Connect with us

News

The joy of weeping

Published

on

The joy of weeping

Stay informed with free updates

Over drinks at the end of a frantic work month, an American friend reflected on a schedule that had seen her weeks away from home. Her diary, she told me, had packed in dozens of meetings, dinners and early starts to follow: she had been on best behaviour for a month. At that point, she was tired, overwrought and fully over it. “I just need to go home,” she concluded. “I need to get on a plane, hug my people and have a good cry and it will all be good.”

As luck would have it, a good cry has been an easy fix. Last week, Ariana Grande dropped Eternal Sunshine, a “concept record” that covers the singer’s divorce from Dalton Gomez and emotional journey as she experiences her Saturn return (which, as well you all know, is a cycle of 29 years). Pitchfork describes Eternal Sunshine as an “emotionally generous collection of music that cycles compassionately through the collapse of one relationship and into the hopeful beginning of another”. It’s also got some banging tunes. In particular, for those who crave the pure emotional release offered by a pop song, “We Can’t Be Friends” is the perfect hit. Heartbreak? The folly of a post-relationship friendship? The bittersweet pain of moving on? Ariana’s got it covered. I’ve been listening to it on repeat. 

I love a good cry. And pop songs are a marvellous placebo for dealing with emotional issues you can’t quite be arsed to face. Why dwell on the superficiality of your existence, your lack of societal contribution or the tragedies of global conflict when you can simply play a song that makes you bawl?

Advertisement

I have a playlist ready for occasions when I feel overwhelmed: I like to channel the spirit of Holly Hunter, the news producer in Broadcast News, who sobs hysterically for precise two-minute episodes before going back to work. 

In real life, I have a very low tolerance for crying: office weeping in particular is a red flag. Rather than shedding tears as an expression of empathy and understanding, I prefer my weeping to be solitary, brisk and ideally exercised in contexts that do not affect me personally — such as while watching documentaries, Crufts, or seeing old men dine alone. 

No one has ever really cracked the code of why humans cry, nor the point of tears. Charles Darwin considered emotional tears as being “purposeless”, and there remains little consensus about their meaning even now. I’m quite fond of the theory, popularised by Dr William H Frey, a self-appointed “student of psychogenic lacrimation”, who concluded in the early 1980s that crying removes toxins that we build up in times of stress. But this theory hasn’t found huge traction within the scientific community, most of which is still unsure about the health benefits of a big blub. 

Clinical psychologist Ad Vingerhoets is a crying expert. The author of the 2013 book Why Only Humans Weep, he has given a TED talk on the subject and has a website on which he shares his thoughts. “Rather than sadness,” he writes, “investigators agree that the key antecedents to crying are helplessness, hopelessness, and the lack of adequate behavioral responses to a problem situation. In addition, there is loss or separation from loved ones. Deaths, divorces, and homesickness are among the most important triggers of crying.”

Even he, however, is unclear about the benefits of crying. He was surprised, for example, to find that only 50 per cent of respondents [to his study about weeping] reported an improved mood following a cry. He concludes that “how people feel after crying is predominantly determined by how observers respond”.

Advertisement
Shirley MacLaine in 1983’s ‘Terms of Endearment’ — ‘still my all-time favourite blub go-to’ © Alamy

I have no desire to share my tears in public. Or for others to share theirs. Perhaps I am marked by that stiff-lipped culture that still sees crying as something that should be shamed. My grandmother lost almost every member of her family and yet I never, ever saw her shed a tear. But maybe she too had a secret playlist to convulse to, quietly, in some darkened room?

Weeping is a wonderful tonic, some weird alchemy of humours that the body must expel. It’s surely why so many people weep uncontrollably on long-haul flights while watching appalling films. Cocooned at 30,000ft, amid total strangers, one is unencumbered by the proprieties one might feel on the ground. You can bawl your way through mawkish romcoms, such as PS I Love You or Terms of Endearment (still a classic and still my all-time favourite blub go-to).

In no way are these moments social, nor do we seek observers to validate our tears. But, man, it feels good to shed them. Spotify, play Ariana Grande please.

Email Jo at jo.ellison@ft.com

Find out about our latest stories first — follow @FTWeekend on Instagram and X, and subscribe to our podcast Life & Art wherever you listen

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading

News

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Published

on

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Crime scene tape surrounds a bicycle in front of St. Lukes Episcopal Church in Atlanta on May 14, 2026. (SKYFOX 5)

The woman stabbed to death on the Beltline has been identified as 23-year-old Alyssa Paige, according to the Fulton County Medical Examiner.

The backstory:

Advertisement

Paige was killed by a 21-year-old man Thursday afternoon while she was on the Beltline. Officials confirmed to FOX 5 that the stabbing happened near the 1700 block of Flagler Avenue NE.

Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum said the department was alerted around 12:10 p.m. that a woman had been stabbed just north of the Montgomery Ferry Drive overpass. She was rushed to Grady Memorial Hospital where she later died. Another person was also stabbed during the incident, but their condition remains unknown.

According to officers, the man responsible attacked a U.S. Postal worker prior to the stabbing before getting away on a bike. He then used that bike to flee the scene of the stabbing as well.

Advertisement

The suspect was arrested near St. Luke’s Episcopal Church on Peachtree Street in Midtown around 5:25 p.m. 

What we don’t know:

Advertisement

While officials haven’t released an official motive, they noted the man may have been suffering a mental health crisis.

The Source: Information in this article came from the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office and previous FOX 5 reporting. 

AtlantaCrime and Public SafetyNewsInstastories
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending