Entertainment
'The Night Agent' creator Shawn Ryan on writing political thrillers and revisiting 'The Shield'
Roughly two decades ago, as many television aficionados tell it, the story of a beleaguered Los Angeles police station and its renegade strike team, led by Det. Vic Mackey, not only helped establish FX as a top cable network but demonstrated that basic cable could be more than a graveyard for movies and network reruns — it was capable of developing appointment-viewing prestige fare.
“The Shield” was an impressive debut for creator Shawn Ryan, who up to that point had contributed to fewer than 100 episodes of television across shows like “Nash Bridges” and “Angel.” (“That was considered extraordinarily inexperienced,” he says.)
In the time since, he’s had a slew of other shows, including “Lie to Me,” “Terriers,” “Last Resort” and, currently, CBS’ “SWAT,” which is now in its eighth season. While it may be harder to make shows that stand out nowadays, Ryan’s other current series, “The Night Agent,” is proof that he’s still making television that has viewers rapt.
Based on the novel by Matthew Quirk, “The Night Agent” follows Peter Sutherland (Gabriel Basso), a low-level FBI agent assigned to top-secret phone duty in the basement of the White House, who is thrust into action — and gets caught up in a deadly conspiracy — when the phone finally rings. In the process, Peter is on a personal mission to uncover the truth about whether his late father, also an FBI agent, actually committed the treason he was suspected of before his death. The first season of the action thriller was the most-watched Netflix original show for the first half of 2023, with more than 98 million views in the first three months of release, according to figures touted by the streamer.
The series returned for its second season last week, with Peter now officially a night agent who is again flung into action on a new mission that included trying to halt a chemical weapons threat to the U.S., which he succeeded in by stealing intelligence that ultimately helped swing a presidential election.
The drama has been renewed for a third season, which the 58-year-old writer said he was already hard at work on during a recent video call from New York, where he was gearing up for the show’s premiere event — the red-carpet portion was ultimately scrapped in the wake of the recent wildfires in Los Angeles.
Ryan, who lives in Sherman Oaks, had been in L.A. as the fires spread and has many friends who lost their homes, including an editor on “The Night Agent.” A significant amount of work on the show, from writing to postproduction, happens in L.A.
“I spoke to her, and I said, ‘I’m still planning to go out and do this press tour in New York and the screening — how do you feel about all that? Is this the right time?’” he says. “But she had an interesting perspective. She was like, ‘We work so hard on it. We’re so proud of it. We got into this business because we’re dreamers and we want to tell stories.’ She really encouraged me to come out here and talk about the show and do the screening and everything — [it’s] much less of a celebration, I would say, and more of an honoring of the work.”
Ryan spoke about Peter’s crisis of conscience this season, what he has planned for the next installment of the Netflix series and his biggest fear about “The Shield.”
Gabriel Basso as Peter Sutherland in “The Night Agent.”
(Netflix)
A presidential election loomed over Season 2. What interested you in exploring this idea of Peter unknowingly aiding in swinging an election?
I wanted the presidential election to be very much in the background — “Oh, why are they showing us these pamphlets? Why are we seeing a yard sign for this particular candidate here? Why are we watching Jacob Monroe [this season’s shadowy figure played by Louis Herthum] watch this interview with Savannah Guthrie? We actually started conceiving and writing this season before Season 1 even aired. So to write a storyline where a presidential candidate drops out of the race [close to the election] was something that felt very fresh to us in January 2023 when we were crafting the story.
Our political figures are all fictional; we have our own universe we live in. But what we liked a lot creatively was the idea that Peter did something and broke some rules for what he knew was the right reason, which was to save Rose, to find this mobile lab, to try to stop these chemical weapons from being deployed. He was successful, but it created these unintended consequences and ripple effects that could platform us into a Season 3. The idea that this broker who’s been his foil all season long not only isn’t brought to justice at the end of Season 2 but seems to have been empowered, and seems to [have] influence with a man who’s about to assume the presidency, was kind of catnip for us.
There’s that moment where Catherine [Amanda Warren] says it’s reductive to view the job as right or wrong, because everything is relative. Is that the great tragedy of “The Night Agent” — that Peter has to wrestle with the morality of every choice?
You have your pulse on something that we talked a lot about in our writers’ room. At the beginning of Season 1, we meet a young man in Peter Sutherland who is moral, who is principled, who is hellbent to do the right thing because his father was accused of doing the wrong thing. Peter believes he’s innocent. By the end of the season, he finds out no, he actually did it. One of the things I talked to the writers about at the beginning of Season 2 was, in Season 1, things were logistically very difficult for Peter, but they were morally clear what the right thing was — hey, they’re trying to kill the president; I have to get into Camp David and try to stop him. These people are trying to kill Rose. I’ve got to go off the grid and keep her safe. I said in Season 2, I want things to remain logistically difficult for Peter, but I want them to also become much more morally difficult. He wanted to be a night agent because, in his mind, this was a way to make up for his father’s sins. What I think he either was naive about or didn’t understand was the moral compromises that would come from a job that is centered in a world of deception, violence, lies, double-crossing. Maybe that ultimately is a tragedy. I don’t think it’s a tragedy yet, but I think it is the great question exposed in Season 2, and will get further explored in Season 3.
Do you see Peter staying on that course, of being inherently good, or could you see a moment where he does break bad?
I think it will ultimately depend on what we want the show to be. Do we want this show to be a vindication of Peter or do we want it to be the tragedy of Peter? I don’t have those answers yet. It’s always a dance because you have the creative side of it and then you have the commercial side of it, because I’m not the sole arbiter of how this show will run. Netflix will have an opinion. Sony, our studio, will have an opinion. I will have a seat at the table to discuss that, and if there’s a strong case to be made creatively for it being X number of seasons, I would hope that they would listen. I would expect that would have some sway. But thinking about the creative: What is the ultimate fate of Peter? What are we ultimately to take away from his journey and melding that with what’s the right commercial length for this show is a delicate dance.
Talk to me about Gov. Hagan (Ward Horton), the presidential candidate and eventual president-elect. There are red caps. Is it too easy to liken him to Donald Trump and what he represents? How are you thinking about him as you head into Season 3?
There’s some caps and there are some other elements, but there are some elements that would lean toward Democrats as well. We were very careful not to assign any political party to either Hagan or President Travers the year before or the other presidential opponent, Patrick Knox. Again, the season was written and crafted mostly in 2023 before the strike.
The idea isn’t to get into any specific political platforms. What I’m interested in is the specifics of a person elected who may owe allegiance to somebody that we know is bad. I think fear that we can have about any president of any party, and certainly, because Netflix is a global audience, not just an American audience, it’s something a lot of people worry about. Do the leaders who have control over aspects of my life have my best interests at heart? Or is there something else, something more nefarious? The show is about the individual versus the system. We don’t have to be specific about whether it’s a Democratic system, a Republican system, an American system or an Iranian system.
Luciane Buchanan as Rose Larkin and Gabriel Basso as Peter Sutherland in “The Night Agent.”
(Christopher Saunders / Netflix)
What are the challenges of writing a political thriller in today’s climate when the president-elect is a convicted felon who will not serve time?
Well, I would say the bar for surprising audiences has been raised in the eight years since Donald Trump appeared on the political stage. Whether you love him or hate him or are in between, there are just things that have occurred that a lot of people didn’t think could occur. One of the things that we discussed after we shot it is we have this scene where Patrick Knox steps down because he’s been outed as having a connection to these chemical weapons in the press. And it’s like, “Well, do we live in a world now where, no matter what you’re accused of, or what proof there is, you just deny it and stay in the race?” If you’re trying to do a hit piece on Donald Trump or any other politician, I think the audience smells that. And the audience feels that you’re trying to manipulate them. We’re not trying to manipulate people. I’m not trying to convince people. I tend to keep my politics rather private. I’m not interested in trying to convince people to think like me politically. I’m trying to get them to think about these specific situations that Peter’s in that he’s dealing with. What would you do if you knew that somebody in a position of power, like the president, was perhaps beholden to somebody who you knew to be inherently evil? That’s the beauty of working on a fictional show that can deviate … from what’s happening in the real world.
There’s about a 10-month gap from where Season 1 ended and Season 2 begins. Is there as much of a time jump when Season 3 picks up? What can you reveal?
I don’t want to say too much because even though we started filming, we haven’t finished writing Season 3. What I will say is it is not a direct pickup.
And you’re filming in Istanbul?
Most of the first episode takes place in Istanbul. We have completed that shooting. We shot for 13 days in Istanbul. I think we’re going to have one of the most spectacular car chases ever seen on a TV show. We’re going to return to filming in New York on Feb. 3, and the majority of the season is going to film in New York City. We’re going to take a little deviation in the season to another international city. But I don’t want to say what it is yet.
I know each season is a standalone, but Vice President Redfield survived Season 1. Gordon Wick is alive. Diane Farr is alive. Are these characters we’ll be seeing again eventually?
The answer is definitely, maybe. You know who’s obsessed with Gordon Wick? Gabriel Basso. He’s like, “I want to get that guy!” He’s pitched, “What if we open up, I’m climbing this fence and go into this bedroom and there’s Gordon Wick.” I was like, that’s not a bad idea but we’ve got to find the right place for it. I’ve talked about Diane Farr sitting in some prison cell, and is there some Hannibal Lecter-esque visit to her cell to get some information that we need.
“I’m not interested in trying to convince people to think like me politically. I’m trying to get them to think about these specific situations that Peter’s in that he’s dealing with,” says Shawn Ryan about writing a thriller in today’s political climate.
(The Tyler Twins / For The Times)
What can you tell me about the Rose situation? Can she actually stay away this time? How are you thinking about the Rose-Peter dynamic? She’s obviously a figure that we’ve come to expect on the show, but she’s a civilian helping on very sensitive national security issues.
We think a lot about it. There are conversations of whether there was even a story in Season 2 for her in that way. In my original pitch to Netflix about what this show would be in success over multiple seasons, Peter was the only character I said would be a constant. Then you work with somebody like Luciane Buchanan, who portrays Rose in such a wonderful way, and we found a storyline that felt authentic to us for Season 2. I would say that if and when there’s a storyline, whether it’s in Season 3 or beyond, that feels appropriate to have Rose be a part of, nothing would make me happier. But I don’t want to become a show that, like every year, is about a more and more ridiculous way that Rose is in danger and Peter has to save her. I think sometimes you have to be true to the story you tell. And the reality is that by the end of Season 2, they’re living very different lives in very different places.
So much of the show is about choices and leadership, particularly during crises. With “The Night Agent,” you had to navigate the pandemic the first season; with the second season, you had the dual Hollywood strikes. How did your experience with the 2007 writers’ strike inform how you managed the emotions of your room and the crew this time around?
I was on the negotiating committee for the Writers Guild in 2007 when we struck and was on the inside of all that. I don’t know if any of the other writers of my show were members of the guild when we struck [then], and so I did have a historical background and knowledge to share with them. I was able to give them what I felt were reality assessments because there’s a lot of games that get played during those things and the companies like to give false hope along the way. These two [recent] strikes have brought writers together, they haven’t driven them apart. When you’re in a writer’s room, there’s a bit of a natural hierarchy. But there is no hierarchy on the picket line. You’re all walking the steps. You’re all carrying a sign, you’re all fighting for a cause. And there’s something beautiful in that. I wouldn’t recommend going through a six-month strike to achieve that beauty, but in the same way I’m seeing in these fires [in L.A.], you find yourself talking more to your neighbors. You see yourself engaging with your community. You say, “What do you need from me? I’m here to help you,” which is a beautiful thing.
What concerns you about the landscape today? You’ve been outspoken about media consolidation. Is it that? Or is it whether the next generation of writers is getting the skill set they need to be the mega showrunners of tomorrow?
I don’t want to create a whole film vs. TV thing, but in my mind, there’s too much filmification of the TV universe. I was raised under the belief that TV makes stars, and I’m very extraordinarily fortunate that Netflix allowed us to discover our Peter and our Rose and turn them into stars rather than make some huge offers to [a known star] that you don’t even know if they’re right for the role, which happens all the time. I believe as fewer films have been getting made, producers and actors and directors from the feature world are trying to get in the TV world and bring a film focus to it so it’s more producer- and director-oriented than writer-oriented. As long as these budgets are huge, they’ll let some filmmaker take two years to make seven episodes of something. But is that sustainable in the long run? I believe not just in making great episodes, but I believe in making them quickly and affordably.
I worry about the exploitation of support staff in Los Angeles; the pay is so little, the hours are so long, that basically you’re creating a situation in which only people who have parents who can afford to subsidize their adult children in the pursuit of this can take those jobs, which is leading to a winnowing out of potentially great talent. The city is more expensive now. These fires are going to make rents only more expensive.
Michael Chiklis in FX’s “The Shield.”
(FX Network)
I know this is a question that has followed you for years: Would you ever revisit “The Shield”?
There was a time where I flirted with an interested executive at Fox who loved “The Shield” with making a movie. Now my caveat for making that movie was that in the first 30 to 40 minutes of the movie, there’s not a single character from the show “The Shield” in the movie. And then at about minute 40, Vic Mackey shows up because somebody’s looking into something in the underworld. The guy who was interested in it got fired and that [idea] disappeared.
I’ve had a really awful thought creep into my head the last couple of years that someday I’m going to wake up and see that “The Shield” is being resurrected without me. Now that’s the reality of Hollywood, right? I was part of the team that resurrected “SWAT,” not the original creators of the show. So I’ve been on that end of my question. Disney owns the rights to “The Shield” and I’ve had to start contemplating, “Well, what will my reaction be if I wake up to that headline one day?” First of all, I would hope that I would never wake up to the headline. I would hope that somebody would actually give me courtesy. But again, I don’t know that anyone ever made the call to the “SWAT” team. I think there’s a place for a “Shield”-type show. Am I the guy to come up with it in the 2020s? Is it up to someone else? Does somebody do it, but it’s just not called “The Shield”? Does AI write something? I hope none of that stuff happens. Nothing would make me happier than to be like, “Oh my God, I’ve got this lightning-strike idea for how we can resurrect ‘The Shield,’” but the bar is incredibly high.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: Travolta’s “Propeller: One-Way Night Coach” is One for the Ages — All Ages
Back in the good ol’days — the ’90s — John Travolta would love to get off the topic of “Michael,” “Pulp Fiction” or “Get Shorty” in interviews with film journalists like me and regale us with how utterly besotted he had been with his first flying experience, how that drove his passion for piloting and buying planes and airfield-adjacent luxury houses.
He didn’t even seem to mind having to move house when this or that development balked at him flying his Boeing 707 out of there on the way to locations.
Travolta would tell any journalist who asked that he was writing a kid-friendly book, “Propeller: One Way Night Coach,” based on his first flights as a child in old propeller driven airliners — cheap red-eye overnight treks with too many connections for your average jet age traveller to tolerate.
I remember picking up the book when it came out later in the ’90s — at an airport gift shop — and thinking “Well, that’s as cute as I figured.”
And now, decades later and trapped in the B-movie hell of his post “Gotti” career, Travolta’s turned that cute book into the most delightful, fanciful and colorful bon bon of a movie.
“One Way Night Coach” is a child’s fantasy of flight and flying the way it used to be — with pristine, uncrowded, futuristic airports, an early ’60s era of jets and prop planes with over-uniformed stewardesses in white gloves, the days “Back before every Joe Sweatsock could wedge himself behind a lunch tray and jet off to Raleigh-Durham,” as Sideshow Bob memorably sneered on “The Simpsons’.”
It’s a fictionalized account of Travolta’s childhood about an only child (at least two Travolta siblings have bit parts in this movie) of a never-made-it/never-will actress/single-mom (Kelly Eviston-Quinnett) who indulges her aviation-obsessed eight-year-old with a cheap cross-country overnight flight.
Little Jeff (Clark Shotwell) will revel in almost every Idlewild to Pittsburgh to Dayton to Chicago to Kansas City to Denver and Los Angeles minute. He strolls into the cockpit to meet pilots, charms the stewardesses and checks out the sleeping bunks on the TWA Lockheed Super Constellation, loving even the delays if not the Chicken Cordon Bleu he’s offered on legs of the journey that offer a meal.
And as he’s an observant child, he comments (Travolta narrates) on his 50ish mother’s vamping and posing, her choice of cigarettes (Newports) and drinks, the solo traveling men whose attention she pursues and earns.
“I was her best audience,” adult Jeff remembers of the mother who’d read him plays as bedtime stories and delusionally hopes that this trip to Los Angeles might be her “big break” even though she’s pushing 50.
“Hollywood called,” she’d explain about their overnight cheap flight arrangements to ticket agents and crew. “They told me to take the next flight!”
At every turn, Jeff meets or sees kindness — stewardesses who indulge his many questions and bump them up to first class on the mostly-empty planes, a captain who fixes his toy model of a Constellation, a mentally ill flyer who flips out but is calmed by a flight attendant who isn’t overworked and frazzled in jet-powered tin-can jammed with Joe and Jane Sweatsocks who think nothing of traveling in their pajamas.
Normally, I cringe at pictures this reliant on voice-over narration. I recoil from stars who populate their picture with Sandler etc. offspring. But “Propeller” is unfailingly sweet and never cloying.
Sure, it’s fictionalized. But if you’ve followed Travolta’s life and career, a lot of him is in this — his raptoruous engagement with flying, an indulged child who developed a taste for fine food and creature comforts, a mother who was his guiding star as an actor.
I get why there are less adoring reviews than mine floating around “Propeller.” It’s unfailingly sweet. Mom’s man-hunting is seriously dated. This TWA tale is decorated with Gershwin’s majestic “Rhapsody in Blue” — United Airlines’ signature tune. And Travolta’s been around long enough for recent generations to come up and not feel a connection to the “Saturday Night Fever/Get Shorty” star whose career has fallen off and life has been visited by too much tragedy.
But I’d hate to be seated next to anybody who doesn’t appreciate this adorable, pristine and nearly perfect aviation fantasy on any flight, much less an overnight one.
Rating: TV-PG
Cast: Clark Shotwell, Kelly Eviston-Quinnett, Ellen Travolta, Ella Beau Travolta, Olga Hoffmann and John Travolta.
Credits: Scripted and directed by John Travolta, based on his book. An Apple TV+ release.
Running time: 1:01
Entertainment
After ‘Barbie’ success, Mattel looks to He-Man for another box-office lift
Three years ago, Mattel Inc. struck box-office gold — or rather, pink — with the billion-dollar success of “Barbie.”
In its first return to theaters since the female-forward phenomenon, the El Segundo toymaker is turning to the brawny He-Man for another box-office lift.
Its latest film, “Masters of the Universe,” opens this weekend, as Mattel looks to build on that previous success and continue extending its signature toy brands into the entertainment arena.
“The movie is very much in tune with culture,” said Mattel Chief Executive Ynon Kreiz. “Everything is much more contemporary relative to what was created more than 40 years ago, but it’s still very true to the origin story and to the DNA of the brand.”
The new film arrives at a pivotal time for Mattel, which is facing pressure from investors to grow its business. The maker of Hot Wheels, American Girl and Uno has recently confronted a challenging market for toys, beset by tariffs on goods produced overseas and weaker-than-expected demand for Barbie dolls and Fisher-Price preschool products.
Amid uncertainty in the toy market and the fallout from tariffs, Mattel’s net income dropped 25% to $398 million in 2025. And since the company announced disappointing holiday sales totals in February, its stock has dropped more than 30%, closing at $14.34 on Wednesday.
“Masters of the Universe” toys at Mattel headquarters in El Segundo.
(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)
The share price slide prompted investor Southeastern Asset Management to send a letter last month to Mattel leadership suggesting the toy maker should sell itself and go private. Southeastern manages about 4% of the company’s stock on behalf of its clients.
“The frustration among investors has been the fact that if you look at the business from 2021 through 2025 and even this year … the business really hasn’t grown,” said Eric Handler, a Roth Capital senior media and entertainment analyst, referring to Mattel. “This is a company that needed something fresh in the portfolio, and there’s a wide range of investments being made, of which ‘Masters of the Universe’ is one part.”
Kreiz pushed back on the idea that the company is not growing. In the fourth quarter of 2025, net sales were up 7% to $1.8 billion, though the result was not as strong as the company expected.
Mattel has spent $1.2 billion in the last three years to buy back shares, with an additional $1.5-billion share repurchase planned for the next three years.
“We’re investing in our own stock because we believe it is undervalued,” he told The Times in an interview at his office, which has floor-to-ceiling windows that give an expansive view of El Segundo. “We absolutely agree that the share price doesn’t reflect the progress that we’ve achieved over the last few years financially, operationally, our place in culture, the strength of our brands, and the continued expansion of the business. And more importantly, the potential that we have down the road.”
“Masters of the Universe” is a key variable in that equation.
Ynon Kreiz, chief executive of Mattel.
(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)
The movie, which had a budget of roughly $170 million, is expected to bring in $25 million to $35 million in the U.S. and Canada during its debut weekend. That’s a far cry from the $162-million opening haul of “Barbie,” but box-office analysts say that film captured the cultural zeitgeist in a way that’s hard to replicate.
The ‘80s-era “Masters of the Universe” is “a property that was famous with a certain group of fans, but it hasn’t had much of a pop culture presence,” said Shawn Robbins, who directs movie analytics at Fandango and founded the forecasting site Box Office Theory. The movie has notched a respectable 74% approval rating from critics on aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.
“There’s been so many callbacks to nostalgic franchises,” he said. “Some people are always on board for them, and maybe the positive reviews bring people in who were on the fence. But people are also ready for something fresh and new and exciting.”
Kreiz said he’s often asked how the company will match the success of “Barbie.”
“The answer is, we don’t need to match ‘Barbie’s’ success for movies to have a meaningful economic impact on the company,” he said. “Not every movie will be ‘Barbie.’ If we create quality content that people want to watch and create quality experiences that people are engaged with, good things happen, and these brands will resonate and will be here for years to come.”
While theatrical revenue is important, the measure of success for “Masters of the Universe” could also include its eventual reception on streaming platforms and, of course, toy sales, analysts said.
There are hundreds of products tied to the movie, from collectible action figures of Nicholas Galitzine’s He-Man and Camila Mendes’ Teela, to branded Uno decks, Legos, clothing and skateboards.
Skeletor from “Masters of the Universe.”
(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)
“For us, it’s a huge win already,” said Robbie Brenner, president of Mattel Studios and chief content officer, who also served as a producer on the film. “We have reinvigorated and relaunched this brand that has been around for decades … and done it in a way with just the best-in-class toys. Obviously that’s our bread and butter. And then to have made an epic, incredible movie … is a huge win.”
While Mattel does not yet have sales totals for its “Masters of the Universe” toys, executives said during an earnings call in late April that product sales were “growing double digits” amid strong customer demand, particularly from adults.
When Kreiz was named CEO in 2018, he saw the potential for Mattel to expand beyond toys. In an entertainment landscape dominated by known franchises and intellectual property, the former TV and media executive wanted to leverage the company’s IP in new ways to attract consumers.
Hence, Mattel has expanded into real-world experiences such as a Barbie pop-up at Coachella or a traveling Hot Wheels monster truck show. In February, the company fully acquired Mattel163 mobile game studio after buying out a stake held by Chinese tech firm NetEase. The studio has released games based on Uno, Skip-Bo and other Mattel intellectual property.
And on the film and television front, the Mattel Studios division now has 51 people — most of whom are based in El Segundo — focused on projects across platforms.
After “Masters of the Universe,” Mattel Studios plans to release a “Matchbox” streaming movie in October. The division has more than a dozen films in development that have been announced, including an American Girl movie with Paramount, Polly Pocket with Amazon MGM Studios, as well as a live-action Magic 8 Ball series from M. Night Shyamalan.
“The journey for the company was to evolve from being a toy manufacturer that was making items to become an IP company that is managing franchises,” Kreiz said. “It’s not that we’re not creating toys — it’s obviously a big part of our business — but the opportunity is to expand so much more than the physical product.”
“Masters of the Universe” was in development for years at several different studios before it was picked up by Amazon MGM.
That partnership stemmed from Mattel’s work on the “Barbie” movie with Courtenay Valenti, then president of production and development at Warner Bros. Pictures who is now head of film at Amazon MGM.
“Masters of the Universe” felt like a good property for Mattel to bet on because of its nostalgia factor and deep bench of colorful characters, from the green tiger Battle Cat to the heavily armored Ram Man and ever meme-able Skeletor, which the company hopes will attract new audiences, Brenner said.
The movie is directed by Travis Knight — chief executive of stop-motion studio Laika who also led the 2018 “Transformers” spin-off “Bumblebee” — who Brenner said “nailed” the narrative’s tone. (It didn’t hurt that Knight was already a fan of the franchise and had sported the He-Man haircut as a child.)
“It’s a property that’s kind of out there,” said Brenner, who grew up watching He-Man and his twin sister She-Ra. “It’s got all these crazy characters. But just riding that line between what is funny and kind of irreverent and then kind of heartfelt, that is a very hard thing to put in a blender and to get right.”
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: Paul Rudd and Nick Jonas hit the right notes in ‘Power Ballad’
Let’s just say that the wedding band has never occupied the most exalted rung of the ladder in music.
Playing “September” and “Celebration” is often what’s most required. As one member of the Bride and the Groove, the band at the center of John Carney’s new film, puts it: They’re not rock stars. They’re human jukeboxes.
But in “Power Ballad,” a wedding band singer and pop star cross paths. For one night, all of the stratification of the music world falls away. “Power Ballad” starts like a fairy tale.
Since 2007’s “Once,” the Irish writer-director has focused his films on the redemptive capacity of music. Carney, who was once a bassist for the Frames, knows from experience. From “Sing Street” to “Flora and Son,” he has made unabashedly earnest tales where a song, or just picking up an instrument, changes lives.
This can, undoubtedly, lead Carney into sentimental territory. Lucky for him, his chosen subject — music — is more worthy of sentiment than almost anything else. Yet the song doesn’t quite remain the same in “Power Ballad,” a movie that begins with the gentle sweetness Carney is known for, but detours into something more discordant.
Rick (Paul Rudd) is an American musician who gave up on his once-promising rock band’s future to instead live with his wife (Marcella Plunkett) and teenage daughter (a spunky, underused Beth Fallon) in Dublin. His former group was called Octagon, a perfect former band name if there ever were one.
But for years, Rick has fronted the Bride and the Groove. It’s an unromantic day job (or rather a night one) that hasn’t entirely sapped his belief in his own songwriting. During an encore at one wedding, he plays an original tune and is mentally transported to an arena full of swaying fans. When he snaps out of it, he’s staring at an empty dance floor and faces that say: That wasn’t Kool & the Gang.
At another wedding at at a castle, the band is asked to let a friend of the newlyweds sit in. They reluctantly agree, and are surprised to see the very popular boy band veteran, Danny (Nick Jonas), step on stage. He sings Stevie Wonder’s “I Wish,” and it’s great. Though Rick had just dismissed Danny’s music as “manufactured content for young, excitable teens,” he discovers Danny is a genuine musician.
But, later that night, something even more remarkable transpires. Rick bumps into Danny, and the two quickly hit it off. They begin jamming together and sharing songs that need work. They are both so jazzed by their unlikely collaboration that they play into the next morning.
The actual moment of artistic creation, and the craft it requires, is something the movies almost always skip over. But capturing collaborative juices flowing is exactly what Carney excels at. You can feel his joy in it. So it’s fitting that one of the unfinished songs Rick plays for Danny, “How to Write a Song (Without You),” is about creative invention.
It’s here when you wonder where “Power Ballad” is headed. Is this, for Rick, the beginning of a beautiful friendship? Will they turn into the next great songwriting duo, lifting Rick out of weddings and proving to the world that Danny is more than a boy-band pretty face?
That is very possibly the movie Carney might have made a decade ago. But “Power Ballad,” which he co-wrote with Peter McDonald (who also co-stars as a band member), shifts six months ahead in time. Rick is standing in a shopping mall when the familiar lyrics of “How to Write a Song” softly float through the stores. He stands dumbfounded in the gleaming halls of commerce, a befuddlement that slowly turns into outrage the bigger and bigger Danny’s smash hit grows.
“Power Ballad” loses some of its steam in its second half, which follows Rick’s struggle for justice. Making things considerably harder is that he can find no recorded demo of the song. His family and his band don’t even really believe him.
But even as the movie struggles to sustain its opening refrain, Carney’s film is always riffing on ideas of authenticity and aspiration in music. That Jonas is, himself, a former boy band star who has at times gone it alone, lends the movie a direct connection to contemporary music, where tussles over authorship are increasingly common.
Jonas has been good in other films (notably the “Jumanji” movies), but this is his most ambitious and convincing performance to date. It’s a testament to the movie that Danny’s theft isn’t a purely villainous act. He gives the song a bridge and the vocal power to take it to another level. He’s under mounting pressure from his label to deliver a hit. An executive (Jack Reynor) wants “Danny 2.0” but has little faith he can supply it.
But it’s an even more well-tailored role for Rudd. He memorably and very goofily played a bassist in the 2009 comedy “I Love You, Man.” But while he sings well, it’s not his musical chops that lift the performance. It’s more that Rick, a contented family man with unrealized rock-star dreams, gives the exceptionally genial Rudd more notes to play as an actor. Rudd makes for a very likeable everyman out to convince the world he is capable of a beautiful song.
And that’s the abiding belief of Carney’s. No matter all the struggles, the artistic injustices, the corporate hegemony, he still believes that if you make something truly soulful, it will break through. It will claw its way to the surface, and move people. It’s undoubtedly gotten harder since “Once,” this movie seems to admit. The world is against you. But what one person can offer, a ballad or otherwise, still has power. Fairy tale or not, that’s worth believing in.
“Power Ballad,” a Lionsgate release in theaters Friday, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for “language throughout and some drug use.” Running time: 108 minutes. Three stars out of four.
-
Detroit, MI15 minutes agoDetroit Lions add UDFA rookie WR during OTAs
-
San Francisco, CA23 minutes agoHow to watch San Francisco Giants vs. Milwaukee Brewers
-
Dallas, TX30 minutes ago3 different Cowboys 53-man roster projections pinpoint contested roster spots
-
Miami, FL33 minutes agoJeff Hafley suggests Miami Dolphins entertain Malik Willis Tush Push
-
Boston, MA38 minutes agoKaren Read sues the police agencies that investigated her Boston police boyfriend’s death
-
Denver, CO45 minutes agoPedestrian dies after hit by car on southbound E-470, Aurora police say
-
Seattle, WA48 minutes agoSeattle paying $2.6M to settle sexual harassment lawsuit filed by four female SPD officers – MyNorthwest.com
-
San Diego, CA53 minutes agoPublisher’s Note: Restaurants Are People, June 2026 | San Diego Magazine