Connect with us

News

Mike Pence must testify about conversations he had with Donald Trump leading up to January 6, judge rules | CNN Politics

Published

on

Mike Pence must testify about conversations he had with Donald Trump leading up to January 6, judge rules | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

A federal decide has determined that former Vice President Mike Pence should testify to a grand jury about conversations he had with Donald Trump main as much as January 6, 2021, based on a number of sources aware of a latest federal courtroom ruling.

However the decide mentioned – in a ruling that is still underneath seal – that Pence can nonetheless decline to reply questions associated to his actions on January 6 itself, when he was serving as president of the Senate for the certification of the 2020 presidential election, based on one of many sources.

The ruling from chief decide James Boasberg of the US District Courtroom in Washington, DC, is a significant win for particular counsel Jack Smith, who’s spearheading the Justice Division investigation. Pence nonetheless has the flexibility to attraction.

Advertisement

Within the lead-up to the congressional certification vote, Pence confronted huge strain from Trump and his allies to disrupt lawmakers’ plans to validate Joe Biden’s win. As president of the Senate, Pence was tasked with presiding over the certification proceedings.

Trump’s conversations with Trump within the days surrounding the revolt have been of eager curiosity to investigators probing the assault. Although Pence declined to testify earlier than the Home January 6 committee that investigated the revolt, individuals in Trump’s orbit informed the committee a couple of heated telephone name he had with Pence the day of the assault through which he lobbed insults at his vice chairman.

Pence and Trump didn’t communicate in the course of the assault on the Capitol itself, through which lots of Trump’s supporters angrily sought him out, and Pence narrowly escaped the mob heading to the Senate flooring.

Nicholas Luna, a former particular assistant to Trump, informed the committee he remembered Trump calling Pence a “wimp.” Luna mentioned he recalled one thing to the impact of Trump saying, “I made the improper choice 4 or 5 years in the past.”

And Julie Radford, Ivanka Trump’s former chief of employees, mentioned she recalled Ivanka Trump telling her that “her dad had simply had an upsetting dialog with the vice chairman.”

Advertisement

Radford mentioned she was informed that Trump had referred to as Pence “the P-word,” referencing a derogatory time period.

For Pence’s half, lots of his public feedback about his conversations with Trump within the days earlier than and after the revolt have are available in a memoir he printed final 12 months.

Within the e book, Pence wrote that Trump informed him within the days earlier than the assault that he would encourage the hatred of a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals as a result of he was “too trustworthy” to aim to overturn the outcomes of the election.

The previous vice chairman additionally mentioned within the e book that he requested his normal counsel for a briefing on the procedures of the Electoral Depend Act after Trump in a December 5 telephone name “talked about difficult the election leads to the Home of Representatives for the primary time.”

Over lunch on December 21, Pence wrote, he tried to steer Trump to take heed to the White Home counsel’s group’s recommendation, quite than exterior legal professionals, a suggestion the then-president shot down.

Advertisement

And Pence wrote that Trump informed him in a New 12 months’s Day telephone name: “You’re too trustworthy,” predicting that “a whole bunch of hundreds are gonna hate your guts” and “individuals are gonna suppose you’re silly.”

“Mr. President, I don’t query there have been irregularities and fraud,” Pence wrote that he informed Trump. “It’s only a query of who decides, and underneath the regulation that’s Congress.”

Smith is investigating the Trump-aligned effort to subvert the 2020 election. Smith subpoenaed Pence for testimony and paperwork earlier this 12 months.

Days after information broke of the subpoena, Pence and his advisers indicated that the previous vice chairman would problem the subpoena underneath the Structure’s Speech or Debate Clause, which shields lawmakers from sure regulation enforcement actions related to their legislative duties.

“I’m going to combat the Biden DOJ subpoena for me to look earlier than the grand jury as a result of I consider it’s unconstitutional and unprecedented,” Pence mentioned at an occasion in February. He has recommended that – as a result of he was additionally serving as president of the Senate in the course of the January 6 certification vote – the constitutional clause coated the conduct that investigators are .

Advertisement

The problem in courtroom has performed out in secret.

Pence’s claims, as he has described them publicly, are seen as novel. His arguments attracted criticism from a broad vary of authorized students, together with former Decide Michael Luttig, a conservative authorized luminary who publicly argued that Pence ought to certify the electoral outcomes.

Whilst Pence has fought the subpoena, he has stood by his refusal to disrupt the congressional certification of Biden’s win, as Trump referred to as upon him to do.

This story has been up to date with further particulars.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

Published

on

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

new video loaded: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

transcript

transcript

Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

At a campaign rally in Philadelphia, members of the Kennedy family endorsed President Biden, rejecting one of their own, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate.

I’m joined here today with my sisters, Kathleen and Rory, with Joe and Chris and Max. And with my hero, President Joe Biden. We want to make crystal clear our feeling that the best way forward for America is to re-elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to four more years. That’s right, the Kennedy family endorses Joe Biden for president.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in 2024 Elections

Continue Reading

News

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Published

on

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Twelve New Yorkers who represent a cross-section of Manhattan residents have been sworn in as jurors for Donald Trump’s “hush money” case, after three days of selection in which almost 200 candidates were vetted for political bias by the court.

The panel — which includes a female physical therapist, a retired male wealth manager, a male investment banker, a male security engineer, two male attorneys, a female English teacher and an Irish-born salesman from Harlem — was finalised just after 4:30pm local time on Thursday. The court also selected the first of likely six alternate jurors.

Opening arguments in the criminal trial, the first against a former US president, are expected to commence on Monday morning.

Advertisement

Trump is facing trial on 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records for alleged payments made in the run-up to the 2016 election to buy the silence of a porn actor who claimed she had an affair with him 10 years prior. He has pleaded not guilty in the case, which is one of four criminal indictments he is facing.

Trump, a New York native and real estate tycoon, must be present in the Lower Manhattan courtroom throughout the six-week trial. Leaving the courthouse, he complained that the proceedings were preventing him from hitting the campaign trail as the presumptive Republican nominee in November’s election.

“I’m supposed to be in New Hampshire. I’m supposed to be in Georgia. I’m supposed to be in North Carolina, South Carolina,” he told reporters. He clutched a stack of paper he said were printouts of news articles criticising the indictment, which he once again decried as a “hoax”.

The third day of jury selection in a Manhattan criminal court had earlier got off to a rocky start. Two previously selected jurors were excused by the court after one woman’s identity was pieced together by family and friends from publicly reported details, and another man was connected to an arrest for ripping down rightwing posters in the 1990s.

Over the course of the week, dozens of potential jurors were dismissed for claiming they could not set aside their bias when it came to determining Trump’s fate.

Advertisement

Soon after court resumed on Thursday morning, an oncology nurse from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, who had been seated late on Tuesday, told Justice Juan Merchan that she had “friends, family and colleagues” contact her after piecing together from press reports that she had been chosen as a juror in the trial.

She added that as a result of the external pressure, she no longer felt she could be fair and unbiased, and was promptly excused.

Minutes later, lawyers for the Manhattan district attorney, who brought the case, revealed their research had uncovered that a male juror may not have been truthful about his past, and had been arrested for ripping down rightwing political posters in the Westchester County area of New York State in the 1990s. His wife may have been “previously accused or involved in a corruption inquiry”, the district attorney’s office said.

Merchan later excused him without further explanation.

Although prospective jurors’ names and addresses have been kept private for fear of reprisals, Merchan admonished the press for publishing “so much information” about their physical attributes and professional lives that some had become “very, very easy to identify”.

Advertisement

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Prosecutors on Thursday also renewed their request for Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for violating a gag order that prevents him from talking about many of the people involved in the case, pointing specifically to a social media post shared by the former president that seemed to imply some prospective jurors were “undercover Liberal Activists”.

Merchan said he would rule after oral arguments on the issue, which are scheduled for Tuesday.

Continue Reading

News

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

1. Trump wasn’t always anti-abortion.

Trump will forever be known as the president who appointed the justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade in June of 2022. But the former president hasn’t always been against abortion rights. In 1999, when he was considering a run for the White House, Trump told NBC’s Tim Russert on Meet the Press:

Advertisement

“I’m very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it, I hate everything it stands for. I cringe when people debate the subject. But I still believe in choice.”

By 2011, Trump had changed his position. Once again he was considering a run for president, and Trump described himself as “pro-life” when speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC.

2. When he first ran for president, about half the country supported a legal right to abortion.

But a key group of voters overwhelmingly opposed it – white evangelical Christians. Trump needed their support, and he was successful: exit polling in the 2016 election showed nearly two-thirds of Christian voters chose Trump.

Their candidate delivered. Trump appointed three Supreme Court justices during his term– which ultimately led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Some Republicans in Congress are pushing for a federal ban on abortion, with many in the Republican base pressuring Trump to voice his support. Last week, Trump posted a video on Truth Social that supported leaving abortion access up to the states:

Advertisement

My view is that now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint. The states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land, in this case the law of the state.”

By saying he will instead leave the issue to the states – essentially the status quo – Trump appears to be trying to avoid strengthening Democrats’ ability to rally their voters around abortion rights.

3. Now, an anti-abortion stance could be a political liability.

Every time there’s been an abortion referendum since Dobbs, voters have favored abortion rights.

Supporting a national abortion ban is a position that some Republicans like Chris Christie and Nikki Haley have said was unwise or at least impractical.

This election year, Trump’s position on abortion could influence whether he wins or loses the race. But if he is elected, anti-abortion activists will likely push Trump to use the power of the executive branch to restrict abortion access.

Advertisement

For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott. It was edited by Courtney Dorning and Megan Pratz.

Continue Reading

Trending