Connect with us

News

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Published

on

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Sitting on the terrace of a café, Daniel, a 60-year-old retired building contractor, is reluctant to talk about how he will vote in upcoming high-stakes snap legislative elections in France. 

But the resident of Châteauroux, a small city in the centre of the country, has a lot of anger to vent against Emmanuel Macron. He believes the president is smug like the elites in Paris, has done little to curb rising crime and his move to increase the retirement age by two years is unfair.

The traditional left and rightwing parties that Daniel has voted for in the past have disappointed, so he is considering casting a first ballot for Marine Le Pen’s far-right Rassemblement National.

“I’m not saying I will definitely vote for the RN, but they have interesting things to say,” he says, such as the need to clamp down on immigration. He is not put off by the party’s historical roots in fascism, symbolised by its now 95-year-old founder, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who once likened the Nazi gas chambers to a “detail of history”.

“This is not Jean-Marie Le Pen’s party any more,” says Daniel, who asked not to use his surname, “and it’s dishonest to keep pretending it is.”

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Voters across France are grappling with a similar choice: are they ready to usher the nationalist, populist RN, once relegated to the fringes of politics, into the heart of government? 

The answer will come in just over three weeks at the end of a lightning campaign sparked by Macron’s shock call for early legislative elections after being trounced by the RN in European elections on June 9. 

The outcome of the snap poll on June 30 and the second round on July 7 will depend largely on whether voters see the RN of today — the one that Marine Le Pen has spent more than a decade crafting into a smoother, more professional force — as up to the task.

Voting patterns in the Berry region of central France where Daniel lives show how the RN is making inroads in new areas and voter segments. It is conquering a swath of France that academics have called “the diagonal of emptiness” for its depopulation, paucity of high-speed train links and weak economy.  

Advertisement

About 250 kilometres south of Paris, Berry is made up of the Indre and Cher departments, and is home to France’s wheat-growing heartland, small villages and the cities of Châteauroux and Bourges. Support for the RN increased by double digits in European elections this month versus five years ago.

Rassemblement National’s Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella
Rassemblement National’s Le Pen and Bardella at a campaign event this month. The social media savvy Bardella has helped to boost the party’s appeal © Stephane De Sakutin/AFP/Getty Images

Polling from Elabe shows the RN on track for another big win with 31 per cent of voting intentions in the new legislative elections, ahead of a new leftwing coalition with 28 per cent, and far ahead of Macron’s centrist alliance with 18 per cent. 

Crucially, a unity pact struck by four leftwing parties on Thursday means Macron’s party is at risk of being squeezed out of many run-offs, leaving two-way contests between the left and the far right.

The polls suggest Le Pen’s party could gain enough seats to make a claim to the prime minister’s office — and could even win an outright majority. That would force Macron into an uncomfortable power-sharing government with the RN’s charismatic 28-year-old party chief, Jordan Bardella, as prime minister. 

An RN win would be a seismic moment in France’s modern history: the far right has never been in power save for in the Vichy era after the country was partly occupied by Germany in 1940. Given Le Pen’s Euroscepticism and desire to take power back from Brussels, there could be significant repercussions for France’s relationship with the EU and its closest partner, Germany. 

Securing the premiership would give Le Pen’s party a chance to enact its programme of curbs on immigration, tax cuts that would aggravate an already large deficit left by Macron, and radical ideas to exempt France from EU single market rules. 

Advertisement
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen. The founder of what is now RN was expelled by the party as part of his daughter’s drive to detoxify its brand and make it an electoral force © Bernard Patrick/ABACA via Reuters

Pascal Perrineau, an academic and author who has studied the French far right for decades, says he can no longer rule out the idea that voters are willing to see the RN leading the government.

“Only a few years ago, I would have said their victory was highly unlikely,” he says. “Now I see it is possible and even probable.”


Macron’s bet is that the country will blink and that Le Pen will fall short of an outright majority. This week he reached for well-honed arguments he has successfully used to beat Le Pen and her party over the years — that the far right is too incompetent to govern, it would tank the economy, divide society with racism and antisemitism, and threaten the rule of law. 

“I hear the anger — message received,” he said alluding to frustration-fuelled protest votes for the RN. But “what would happen to your pensions? They would no longer be able to pay them. What would happen to your mortgages?

“If the RN came to power, what would happen to our values or our fellow citizens of diverse origins? . . . These are the questions [before you] today.”

Le Pen dismisses Macron’s arguments as scaremongering. With Bardella at her side, she insists they are ready to govern. 

Advertisement
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system that were driven through by Macron’s government
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system, which were driven through by Macron’s government © Hache Valery/AFP/Getty Images

The social media savvy Bardella has been key to expanding the RN’s appeal among those historically wary of the party — retirees, white-collar workers and women — all of whom voted for the party in the European election at higher levels than before.

“People here support RN and they love Bardella, they think he’s going to give them the moon and a cheque each,” says a restaurant owner in Châteauroux, who declined to be named. 

The Le Pen-Bardella duo mock Macron’s criticism of their economic policies by pointing out his government has caused deficits to balloon. On the hot-button issues of the RN’s previous cosiness with Russia and its antisemitic past, Le Pen has sought to defuse them by quickly declaring her support for Ukraine in 2022 and supporting France’s Jewish community after the Hamas attack in Israel on October 7. 

Kévin Pfeffer, an MP from Moselle in eastern France and RN party treasurer, says victory is within reach and an outright majority “attainable”, making Le Pen a frontrunner for the 2027 presidential election.

“Marine Le Pen’s mission has been to take each critique made against the RN and dismantle them methodically one by one,” he says. “The French are ready. They are sending us a signal that they want to try us out.” 


In the Berry region as elsewhere, RN voting results have been helped by Le Pen’s long effort to “detoxify” the movement her father founded in 1972 under the name the Front National, which included figures who supported the Nazi collaborationist Vichy government during second world war.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

When she took over in 2011, she expelled the party’s more radical elements, including her father, and rebranded it as the Rassemblement National. While keeping its core DNA of protecting French identity, Le Pen focused on cost of living issues and the plight of low-income workers. 

The RN vote in Indre leapt to 40 per cent in the European election, up 26 percentage points from the last vote in 2019, while Macron’s support increased by 4 percentage points. 

In historically left-leaning Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, Le Pen’s scores have also steadily risen in the past decade. This year the picturesque medieval village filled with flower boxes — population 550 — saw its last boulangerie and a butcher’s shop close. The shuttering of a local cookware factory in 2019 was another blow. 

Le Pen has cast herself as the champion of such places — what she calls the “forgotten France” — far from the wealth, power and cultural cache of Paris and its population of well-off Macron voters. 

Damien Barré, Saint-Benoît-du-Sault’s left-leaning young mayor, is determined to combat people’s sense of decline by fighting to retain businesses and services. His projects include landscaping, building restoration and cultural programming. He even went on a quest last year to find a male goat to mate with the village’s ageing herd. 

Advertisement

Although the sense of being left behind is a powerful motor of the RN vote, he says, its appeal is now wider than that. 

Damien Barré
Damien Barré, the left-leaning mayor of Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, where RN’s support has steadily risen in the past decade. He says he is fighting to stem people’s sense of decline © Adrienne Klasa/FT

“We have been told for a decade that voting for the RN is a protest vote, it’s a fed-up vote, but actually since Marine Le Pen took over the party it is a vote of support. People will tell you, ‘I support their programme, that is why I am voting for them’,” Barré says.

Although mostly rural, voters in Indre and Cher are also worried about crime and immigration — core drivers of the RN vote. A government plan to build a facility to house asylum seekers in a village near Saint-Benoît-du-Sault split opinion and sparked protests.

In Châteauroux, residents are haunted by the stabbing of 15-year-old Matisse Marchais in April. When two people of Afghan descent were indicted for the crime, RN party chief Bardella declared that Matisse was a “victim of out of control immigration that brings predators to our door”.

On a national level, the sociology of the RN vote is also changing.

In the European election, 34 per cent of 60-somethings voted RN, according to an Ipsos analysis, up from 23 per cent in 2019. They even outperformed Macron’s alliance among pensioners, a cohort that has long been loyal to the president and which accounts for a third of the electorate.

Advertisement

“There is no longer a segment of the population or a corner of the country that is off limits for the RN,” says Brice Teinturier, a pollster from Ipsos. “They have become a catch-all party.”

The RN’s new strength with white-collar workers can be seen in Bourges, a city of 66,000 in the Cher department.

Saint-Benoit-du-Sault
Le Pen has cast herself as a champion of places like Saint-Benoit-du-Sault, a picturesque village that in recent years has faced population decline and business closures © Ed Buziak/Alamy

After a period of industrial decline, Bourges has enjoyed an economic boost in recent years as a hub for defence companies benefiting from the war in Ukraine. The biggest private employer, missile group MBDA, is hiring staff to build a second factory, and munitions maker Nexter is also expanding.

Yann Galut, the leftist mayor, says he was “shocked” by the 8 percentage point jump in RN support, which was not as big as in nearby rural areas, but significant in a historically moderate city. 

He fears the far right could soon capture all three of Cher’s seats in the legislature for the first time. Using a French term for voters’ desire to throw the political class out of office, he says there is “an explosive cocktail of dégagisme and a deep hatred of Emmanuel Macron.”

He adds: “I don’t believe the RN has the capacity to run the country and I abhor their politics that play on fears. Yet they are on the verge of power.” 

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

Published

on

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

President Trump announced a three-week extension of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon that had been set to expire in a few days, after hosting a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats at the White House on Thursday.

Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that has been attacking Israel from southern Lebanon, did not have representatives at the meeting and did not immediately comment on the announcement. The prime minister of Israel and the president of Lebanon also did not comment.

A successful peace agreement would hinge upon Hezbollah halting attacks, which Lebanon’s government has little power to enforce because it does not control the militia. Lebanon’s military has mostly stayed out of the fighting and is not at war with Israel.

The cease-fire, which was scheduled to end on April 26, would last until May 17 if it takes effect as Mr. Trump described it. Before the cease-fire was brokered last week, nearly 2,300 people were killed in Lebanon and 13 in Israel. Since then, the number of Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah attacks have been dramatically reduced, though the two sides have continued exchanging fire.

The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Nada Hamadeh, credited Mr. Trump for extending the cease-fire, saying that “with your help and support, we can make Lebanon great again.” Mr. Trump replied, “I like that phrase, it’s a good phrase.”

Advertisement

Asked about the potential of a lasting peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, Mr. Trump said that “I think there’s a great chance. They are friends about the same things and they are enemies on the same things.”

But Lebanon and Israel have periodically been at war since Israel’s founding in 1948. Israel has invaded Lebanon for the fifth time since 1978, incursions that have destabilized the country and the delicate balance of power between Muslim, Christian and Druze communities.

In the hours before the president’s announcement on social media, Israel and Hezbollah were trading attacks in southern Lebanon, testing the existing cease-fire.

Mr. Trump said the meeting at the White House had been attended by high-ranking U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the U.S. ambassadors to Israel and Lebanon.

Earlier on Thursday, an Israeli strike near the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh killed three people, according to Lebanon’s health ministry. Hezbollah claimed three separate attacks on Israeli troops who are occupying southern Lebanon, though none were wounded or killed.

Advertisement

Hezbollah set off the latest round of fighting last month by attacking Israel soon after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran. Israel responded to Hezbollah’s attacks by launching airstrikes across Lebanon and widening a ground invasion of the country’s south.

Continue Reading

News

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Published

on

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Smoke rises from Port of La Guaira in Venezuela on Jan. 3, 2026 after U.S. forces seized the country’s president, Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images

Federal prosecutors on Thursday unsealed an indictment against a U.S. Army soldier, accusing him of using his insider knowledge of the clandestine military operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January to reap more than $400,000 in profits on the popular prediction market site Polymarket.

The Justice Department says Gannon Ken Van Dyke, 38, who was stationed at Fort Bragg, in North Carolina, was part of the team that planned and carried out the predawn raid in Caracas earlier this year that resulted in the apprehension of Maduro.

The Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed the actions against Van Dyke, the first time U.S. officials have leveled criminal charges against someone over prediction market wagers.

Advertisement

According to the indictment, Van Dyke now faces counts of wire fraud, commodities fraud, misusing non-public government information and other charges.

Trading under numerous usernames including “Burdensome-Mix,” Van Dyke allegedly traded about $32,000 on the arrest of Maduro, resulting in profits exceeding $400,000.

“Prediction markets are not a haven for using misappropriated confidential or classified information for personal gain,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Those entrusted to safeguard our nation’s secrets have a duty to protect them and our armed service members, and not to use that information for personal financial gain.”

Van Dyke’s defense lawyer is not yet publicly known. Polymarket did not return a request for comment.

The charges against Van Dyke come at a sensitive time for the prediction market industry, which has been growing exponentially, despite calls in Washington and among state leaders for the sites to be reined in.

Advertisement

Van Dyke is the first to be charged in the U.S. for suspected Polymarket insider trading, but Israeli authorities in February arrested several people and charged two on suspicion of using classified information to place bets about military operations in Iran on Polymarket.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

Published

on

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

The Senate early Thursday morning adopted a Republican budget blueprint that would pave the way for a $70 billion increase for immigration enforcement and the eventual reopening of the Department of Homeland Security.

Republicans pushed through the plan on a nearly party-line vote of 50 to 48. It came after an overnight marathon of rapid-fire votes, known as a vote-a-rama, in which the G.O.P. beat back a series of Democratic proposals aimed at addressing the high cost of health care, housing, food and energy. The debate put the two parties’ dueling messages on vivid display six months before the midterm elections.

Republicans, who are using the budget plan to lay the groundwork to eventually push through a filibuster-proof bill providing a multiyear funding stream for President Trump’s immigration crackdown, used the all-night session to highlight their hard-line stance on border security, seeking to portray Democrats as unwilling to safeguard the country.

Democrats tried and failed to add a series of changes aimed at addressing cost-of-living issues, seizing the opportunity to hammer Republicans as out of touch with and unwilling to act on the concerns of everyday Americans.

Here’s what to know about the budget plan and the nocturnal ritual senators engaged in before adopting it.

Advertisement

The budget blueprint is a crucial piece of Republicans’ plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security and end a shutdown that has lasted for more than two months. After Democrats refused to fund immigration enforcement without new restrictions on agents’ tactics and conduct, the G.O.P. struck a deal with them to pass a spending bill that would fund everything but ICE and the Border Patrol. Republicans said they would fund those agencies through a special budget bill that Democrats could not block.

“We can fix this with Republican votes, and we will,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and the Budget Committee chairman. “Every Democrat has opposed money for the Border Patrol and ICE at a time of great peril.”

In resorting to a new budget blueprint, Republicans laid the groundwork to deny Democrats a chance to stop the immigration enforcement funding. But they also submitted themselves to a vote-a-rama, in which any senator can propose unlimited changes to such a measure before it is adopted.

The budget measure now goes to the House, which must adopt it before lawmakers in both chambers can draft the legislation funding immigration enforcement. That bill will provide yet another opportunity for a vote-a-rama even closer to the November election.

Democrats took to the floor to criticize Republicans for supercharging funding for federal immigration enforcement rather than moving legislation that would address Americans’ concerns over affordability.

Advertisement

“This is what Republicans are fighting for,” said Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the Democratic leader. “To maintain two unchecked rogue agencies that are dreaded in all corners of this country instead of reducing your health care costs, your housing costs, your grocery costs, your gas costs.”

Democrats offered a host of amendments along those lines, all of which were defeated by Republicans — and that was the point. The proposals were meant to put the G.O.P. in a tough political spot, showcasing their opposition to helping Americans afford high living costs. Fewer than a handful of G.O.P. senators crossed party lines to support them.

The G.O.P. thwarted an effort by Mr. Schumer to require that the budget measure lower out-of-pocket health care costs for Americans. Two Republicans who are up for re-election this year, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, voted with Democrats, but the proposal was still defeated.

Republicans also squelched a move by Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Democrat of New Mexico, to create a fund that would lower grocery costs and reverse cuts to food aid programs that Republicans enacted last year. Ms. Collins and Mr. Sullivan again joined Democrats.

Also defeated by the G.O.P.: a proposal by Senator John Hickenlooper, Democrat of Colorado, to address rising consumer prices brought on by Mr. Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran; one by Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, to require the budget measure to address rising electricity prices, and another by Mr. Markey to create a fund to bring down housing costs.

Advertisement

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat who is up for re-election in Georgia, also sought to add language requiring the budget plan to address health insurance companies denying or delaying access to care, but that, too was blocked by Republicans.

While Republicans had fewer proposals for changes to their own budget plan, they also sought to offer measures that would underscore their aggressive stance on immigration enforcement and dare Democrats to vote against them.

Mr. Graham offered an amendment to allocate funds toward a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to the apprehension and deportation of adult immigrants convicted of rape, murder, or sexual abuse of a minor after illegally entering the United States. It passed unanimously.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, sought to bar Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood, which provides abortion and other services, and criticized the organization for providing transgender care to minors. Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, also attempted to tack on the G.O.P. voter identification bill, known as the SAVE America Act. Both proposals were blocked when Democrats, joined by a few Republicans, voted to strike them as unrelated to the budget plan.

The Republicans who crossed party lines to oppose their own party’s proposals for new voting requirements were Ms. Collins along with Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Advertisement

Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski also opposed the effort to block payments to Planned Parenthood.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending