Connect with us

News

Reeves to go ‘further and faster’ for growth after recent turmoil

Published

on

Reeves to go ‘further and faster’ for growth after recent turmoil

A barrage of grim UK economic data this month has given chancellor Rachel Reeves “permission” to pursue a more aggressive growth agenda, according to senior government officials, trampling on Labour sensitivities and putting her on a war footing with regulators.

The chancellor will next week deliver a “growth” speech against the backdrop of a stagnating economy, recent turmoil in the bond markets, and a survey on Friday showing UK businesses cutting jobs at the fastest pace since the financial crash, barring the pandemic.

Reeves, who wants to accelerate a number of flagship investment projects, is said by colleagues to have decided after her recent battering at the hands of the markets and political opponents to go “faster and further” to pursue growth.

“There’s a view in the Treasury that all of this is fine,” said one minister. “It is seen as permission for them to go harder on growth measures.”

An ally of the chancellor said: “She has been frustrated by the speed at which things have been happening. She wants to use the power of the Treasury to show where we want to go next. This is politically contentious stuff.”

Advertisement

For example Reeves, who attracted Conservative criticism for visiting Beijing this month, is pushing for fast-fashion company Shein to list in London, in spite of concerns about standards in its factories in China. She is also supporting an expansion of Heathrow airport.

Market turmoil at the start of the year led to claims that Reeves’ job was on the line, but her supporters say she has used the episode to respond with “strength and decisiveness”. She said this month she would be happy to be known as “the Iron Chancellor”.

The Conservatives, however, say this is laughable. “It is clear Labour are out of their depth and out of ideas to get the economy growing,” said Andrew Griffith, shadow business secretary. “Working people are paying the price for Labour’s war on business.”

Griffith notes that for all Reeves’ deregulatory talk, she is about to impose on companies a raft of new employment laws, which the government estimates will cost business £5bn.

But Reeves — who this week was talking up the British economy at the World Economic Forum — has shown in recent days a willingness to use the power of her office to take decisive action across Whitehall, some of which is privately applauded by the Tories.

Advertisement

Ministers this week ousted Marcus Bokkerink as chair of the Competition and Markets Authority, the monopolies regulator that has been criticised for allegedly hobbling growth.

His departure was a signal to other regulators they must push harder on growth, according to Treasury officials. “Sometimes a message has to be sent,” said one.

Reeves’ focus on spurring on regulators has received the private admiration of the opposition. “We should have done this ourselves,” said one former Tory Treasury minister.

Yet while some Tories privately approve, Reeves’ actions have ruffled some on her side of the aisle. She has been accused by former shadow chancellor John McDonnell of leaving the door open for critics to say Labour was “defending corporate abuse and profiteers”. Another senior leftwing Labour MP said: “It’s desperate.” She appears, however, to be comfortable making such enemies.

The chancellor also sided with the banks this week in a Supreme Court case that will determine whether they have to pay out potentially tens of billions of pounds in redress in a motor finance mis-selling case. A new non-dom tax regime has been loosened.

Advertisement

Next week, Reeves is also expected to signal her backing for airport expansion in the south-east, including Heathrow, in spite of fierce criticism from the green lobby and London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan.

Whitehall insiders believe Reeves leaked the move to bounce her cabinet colleagues; Starmer himself has previously voted against a third runway at Heathrow, while Ed Miliband — who threatened to resign from Gordon Brown’s government over the issue — this week played down any suggestion he would quit. Meanwhile judicial reviews of contentious infrastructure projects will be curtailed.

Given the threat posed to her precarious fiscal plan by sluggish growth, Reeves has told the Treasury to stop focusing on Budgets and concentrate on boosting investment instead.

Officials are working on a range of projects — some with fruit-related code names — to get investment into Britain. 

One relates to a massive new Universal theme park being proposed for a site near Bedford, with officials close to talks between the company and Treasury saying that they are “progressing well”. 

Advertisement

Backers of the project claim it could generate as much as £50bn in economic value in its first 20 years. The Treasury has been asked to provide financial support, including for the upgrading of an M1 motorway junction and the building of a new station.

One official briefed on the talks, dubbed Project Mandarin, said they were nearly complete: “It’s one of those negotiations you could conclude if you wanted to.” Another person briefed on the talks added: “It’s very close. It’s almost there, but not there yet.”

Officials said the package of support focused mainly on guaranteeing infrastructure investments and improvements, which will be critical to carrying the thousands of people travelling to visit the 500 acre site.

Executives at Comcast — whose Universal Destinations & Experiences is behind the scheme — have in the past told the FT that they wanted to build “one of the greatest theme parks in the world”.

Universal Destinations & Experiences said: “We continue to have productive discussions with the UK government.”

Advertisement

Alongside the theme park, Reeves is also trying to finalise negotiations with AstraZeneca to revive a stalled vaccine manufacturing site in Speke, Merseyside.

The project was paused after the Treasury sought to reduce the amount of state support provided to the British pharmaceutical company’s vaccine centre, cutting a pledge made by the last Conservative administration from about £90mn to £40mn.

Meanwhile Reeves is also expected to signal her support for a £9bn highway and tunnel across the river Thames in east London, which would use private finance to defray the cost to taxpayers.

There are also signs that the government hopes to avoid any criticism that it is focusing all its firepower on the south east of England.

The Treasury has announced plans to review the “green book” it uses to evaluate the value of proposed investment decisions, long the focus of ire from critics who believe it favours London and the surrounding region.

Advertisement

It has also promised to build a pipeline of investable projects outside of the south east, with the help of the Office for Investment. Reeves is being watched closely by northern mayors, who had been courted by the Labour government when it first took office.

News

Donald Trump has no ‘phase two’ plan for Iran war, says US senator

Published

on

Donald Trump has no ‘phase two’ plan for Iran war, says US senator

To read this article for free

Register now

Once registered, you can:

• Read free articles
• Get our Editor’s Digest and other newsletters
• Follow topics and set up personalised events
• Access Alphaville: our popular markets and finance blog

Continue Reading

News

Man accused of plot to assassinate Trump testifies Iran pressured him, says Biden and Haley were other possible targets

Published

on

Man accused of plot to assassinate Trump testifies Iran pressured him, says Biden and Haley were other possible targets

The allegation sounded like the stuff of spy movies: A Pakistani businessman trying to hire hit men, even handing them $5,000 in cash, to kill a U.S. politician on behalf of Iran ‘s powerful paramilitary Revolutionary Guard.

It was true, and potential targets of the 2024 scheme included now-President Donald Trump, then-President Joe Biden and former presidential candidate and ex-U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, the man told jurors at his attempted terrorism trial in New York on Wednesday. But he insisted his actions were driven by fear for loved ones in Iran, and he figured he’d be apprehended before anything came of the scheme.

“My family was under threat, and I had to do this,” the defendant, Asif Merchant, testified through an Urdu interpreter. “I was not wanting to do this so willingly.”

Merchant said he had anticipated getting arrested before anyone was killed, intended to cooperate with the U.S. government and had hoped that would help him get a green card.

U.S. authorities were, indeed, on to him – the supposed hit men he paid were actually undercover FBI agents – and he was arrested on July 12, 2024, a day before an unrelated attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania.  During a search, investigators said they found a handwritten note that contained the codewords for the various aspects of the plot, CBS News previously reported

Advertisement

Merchant did sit for voluntary FBI interviews, but he ultimately ended up with a trial, not a cooperation deal.

“You traveled to the United States for the purpose of hiring Mafia members to kill a politician, correct?” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nina Gupta asked during her turn questioning Merchant Wednesday in a Brooklyn federal court.

“That’s right,” Merchant replied, his demeanor as matter-of-fact as his testimony was unusual.

The trial is unfolding amid the less than week-old Iran war, which killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a strike that Trump summed up as “I got him before he got me.” Jurors are instructed to ignore news pertaining to the case.

The Iranian government has denied plotting to kill Trump or other U.S. officials.

Advertisement

Merchant, 47, had a roughly 20-year banking career in Pakistan before getting involved in an array of businesses: clothing, car sales, banana exports, insulation imports. He openly has two families, one in Pakistan and the other in Iran – where, he said, he was introduced around the end of 2022 to a Revolutionary Guard intelligence operative. They initially spoke about getting involved in a hawala, an informal money transfer system, Merchant said.

Merchant testified that his periodic visits to the U.S. for his garment business piqued the interest of his Revolutionary Guard contact, who trained him on countersurveillance techniques.

The U.S. deems the Revolutionary Guard a “foreign terrorist organization.” Formally called the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the force has been prominent in Iran under Khamenei.

Merchant said the handler told him to seek U.S. residents interested in working for Iran. Then came another assignment: Look for a criminal to arrange protests, steal things, do some money laundering, “and maybe have somebody murdered,” Merchant recalled.

“He did not tell me exactly who it is, but he told me – he named three people: Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Nikki Haley,” he added.

Advertisement

In 2024, multiple sources familiar with the investigation told CBS News Merchant planned to assassinate current and former government officials across the political spectrum.

Merchant allegedly sketched out the plot on a napkin inside his New York hotel room, prosecutors said, and told the individual “that there would be ‘security all around’ the person” they were planning to kill.

“No other option”

After U.S. immigration agents pulled Merchant aside at the Houston airport in April 2024, searched his possessions and asked about his travels to Iran, he concluded that he was under surveillance. But still he researched Trump rally locations, sketched out a plot for a shooting at a political rally, lined up the supposed hit men and scrambled together $5,000 from a cousin to pay them a “token of appreciation.”

This image provided by the Justice Department, contained in the complaint supporting the arrest warrant, shows Asif Merchant. 

Advertisement

AP


He even reported back to his Revolutionary Guard contact, sending observations – fake, Merchant said – tucked into a book that he shipped to Iran through a series of intermediaries.

Merchant said he “had no other option” than to play along because the handler had indicated that he knew who Merchant’s Iranian relatives were and where they lived.

In a court filing this week, prosecutors noted that Merchant didn’t seek out law enforcement to help with his purported predicament before he was arrested. He testified that he couldn’t turn to authorities because his handler had people watching him.

Prosecutors also said that in his FBI interviews, Merchant “neglected to mention any facts that could have supported” an argument that he acted under duress.

Advertisement

Merchant told jurors Wednesday that he didn’t think agents would believe his story, because their questions suggested “they think that I’m some type of super-spy.”

“And are you a super-spy?” defense lawyer Avraham Moskowitz asked.

“No,” Merchant said. “Absolutely not.”

Continue Reading

News

Satellite images show Iran school strike hit more buildings than earlier reported

Published

on

Satellite images show Iran school strike hit more buildings than earlier reported

The bombing of an Iranian elementary school that killed some 165 people, many of them schoolgirls, included more targets near the school than has been initially reported, a review of commercial satellite imagery by NPR has found.

The images suggest that the school was hit on Saturday as part of a precision airstrike on a neighboring Iranian military complex — and that it may have been struck as a result of outdated targeting information.

The new images come from the company Planet and are of the city of Minab, located in southeastern Iran. They show that a health clinic and other buildings near the school were also struck. Three independent experts confirmed NPR’s analysis of the additional strike points.

Advertisement

The strike points “look like pretty clean detonation centroids,” said Corey Scher, a postdoctoral researcher at the Conflict Ecology laboratory at Oregon State University.

“These certainly appear like detonation sites,” agreed Scher’s colleague, Oregon State associate professor Jamon Van Den Hoek.

Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at Middlebury College who specializes in satellite imagery, said the imagery was consistent with a precision airstrike.

The images show “very precise targeting,” Lewis told NPR. “Almost all the buildings [in the compound] are hit.”

A satellite image of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard compound taken on March 4.

A satellite image of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard compound taken on March 4, several days after an airstrike destroyed a school on the edge of the compound. The image reveals that half a dozen other buildings in addition to the school were struck.

Planet Labs PBC

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Planet Labs PBC

Advertisement

Iranian state media said 165 people died in the bombing, which struck a girls’ school. The school was located within less than 100 yards of the perimeter of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard naval base, according to satellite images and publicly available information. The clinic was also located within the base perimeter, although both facilities had been walled off from the base.

Israel has denied involvement. “We are not aware at the moment of any IDF operation in that area,” Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Nadav Shoshani told NPR on Monday. “I don’t know who’s responsible for the bombing.”

At a press conference Wednesday morning, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the U.S. is looking into what happened at the school. “All I know, all I can say, is that we’re investigating that,” Hegseth said. “We, of course, never target civilian targets.”

Given Minab’s location in the southeastern part of Iran, Lewis believes it’s more likely the U.S. would have conducted the strike than Israel. As one gets farther south and east in Iran, “a strike is much more likely to be a U.S. strike than an Israeli strike because of the type of munitions and the geographic location,” he said.

Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, called the strike “deliberate” and said that the U.S. and Israel bombed the school in part to tie up Iranian forces in the region with rescue efforts. “To call the attack on the girls school merely a ‘war crime’ does not capture the sheer evil and depravity of such a crime,” he said.

Advertisement

But Lewis said it’s more likely that the strike was the result of an error. Satellite images show that the school and clinic buildings were both once part of the base. The school was separated from the base by a wall between 2013 and 2016. The clinic was walled off between 2022 and 2024.

Lewis believes it’s possible American military planners had not updated their target sets.

“There are thousands of targets across Iran, and so there will be teams in the United States and Israel that are responsible for tracking those targets and updating them,” he said. “It’s possible that the target didn’t get updated.”

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to NPR’s request for additional information about the strike.

NPR’s Arezou Rezvani and NPR’s RAD team contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending