Connect with us

News

The ‘one’ way for Wall Street banks

Published

on

The ‘one’ way for Wall Street banks

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A silo is a dangerous place to be on Wall Street these days. New Morgan Stanley boss Ted Pick is the industry’s latest leader to tout a silo-busting mindset to get his roughly 80,000 employees to work better together. 

Pick is hoping investment bankers will refer millionaire clients to a financial adviser, while employees working on a company’s stock plan can put in a letter good word for Morgan Stanley to win an M&A deal.

Pick used the slogan of “The Integrated Firm” repeatedly in his first letter to shareholders this year and Morgan Stanley insiders talk about this as its next leg of growth. 

Advertisement

The idea is hardly a novel one, with Pick telling an industry conference this month that he was “well aware that such phraseology exists at every firm like ours”. 

“At some level, it’s motherhood and apple pie, right? Let’s all work together,” Pick joked. And he needn’t have even looked beyond Morgan Stanley for inspiration — John Mack, one of his predecessors, was focusing on building the “one-firm firm” all the way back in the 1990s. 

In his 2022 memoir, Mack described how Morgan Stanley was so siloed that divisions had their own summer softball teams and holiday parties. “People could be as competitive inside Morgan Stanley as they were against our Wall Street rivals,” Mack wrote.

Larry Fink introduced a “one BlackRock” principle back in 2012 for the asset manager, while perennial competitor Goldman Sachs has had a “OneGS” initiative in place for almost six years under chief executive David Solomon.

There was even a wink to it in the most recent season of Industry, the raunchy HBO/BBC show about a fictional investment bank called Pierpoint, when one character references a “One Pierpoint” mantra.  

Advertisement

Goldman president John Waldron said last month that OneGS “really has a lot to do with figuring out a way to break down the silos of the firm, create incentives in the firm for everybody in the firm to serve our clients holistically”. 

For a new CEO like Pick, who is inheriting a business that made $9bn in profits last year and a strategy that investors like, “The Integrated Firm” makes sense — why not try to fine-tune the bank’s moneymaking machine? 

It also speaks to two challenges for Morgan Stanley. First, it is harder to grow mature businesses like investment banking and trading where market share has become increasingly concentrated and secular tailwinds are harder to come by. 

Goldman has said repeatedly that its OneGS initiative has helped it gain market share, overtaking Morgan Stanley in equities trading and strengthening its spot as Wall Street’s leading M&A adviser. (A retrenchment by some European rivals has also helped.)

Second, firms like Morgan Stanley have expanded so much beyond bread-and-butter investment banking and trading and into money management that they risk leaving money on the table by not ensuring that they are properly synced up. But while it makes sense on paper, actually getting these different divisions to work together can be much more fraught in practice. 

Advertisement

Bonuses for working with another division are typically highly discretionary. This can be a turn-off for some employees, though Goldman has explored paying more formulaic bonuses for business referred to its private bank. 

Cultural differences also run deep on Wall Street, where firms are often stitched together from acquisitions over many years. (Goldman is an outlier in that it has largely grown without M&A). 

The company that Pick runs today is a mix of Morgan Stanley’s investment banking and trading business, brokerage firms Smith Barney and Dean Witter, electronic trading platform ETrade and asset manager Eaton Vance. 

For a banker to refer a client to a colleague, they need to trust that the other part of the company is up to the same standard and won’t make them look bad. 

“If you’re an investment banker, you don’t want a private banker to do anything that could jeopardise the relationship [with the client], like putting them in a bad investment,” said one banker at a large US firm. 

Advertisement

Pick has said the leaders at Morgan Stanley’s different businesses are already on friendly terms, pointing to an unusually calm succession process that saw him become CEO and his two other contenders stick around as co-presidents. “We’ve been unified for a long time,” Pick said this month. “You can’t just wake up one day and say, let’s get along.”

It is not difficult to wonder though how deep such bonhomie runs at Morgan Stanley or any Wall Street bank. Investment banking is not exactly well known for being a kind and gentle world. But no doubt, when the next bank appoints a new CEO, expect the “one” playbook to be dusted off.

joshua.franklin@ft.com

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending