Connect with us

News

US tested hypersonic missile in mid-March but kept it quiet to avoid escalating tensions with Russia

Published

on

US tested hypersonic missile in mid-March but kept it quiet to avoid escalating tensions with Russia

The Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Idea (HAWC) was launched from a B-52 bomber off the west coast, the official mentioned, within the first profitable take a look at of the Lockheed Martin model of the system. A booster engine accelerated the missile to excessive pace, at which level the air-breathing scramjet engine ignited and propelled the missile at hypersonic speeds of Mach 5 and above.

The official supplied scant particulars of the missile take a look at, solely noting the missile flew above 65,000 toes and for greater than 300 miles. However even on the decrease finish of hypersonic vary — about 3,800 miles per hour — a flight of 300 miles is lower than 5 minutes.

US officers downplayed the importance of the Russian use of their hypersonic Kinzhal missile. Protection Secretary Lloyd Austin mentioned he didn’t view it as “some type of sport changer” after the Russians introduced the missile launch. Days later, Pentagon press secretary John Kirby mentioned it was “onerous to know what precisely the justification” was for the launch, because it focused a stationary storage facility.

“That is a fairly vital sledgehammer to take out a goal like that,” Kirby mentioned on the time.

The Kinzhal missile is solely an air-launched model of the Russian Iskander short-range ballistic missile. In different phrases, it’s a variation of a longtime know-how versus a revolution in hypersonic weaponry. The US take a look at was of a extra subtle and troublesome air-breathing scramjet engine. The HAWC missile additionally has no warhead, as an alternative counting on its kinetic vitality to destroy the goal.

Advertisement

On the time of the US take a look at, Biden was getting ready for a go to to NATO allies in Europe, together with a cease in Poland the place he met with Ukraine’s international minister and protection minister.

The US has been cautious to not take steps or make statements that would unnecessarily escalate the tensions between Washington and Moscow. On Friday, the US canceled a take a look at of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) to keep away from any misinterpretation by Russia. Austin had already postponed the take a look at in early March to keep away from any actions that could possibly be misconstrued by Russia at such a delicate time.

Usually, the US has additionally remained considerably discreet concerning the weapons and tools it sends into Ukraine. Solely within the newest $300 million safety help package deal did the Protection Division listing particular techniques and weapons.

The US has additionally opposed the switch of fighter plane to Ukraine by means of the USA, involved that the Kremlin might interpret such a transfer because the US and NATO coming into the battle in Ukraine.

US officers remained quiet about this newest hypersonic take a look at for 2 weeks for comparable causes, the protection official mentioned, cautious to not provoke the Kremlin or President Vladimir Putin, particularly as Russian forces expanded their bombardment of Ukraine.

Advertisement

The US take a look at is the second profitable take a look at of a HAWC missile, and it’s the first of the Lockheed Martin model of the weapon. Final September, the Air Drive examined the Raytheon HAWC, powered by a Northrop Grumman scramjet engine.

The take a look at met all main goals, based on a press launch from the Protection Superior Analysis Tasks Company (DARPA), together with the missile’s integration and launch, protected separation from the launch plane, booster firing, and cruise. Then too officers supplied few particulars concerning the flight, with no point out of how briskly the missile flew or what distance it traveled. The discharge solely said that the missile traveled at speeds larger than Mach 5.

The US has positioned a renewed emphasis on hypersonic weapons following profitable Russian and Chinese language checks in latest months, exacerbating the priority in Washington that the US is falling behind on a navy know-how thought of important for the longer term.

Within the FY23 protection price range, the Biden administration has requested $7.2 billion for lengthy vary fires, together with hypersonic missiles. In a report final 12 months, the Authorities Accountability Workplace recognized 70 efforts associated to the event of hypersonic weapons, anticipated to value almost $15 billion between 2015 and 2024.
One month after the primary profitable HAWC take a look at, the US suffered a setback when the take a look at of a unique hypersonic system failed. The failure got here simply as experiences emerged that China had efficiently examined a hypersonic glide automobile over the summer time and shortly after Russia claimed to have efficiently examined its submarine-launched hypersonic missile, dubbed the Tsirkon.

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading

News

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India

Published

on

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India
Former President Trump has suggested he might support a Florida ballot measure to legalise recreational marijuana for adults, known as Amendment 3, reported the Hill.
Trump, a Florida resident, emphasised the importance of this measure being appropriately managed by the state Legislature to avoid public consumption issues.
Emphasis on responsible legislation
“In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalised for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.”

Trump avoided stating his voting intention or openly backing marijuana legalisation but stressed that responsible legislation is necessary to avoid public nuisances. He pointed to the need for laws that prevent marijuana use in public areas to keep public spaces free from the smell of marijuana, similar to the issues observed in other cities.
“The state Legislature needs to responsibly create laws that prohibit marijuana consumption in public spaces so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat-run Cities,” said Trump.
Concerns over inconsistent marijuana laws
He also highlighted the inconsistency of criminalising marijuana possession in Florida when it is legal in many other states. Trump emphasised that law enforcement resources and lives should not be wasted on arresting adults for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
“We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana,” he added.
Impact on voter mobilisation and Republican division
Trump’s comments follow recent efforts by Democrats to attract younger voters in Florida, focusing on issues like abortion and marijuana legalisation. These issues have mobilised younger voters in other regions, as seen in Ohio, and Democrats hope for a similar impact in Florida.
Democrats are targeting the fall ballot measures, aiming to increase voter turnout and gain the support of younger voters, a group with which Trump has faced challenges.
Earlier in the year, the Department of Justice made a significant move toward reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. If this reclassification is approved, marijuana will be downgraded to a Schedule III drug.
Despite the trend toward normalisation and Trump’s comments, some Republicans remain opposed to legalising recreational marijuana. Sen Rick Scott has publicly stated his intention to vote against the measure. He cited personal family experience with addiction as a key reason for his opposition.
“My brother, who died at 67 in April, began smoking marijuana as a teenager and led a life of addiction,” Scott said.

Continue Reading

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading

Trending