News
Justice Dept. to Review Election Tampering Conviction of Pro-Trump Clerk
The Justice Department said on Monday that it would review the conviction of the former clerk of Mesa County, Colo., who was found guilty of state charges last summer of tampering with voting machines under her control in a failed attempt to prove that they had been used to rig the 2020 election against President Trump.
The decision was the latest example of the Justice Department under Mr. Trump’s control seeking to use its powers to support those who have acted on his behalf and to go after those who have criticized or opposed him. It also played into the president’s effort to rewrite the history of his efforts to overturn the results of the election.
Three weeks ago, the former clerk, Tina Peters, who was sentenced to nine years in prison on the state election tampering charges, filed a long-shot motion in Federal District Court in Denver effectively challenging the guilty verdict she received in August at the end of a trial in Grand Junction.
But, in a surprise move, Yaakov M. Roth, the acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s civil division, filed a court brief known as a statement of interest on Monday, declaring that “reasonable concerns have been raised about various aspects of Ms. Peters’s case.” In the filing, Mr. Roth said the federal judge who received Ms. Peters’s petition this month should give it “prompt and careful consideration.”
Mr. Roth said that the Justice Department was concerned, among other things, about “the exceptionally lengthy sentence” imposed on Ms. Peters by the judge in Grand Junction. He also questioned a decision by state prosecutors to deny her bail as she appeals her conviction as “arbitrary or unreasonable.”
The review of Ms. Peters’s case was part of a larger examination of cases “across the nation for abuses of the criminal justice process,” Mr. Roth wrote. The scrutiny of Peters case, he added, was being conducted under the aegis of an executive order that Mr. Trump issued seeking to end the “weaponization of the federal government.”
It remains unclear what lasting effect the Justice Department’s review of Ms. Peters’s case might have on the proceeding. But Mr. Roth made clear in his court papers that the evaluation was taking place to determine whether the prosecution was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice.”
The Justice Department has no power to directly overturn the state conviction. But its filing lobbying a federal court to intercede in the case was nonetheless a remarkable intervention in the matter.
Dan Rubinstein, the Mesa County district attorney who secured the conviction against Ms. Peters, said on Monday evening that, until Mr. Roth’s court papers were filed, he had had no idea that the Justice Department was thinking of scrutinizing Ms. Peters’s case for alleged political bias.
Moreover, he said, no one from the department had reached out to him before the filing to express concern about the case.
“I am happy to have a conversation with anybody in the administration as to the motivations and expectations that our community had when they overwhelmingly wanted me to bring this criminal action,” Mr. Rubinstein said.
A jury in Grand Junction found Ms. Peters guilty of seven charges stemming from her efforts to breach a voting machine manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems in the months after Mr. Trump lost the election to Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The jury determined that Ms. Peters had helped an outsider gain unauthorized access to the machine in May 2021 and to obtain information that was later made public at a conspiratorial event held to undermine trust in Mr. Trump’s defeat.
At a sentencing hearing in October, Judge Matthew D. Barrett scolded Ms. Peters from the bench, telling her that he was imposing a stiff penalty on her because she had repeatedly advanced false claims about Mr. Trump’s defeat, and that, in so doing, she had become a celebrity among those who denied that he lost the race.
“You are no hero. You abused your position, and you are a charlatan,” Judge Barrett said, adding, “You cannot help but lie as easy as you breathe.”
Since Mr. Trump’s re-election, the Justice Department has faced criticism for its conduct in a number of cases, several of which have resulted in the abrupt resignations of federal prosecutors.
Top prosecutors in New York and Washington stepped down this month in response to the department’s efforts to dismiss the corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams of New York.
In a similar fashion, the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington recently resigned after she declined a request from her boss, Ed Martin, to freeze the assets of a government contractor, saying she had insufficient evidence to do so.
Mr. Martin has also been quietly pushing to present evidence against Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, to a federal grand jury over comments he made about Supreme Court justices in 2020, according to people with knowledge of the situation. Justice Department officials have thus far rebuffed the request, one of those people said.
The man accused of sparking the deadly Palisades fire in Los Angeles was upset over a failed relationship and his lack of plans for New Year’s Eve – and he ranted about being angry at the world before the initial blaze was ignited, according to court documents filed by prosecutors.
Jonathan Rinderknecht, 29, has pleaded not guilty to starting what became one of the most destructive wildfires in California history. It began on 7 January 2025 in the hillside neighborhoods of Pacific Palisades and Malibu and killed 12 people. Prosecutors say Rinderknecht started a fire on 1 January that burned undetected deep in root systems before flaring back up a week later.
Rinderknecht’s trial will begin on 8 June. His attorneys say he is being used as a scapegoat for the Los Angeles fire department’s failure to fully extinguish the earlier blaze.
An outline of the prosecutors’ strategy – with details about the defendant’s alleged state of mind on the night before the first fire began – appears in a 29 April pre-trial memo filed by the US attorney’s office.
Witnesses reported that Rinderknecht had been driving erratically while on Uber routes around the Palisades on New Year’s Eve, said prosecutors. His passengers described him as “angry, intense, driving erratically, and ranting about being ‘pissed off at the world,’” the memo said, echoing a criminal complaint against Rinderknecht that had previously been filed.
According to court filings, Rinderknecht ranted to passengers about Luigi Mangione, the accused murderer of UnitedHealthcare chief executive officer Brian Thompson; capitalism; and vigilantism. In an interview with investigators on 24 January, when asked why someone might commit arson in the Palisades, Rinderknecht “responded that it would be out of resentment of the rich enjoying their money as ‘we’re basically being enslaved by them,’” and again referenced Mangione’s alleged crime, the documents said.
Prosecutors additionally said Rinderknecht was distraught over a failed relationship and upset about thwarted plans for New Year’s Eve.
In an email responding to those allegations, Rinderknecht’s attorney Steve Haney said: “My client maintains his innocence as he has from the beginning, and we look forward to clearing his name at trial.
“The offered motive that my client started a fire on [New Year’s] Eve because he did not have date speaks for itself.”
Haney held a news conference in March to call for Rinderknecht’s release from jail in light of evidence he said shows he is not responsible for the blaze. Haney pointed to a deposition in which a firefighter testified that he noticed the ground was still smoldering from the fire on 2 January 2025 and alerted supervisors that there were hotspots. That testimony was gathered as part of a lawsuit filed by fire victims against the city.
A battalion chief had testified that he walked the perimeter of the burn area four times throughout the day and ensured all hotspots were out.
Jaime Moore, the fire department chief who was appointed in October, has said he is concerned about the differences in the firefighters’ testimonies and commissioned an independent report on how the 1 January 2025 fire was handled.
Haney has said this evidence was not available to the defense when Rinderknecht was indicted.
Federal prosecutors say the man accused of starting one of the most destructive fires in California history was fascinated by fire and by Luigi Mangione, who became a populist hero to some after he was charged with murdering a health insurance executive.
Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30, is accused of intentionally setting a fire in the Santa Monica Mountains that later exploded into the Palisades fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of homes across the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles in January last year.
A trial memorandum released by federal prosecutors last week paints a portrait of Mr. Rinderknecht in the weeks before the fire as a lonely and erratic man who was angry at the world, particularly the rich.
Federal prosecutors say that in December 2024, the month before the fire, Mr. Rinderknecht had been living alone in an apartment in North Hollywood and working as an Uber driver.
He seemed to have followed the case of Mr. Mangione, who is charged with fatally shooting Brian Thompson, the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare, in New York City on Dec. 4, 2024.
In the wake of the shooting, Mr. Mangione became a folk hero to some people, who saw him as striking a blow against the health insurance industry and its profits. (Mr. Mangione is set to stand trial on a second-degree murder charge in September.)
Mr. Rinderknecht searched for Mangione-related news, using the search terms “free Luigi Mangione,” “lets take down all the billionaires” and “reddit lets kill all the billionaires,” according to court documents.
When investigators later asked Mr. Rinderknecht why someone might commit arson in the Palisades, he said it would be out of resentment of the rich, and he compared such a fire to the murder for which Mr. Mangione was charged. “We’re basically being enslaved by them,” he told investigators.
Mr. Rinderknecht was arrested in October and has been charged with three arson-related counts. He has pleaded not guilty, and his lawyers maintain that the fire was sparked by fireworks. Mr. Rinderknecht is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles. His trial is set for June.
His lawyer, Steven Haney, pushed back on federal prosecutors’ latest narrative. He said that they were politicizing the case and offering “wild motives and conspiracy theories.” He said that the focus on Mr. Mangione revealed a lack of concrete evidence.
“If fascination with Luigi Mangione is evidence of arson, the U.S. attorney’s office is going to need a much bigger courtroom — because they’ll have to indict half the country,” he said in an email.
Prosecutors pointed to other factors that might have affected Mr. Rinderknecht’s state of mind on New Year’s Eve, just before prosecutors say the fire was set.
Mr. Rinderknecht was unable to secure plans for the evening and “exhibited extreme anger, indignation and frustration” about that, according to an affidavit. He was upset about his relationship with a co-worker whom he had dated earlier in the year. He shared information about his feelings toward her with ChatGPT more than 50 times, according to the court documents.
On Dec. 30, the woman asked Mr. Rinderknecht for space. He then left her “two manic voice mails,” according to the affidavit. He reached out to two other people to try to make alternate plans, but neither came through.
On New Year’s Eve, he drove several Uber passengers, who later recalled that he had been driving erratically, ranting about Mr. Mangione, capitalism and vigilantism. He dropped off his final passenger in Pacific Palisades and hiked up a trail, where he listened to a French rap song about despair. (The music video for the song shows the singer lighting things on fire, prosecutors note.)
He was obsessed with fire, prosecutors say. A few months before the Palisades fire, he asked ChatGPT to generate images of people running away from a burning forest. On Dec. 5, he viewed images of a wildfire in Southern California caused by arson. On Dec. 29, he filmed fire engines leaving a Hollywood station and said out loud, presumably to himself, “They’re coming for you, bro,” and warned himself to get his mind in order and “not be liking this craziness,” according to the court documents.
Prosecutors say that just after midnight he lit a fire in the chaparral, and then repeatedly called 911. He watched as fire trucks arrived and took videos of their efforts. That blaze, known as the Lachman fire, was not fully put out; it rekindled amid terrible winds seven days later and became known as the Palisades fire, prosecutors say.
General view of Arrowhead Stadium, in Kansas City, Missouri, which will be hosting some of the World Cup matches this summer.
Jamie Squire/Getty Images North America
hide caption
toggle caption
Jamie Squire/Getty Images North America
With only six weeks to go before the start of the World Cup, hotels at most of the cities hosting the tournament are facing a major problem: Bookings are running far below what they had expected.
For some metro areas such as Kansas City, bookings are running even below what a typical June or July would bring, according to an industry survey released on Monday by the American Hotel and Lodging Association. The report was conducted last month and a spokesperson said it’s based on 205 respondents “representing hotel operators and owners, many of whom own multiple hotel portfolios across the country and across multiple World Cup markets.”
AHLA said the disappointing bookings stem from fewer than expected international travelers and large cancellations by FIFA — the organizer of the World Cup — leaving hotels with an unexpectedly large number of empty rooms.
“Despite more than 5 million tickets sold (for World Cup matches), this demand has not yet translated into strong hotel bookings,” the AHLA said in the report.
The disappointment comes after the hotel industry was bracing for a strong summer in 2026. The World Cup is taking place across the U.S., Canada and Mexico — with 11 U.S. cities hosting games. In addition, the U.S. is celebrating the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which was also expected to bring an influx of foreign visitors.
Overseas visitors are critical to the hotel industry, the AHLA says, because they tend to spend more — and stay longer.
But the AHLA warned nearly 80% of hotel bookings across host cities are running below initial forecasts, according to its survey. In Kansas City, 85% to 90% of hotels reported bookings below projections.
World Cup organizers in Kansas City pushed back to the survey, telling The Athletic that embassy staff in countries such as the Netherlands are deploying additional staff to the city in anticipation of a high number of visitors. An tournament organizers in the city still stand by their ambitious projection to attract 650,000 visitors over the course of the World Cup, CEO of Visit KC and the Kansas City Sports Commission, Kathy Nelson, told KCUR in an interview.
KC26, the host committee, did not immediately reply to a request for comment from NPR.
There were bright spots, however, for host cities Miami and Atlanta. About half of survey respondents in the capital of Georgia reported bookings in line or ahead of projections, while about 55% of respondents in Florida’s biggest metro city reporting stronger-than-expected projections.
Japan supporters celebrate after their team beat Spain at a 2022 World Cup game held at the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha, Qatar, on Dec. 1, 2022.
Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images
Not coming to America
The survey results appear to be another sign that overseas travelers are not planning to come to the U.S. in the numbers once expected as a result of a slew of factors including tighter immigration policies by the U.S. administration.
“Even with global anticipation building, the path to the U.S. for many World Cup travelers feels increasingly less like a red-carpet welcome,” the AHLA said in its survey. “There is a perception that international travelers may face lengthy visa wait times, increased visa fees, and lingering uncertainty around entry processing.”
The AHLA also cited other factors such as the strong U.S. dollar and concerns about airport screening as “contributing to a growing sense that visiting the U.S. for the World Cup may be more complicated and costly.”
FIFA has continued to tout the “unprecedented” demand for the tournament, and has said it expects the World Cup to break attendance records.
Meanwhile, White House spokesman Davis Ingle told NPR last week for a story on World Cup demand that the tournament “will no doubt be one of the greatest and most spectacular events in the history of mankind,” and that “President Trump is focused on ensuring that this is not only an incredible experience for all fans and visitors, but also the safest and most secure in history.”
-
Entertainment3 minutes agoThe full list of 2026 Tony Awards nominations
-
Lifestyle9 minutes agoKoreatown’s Wi Spa ups its game with a head spa, AI robot masseuse and more
-
Politics15 minutes ago‘Ceasefire is not over,’ Hegseth says as U.S. acts to reopen Strait of Hormuz
-
Sports27 minutes agoPrep talk: Verbum Dei set to honor football grads Kenechi Udeze, Hardy Nickerson
-
World39 minutes agoUkraine strikes Russian army facility 1,000km into Moscow’s territory
-
News1 hour agoMan accused of starting Palisades fire was ‘angry, intense, driving erratically’, lawyers say
-
New York3 hours agoDaniel Radcliffe, John Lithgow and Lesley Manville Pick Up Tony Nominations
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoA New Day for Detroit’s Dakota Inn – Hour Detroit Magazine