Connect with us

News

The case for joint European energy procurement is irresistible

Published

on

In an echo of the Nineteen Seventies, the world is within the throes of a geopolitically induced power worth shock. That decade is rightly remembered as a painful time for western economies. However excessive oil costs additionally yielded sudden advantages. The tip of low-cost power and the apparent want for long-term power safety spurred a profitable drive for power effectivity.

After Vladimir Putin’s assault on Ukraine, the EU’s must take away the nationwide safety danger of counting on Russian power is a brand new alternative to make a advantage out of necessity.

EU leaders have already requested the European Fee to set out plans to wean the bloc off Russian power dependence. Germany says it is going to largely finish its reliance on Russia for oil and coal this yr, and pure fuel by 2024.

Europe also can flip power coverage into an lively device of exterior affect. The EU is — not earlier than time — probing its potential to represent a consumers’ cartel. Some member states have resisted requires joint EU procurement of pure fuel. Putin’s aggression has lifted their doubts: on Friday the European Council vowed to work on a typical buy platform.

This can be a momentous transfer. Think about the worldwide results ought to EU nations collectively procure and handle the fuel wanted to completely replenish the bloc’s fuel storage yearly. That may imply yearly shopping for as much as 100bn cubic metres of fuel, about one-tenth of the world’s annual commerce. If it was all purchased as liquefied pure fuel it could be one-fifth of the LNG market. If largely concentrated in the summertime, the non permanent market share could be greater nonetheless. Alternatively, if a joint buy company purchased on the similar price in winter as what it wanted to replenish storage in summer season, the market share may keep greater all year long.

Advertisement

This could not fairly attain Opec ranges — the oil-producers’ cartels account for greater than half of world crude oil exports. However a European consumers’ cartel in pure fuel may nonetheless wield important market energy.

The obvious profit is mercantile. The muscle of collective procurement would certainly over time afford Europe decrease costs than in any other case. It will additionally change the incentives guiding power decisions nicely past Europe’s shores. Within the brief run, joint EU buying in a squeezed LNG market would elevate costs for others, particularly Asian economies. Together with European carbon border tariffs, that may enhance demand for zero-carbon power.

In the long term, joint procurement would make it simpler for EU nations to pre-announce plans for cutting down fuel use — which, via its international market affect, would forged doubt on the knowledge of investing in long-term fuel improvement elsewhere. The general impact could be a lift to incentives for international renewable power investments right this moment.

Then there’s the geopolitical achieve. If strategic autonomy means something, it’s certainly that the pursuit of European values and pursuits shouldn’t be constrained by the stranglehold stored by Russia or different powers on the power provides of EU nations. Moscow has minimize off fuel provides for geostrategic causes earlier than. And Gazprom’s unwillingness to fill its German reservoirs earlier than final winter worsened the EU’s strategic place when Putin launched his warfare.

This isn’t a brand new level. There was curiosity in an EU power union, together with frequent purchases from Russia, within the final decade. German complicity with Russian power pursuits stood in the best way. However so did the tragedy of the post-2015 Polish authorities’s anti-European flip. It did not collaborate Europe-wide on such an agenda due to home variations with Donald Tusk, the previous Polish prime minister, who in his subsequent job as president of the European Council may have rallied a coalition of nations behind this very important Polish curiosity.

Advertisement

However higher late than by no means. The situations are propitious for Europe to make up for misplaced time. Germany has been shocked out of complacency. The EU has some expertise with frequent procurement of a collective good: its purchases of Covid-19 vaccines throughout the pandemic had been extra profitable than they get credit score for, and modern vaccines are a way more sophisticated market to enter than pure fuel.

The EU shouldn’t be prepared in a single day to turn out to be a gas-buying cartel at scale. It should construct up experience and enhance its regasification and home piping capability. However that is taking place. And establishing a typical buy platform will speed up the method.

The Nineteen Seventies shocks got here from the younger Opec flexing its muscle tissue. The 2020s shocks ought to give beginning to a European anti-Opec.

martin.sandbu@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Joe Biden vows to stay in fight with Trump as pressure to quit mounts

Published

on

Joe Biden vows to stay in fight with Trump as pressure to quit mounts

Standard Digital

Weekend Print + Standard Digital

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

Continue Reading

News

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Published

on

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Four people were killed and nine others were injured after a minivan crashed into a Long Island, New York, nail salon Friday afternoon.

The vehicle slammed into Hawaii Nail & Spa on Grand Boulevard in Deer Park shortly before 5 p.m.

A witness told NBC New York that the van plowed through the front of the business and almost came out through the back of the salon.

All of those killed or injured were inside the salon at the time, according to Lt. Kevin Heissenbuttel. Some people were trapped in the salon and had to be extricated by emergency services, he said.

A witness said the vehicle had been racing through a parking lot across the street before crashing and “seemingly in a rush,” NBC New York reported, adding that others said the van was trying to get around another vehicle when it drove into the building.

Advertisement

The van was seen racing though a parking lot across the street, NBC New York reported. A witness said it was trying to pass another vehicle when it drove into the building, the station reported.

Photos from the scene showed a gaping hole in the storefront.

The Associated Press reported that a witness said he heard a speeding car and then a “shattering” noise.

“It was a sound that I never heard before,” he said.

The vehicle’s driver was among the injured and transported to a hospital.

Advertisement

The Deer Park Fire Department chief said it was not clear what caused the vehicle to crash into the business.

About 150 firefighters and EMS personnel responded to the scene.

Continue Reading

News

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Published

on

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Thursday night’s US presidential debate was watched by 48mn television viewers, a sharp drop from the numbers that tuned in to the clashes between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in the 2020 campaign.

CNN, the Warner Bros Discovery-owned network which hosted the event, said just over 9mn viewers had watched on its own channels, narrowly ahead of Fox News and ABC News, with cable rival MSNBC drawing about 4mn viewers. Another 30mn people tuned in on CNN’s digital channels or YouTube, it added.

The combined television audiences were well below the totals for previous presidential debates, however, extending a pattern of US media outlets reporting less interest in their election coverage this year.

Advertisement

Trump and Biden drew 73mn viewers for their first debate in 2020, while Trump and Hillary Clinton pulled in an audience of 84mn for the opening showdown of their 2016 contest.

With full control over the style, content and format of the debate, CNN inserted rules that are atypical for US political events, such as foregoing a live audience and muting each candidate’s microphones unless it was their turn to speak.

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

The debate was also a stark departure in tone from last year’s CNN town hall event with Trump, when a studio audience filled with the former president’s supporters prompted comparisons with his raucous rallies. CNN’s own media commentator slammed the town hall as a “spectacle of lies”, and Chris Licht resigned as CNN’s chief executive just a few weeks later.

By comparison, Thursday’s night’s debate was restrained. With microphones muted, there were no shouting matches, and with no audience or press in the room, it was quiet. The moderators played a background role, leaving the debate largely a back-and-forth dialogue between Trump and Biden. 

Advertisement

However CNN was criticised for one significant choice: moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash largely avoided fact-checking the candidates in real time. The format seemed to favour Trump, who was allowed to make a series of unsubstantiated claims without being challenged during the 90-minute programme. 

The debate was a big test for CNN — the network that pioneered the dramatic, ultra-competitive cable news format in the US in the 1980s, but whose audiences have dwindled in recent years. It was easily the biggest moment yet for CNN chief executive Sir Mark Thompson, who took over as leader of the channel last year and has been tasked with turning around its business and restoring its brand.

CNN landed the sponsorship of the debate in May, beating out competitors including Fox News. The network seized on the moment, promoting the event heavily and forcing its rivals, who simultaneously broadcast the debate, to display CNN’s logo prominently on their screens.

The event was unique for a number of reasons. It was the first presidential debate in decades that was not organised by an independent commission, after Biden and Trump chose to bypass the tradition. It was also scheduled far earlier than usual in the election cycle. In previous years, the initial match-ups between presidential candidates took place in September or October. 

CNN has a fraught history with Trump, who frequently attacked the channel during his presidency. But on Friday morning, the Trump campaign blasted an email out to his supporters titled: “I love CNN . . . Because they gave me the opportunity to wipe the floor with Joe Biden.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending