Connect with us

News

#StopWillow is taking TikTok by storm. Can it actually work? | CNN

Published

on

#StopWillow is taking TikTok by storm. Can it actually work? | CNN



CNN
 — 

When Elise Joshi posted a TikTok video concerning the Alaska oil drilling challenge generally known as Willow in early February, she didn’t have excessive hopes it might go viral.

Joshi, 20, posts usually about local weather points on TikTok for the account Gen-Z for Change, in addition to her private account. She’s properly conscious “local weather doesn’t development fairly often,” as she advised CNN. However Joshi’s video about Willow was very totally different. It took only a few days to build up greater than 100,000 views, ultimately surpassing 300,000.

“It’s my most-viewed video in months,” Joshi advised CNN. “That is the whole web advocating towards Willow; [President Joe Biden’s] voter base, that trusted him to behave on local weather.”

Biden’s administration is predicted to finalize its choice on whether or not to approve the ConocoPhillips Willow Venture subsequent week. If it goes via, the decadeslong oil drilling enterprise within the on the North Slope of Alaska would create 1000’s of jobs and set up a brand new income for the area.

Advertisement

However it might additionally generate sufficient oil to launch 9.2 million metric tons of planet-warming carbon air pollution a yr, by the federal authorities’s estimate, about the identical as including 2 million automobiles to the roads.

Whereas the challenge has each supporters and opponents in its dwelling state, it has develop into a lightning rod on social media. Over the previous week, TikTok customers specifically have galvanized round halting the challenge, with a staggering variety of individuals watching and posting on the subject.

Movies with anti-Willow hashtags like #StopWillow have amassed near 50 million views within the final week, and on Friday, Willow was on the location’s prime 10 trending listing, behind celebrities Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber. A lot of the spike in curiosity has come within the final week alone.

The net activism has resulted in a couple of million letters being written to the White Home protesting the challenge, in addition to a Change.org petition with 2.8 million signatures and counting.

Advertisement

“If that doesn’t emphasize the truth that it’s on a regular basis Individuals pushing again, I don’t know what does,” mentioned Alex Haraus, 25, a TikTok creator whose Willow movies have garnered tens of millions of views. “This isn’t an environmental motion, it’s a lot bigger than that. It’s the American public that may vote.”

TikTok creators and local weather teams CNN spoke to mentioned the sudden surge in on-line activism round Willow has largely been natural, and far bigger than another local weather subject on the app earlier than.

Some local weather and anti-fossil gas teams have been working with particular TikTok creators and accounts round Willow, however nobody group has spearheaded the net motion across the challenge. Comparable TikTok campaigns have sprung up up to now few years round banning oil drilling within the Arctic Nationwide Wildlife Refuge and stopping the Line 3 pipeline in Minnesota, however few have captured as a lot consideration as Willow.

“I’ve been doing this for a very long time and it’s very uncommon to see a local weather subject go viral,” mentioned Alaina Wooden, 26, a scientist, local weather activist and TikTok creator.

Advertisement

Wooden advised CNN she thinks the profile of local weather has grown on apps frequented by youthful generations, particularly given Biden’s local weather legislation handed final yr. However there may be additionally loads of anxiousness and concern concerning the local weather disaster on TikTok – sentiments the Willow Venture has captured and amplified.

“Anytime a challenge like this goes viral, the local weather doom additionally goes viral,” Wooden mentioned, including she’s made movies to attempt to counter the local weather doomerism proliferating amongst some younger individuals. “A number of younger individuals are below the impression that if Willow will get handed, local weather change will probably be irreversible. We nonetheless must struggle Willow, however your life isn’t over if it’s handed.”

The expansion of #StopWillow TikTok has each befuddled and delighted legacy local weather teams, a few of which had been questioning why it took so lengthy for Willow to get seen. Regardless that Biden has already cemented a part of his legacy on local weather by working with Congress to move essentially the most formidable local weather invoice in generations, activists who fought Keystone XL and the Dakota Entry Pipeline in the course of the Obama administration say one factor stays fixed: huge fossil gas initiatives have a tendency to fireside individuals up.

“Particular fights impress public consideration far more than coverage does,” mentioned Jamie Henn, the director of nonprofit Fossil Free Media and a former co-founder of the environmental group 350.org. “These are the problems that seize the general public creativeness. It’s actually foolhardy to disregard that.”

Advertisement

The White Home has proven it cares about reaching TikTok’s huge, younger viewers. White Home officers have invited TikTok creators to the White Home a number of instances, together with for a gathering with Biden himself concerning the Inflation Discount Act in October.

“I believe Democrats and the Biden administration would do properly to concentrate to those tendencies,” mentioned Lena Moffitt, chief of workers for local weather group Evergreen Motion. “Younger individuals more and more need local weather motion from their elected officers and so they’re going to demand it.”

Nutaaq Simmonds of Utqiagvik, Alaska, speaks at a protest against the Willow Project in front of the White House on Friday.

Protests towards Willow aren’t simply occurring on TikTok. On Friday, a gaggle of about 100 individuals gathered in entrance of the White Home in frigid drizzle to reveal towards the challenge.

TikTok creators had been skinny on the bottom. Those that had braved the chilly March climate included Alaska Natives and elders who had flown over 10 hours from Anchorage and villages on the North Slope to DC. Robert Thompson is one elder who made the grueling journey from his dwelling village of Kaktovik.

Thompson advised CNN he had needed to discuss the results of local weather change on the area’s animals and spoke of over 200 caribou discovered lifeless close to his dwelling.

Advertisement

“We might see them from our home, it’s unhappy,” Thompson mentioned, tearing up. “I used to be in Vietnam and noticed loads of issues that had been unhappy, however I by no means thought I’d see it at my dwelling. I don’t know how one can settle for it.”

This 2019 photo shows an exploratory drilling camp at the proposed site of the Willow Project on Alaska's North Slope.

Willow’s supporters – together with a coalition of Alaska Natives on the North Slope – say Willow may very well be a much-needed new income for the area and assist fund faculties, well being care and different primary companies.

“Willow presents a possibility to proceed that funding within the communities,” Nagruk Harcharek, president of the advocacy group Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, advised CNN. “With out that cash and income stream, we’re reliant on the state and the feds.”

However others dwelling nearer to the deliberate challenge, together with metropolis officers and tribal members within the Native village of Nuiqsut, are involved concerning the well being and environmental impacts of a significant oil growth.

“We’re saying that you’re not allowed to make selections which are going to make our world unlivable,” Siqiniq Maupin, government director of the Indigenous activist group Sovereign Iñupiat for a Dwelling Arctic, advised CNN. “We’re involved about local weather change, however we’re additionally involved about Indigenous rights and human rights.”

Advertisement

Maupin and Thompson mentioned they’ll proceed to struggle Willow via the courts if the Biden administration approves the challenge. Environmental authorized group Earthjustice has additionally been getting ready a lawsuit towards the challenge whether it is authorized.

“We plan to do all the pieces in our energy to cease ConocoPhillips from doing building in Nuiqsut this winter,” Maupin mentioned. “We’re going to proceed to struggle this by authorized means, by direct motion.”

As for whether or not the surge of on-line activism will work to halt or delay the challenge, TikTok creators themselves aren’t positive. If the challenge is authorized, a number of advised CNN they’ll proceed to submit concerning the challenge – detailing methods their followers can help Indigenous teams in Alaska and hold talking out about Willow.

“We’re coordinated sufficient to do no matter makes essentially the most sense,” Haraus advised CNN. “If that’s in-person protesting, then we’ll fortunately try this. This is a matter that we’ll be voting on and can keep in mind on the poll field.

Advertisement

“Hundreds of thousands of individuals are ready for the White Home’s transfer.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

‘Mission South Africa’: How Trump Is Offering White Afrikaners Refugee Status

Published

on

‘Mission South Africa’: How Trump Is Offering White Afrikaners Refugee Status

Almost immediately after taking office, President Trump began shutting down refugee resettlement programs, slashing billions of dollars in funding and making it all but impossible for people from scores of countries to seek haven in the United States.

With one exception.

The Trump administration has thrown open the doors to white Afrikaners from South Africa, establishing a program called “Mission South Africa” to help them come to the United States as refugees, according to documents obtained by The New York Times.

Under Phase One of the program, the United States has deployed multiple teams to convert commercial office space in Pretoria, the capital of South Africa, into ad hoc refugee centers, according to the documents. The teams are studying more than 8,200 requests expressing interest in resettling to the United States and have already identified 100 Afrikaners who could be approved for refugee status. The government officials have been directed to focus particularly on screening white Afrikaner farmers.

The administration has also provided security escorts to officials conducting the interviews of potential refugees.

Advertisement

By mid-April, U.S. officials on the ground in South Africa will “propose long-term solutions, to ensure the successful implementation of the president’s vision for the dignified resettlement of eligible Afrikaner applicants,” according to one memo sent from the embassy in Pretoria to the State Department in Washington this month.

The administration’s focus on white Afrikaners comes as it effectively bans the entry of other refugees — including about 20,000 people from countries like Afghanistan, Congo and Syria who were ready to travel to the United States before Mr. Trump took office. In court filings about those other refugees, the administration has argued that core functions of the refugee program had been “terminated” after the president’s ban, so it did not have the resources to take in any more people.

“There’s no subtext and nothing subtle about the way this administration’s immigration and refugee policy has obvious racial and racist overtones,” said Vanessa Cárdenas, the executive director of America’s Voice. “While they seek to single out Afrikaners for special treatment, they simultaneously want us to think mostly Black and brown vetted newcomers are dangerous despite their background checks and all evidence to the contrary.”

The program also inserts the United States into a charged debate inside South Africa, where some members of the white Afrikaner minority have begun a campaign to suggest that they are the true victims in post-apartheid South Africa. Under apartheid, a white minority government discriminated against South Africans of color, and brutality and violence flourished, leading to torture, disappearances and murder.

There have been murders of white farmers, the focus of the Afrikaner grievances, but police statistics show they are not any more vulnerable to violent crime than others in the country. In South Africa, more than 90 percent of the population comes from racial groups persecuted by the racist, apartheid regime.

Advertisement

In a statement, the State Department said it was focused on resettling Afrikaners who have been “victims of unjust racial discrimination.” The agency confirmed that it had begun interviewing applicants and said they would need to pass “stringent background and security checks.”

The decision to unleash resources for Afrikaners just starting the refugee process, while stonewalling court demands to process those fleeing other countries who have already been cleared for travel, risks upending an American refugee program that has been the foundation of the United States’ role for the vulnerable, according to resettlement officials.

“The government clearly has the ability to process applications when it wants to,” said Melissa Keaney, a senior supervising attorney for the International Refugee Assistance Project, the group representing plaintiffs trying to restart refugee processing.

Mr. Trump signed an executive order suspending refugee admissions on his first day in office, arguing that welcoming refugees could compromise resources for Americans. He added that future versions of the program should prioritize “only those refugees who can fully and appropriately assimilate into the United States.”

A federal judge in Seattle later temporarily blocked that executive order and instructed the administration to restore the refugee program. But the Trump administration still cut contracts with organizations that assist those applying for refugee status overseas, reducing the infrastructure needed to support people seeking refuge in the United States.

Advertisement

An appeals court ruled last week that the administration must admit those thousands of people who were granted refugee status before Mr. Trump entered office, but also declined to stop him from halting the admission of new refugees.

The Justice Department has for weeks deflected demands from refugee advocates accusing the administration of sidestepping the court order and delaying the process of almost every refugee previously granted a ticket to come to the United States. The Trump administration has said it has allowed a limited number of refugees who were vetted to enter the country, although the State Department declined to provide a number.

Lawyers for the Justice Department have argued both that the administration now lacks resources to help thousands of refugees and that in restarting the program the government reserves the right to “do so in a manner that reflects administration priorities.”

Mr. Trump has made clear what those priorities were when he created a refugee carve-out for white Afrikaners. Mr. Trump at the time accused the South African government of confiscating the land of white Afrikaners, backing a long-held conspiracy theory about the mistreatment of white South Africans in the post-apartheid era.

Mr. Trump was referring to a recent policy signed into law by the South African government, known as the Expropriation Act. It repeals an apartheid-era law and allows the government in certain instances to acquire privately held land in the public interest, without paying compensation, only after a justification process subject to judicial review.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump and his allies have for years echoed the grievances of Afrikaners. During his first term, Mr. Trump directed the State Department to investigate land seizures and “the large-scale killing of farmers.” Elon Musk, who was born in South Africa but is not of Afrikaner descent, has also falsely claimed that white farmers in South Africa were being killed every day.

Despite the claims, white people own half of South Africa’s land while making up just 7 percent of the country’s population. Police statistics do not show that they are any more vulnerable to violent crime than other people in the nation.

Ernst Roets, the former executive director of the Afrikaner Foundation, which lobbies for international support of the interests of Afrikaners, said many of his peers felt seen by Mr. Trump.

But he said the creation of the new refugee program had elicited debate among Afrikaners. Many do not want to leave their home, Mr. Roets said, but want the United States to back their efforts to claim “self-governance” in South Africa.

“I don’t know anyone — no one I’m aware of — that plans to move to America,” Mr. Roets said. “People who want to come to America, we would support that. If people want to relocate to America, the farmers or Afrikaners, we think they would make good Americans.”

Advertisement

“There’s a good fit,” he added.

Zumbe Baruti, a Congolese refugee living in South Carolina, said he spent decades in a refugee camp in Africa waiting for his turn to be accepted.

“Those white Africans are allowed to enter the United States, but Black Africans are denied entry to the United States,” Mr. Baruti, 29, said in Swahili. He said the pivot away from refugees who have waited in camps for years and to Afrikaners was a form of “discrimination.”

Mr. Baruti, a member of the Bembe people in the Democratic Republic of Congo, fled ethnic violence in the nation when he was a child. He was granted refugee status in 2023, but his wife and three children — the oldest 6 years old and the youngest just 2 — had yet to clear security vetting. He entered the United States two years ago, focused on getting a job, saving money and immediately applying for his family to join him.

When he entered, he said he was told by advisers helping him with his application that his family would most likely join him in two years.

Advertisement

He said that seemed unlikely as Mr. Trump turned his focus elsewhere.

“Regarding my family,” Mr. Baruti said, “hope has diminished.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump threatens secondary tariffs on Russian oil if no deal on Ukraine

Published

on

Trump threatens secondary tariffs on Russian oil if no deal on Ukraine

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump said he was “pissed off” with Vladimir Putin for foot-dragging in talks over a ceasefire with Ukraine, as the US president threatened secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian oil if no deal is done. 

Trump’s comments on Sunday revealed the frustration at the White House with the Russian president as negotiations over a settlement of the war in Ukraine continue on without a clear breakthrough.

The new threat to hit imports from countries that purchase Russian oil come as Trump prepares to impose tariffs on goods from many of America’s largest trading partners on Wednesday. The president has proclaimed the moment “liberation day”, but the plan has caused turmoil in markets and anxiety among businesses and governments worldwide. 

Advertisement

Trump’s outburst at Moscow is a shift in tone for the US president, who for weeks blamed Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian president, for being reluctant to strike a deal. 

The US president chided Putin for attacking Zelenskyy’s legitimacy as Kyiv’s leader.

“If we’re in the midst of a negotiation, you could say that I was very angry, pissed off . . . when Putin started getting into Zelenskyy’s credibility,” Trump told NBC News. “That’s not going in the right location, you understand?”

While Ukraine has agreed to American demands for a full 30-day ceasefire, Russia has rebuffed the plan and conceded only to a truce regarding energy infrastructure targets and maritime operations in the Black Sea — and only if the west first lifts sanctions on some agricultural goods.

Zelenskyy has accused Russia of breaking the energy ceasefire at least twice since it was agreed. “Russia must be forced into peace — only pressure will work,” he said this weekend.

Advertisement
Finnish President Alexander Stubb, right. with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago on Saturday © Finnish Presidential Office/Instagram/Reuters

Finland’s president Alexander Stubb, who spent seven hours with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday including a round of golf, told the Financial Times the US president was “running out of patience” with Putin over the ceasefire.

“I think we’re moving in the right direction,” said Stubb on a visit to London where he will on Monday debrief British prime minister Keir Starmer on his discussions with Trump.

Stubb said he had proposed setting a deadline of April 20 — which marks three months since Trump returned to the White House — to accept a 30-day unconditional truce on land, sea and in the air. Both western and eastern Christian churches will celebrate Easter on April 20 this year, a rare calendar alignment.

“The Russians are stalling, they’re coming up with new conditions,” Stubb said. “Let’s call Putin’s bluff for what it is. Russia at this stage does not want peace. So we need to force peace on Russia.”

Trump had previously threatened Russia with new tariffs and sanctions if it resisted an agreement, but expanding the trade bluster to buyers of Russian oil in other countries will add more pressure on Putin. 

Advertisement

“If a deal isn’t made, and if I think it was Russia’s fault, I’m going to put secondary sanctions on Russia,” Trump told NBC.

Trump did not offer a clear explanation of what the plan would involve. He said “anybody buying oil from Russia will not be able to sell their product, any product, not just oil, into the United States”, but also said there would be a “25 to 50-point tariff on all oil”. 

The US president added that he would slap “secondary tariffs” on Iran if they failed to make a deal on its nuclear programme, as he renewed his threat of “bombing” Tehran if they did not strike an agreement.

Continue Reading

News

Iran rejects direct nuke talks as Trump threatens 'bombing' – DW – 03/30/2025

Published

on

Iran rejects direct nuke talks as Trump threatens 'bombing' – DW – 03/30/2025

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday rebuked the idea of direct negotiations with US President Donald Trump’s administration over its nuclear program. 

Pezeshkian: US must ‘build trust’ after earlier breached promises 

“We responded to the US president’s letter via Oman and rejected the option of direct talks, but we are open to indirect negotiations,” Pezeshkian said during a sitdown with his cabinet broadcast on Iranian TV. 

“We don’t avoid talks; it’s the breach of promises that has caused issues for us so far,” Pezeshkian said. “They must prove that they can build trust.”

During Trump’s first term in 2018, he pulled the US out of a nuclear agreement with Iran known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Iran and Russia look to forge stronger ties against West

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Advertisement

That deal provided sanctions relief for Iran, with the Iranian government in exchange curbing its nuclear program and allowing inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency to periodically view its enrichment sites. France, Germany, Russia, the UK and the EU are some of the other parties signed onto the JCPOA.   

Trump vows ‘bombing’ if no new Iran nuclear deal 

Trump sent a letter to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei earlier this month, urging Iran to reach a new nuclear deal with the US in his second term in the White House.   

In an interview with US broadcaster NBC News, Trump made new threats towards Iran if there is no new nuclear agreement with the US.

“If they don’t make a deal,” Trump told the outlet on Saturday evening, referring to Iran. “There will be bombing. It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

Trump claimed that representatives from the US and Iran are “talking” on the matter.  

Advertisement

Trump orders strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

The Trump administration has a “maximum pressure” approach towards Iran, which aims to both economically and politically isolate Tehran.

The Trump administration has also vowed to crack down on so-called Iranian proxies in the Middle East region, with the US currently attacking the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen. 

Edited by: Roshni Majumdar

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending