Connect with us

News

Ronald Reagan tried the UK’s economic plan. It didn’t work | CNN Business

Published

on

Ronald Reagan tried the UK’s economic plan. It didn’t work | CNN Business

A model of this story first appeared in CNN Enterprise’ Earlier than the Bell publication. Not a subscriber? You may enroll proper right here. You may hearken to an audio model of the publication by clicking the identical hyperlink.


New York
CNN Enterprise
 — 

The British pound hit a report low in opposition to the greenback on Monday after UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, a fan of “trickle-down economics,” introduced a sweeping spending and tax reduce plan to rescue the British financial system from recession on Friday.

What’s taking place: Buyers had been greatly surprised by the brand new authorities’s option to institute its largest tax reduce in 50 years whereas boosting authorities spending and borrowing with inflation close to 40-year highs. Citibank analysts referred to as the choice a “large, unfunded gamble for the UK financial system.” Markets dropped precipitously on the information.

Advertisement

However Truss took a cue from former US President Ronald Reagan as she defended her actions. The federal government is “incentivizing companies to take a position, and we’re additionally serving to bizarre individuals with their taxes,” she instructed CNN’s Jake Tapper final week, referencing Reagan’s trickle-down beliefs.

So is she proper? Let’s mud off our historical past books and see.

Attention-grabbing parallels: When Reagan arrived in Washington in 1981, inflation charges had been almost 10% and tight financial coverage had taken rates of interest to over 19%. However very similar to Truss, Reagan argued that huge tax cuts and deregulation would stimulate productiveness and he championed a sweeping tax reduce that was handed by Congress that yr.

Truss’ authorities factors to that as proof that reducing taxes doesn’t essentially drive up costs. Inflation fell and development surged beneath Reagan, it says.

However the coverage got here at a value. In accordance with US Treasury estimates, Reagan’s tax cuts diminished federal revenues by about 9% within the first couple of years. In the meantime, unemployment saved rising.

Advertisement

Congress concluded the sweeping tax cuts had been unsustainable. With Reagan’s approval, it raised taxes by loads in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1987.

A lesson from historical past: “When tax cuts are actually too massive to be sustainable, they’re usually adopted by tax will increase,” wrote David Wessel, director of The Hutchins Middle on Fiscal and Financial Coverage.

And within the close to time period, for the UK, there’s additionally an enormous threat to its foreign money. The US greenback appreciated in the course of the Reagan tax cuts as a result of it advantages from international reserve foreign money standing. A powerful foreign money helps include inflation and makes imports cheaper. Britain, seeing report drops in its personal foreign money, doesn’t have that benefit.

The underside line: The British pound will probably hit backside in three months, wrote Goldman Sachs economist Kamakshya Trivedi in a notice Monday. “But when [tax] coverage doesn’t ultimately change tack, then we might count on Sterling underperformance to persist for longer,” he stated.

That’s dangerous information for markets across the globe. S&P 500 corporations which have a worldwide footprint are getting hit arduous by the robust greenback and weakening pound — about 30% of all S&P 500 corporations’ income is earned in markets outdoors the US.

Advertisement

The final time taxes in Britain had been reduce this a lot, there was rampant inflation, an enormous soar in debt and ultimately an IMF bailout. “It’s tough to see how the pound can recuperate from right here,” wrote Fiona Cincotta, senior monetary markets analyst, at Metropolis Index, in a notice. “Buyers are quickly pulling out of UK belongings, and who can blame them?”

We all know the British pound is falling in opposition to the greenback, however what does that imply precisely?

A falling pound is dire information for an financial system that will already be in recession, reviews my colleague Julia Horowitz. As the worth of sterling falls, it turns into dearer to import important items usually paid for in US {dollars} like meals and gasoline. That would fan decades-high inflation that’s stoking a cost-of-living disaster for thousands and thousands of households.

Then there’s the fast rise in borrowing prices for the federal government, companies and households. Buyers count on Britain’s central financial institution, the Financial institution of England might want to improve rates of interest way more aggressively to get inflation in verify.

A basic pressure between the central financial institution and British authorities might additionally fan volatility. Whereas the Truss authorities needs to spice up demand to take the sting off a recession this winter, the Financial institution of England is making an attempt to chill the financial system so it may well put a lid on the quickest value will increase amongst G7 nations. That friction will cut back confidence within the path ahead.

Advertisement

“If markets nonetheless don’t place confidence in the fiscal image, I’m unsure how the Financial institution of England wins this,” Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe on the consultancy Eurasia Group stated.

International central banks are jacking up rates of interest ad infinitum till excessive inflation is vanquished, reviews CNN’s chief enterprise correspondent Christine Romans. Listed below are 5 teams feeling the ache consequently.

Investors: By the seems of final week’s inventory market motion, Wall Road is waking as much as the very fact the Fed will stay aggressive. Bond yields are rising, making shares look much less enticing.

Then there’s Goldman Sachs’ S&P 500 value goal downgrade, its fourth this yr, to three,600 from 4,300. That’s a whopping 16% reduce. For inventory traders, the gloom is palpable. The pathway to a tender touchdown appears harder by the day.

Homebuyers: Mortgage charges have greater than doubled from the report low final yr of two.87% to only over 6% final week. That provides greater than $700 in month-to-month curiosity funds to the identical home bought a yr in the past.

Advertisement

Final week, Fed Chair Jerome Powell instructed me that renters would additionally be feeling the ache. “Hope for the very best, plan for the worst,” he stated about rental value inflation. “You’ve simply received to imagine that it’s going to stay fairly excessive for some time.

Automotive consumers: The common rate of interest for a 60-month new automobile mortgage was 3.85% in the beginning of the yr. It’s now hovering above 5%.

The market to purchase a brand new or used automobile remains to be out of whack due to pandemic-related supply-chain issues. Greater rates of interest make financing a automobile — when you’ll find one — much more costly.

Staff: Powell and the Fed have been clear that they may tolerate, and should even need, the next jobless fee to chill inflation. The US financial system has added again 3.6 million jobs this yr and recovered all the roles misplaced within the pandemic, however the Fed’s inflation campaign might lead to a lack of 1.2 million.

The Convention Board releases September US shopper confidence information at 10:00 a.m. ET. 

Advertisement

The US Census Bureau releases new residence gross sales at 10:00 a.m. ET. 

News

Ministers split over aid for Titanic shipbuilder Harland & Wolff

Published

on

Ministers split over aid for Titanic shipbuilder Harland & Wolff

The UK government is split over a financial support package for Harland & Wolff in a row that casts uncertainty over the future of the Belfast shipbuilder behind the Titanic.

The Treasury has reservations about approving a taxpayer-backed £200mn guaranteed loan facility, while three rival ministries — Defence, Trade and Business, and the Northern Ireland Office — are all keen to press ahead, according to Whitehall officials.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, who must greenlight the package, has not made up his mind and is still receiving advice, with some involved in the talks claiming he is dragging his feet on the decision, three people with knowledge of the talks said. Insiders said a decision is expected in the coming days. H&W wants to borrow up to £200mn from a group of banks at a lower interest rate with the government acting as a guarantor for those loans.

Without the guarantee, the lossmaking business will need to find other sources of financing to help meet its working capital requirements and fulfil key contracts that include building three ships in a £1.6bn Royal Navy contract.

The company’s auditors last year warned the business faced “material uncertainty” unless it could source fresh financing and win additional new work.

Advertisement

The group is also engaged in pay negotiations with staff and “needs the money” to meet payroll, one person with knowledge of the business said.

Report of the government split comes only days after defence secretary Grant Shapps claimed the UK was entering a “golden age” of shipbuilding, after he approved new warships as part of the UK’s increased military spending.

Two of the officials said that the government was inclined to help the Aim-listed company, which has operations in Scotland and England as well as the iconic shipyard where the Titanic was built and whose yellow cranes dominate the Belfast skyline.

One insisted that the Treasury was concerned about the specific financing mechanism proposed, but was not opposed to the principle of extending support to the 163-year-old company. Officials are weighing alternative support options in the event the chancellor blocks the guarantee scheme.

However, MPs have questioned whether it is right to use taxpayers’ money to support the struggling business at all.

Advertisement

Kevan Jones, Labour MP for North Durham, on Wednesday called on the National Audit Office to investigate the matter.

“There are serious questions to answer around the use of taxpayer money in guaranteeing a multimillion pound loan to Harland & Wolff, given its current financial position,” Jones told the Financial Times.

Jones, who has previously raised concerns in parliament about the intention to offer an unprecedented 100 per cent guaranteed loan, wrote to Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, earlier this week asking the agency to look into what guarantees were in place to protect taxypayers. 

Jones said there were also questions to be asked about the “due diligence that was done on the ability of H&W to deliver on the £1.6bn contract prior to it being awarded”.

“The National Audit Office should seek answers to these questions on taxpayers’ behalf,” said Jones.

Advertisement

In a statement on Wednesday, H&W said its management was “comfortable with progress on what is a complex and large transaction for all parties involved”.

H&W shares fell more than 28 per cent on Tuesday before recovering half their losses to close at £10.10, valuing the business at less than £18mn.

The company’s latest annual accounts, to the end of 2022, showed revenues of £27mn but losses of £70mn. H&W also had net debt of £82.5mn, in part thanks to high interest payments on a $100mn loan to New York-based Riverstone Credit Partners.

In December, H&W said it had “sufficient funds” to meet its working capital requirements “until the new loan facility is completed”.

Francis Tusa, analyst and editor of the Defence Analysis newsletter, said “awarding a £1.6bn contract to a company with a market value substantially below this level is not best practice”. H&W has not built a complex warship for more than two decades.

Advertisement

Ministers had agreed in December to advance the loan guarantee to the next stage, so that H&W could work on financing with its bank syndicate.

The officials said the MoD, DBT and NIO want a financial package agreed swiftly to offer certainty around the future of the shipbuilding business.

The package is critical if H&W is to deliver on a £1.6bn contract to build three support ships for the Royal Navy, which it won in 2022 as part of a Spanish-led consortium. Unions have previously raised concerns that the work could migrate to Spain.

The NIO supports extending finance to Harland & Wolff, mindful of its status as an iconic Belfast-founded business that has particular significance to the unionist community, according to one of the Whitehall insiders. The government pledged in January to support the region’s shipbuilding and defence industries.

Despite the row, first reported by The Times, unions remain confident. Alan Perry, senior organiser for the GMB union in Belfast, said he was “definitely not” hearing the company was in any danger or anything “at the moment that would concern us”.

Advertisement

A government spokesperson said: “We continue to engage with Harland and Wolff with the export development guarantee. Due to commercial sensitivities, it would not be appropriate to comment further until the outcome of the process is confirmed.”

Continue Reading

News

Morrisey dominated Eastern Panhandle, outdistanced opponents in 35 of 55 counties on way to victory – WV MetroNews

Published

on

Morrisey dominated Eastern Panhandle, outdistanced opponents in 35 of 55 counties on way to victory – WV MetroNews

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — State Attorney General Patrick Morrisey dominated the Eastern Panhandle counties in Tuesday’s Primary Election in which he won the GOP nomination for governor.

Greg Hunter

Morrisey outdistanced former state lawmaker Moore Capito by more than 10,000 votes in that area of the state.

MetroNews Decision 2024 vote analyst Greg Hunter said Capito needed to be stronger in Kanawha and surrounding counties to make up the difference but he wasn’t.

“Moore Capito did well in Kanawha County but really that whole sort of Kanawha Valley region, seven counties, he wasn’t as dominate as he needed to be,” Hunter said Wednesday.

The Capito campaign also needed to win what Hunter calls the neutral areas like Wood and Monongalia counties but the counties were even or Morrisey was the winner. Morrisey won 35 of 55 counties in the GOP race.

Advertisement

“You get one dominate region and a few hundred vote wins in several other counties and you end up with a 10,000 vote lead like Morrisey had,” Hunter said.

Morrisey received approximately 75,000 which represented about 34% of the GOP votes cast.

Morrisey on Talkline

Patrick Morrisey

Morrisey made an appearance Wednesday on MetroNews Talkline. He said a dozen years in office as state Attorney General was a solid springboard to victory.

“Over the last 12 years, we’ve been able to get a lot of terrific things done to help our state and help pave the way for West Virginia to be the shining state in the mountains,” Morrisey said. “I think the conservative values and the experience made a really big difference.”

Morrisey said his victory sends a message.

Advertisement

“I think the people of West Virginia spoke loud and clear that they are looking for changes. That they are looking for people who have a vision for putting West Virginia first, protecting our jobs and protecting us from all of the threats out there,” Morrisey said.

Advice for Williams

Danny Jones

Former Charleston Mayor Danny Jones has some advice for his friend, Huntington Mayor Steve Williams and his upcoming race against Morrisey.

Jones said on “Talkline” Wednesday that if Williams is serious about the race he should step down from being mayor and be a full-time candidate.

“When you get up in the morning you think about being governor and you do it until you go to bed at night,” Jones said. “Steve hasn’t been out on the trail in a long time and he’s never been nothing but a nice guy.”

Jones said Williams is going to have to take the gloves off against Morrisey.

Advertisement

“He’s a good-looking tall man and he’s got to get out where people can see him,” Jones said.

Morrisey said he knows Williams and expects a campaign on the issues.

“I have respect for the Democrat nominee, we’ve worked together and he’s praised a lot of work we’ve done on the epidemic,” Morrisey said. “I think this will be spirited and focused on the issues.”

Continue Reading

News

US inflation falls to 3.4% in April

Published

on

US inflation falls to 3.4% in April

Stay informed with free updates

US inflation fell to 3.4 per cent in April, in line with economists’ expectations, prompting investors to increase their bets on Federal Reserve interest rate cuts this year.

The consumer price data released by the US labour department on Wednesday compared with a 3.5 per cent annual rise in consumer prices in March.

Before the report, traders had bet on between one and two rate cuts this year, starting in November. But in its immediate aftermath, they priced in two full cuts by December, according to Bloomberg data.

Advertisement

US bond yields dipped and stock futures also rose after the data release. 

The two-year Treasury yield, which moves with interest rate expectations, dropped to 4.71 per cent, its lowest level since early April.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The figures come a day after Fed chair Jay Powell warned the central bank may have to maintain high interest rates for longer as it struggles to tame persistent inflation.

With less than six months to go before the US election, high inflation has hit President Joe Biden’s poll ratings on the economy.

Advertisement

According to Wednesday’s figures, core consumer prices — which strip out volatile food and energy costs — rose by 3.6 per cent last month compared with last year. On a monthly basis, the core consumer price index rose by 0.3 per cent in April, compared with 0.4 per cent in March.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending