukraine. “The prime minister wanted more direct control over them and reintegrated intelligence and counter-intelligence,” he said.

Rogán denied the corruption allegations Magyar and others had levelled against him, noting that no charges stuck in court. He also disputed being shielded of prosecution under Orbán. “Nobody is indispensable in this government,” he said, “not even me.”

Despite the bruising EU election result, Orbán has stood by his longtime ally. “Rogán has an uncanny ability to make others depend on him, and Orbán is no exception,” said a person familiar with the situation. “He is convinced replacing Rogán would be like shooting himself in . . . both feet.”

Advertisement

Another person who knows Rogán well said that the Richelieu parallel was “spot on” as the Hungarian minister had amassed power and wealth by making himself indispensable to Orbán.

Rogán rejected the Richelieu comparison because the French minister was a mentor to the king, whereas he is nine years younger than Orbán. “I saw a man who could renew conservative politics, and he did,” Rogán said of his first meeting with Orbán in the early 1990s.

Rogán grew up near Hungary’s western border with Slovenia in a Slovenian-speaking family. Described by peers as sharp, bookish and intensely political, he became chief domestic political adviser when Orbán first won the premiership in 1998.

After spending a few years as a Budapest district mayor, Rogán returned to parliament in 2010 to lead the Fidesz majority. Among the first bills he drew up was a media law as one of the initial steps towards Orbán’s illiberal state — and which set Budapest on a collision course with the EU.

The government was alleged to have allocated €3.5bn to public events and communications since Rogán became propaganda minister in 2015, according to local media outlet G7. “It is a money pump,” said Gábor Polyák, chair of media studies at Budapest’s Eötvös Loránd University. “A completely opaque system of random sums spent with dubious efficiency.”

Advertisement

Rogán said the ministry had struck tenders worth only €1.8bn on communications and events, including major international sporting events— an amount that, over nine years, was “defensible when we compare it to our predecessors’ spending”.

Magyar’s success is in part due to the fallout from a child sex abuse scandal in a village next to Orbán’s hometown — and the failure of Rogán’s propaganda machine in attempting to sweep the affair under the carpet.

“This is the deepest crisis Fidesz has yet faced,” one person with knowledge of the events said. “And the same goes for Rogán.”

Magyar said Rogán would be one of his early targets if he won power in 2026 and, on the campaign trail, suggested that the Orbán aide “find a country with no extradition treaty with Hungary”.

Rogán declined to discuss the child sex abuse scandal but acknowledged that his political career was tied to Orbán’s tenure.

Advertisement

“I will be in the political field as long as Viktor Orbán is the prime minister,” he said.

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading

News

Manhattan Building’s Columns Buckled Beneath New Addition, Images Show

Published

on

Manhattan Building’s Columns Buckled Beneath New Addition, Images Show

At least two structural columns buckled and failed in a 37-story office tower in Midtown Manhattan on Tuesday, prompting evacuations of nearby streets and buildings. While city officials asserted that the tower was in no danger of collapsing completely, outside engineers said further failures in the structure could not be ruled out.

A pair of columns that failed completely were part of the tower’s existing structure. A New York Times review of images and videos from inside the building has found that several floors were added atop these columns.

Advertisement

City officials said in a news conference on Tuesday that the building was continuing to move, while they simultaneously assured the city that the building would not suffer “total collapse.” “The way this building is constructed, it’s a steel-frame building,” John Esposito, a chief in the Fire Department in New York, said at the afternoon news conference. “So, it would not be a total collapse. It would be more of a localized collapse.” Still, he said, “that remains our concern, that it’s moved.”

Advertisement

Engineers said that the movement itself was cause for concern. In a properly designed steel building, they said, loads should redistribute quickly to surviving structural supports if columns failed.

Joe DiPompeo, a former president of the Structural Engineering Institute at the American Society of Civil Engineers, said that if the structure had been overloaded, he would expect any movement “to happen very quickly,” rather than gradually.

“Generally when a column buckles, it’s a sudden failure,” Mr. DiPompeo said. He said that a full collapse remained unlikely given the redundancies built into the building codes.

Advertisement

Engineers often refer to the most dangerous possibility as a progressive collapse, a process in which structures near the initial failure become overstressed and also fail, potentially bringing down the building if the sequence continues. While unlikely, it cannot be ruled out, Mr. DiPompeo said.

Footage recorded from inside the building shows at least two structural columns appear to have failed completely, Mr. DiPompeo said. Other nonstructural, interior walls — or at least the metal “studs” that were in place to hold them up — also appear to have deformed.

Advertisement

“The only way that really happens is if the floor above them dropped. It looks like the floor above could have dropped a foot or two, which is obviously not a good situation,” Mr. DiPompeo said.

@fernando40tiktok.commarc via Storyful

Advertisement

Advertisement

Image from @fernando40tiktok.commarc via Storyful

Advertisement

Image from @Bogs4NY via X

Advertisement

The 37-story building is in the process of being converted from office space into residential units. Four new floors and a large vertical portion were added onto the existing building in recent months. The vertical portion consists of a stack of over a dozen new floors cantilevered out over the existing building below.

Engineers said that there was nothing inherently wrong with adding residential floors or the cantilevered section above the columns that failed, as long as the original structure and the modifications had properly accounted for the added weight and wind loads.

“The cantilever alone doesn’t change anything,” Mr. DiPompeo said, but it does put additional load on the columns underneath — a factor that should have been reflected in the design.

Advertisement

Nathan Berman, managing principal and founder of MetroLoft, the developer overseeing the conversion, said on Tuesday that “this incident is nothing more than a typical construction mishap.”

He said two columns near the northwest corner of the tower had bent under the weight of additions to the building above, most likely because those columns had not been properly reinforced, though he said an investigation would determine the cause. The rest of the columns, he said, “picked up the weight.” He estimated the affected floors above the failed columns had sagged by a maximum of four inches.

Advertisement

Mr. Berman said that he expected the problems to be fixed and the project to be completed with, at most, a slight delay.

On Tuesday evening, installation of temporary shoring was set to begin shortly, in order to help stabilize the 20th and 21st floors of the building.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending