Connect with us

News

Top Florida Republicans praise California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s banning of homeless camps

Published

on

Top Florida Republicans praise California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s banning of homeless camps


GOP Rep. Sam Garrison, in line to be the next Fla. House speaker, said he was glad Newsom acknowledged ‘the damage chronic homelessness does to communities and businesses.’

play

Top Florida Republicans, including a leading lawmaker and governor’s office staff, are applauding Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom for his executive order to remove homeless encampments across the Golden State.

“I’m glad to see Governor Newsom finally accept reality and acknowledge the damage chronic homelessness does to communities and businesses,” said state Rep. Sam Garrison, R-Fleming Island, in a statement.

Garrison, who is in line to be Florida House speaker in 2026-28, thanked Gov. Ron DeSantis for signing “Unauthorized Public Camping and Public Sleeping” (HB 1365), which prohibits local municipalities from allowing people to camp or sleep on public property.

“The Free State of Florida rejects the siren song of comfortable inaction and instead chooses to lead the way,” Garrison added.

The order requires state departments and agencies in California to address encampments on state property. Notices to vacate must be posted at least 48 hours in advance, and personal property will be bagged, tagged and stored for at least 60 days, according to the executive order.

Advertisement

“No more excuses. We’ve provided the time. We’ve provided the funds. Now it’s time for locals to do their job,” Newsom wrote in a post on X.

California’s move to ban homeless encampments comes after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in late June it’s not “cruel and unusual” to fine and jail people for being camping and living in public spaces.

DeSantis spokesman Bryan Griffin urged California to make the executive order a state law. “Keep following the Florida model,” he posted on X.

Christina Pushaw, the special projects director for DeSantis’ communications team, wrote in a social post that she was doubtful Newsom could enforce his executive order.

“I do hope California is able to clean up the homeless encampments because they’re squalid, dangerous, and should not exist in a civilized society. However, as with anything Newsom says, I’ll believe it when I see it,” she wrote.

Advertisement

As previously reported, the deadline to comply with Florida’s new anti-camping law is drawing near, and local municipalities are scrambling to comply.

In March, the City of Orlando was looking at facilities for an emergency overnight shelter, said spokesperson Ashley Papagni.

And the Tampa Bay Times recently reported Pinellas County law enforcement agencies have started to track the location and number of homeless people who sleep outside.

Advertisement

DeSantis has touted the state’s anti-camping law as the “Florida Model,” a way to keep the state from looking like San Francisco, a city that he had previously said “collapsed because of leftist policies.”

DeSantis and Newsom have a fierce rivalry, even debating each other last year on Fox News. Newsom has criticized DeSantis over abortion and immigration, and DeSantis has consistently used California as an example of what Florida isn’t.

“We’re basically saying in the state of Florida, a municipality or county is just simply not allowed to embrace San Francisco-style policies,” DeSantis said in March. “You can make other choices, but you can’t make that choice. Why? Because every time that choice has been made, the result has been destructive.”

In 2023, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) counted 18,815 year-round shelter beds in emergency, safe haven and transitional housing in Florida. That same year, the state had 30,756 people experiencing homelessness, with 15,482 people unsheltered.

In 2023, the Annual Homelessness Assessment Report to Congress by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found Hardee, Hendry and Highlands counties had the second-highest rate of homelessness in the nation.

Advertisement

Ana Goñi-Lessan, state watchdog reporter for the USA TODAY Network – Florida, can be reached at agonilessan@gannett.com.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Global stock markets tumble as Donald Trump’s tariffs loom

Published

on

Global stock markets tumble as Donald Trump’s tariffs loom

Stay informed with free updates

Global markets tumbled on Monday, with US stocks on track for their worst quarter since 2022, on fears of an escalating trade war led by President Donald Trump.

The S&P 500 was down 0.8 per cent in New York, having already fallen more than 5 per cent this quarter. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.9 per cent.

European and Asian stocks were also down sharply, accelerating a sell-off that began last week, after Trump said the reciprocal trade duties he is expected to announce on April 2 would apply globally. Europe’s broad-based Stoxx 600 index was 1.4 per cent lower, while the FTSE 100 lost 0.9 per cent.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing another wave of US-led selling,” said Trevor Greetham, head of multi-asset at Royal London Asset Management. “There’s been no let-up from Trump.”

US technology stocks were hit on Monday, with chipmaker Nvidia’s share price falling 4.8 per cent and Tesla losing 6.6 per cent. The president last week announced a 25 per cent tariff on imports of foreign-made cars and parts, which would affect the electric-car maker.

Consumer-facing companies and other economically sensitive stocks also fared badly, with International Airlines Group down 7.1 per cent and United Airlines dropping 6.7 per cent amid concerns over demand for flights.

Trump’s tariffs threats have also had a big impact on the industrial commodities sector. London-listed Anglo American fell 5.1 per cent, while Glencore lost 3.2 per cent and BHP dropped 3.8 per cent.

“I don’t necessarily see the floor quite yet,” said Sharon Bell, senior equities strategist at Goldman Sachs.

Advertisement

The US investment bank has increased its tariff expectations, while downgrading GDP forecasts for the US and Europe. It is now pricing in a more aggressive 15 per cent reciprocal tariff across Washington’s trading partners, and sees a higher probability of a US recession.

The tariff threat “ups the risk premium that you put on equities” said Bell, although she added that the US stock market has “other issues — some of the DOGE cuts, for example, and the general slowing in the pace of growth”.

Gold surged as high as $3,128 a troy ounce, a fresh record, while US Treasury yields declined, in a sign that investors were piling into safe assets. The 10-year yield, which moves inversely to prices, fell 0.03 percentage points to 4.22 per cent.

The latest moves came after Trump addressed reporters on Air Force One on Sunday, saying on tariffs: “You’d start with all countries, so let’s see what happens.” Last week he had hinted at concessions for some countries.

The US president singled out Asia for its trade practices. “Take a look at trade with Asia. I wouldn’t say anybody has treated us fairly,” he said.

Advertisement

The chaotic rollout of Trump’s aggressive trade agenda has roiled markets and alarmed the US’s trading partners, many of whom have threatened to retaliate.

The US president has said that on Wednesday, which he has dubbed “liberation day”, he will impose levies on any country the White House deems to have an unfair trading relationship with the US.

Charles De Boissezon, global head of equity strategy at Société Générale, said cyclical stocks, whose performance tend to fluctuate with the economy, were suffering. “It is much more the uncertainty overall weighing on investor sentiment,” he said. “The [tariff] announcements keep on changing, but what they have in common is that [they’re] just not good for growth globally.”

The S&P 500 dropped nearly 2 per cent on Friday last week. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite slid 2.7 per cent as gloomy data on the economy and consumer sentiment raised fears about stagflation.

In Asia on Monday, Japan’s benchmark Topix dropped 3.6 per cent and the exporter-oriented Nikkei 225 slid 4.1 per cent. South Korea’s Kospi fell 3 per cent, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng retreated 1.3 per cent.

Advertisement

“Many investors are [waiting] for actual tariffs to be announced, unwinding their positions and realising gains,” said Wei Li, head of multi-asset investments for BNP Paribas in China. “This tariff announcement . . . has affected the whole market sentiment.”

The dollar was up 0.3 per cent against a basket of its major trading partners. Having strengthened after Trump’s election on the anticipation of tariffs feeding inflation, the greenback has weakened this year as investors grow more concerned about the impact of the trade war on the US economy.

Continue Reading

News

World braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect? | Today News

Published

on

World braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect? | Today News

US President Donald Trump is set to unveil a sweeping tariff plan on April 2, a date he has branded as “Liberation Day.” The plan, centered around so-called reciprocal tariffs, aims to rebalance global trade, boost American manufacturing, and generate substantial revenue for domestic policy priorities. However, the broad scope of these tariffs, potentially covering all nations, has stoked fears of a global trade war.

A plan without details

Despite the imminent rollout, the White House has not specified the exact tariff rates, how they will be calculated, or which countries might qualify for exemptions. Trump has also hinted that non-tariff barriers will be factored into the calculations, but no methodology has been provided.

“You’d start with all countries, so let’s see what happens,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “I haven’t heard a rumor about 15 countries, 10 or 15.”

Key sectors and trading partners targeted

The new tariffs will build on existing levies on aluminum, steel, and autos. Trump has also pledged a 25% tariff on imported vehicles, and has suggested increasing tariffs on pharmaceuticals, lumber, semiconductors, and copper. Mexico and Canada, the two largest US trading partners, are expected to be hit with 25% tariffs.

Additionally, Trump has warned of curbs on “all oil coming out of Russia” if Moscow refuses to comply with US demands regarding Ukraine.

Advertisement

April 2, the ‘Liberation Day’ Trump promised

US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariff plan, set to begin on April 2, has sent shockwaves through the global economy. Branded as “Liberation Day” by Trump, the policy aims to rebalance trade by imposing tariffs on imports from all nations, unless they negotiate exemptions post-launch. The move, which includes hefty levies on autos, metals, and various other sectors, has sparked fears of a global trade war.

Global reactions

The announcement has triggered concerns among US allies and trading partners, with several governments scrambling to negotiate exemptions or alternative trade arrangements.

UK seeks exemption but braces for impact

The United Kingdom is among the many nations hoping to secure a deal to avoid the tariffs. Downing Street has acknowledged that the UK is “likely to be impacted” and is engaged in ongoing discussions with US trade representatives.

“When it comes to tariffs, the Prime Minister has been clear he will always act in the national interest,” said a spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. “Our trade teams are continuing constructive discussions to agree on a UK-US economic prosperity deal.”

However, the UK government has signaled that talks may extend beyond April 2, raising concerns for British industries, particularly luxury car manufacturers like Rolls-Royce and Aston Martin, which face a 25% import duty.

Advertisement

Canada’s energy industry on edge

Canada faces a looming 10% tariff on energy exports to the US, creating unease within the nuclear power sector. The US relies on Canada for over a quarter of its uranium supply, making the tariffs particularly disruptive.

“Utilities are waiting to see what this all means before they take action,” said Karen Radosevich, manager of nuclear fuel supply at Entergy Corp. “This uncertainty is paralyzing for the industry.”

Canadian officials have warned they may retaliate with their own export duties on uranium, potentially escalating trade tensions between the two allies.

EU delays retaliatory measures

The European Union, also in the crosshairs of Trump’s tariff plan, has opted to delay its first countermeasures until mid-April. This decision allows for additional negotiation time and reconsideration of targeted US goods.

Also Read | Explainer: Possible impact of Trumps reciprocal tariffs on India

Russia and Venezuela face additional pressure

Trump has extended his tariff strategy beyond traditional trade disputes, leveraging economic pressure in geopolitical conflicts. On Sunday, he announced a secondary tariff of 25% to 50% on all Russian oil unless Moscow agrees to a ceasefire in Ukraine.

Advertisement

In Venezuela’s case, Trump introduced a new economic tool—”secondary tariffs”—threatening 25% tariffs on any country that purchases Venezuelan oil. The executive order, signed on Monday, gives Secretary of State Marco Rubio discretion to impose these penalties.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro responded defiantly: “They can sanction and impose tariffs on whatever they want, what they cannot sanction is the love and patriotism of the Venezuelan people.”

China, Venezuela’s largest oil buyer, condemned the US move. “We call on the U.S. to stop interfering in Venezuela’s internal affairs and abolish the illegal unilateral sanctions,” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun.

Also Read | Trump tariffs shake US markets: S&P 500, Nasdaq hit 6-month low as April 2 nears

Catch all the Business News , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

Business NewsNewsUs NewsWorld braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect?

MoreLess

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump Says He’s ‘Not Joking’ About Seeking a Third Term in Defiance of Constitution

Published

on

Trump Says He’s ‘Not Joking’ About Seeking a Third Term in Defiance of Constitution

President Trump did not rule out seeking a third term in office on Sunday, telling NBC News that he was “not joking” about the possibility and suggesting there were “methods” to circumvent the two-term limit laid out in the Constitution.

In wide-ranging remarks to “Meet the Press,” Mr. Trump said “a lot of people” wanted him to serve a third term, described himself as “pissed off” at President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and vowed to impose tariffs on global rivals, according to a transcript of the interview provided by the network.

“A lot of people want me to do it,” he said to the program’s host, Kristen Welker, about the possibility of a third term. “But we have — my thinking is, we have a long way to go. I’m focused on the current.”

Any attempt to seek a third term would run afoul of the 22nd Amendment, which begins, “No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice.”

On Sunday, after the release of the interview, the White House reiterated Mr. Trump’s point that he was focused on his current term, and added that it was “far too early to think about” the idea.

Advertisement

“Americans overwhelmingly approve and support President Trump and his America First policies,” Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement. He added that Mr. Trump was focused on “undoing all the hurt” done by the Biden administration and “Making America Great Again.”

Mr. Trump has often mused about the idea of a third term, particularly in rallies and speeches that have delighted his supporters, though he has often treated it more as a humorous aside. The interview was the first time that Mr. Trump indicated that he was seriously considering the idea, which his allies have continued to amplify. Already he has likened himself to a king, shown an affinity for autocratic leaders and displayed governance tactics constitutional experts and historians have compared to authoritarianism.

Three days after Mr. Trump was sworn in for the second time, Representative Andy Ogles of Tennessee proposed an amendment to the Constitution that would make Mr. Trump eligible for a third term. Such a measure would be extraordinarily difficult: Constitutional amendments require approval by a two-thirds vote of Congress and then the ratification of three-fourths of the states.

In the interview, Ms. Welker noted that she had heard him joke about serving a third term a number of times. Mr. Trump made it clear he considered it a real possibility.

“No, no I’m not joking,” he said. “I’m not joking.”

Advertisement

Ms. Welker asked Mr. Trump whether he had been presented with plans, and he said that he had not — but added that there were “methods which you could do it.”

Ms. Welker suggested one possibility: having Vice President JD Vance at the top of the ticket in 2028, only to pass the office on to Mr. Trump after winning. Mr. Trump acknowledged “that’s one” way it could happen.

“But there are others too,” he said. “There are others.”

Mr. Trump declined to say what those could be.

Derek T. Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame and a scholar in election law, said there has been a dissenting view about the provision of the 22nd Amendment — which focuses on being “elected” president without addressing the idea of ascending to the office. However, he said, such a route would be complicated by the 12th Amendment.

Advertisement

Mr. Muller pointed out that the 12th Amendment states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be eligible to that of vice-president of the United States.”

Mr. Muller said he very much doubted that would provide a path to a third term for Mr. Trump.

“You’d have to have so many pieces fall into place for this even to be practically viable, on top of this complicated legal theory,” he said.

In his remarks to Ms. Welker, the president also leveled his strongest criticism to date against Mr. Putin, threatening to impose “secondary tariffs” on Russia’s oil if the country thwarted negotiations on a cease-fire deal with Ukraine that would stop the fighting.

The comments signaled growing impatience with the negotiations. Mr. Trump said that tariffs of 25 to 50 percent on Russian oil could be imposed at “any moment” and that he planned to speak with his Russian counterpart this week.

Advertisement

“If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia’s fault — which it might not be — but if I think it was Russia’s fault, I am going to put secondary tariffs on oil, on all oil coming out of Russia,” Mr. Trump said.

Mr. Trump has previously referred to secondary tariffs as levies on imports from countries that purchase products from a nation he’s targeted in his foreign policy. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The comments were notable given the steps that Mr. Trump has taken to align himself with Mr. Putin, despite the United States’ support for Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion more than three years ago. Since taking office, Mr. Trump has declined to acknowledge that it was Russia who started the war, falsely declared President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine a “dictator,” but not Mr. Putin, and accused Mr. Zelensky of not wanting peace.

Mr. Trump’s remarks also underscored his increasing promise to use tariffs to compel countries to bend to his domestic and foreign policy goals. In the same phone call, he said he would consider secondary tariffs on Iran if it did not reach a deal with the United States to ensure it did not develop a nuclear weapon, Ms. Welker said.

Mr. Trump told Ms. Welker that he was “very angry, pissed off” at Mr. Putin for questioning the credibility of Mr. Zelensky, and for discussing the prospect of new leadership in that country. Mr. Trump suggested that such comments could set negotiations back, and that they were ”not going in the right location.”

Advertisement

“New leadership means you’re not going to have a deal for a long time, right?” Mr. Trump said.

Russia and Ukraine have agreed to a limited truce, but that has fallen short of the complete pause in combat that Trump administration officials have sought, with Ukraine’s support. The limited cease-fire remains tenuous as Russia seeks more concessions and Ukraine has expressed doubt that a truce would be upheld.

On negotiations about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Mr. Trump said officials from both countries were “talking,” according to NBC’s account of Ms. Welker’s call with the president, although he raised the prospect of military action if economic and other measures do not succeed.

“If they don’t make a deal,” Mr. Trump said about Iran, “there will be bombing. It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

Earlier this month, Mr. Trump sent a letter to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, urging direct negotiations with the government in Tehran on a deal to curb the country’s advancing nuclear program. The letter said Mr. Trump preferred diplomacy over military action.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump’s raising of secondary tariffs on oil from Russia and Iran was the latest example of the president’s interest in using the prospect of economic pressure on third-party nations.

Last week, he issued an executive order on Monday to crack down on countries that buy Venezuelan oil by imposing tariffs on the goods those nations send into the United States, claiming that Venezuela has “purposefully and deceitfully” sent criminals and murderers into America.

Mr. Trump called the new levies he threatened on buyers of Venezuelan oil “secondary tariffs,” a label that echoed “secondary sanctions” — penalties imposed on other countries or parties that trade with nations under sanctions.

Some trade and sanctions experts said existing secondary sanctions associated with countries such as Russia and Iran already were not well enforced, and questioned whether the United States would have the capacity to pull off new tariff-based penalties.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending