Connect with us

News

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Published

on

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Sitting on the terrace of a café, Daniel, a 60-year-old retired building contractor, is reluctant to talk about how he will vote in upcoming high-stakes snap legislative elections in France. 

But the resident of Châteauroux, a small city in the centre of the country, has a lot of anger to vent against Emmanuel Macron. He believes the president is smug like the elites in Paris, has done little to curb rising crime and his move to increase the retirement age by two years is unfair.

The traditional left and rightwing parties that Daniel has voted for in the past have disappointed, so he is considering casting a first ballot for Marine Le Pen’s far-right Rassemblement National.

“I’m not saying I will definitely vote for the RN, but they have interesting things to say,” he says, such as the need to clamp down on immigration. He is not put off by the party’s historical roots in fascism, symbolised by its now 95-year-old founder, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who once likened the Nazi gas chambers to a “detail of history”.

“This is not Jean-Marie Le Pen’s party any more,” says Daniel, who asked not to use his surname, “and it’s dishonest to keep pretending it is.”

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Voters across France are grappling with a similar choice: are they ready to usher the nationalist, populist RN, once relegated to the fringes of politics, into the heart of government? 

The answer will come in just over three weeks at the end of a lightning campaign sparked by Macron’s shock call for early legislative elections after being trounced by the RN in European elections on June 9. 

The outcome of the snap poll on June 30 and the second round on July 7 will depend largely on whether voters see the RN of today — the one that Marine Le Pen has spent more than a decade crafting into a smoother, more professional force — as up to the task.

Voting patterns in the Berry region of central France where Daniel lives show how the RN is making inroads in new areas and voter segments. It is conquering a swath of France that academics have called “the diagonal of emptiness” for its depopulation, paucity of high-speed train links and weak economy.  

Advertisement

About 250 kilometres south of Paris, Berry is made up of the Indre and Cher departments, and is home to France’s wheat-growing heartland, small villages and the cities of Châteauroux and Bourges. Support for the RN increased by double digits in European elections this month versus five years ago.

Rassemblement National’s Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella
Rassemblement National’s Le Pen and Bardella at a campaign event this month. The social media savvy Bardella has helped to boost the party’s appeal © Stephane De Sakutin/AFP/Getty Images

Polling from Elabe shows the RN on track for another big win with 31 per cent of voting intentions in the new legislative elections, ahead of a new leftwing coalition with 28 per cent, and far ahead of Macron’s centrist alliance with 18 per cent. 

Crucially, a unity pact struck by four leftwing parties on Thursday means Macron’s party is at risk of being squeezed out of many run-offs, leaving two-way contests between the left and the far right.

The polls suggest Le Pen’s party could gain enough seats to make a claim to the prime minister’s office — and could even win an outright majority. That would force Macron into an uncomfortable power-sharing government with the RN’s charismatic 28-year-old party chief, Jordan Bardella, as prime minister. 

An RN win would be a seismic moment in France’s modern history: the far right has never been in power save for in the Vichy era after the country was partly occupied by Germany in 1940. Given Le Pen’s Euroscepticism and desire to take power back from Brussels, there could be significant repercussions for France’s relationship with the EU and its closest partner, Germany. 

Securing the premiership would give Le Pen’s party a chance to enact its programme of curbs on immigration, tax cuts that would aggravate an already large deficit left by Macron, and radical ideas to exempt France from EU single market rules. 

Advertisement
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen. The founder of what is now RN was expelled by the party as part of his daughter’s drive to detoxify its brand and make it an electoral force © Bernard Patrick/ABACA via Reuters

Pascal Perrineau, an academic and author who has studied the French far right for decades, says he can no longer rule out the idea that voters are willing to see the RN leading the government.

“Only a few years ago, I would have said their victory was highly unlikely,” he says. “Now I see it is possible and even probable.”


Macron’s bet is that the country will blink and that Le Pen will fall short of an outright majority. This week he reached for well-honed arguments he has successfully used to beat Le Pen and her party over the years — that the far right is too incompetent to govern, it would tank the economy, divide society with racism and antisemitism, and threaten the rule of law. 

“I hear the anger — message received,” he said alluding to frustration-fuelled protest votes for the RN. But “what would happen to your pensions? They would no longer be able to pay them. What would happen to your mortgages?

“If the RN came to power, what would happen to our values or our fellow citizens of diverse origins? . . . These are the questions [before you] today.”

Le Pen dismisses Macron’s arguments as scaremongering. With Bardella at her side, she insists they are ready to govern. 

Advertisement
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system that were driven through by Macron’s government
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system, which were driven through by Macron’s government © Hache Valery/AFP/Getty Images

The social media savvy Bardella has been key to expanding the RN’s appeal among those historically wary of the party — retirees, white-collar workers and women — all of whom voted for the party in the European election at higher levels than before.

“People here support RN and they love Bardella, they think he’s going to give them the moon and a cheque each,” says a restaurant owner in Châteauroux, who declined to be named. 

The Le Pen-Bardella duo mock Macron’s criticism of their economic policies by pointing out his government has caused deficits to balloon. On the hot-button issues of the RN’s previous cosiness with Russia and its antisemitic past, Le Pen has sought to defuse them by quickly declaring her support for Ukraine in 2022 and supporting France’s Jewish community after the Hamas attack in Israel on October 7. 

Kévin Pfeffer, an MP from Moselle in eastern France and RN party treasurer, says victory is within reach and an outright majority “attainable”, making Le Pen a frontrunner for the 2027 presidential election.

“Marine Le Pen’s mission has been to take each critique made against the RN and dismantle them methodically one by one,” he says. “The French are ready. They are sending us a signal that they want to try us out.” 


In the Berry region as elsewhere, RN voting results have been helped by Le Pen’s long effort to “detoxify” the movement her father founded in 1972 under the name the Front National, which included figures who supported the Nazi collaborationist Vichy government during second world war.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

When she took over in 2011, she expelled the party’s more radical elements, including her father, and rebranded it as the Rassemblement National. While keeping its core DNA of protecting French identity, Le Pen focused on cost of living issues and the plight of low-income workers. 

The RN vote in Indre leapt to 40 per cent in the European election, up 26 percentage points from the last vote in 2019, while Macron’s support increased by 4 percentage points. 

In historically left-leaning Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, Le Pen’s scores have also steadily risen in the past decade. This year the picturesque medieval village filled with flower boxes — population 550 — saw its last boulangerie and a butcher’s shop close. The shuttering of a local cookware factory in 2019 was another blow. 

Le Pen has cast herself as the champion of such places — what she calls the “forgotten France” — far from the wealth, power and cultural cache of Paris and its population of well-off Macron voters. 

Damien Barré, Saint-Benoît-du-Sault’s left-leaning young mayor, is determined to combat people’s sense of decline by fighting to retain businesses and services. His projects include landscaping, building restoration and cultural programming. He even went on a quest last year to find a male goat to mate with the village’s ageing herd. 

Advertisement

Although the sense of being left behind is a powerful motor of the RN vote, he says, its appeal is now wider than that. 

Damien Barré
Damien Barré, the left-leaning mayor of Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, where RN’s support has steadily risen in the past decade. He says he is fighting to stem people’s sense of decline © Adrienne Klasa/FT

“We have been told for a decade that voting for the RN is a protest vote, it’s a fed-up vote, but actually since Marine Le Pen took over the party it is a vote of support. People will tell you, ‘I support their programme, that is why I am voting for them’,” Barré says.

Although mostly rural, voters in Indre and Cher are also worried about crime and immigration — core drivers of the RN vote. A government plan to build a facility to house asylum seekers in a village near Saint-Benoît-du-Sault split opinion and sparked protests.

In Châteauroux, residents are haunted by the stabbing of 15-year-old Matisse Marchais in April. When two people of Afghan descent were indicted for the crime, RN party chief Bardella declared that Matisse was a “victim of out of control immigration that brings predators to our door”.

On a national level, the sociology of the RN vote is also changing.

In the European election, 34 per cent of 60-somethings voted RN, according to an Ipsos analysis, up from 23 per cent in 2019. They even outperformed Macron’s alliance among pensioners, a cohort that has long been loyal to the president and which accounts for a third of the electorate.

Advertisement

“There is no longer a segment of the population or a corner of the country that is off limits for the RN,” says Brice Teinturier, a pollster from Ipsos. “They have become a catch-all party.”

The RN’s new strength with white-collar workers can be seen in Bourges, a city of 66,000 in the Cher department.

Saint-Benoit-du-Sault
Le Pen has cast herself as a champion of places like Saint-Benoit-du-Sault, a picturesque village that in recent years has faced population decline and business closures © Ed Buziak/Alamy

After a period of industrial decline, Bourges has enjoyed an economic boost in recent years as a hub for defence companies benefiting from the war in Ukraine. The biggest private employer, missile group MBDA, is hiring staff to build a second factory, and munitions maker Nexter is also expanding.

Yann Galut, the leftist mayor, says he was “shocked” by the 8 percentage point jump in RN support, which was not as big as in nearby rural areas, but significant in a historically moderate city. 

He fears the far right could soon capture all three of Cher’s seats in the legislature for the first time. Using a French term for voters’ desire to throw the political class out of office, he says there is “an explosive cocktail of dégagisme and a deep hatred of Emmanuel Macron.”

He adds: “I don’t believe the RN has the capacity to run the country and I abhor their politics that play on fears. Yet they are on the verge of power.” 

Advertisement

News

A New Worry for Republicans: Latino Catholics Offended by Trump

Published

on

A New Worry for Republicans: Latino Catholics Offended by Trump

When Stuart Sepulvida arrives at St. Francis de Sales Roman Catholic Parish in Tucson, Ariz., for Mass, which he attends most mornings, he passes a display honoring local soldiers and encouraging parishioners to pray for their safety. Hundreds of small cards record their names: Robles, Arenas, Grajeda. A portrait of Pope Leo XIV hangs across the lobby.

Mr. Sepulvida, 81, is a Vietnam veteran whose patriotism and Catholicism are deeply intertwined. He voted for President Trump three times but has never felt more betrayed by an American president than when Mr. Trump denounced Pope Leo as “weak on crime” and “terrible for foreign policy.”

“It was very disturbing to me to hear both of them clashing like they did,” Mr. Sepulvida said, standing outside the church one morning this week. Now, he is reconsidering whether he will vote Republican this year.

The Republican Party is struggling to hold onto the support from Hispanic voters who helped propel Mr. Trump back into the White House in 2024. Yet as many party leaders have acknowledged the urgent need to stop the backsliding among Latinos, the president has enraged many of even his strongest supporters by clashing with the pope.

On Easter Sunday, Pope Leo, the first U.S.-born pontiff, spoke of the need to “abandon every desire for conflict, domination and power, and implore the Lord to grant his peace to a world ravaged by wars.” Within days, Mr. Trump, who has led the United States into a war with Iran, said the pope was “catering to the radical left” and posted an AI-generated image portraying himself as a Jesus figure. Mr. Trump later deleted the image, saying he thought it depicted him as a doctor.

Advertisement

“It just isn’t what a president should do,” Mr. Sepulvida said. “The pope speaks for his people. He is beyond politics.”

Mr. Trump won 55 percent of Catholic voters in the 2024 election, compared to 43 percent who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, according to Pew Research Center. The most sizable gains came from Hispanic Catholics. While Joseph R. Biden Jr. won their votes by a 35-point margin in 2020, the Democratic advantage shrunk to 17 points in 2024. Now, just 18 percent of Hispanic Catholics said they support most or all of President Trump’s agenda, according to a poll from Pew released earlier this year.

If the president’s quarrel with the pope sours more Latinos on the Republican Party, it could affect midterm races across the country, including in South Florida and South Texas, where Republicans have notched important victories in predominantly Hispanic districts in recent years.

In Arizona’s Sixth Congressional District, which stretches from north of Tucson to the Mexican border, voters were still grappling with the fallout this week.

The district is roughly evenly divided among Republicans, Democrats and independent voters. Nearly a third of the district is Hispanic, and there is a significant population of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as well as a large Catholic community with deep history in the region. It also has one of largest numbers of military veterans of all congressional districts in the country.

Advertisement

“The president is looking for a lot of attention from everything,” said Maria Ramos, 60, who regularly attends weekday Mass at St. Francis. A registered independent, she usually votes for Democrats but often declines to cast a ballot if she views a candidate as too liberal. “He believes he can put God in his place. He’s meddling in countries that he’s not in control of — he wants to control the world.”

“It is not just a very serious lack of respect — it is a mortal sin,” she said, shaking her head. One word comes to her mind again and again, she said: disgust.

Like so many others in southern Arizona, Ms. Ramos has several relatives who serve in the military — a path they saw to both serve the country and as an entry into the stable middle class. Many of them, she said, voted for Mr. Trump for president.

The Tucson district is now widely seen as one of the most competitive in the country. Republican Juan Ciscomani narrowly won the district in 2022, in part by emphasizing his biography as a Mexican immigrant and a devoted father of six children. He is also an evangelical Christian, a group that has driven much of the growth among Hispanic Republican voters in recent years.

Mr. Ciscomani declined a request for an interview, but when a local radio host asked Mr. Ciscomani what he thought of Mr. Trump’s comments “as a man of faith,” the congressman declined to criticize the president but said, “You can trust that you won’t see any meme like that coming out of my account.”

Advertisement

JoAnna Mendoza, the Democrat challenging Mr. Ciscomani this fall, has made her 20-year career in the U.S. Navy and Marines a key aspect of her story on the campaign trail. While she rarely speaks about her religious background and no longer considers herself a practicing Catholic, she said she briefly considered becoming a nun as a teenager. She criticized Mr. Ciscomani for not condemning the president’s remarks.

“You can’t make faith a central part of your campaign and then allow this to stand,” she said in an interview.

Across Tucson, Latino Catholics, regardless of their past voting preferences, were similarly quick to condemn the president’s remarks.

When Cecilia Taisipic, 71, heard about it, she said, she winced with shame about her vote for him in 2024.

“I thought he would make the country better, but apparently it’s the opposite,” she said as she left Mass at St. Francis earlier this week. She is so fed up with politics, she said, that she is unlikely to vote at all this year. “When it comes to my faith, I don’t like anybody to challenge it. Now I don’t want to hear anything on the news. I just want to pray.”

Advertisement

Matilde Robinson Bours, 63, teaches a weekly Spanish Bible study class at St. Thomas the Apostle Parish, and like nearly all of the women in her class, she immigrated from Mexico decades ago. She has voted for Republicans in nearly every election since she became a citizen. Though she has never liked President Trump, she said, his comments about the pope enraged her more than anything else he has said or done in the past.

“This surpassed everything, every social and political norm — this is personal to all Catholics,” she said. “The arrogance and ego is disgusting. To think that he is God? The pope has every right and responsibility to talk about peace.”

Still, Ms. Robinson Bours said, nothing will stop her from supporting Republicans again this year. She has been delighted that her adult children have stopped supporting Democrats in recent elections.

“Almost everyone I know thinks the way I do,” she said.

Patricia Martinez, 86, who has attended the same Bible study as Ms. Robinson Bours for years, shook her head in disagreement. She said she cannot imagine voting for a Republican who supports Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

“This is different — this shows he is out of his mind,” said Ms. Martinez. “We have to have basic respect and teach that to people in this country.”

Patrick Robles, a 24-year-old native of Tucson, spent years alienated from the Roman Catholic Church, but returned to his faith more recently. “The craziness of the world sort of caused me to seek some sort of answers,” he said. Now, he attends Mass at the St. Augustine Cathedral in downtown Tucson, a few blocks from the office where he works as an aide to Representative Adelita Grijalva, a Democrat.

Mr. Robles said he saw Mr. Trump’s battle with the pope as both a personal affront and a political opportunity.

“The president is basically trying to draw a line between Catholics and what we perceive to be patriotism,” he said. “I believe we can be both.”

Last week, he texted one of his uncles who has supported Mr. Trump in every election asking him what he thought.

Advertisement

“I’m afraid we need divine intervention,” the uncle replied.

Continue Reading

News

After 2 failed votes, Mike Johnson unveils new plan to extend key U.S. spy powers

Published

on

After 2 failed votes, Mike Johnson unveils new plan to extend key U.S. spy powers

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the Capitol on Tuesday.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Speaker Mike Johnson, R.-La., is forging ahead with his latest proposal to renew a key American spy power. His bill, revealed Thursday, is largely unchanged from a previous plan which failed in a series of overnight votes earlier this month.

The program at center of the debate, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), is set to expire on April 30.

FISA 702 allows U.S. intelligence agencies to intercept the electronic communications of foreign nationals located outside of the United States. Some of the nearly 350,000 foreign targets whose communications are collected under the provision are in touch with Americans, whose calls, texts and emails could end up in the trove of information available to the federal government for review.

Advertisement

For almost two decades, privacy-minded lawmakers from both parties have sought to require specific court approval before federal law enforcement can conduct a targeted review of an American’s information gathered through the program. The lack of any such warrant requirement helped sink an effort last week to extend the program for 18 months, as well as a separate vote on a five-year renewal. 

Trump officials, like those in past administrations, have argued that such a warrant requirement would overburden law enforcement and endanger national security. Johnson’s latest proposal would reauthorize the program for three years, but does not include a warrant requirement. Instead, the bill calls for the FBI to submit monthly explanations for reviews of Americans’ information to an oversight official as well as criminal penalties for willful abuse, among other tweaks.

“I am willing to risk the giving up of my Rights and Privileges as a Citizen for our Great Military and Country,” the president wrote on Truth Social last week, advocating for the program to be extended without changes. “I have spoken with many in our Military who say FISA is necessary in order to protect our Troops overseas, as well as our people here at home, from the threat of Foreign Terror Attacks. It has already prevented MANY such Attacks, and it is very important that it remain in full force and effect.”

Glenn Gerstell, who served as general counsel at the National Security Agency during the Obama and first Trump administration, says Johnson’s reforms look like an attempt to find a middle ground.

“There’s not a lot of really substantive changes to the statute, but some gestures are made to people who are worried about privacy and civil liberties,” Gerstell said. “It seems like a pretty reasonable compromise that is going to be satisfactory to the national security agencies and yet at the same time represents some gesture to the privacy advocates.”

Advertisement

“This is not a reform bill and it’s not a compromise,” Elizabeth Goitein, a privacy advocate and senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, wrote on X. “It’s a straight reauthorization with eight pages of words that serve no serious purpose other than to try to convince members that it’s NOT a straight reauthorization.”

A bipartisan reform deal is still out of reach

Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee, told NPR on Wednesday, before the release of Johnson’s new proposal, that lawmakers were working on a bipartisan solution. He said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., was in touch with Johnson on the issue.

“There’s a lot of work being done here,” Himes said. “We’re sort of working out a process that will be inclusive rather than exclusive.” Himes said he was negotiating with Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat and constitutional law scholar, on a reform proposal they hoped could preserve and reform the program — reauthorizing it with bipartisan support.

But Johnson’s new bill appears to fall short of the inclusive approach Himes hoped for.

NPR obtained a memo written by Raskin to his colleagues urging them to oppose the bill, which he said “continues the disastrous policy of trusting the FBI to self-police and self-report its abuses of Section 702 and backdoor searches of Americans’ data.”

Advertisement

“FBI agents can still collect, search, and review Americans’ communications without any review from a judge,” Raskin wrote.

FBI agents must receive annual training on FISA and are generally barred from searching for information about people in the U.S. if the goal of the search is to investigate general criminal activity, rather than find foreign intelligence information, and those searches need approval from a supervisor or an attorney. 

Republican hardliners — who sunk Johnson’s last reauthorization attempt — also don’t all appear to be on board for Johnson’s latest revision. Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, a past chair of the Freedom Caucus, said “we’re not there yet” in a video he shared to X on Thursday.

“I didn’t take an oath to defend FISA, I didn’t take an oath to defend the intelligence community,” Perry said. “We can’t have them spying on American citizens and, when they do, there has to be accountability and I haven’t seen any that I’m satisfied with yet.”

The House Rules committee meets Monday morning, the first step toward advancing the renewal bill toward a vote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

Published

on

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

President Trump announced a three-week extension of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon that had been set to expire in a few days, after hosting a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats at the White House on Thursday.

Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that has been attacking Israel from southern Lebanon, did not have representatives at the meeting and did not immediately comment on the announcement. The prime minister of Israel and the president of Lebanon also did not comment.

A successful peace agreement would hinge upon Hezbollah halting attacks, which Lebanon’s government has little power to enforce because it does not control the militia. Lebanon’s military has mostly stayed out of the fighting and is not at war with Israel.

The cease-fire, which was scheduled to end on April 26, would last until May 17 if it takes effect as Mr. Trump described it. Before the cease-fire was brokered last week, nearly 2,300 people were killed in Lebanon and 13 in Israel. Since then, the number of Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah attacks have been dramatically reduced, though the two sides have continued exchanging fire.

The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Nada Hamadeh, credited Mr. Trump for extending the cease-fire, saying that “with your help and support, we can make Lebanon great again.” Mr. Trump replied, “I like that phrase, it’s a good phrase.”

Advertisement

Asked about the potential of a lasting peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, Mr. Trump said that “I think there’s a great chance. They are friends about the same things and they are enemies on the same things.”

But Lebanon and Israel have periodically been at war since Israel’s founding in 1948. Israel has invaded Lebanon for the fifth time since 1978, incursions that have destabilized the country and the delicate balance of power between Muslim, Christian and Druze communities.

In the hours before the president’s announcement on social media, Israel and Hezbollah were trading attacks in southern Lebanon, testing the existing cease-fire.

Mr. Trump said the meeting at the White House had been attended by high-ranking U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the U.S. ambassadors to Israel and Lebanon.

Earlier on Thursday, an Israeli strike near the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh killed three people, according to Lebanon’s health ministry. Hezbollah claimed three separate attacks on Israeli troops who are occupying southern Lebanon, though none were wounded or killed.

Advertisement

Hezbollah set off the latest round of fighting last month by attacking Israel soon after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran. Israel responded to Hezbollah’s attacks by launching airstrikes across Lebanon and widening a ground invasion of the country’s south.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending