Connect with us

News

Mike Pence must testify about conversations he had with Donald Trump leading up to January 6, judge rules | CNN Politics

Published

on

Mike Pence must testify about conversations he had with Donald Trump leading up to January 6, judge rules | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

A federal decide has determined that former Vice President Mike Pence should testify to a grand jury about conversations he had with Donald Trump main as much as January 6, 2021, based on a number of sources aware of a latest federal courtroom ruling.

However the decide mentioned – in a ruling that is still underneath seal – that Pence can nonetheless decline to reply questions associated to his actions on January 6 itself, when he was serving as president of the Senate for the certification of the 2020 presidential election, based on one of many sources.

The ruling from chief decide James Boasberg of the US District Courtroom in Washington, DC, is a significant win for particular counsel Jack Smith, who’s spearheading the Justice Division investigation. Pence nonetheless has the flexibility to attraction.

Advertisement

Within the lead-up to the congressional certification vote, Pence confronted huge strain from Trump and his allies to disrupt lawmakers’ plans to validate Joe Biden’s win. As president of the Senate, Pence was tasked with presiding over the certification proceedings.

Trump’s conversations with Trump within the days surrounding the revolt have been of eager curiosity to investigators probing the assault. Although Pence declined to testify earlier than the Home January 6 committee that investigated the revolt, individuals in Trump’s orbit informed the committee a couple of heated telephone name he had with Pence the day of the assault through which he lobbed insults at his vice chairman.

Pence and Trump didn’t communicate in the course of the assault on the Capitol itself, through which lots of Trump’s supporters angrily sought him out, and Pence narrowly escaped the mob heading to the Senate flooring.

Nicholas Luna, a former particular assistant to Trump, informed the committee he remembered Trump calling Pence a “wimp.” Luna mentioned he recalled one thing to the impact of Trump saying, “I made the improper choice 4 or 5 years in the past.”

And Julie Radford, Ivanka Trump’s former chief of employees, mentioned she recalled Ivanka Trump telling her that “her dad had simply had an upsetting dialog with the vice chairman.”

Advertisement

Radford mentioned she was informed that Trump had referred to as Pence “the P-word,” referencing a derogatory time period.

For Pence’s half, lots of his public feedback about his conversations with Trump within the days earlier than and after the revolt have are available in a memoir he printed final 12 months.

Within the e book, Pence wrote that Trump informed him within the days earlier than the assault that he would encourage the hatred of a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals as a result of he was “too trustworthy” to aim to overturn the outcomes of the election.

The previous vice chairman additionally mentioned within the e book that he requested his normal counsel for a briefing on the procedures of the Electoral Depend Act after Trump in a December 5 telephone name “talked about difficult the election leads to the Home of Representatives for the primary time.”

Over lunch on December 21, Pence wrote, he tried to steer Trump to take heed to the White Home counsel’s group’s recommendation, quite than exterior legal professionals, a suggestion the then-president shot down.

Advertisement

And Pence wrote that Trump informed him in a New 12 months’s Day telephone name: “You’re too trustworthy,” predicting that “a whole bunch of hundreds are gonna hate your guts” and “individuals are gonna suppose you’re silly.”

“Mr. President, I don’t query there have been irregularities and fraud,” Pence wrote that he informed Trump. “It’s only a query of who decides, and underneath the regulation that’s Congress.”

Smith is investigating the Trump-aligned effort to subvert the 2020 election. Smith subpoenaed Pence for testimony and paperwork earlier this 12 months.

Days after information broke of the subpoena, Pence and his advisers indicated that the previous vice chairman would problem the subpoena underneath the Structure’s Speech or Debate Clause, which shields lawmakers from sure regulation enforcement actions related to their legislative duties.

“I’m going to combat the Biden DOJ subpoena for me to look earlier than the grand jury as a result of I consider it’s unconstitutional and unprecedented,” Pence mentioned at an occasion in February. He has recommended that – as a result of he was additionally serving as president of the Senate in the course of the January 6 certification vote – the constitutional clause coated the conduct that investigators are .

Advertisement

The problem in courtroom has performed out in secret.

Pence’s claims, as he has described them publicly, are seen as novel. His arguments attracted criticism from a broad vary of authorized students, together with former Decide Michael Luttig, a conservative authorized luminary who publicly argued that Pence ought to certify the electoral outcomes.

Whilst Pence has fought the subpoena, he has stood by his refusal to disrupt the congressional certification of Biden’s win, as Trump referred to as upon him to do.

This story has been up to date with further particulars.

Advertisement

News

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Published

on

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Your investigation of these allegations is consistent with the IG’s mission to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in federal agencies, and can help determine if politically connected crypto interests are undermining our national security. As Congress considers legislation on the market structure for digital assets, we must ensure that cryptocurrencies like USD1 are not providing the President and senior officials with the ability to line their pockets at the expense of the public interest.

The following facts have been reported in multiple outlets regarding Mr. Witkoff:

• Mr. Witkoff’s son Zach Witkoff is the CEO of World Liberty Financial (WLF), which the President’s family owns a majority stake in.³
• Beginning in January, one of Sheikh Tahnoon’s employees, Fiacc Larkin, joined WLF as the “chief strategic advisor” while continuing to work at G42, an AI investment firm owned by Sheikh Tahnoon that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, works closely with Chinese military companies.4



On May 1, 2025, Zach Witkoff announced that MGX, a state-owned investment firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, had agreed to use a WLF-issued stablecoin, USD1, to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. As a result of this deal, WLF stands to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction fees from MGX, and more from the returns on any investments it makes with the $2 billion deposit.³
As of August, Mr. Witkoff maintained a financial interest in WLF and thus stands to personally benefit from his son’s business dealings with the UAE.6 Nevertheless, he did not recuse himself from deliberations regarding the UAE, which may violate federal ethics law.

The following facts have been reported about Mr. Sacks:







He is a special government employee who continues to serve as a “general partner” at his venture capital fund, Craft Ventures.

8

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, an Emirati sovereign wealth fund controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, was an early investor in Craft Ventures and continues to hold an investment in the fund.
In addition, Craft Ventures is invested in BitGo, which has partnered with WLF to provide the technical infrastructure for USD1. If BitGo’s valuation grows, based on the UAE’s investment into USD1, Mr. Sacks and his firm stand to benefit.

3 Yahoo Finance, “Trump family reportedly has a 60% stake in the World Liberty Financial,” Anand Sinha, March 31, 2025,
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-reportedly-60-stake-172742661.html.
4 New York Times, “Inside U.S. Efforts to Untangle an A.I. Giant’s Ties to China,” Mark Mazzetti and Edward
Wong, Nov. 27, 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/us/politics/ai-us-uae-china-security-g42.html.
5 New York Times, “At a Dubai Conference, Trump’s Conflicts Take Center Stage,” David Yaffe-Bellany, May 1, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/us/politics/trump-cryptocurrency-usd1-dubai-conference-

announcement.html.

6U.S Office of Government Ethics, Form 278e for Steven C. Witkoff, August 13, 2025, p. 23, https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/090d0de07e1d2fdf/bbf02867-full.pdf.

18 U.S.C. § 208.

8 White House, “Limited Waiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) Regarding A.I. Assets,” June 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/David-Sacks.pdf.

2

Continue Reading

News

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Published

on

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Nigel Farage has refused to criticise Donald Trump’s claims that paracetamol, sold in the US as Tylenol, could cause autism, insisting “science is never settled” and he would never “side with” medical experts.

The Reform UK leader said he had “no idea” if the US president was right to tell pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, also known as Tylenol and paracetamol, and suggesting that those who could not “tough it out” should limit their intake.

Scientists and global health agencies including the World Health Organization have strongly dismissed Trump’s false claims, calling them misguided and saying the evidence linking paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism was “inconsistent”.

The UK’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the British public they should not “pay any attention whatsoever to what Donald Trump says about medicine”, adding: “I trust doctors over President Trump frankly, on this.”

But in a wide-ranging interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Farage was asked directly if Trump was right to share those unproven claims. He said: “I have no idea, I’ve no idea. You know we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows Nick, I don’t know.

Advertisement

“He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism. I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I’ve no idea.”

When Farage was asked if he would side with medical experts who say it is dangerous to make the link, he added: “I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody, right? You know? I don’t side with anybody, because science is never settled. We should remember that.”

Yet when challenged over whether it was irresponsible for Trump to make such an unproven claim, Farage said: “That’s an opinion he’s [Trump’s] got. It’s not one that I necessarily share.”

Farage’s refusal to condemn Trump’s claims comes weeks after a controversial doctor, Aseem Malhotra, was given top billing at Reform UK’s party conference and used his main-stage speech to claim the Covid vaccine caused cancer in the royal family. Malhotra is an adviser to Trump’s health secretary, Robert F Kennedy.

In the same interview, Farage said Trump was “right to say” that sharia law “is an issue in London”.

Advertisement

“Never take what he [Trump] says literally, ever on anything. But always take everything he says seriously,” Farage said, adding: Trump “has a point.”

“So is he right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No. Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

Labour MPs have urged Keir Starmer to reprimand Trump’s administration after the US president falsely claimed in a speech to the United Nations: “I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed.

skip past newsletter promotion

“Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.”

Trump has been publicly attacking the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, since 2015 when the Labour politician criticised Trump, the then presidential candidate, for suggesting that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.

A spokesperson for Khan said: “We are not going to dignify his appalling and bigoted comments with a response. London is the greatest city in the world, safer than major US cities and we’re delighted to welcome the record number of US citizens moving here.”

During the LBC phone-in, Farage also said Reform’s plan to ban anyone who was not a UK citizen from claiming benefits would not apply to Ukrainians and Hongkongers.

Advertisement

“No, because they come for different reasons,” Farage said, adding those who had lived in the UK on indefinite leave to remain and had not worked or paid into the system would be told their benefits would be cut.

Continue Reading

News

Alphabet market value exceeds $3tn

Published

on

Alphabet market value exceeds tn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Alphabet’s market capitalisation surged above $3tn for the first time on Monday on the back of a sharp rally for the search giant’s shares over the past few weeks.

Shares in Google’s parent company have climbed more than 30 per cent to a record high of $252 since the group posted double-digit growth in revenue and profit in quarterly results out in late July.

The rally means Alphabet joins Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple as the only US companies valued above $3tn. Chipmaker Nvidia in July became the first company to hit a $4tn market value.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending