Connect with us

News

‘If war breaks out, I’m cannon fodder:’ In Taiwan, ex-conscripts feel unprepared for potential China conflict | CNN

Published

on

‘If war breaks out, I’m cannon fodder:’ In Taiwan, ex-conscripts feel unprepared for potential China conflict | CNN


Taipei, Taiwan
CNN
 — 

Rising issues over more and more aggressive army maneuvers by China have prompted Taiwan to increase the obligatory army service interval most of its younger males should serve. However former conscripts interviewed by CNN say Taipei might want to do way over that whether it is to make the coaching efficient.

Outdated, boring and impractical. That was the decision of six younger males who spoke to CNN about their latest experiences of obligatory service in Taiwan’s army.

They describe a course of that was designed many years in the past with a heavy emphasis on bayonet coaching, however missing instruction in city warfare methods or trendy weapons like drones. Some say there have been too few rifles to go round, or that the weapons they skilled with had been too previous to be of use. Others recount “specializing” in cannon, grenade and mortar models, however by no means receiving any ammunition to coach with.

Their criticisms come at a vital time for Taiwan’s army. President Tsai Ing-wen introduced lately that the interval of obligatory service for males born in or after 2005 will likely be prolonged from 4 months to a 12 months, saying that the current system “not fits the wants” of the island’s protection. The army says the rethink follows comparisons to the militaries of different democratic jurisdictions which have longer conscription durations – corresponding to South Korea (18-21 months), Singapore (24 months) and Israel (24-30 months).

Advertisement

Strengthening the island’s army has develop into a key concern for Tsai, who has spoken of the necessity to spotlight Taiwan’s willpower to defend itself amid more and more aggressive noises from Beijing. The ruling Chinese language Communist Get together claims the self-governing democracy of 23.5 million folks as a part of its territory, regardless of by no means having managed it, and has despatched report numbers of air and sea patrols to harass it since former US Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited in August. Chinese language chief Xi Jinping has repeatedly refused to rule out using power to “reunify” the island with mainland China.

“Nobody desires warfare,” Tsai stated in asserting the lengthening of obligatory service durations in December. “That is true of Taiwan’s authorities and folks, and the worldwide neighborhood, however peace doesn’t come from the sky, and Taiwan is on the entrance traces of the growth of authoritarianism.”

However former conscripts are skeptical, telling CNN the issues with obligatory army service transcend the quick timeframe and can solely be mounted by a extra thorough revamp.

Tsai herself has acknowledged that many voters really feel serving within the army is “only a waste of time.”

Advertisement

“In our firm, we had greater than 100 assault rifles, however solely barely greater than a dozen might be used for capturing practices,” stated Frank Liu, a 26-year-old auditor from the central Changhua county who served in 2021. He stated about 140 conscripts acquired coaching in his firm.

“Lots of these assault rifles had been made many many years in the past, and plenty of had been too worn out for use in coaching. The weapons needed to be rotated amongst ourselves.”

Paul Lee, a manufacturing facility supervisor from Taipei who served in 2018, had an analogous expertise.

“We didn’t hearth many rounds throughout the army coaching,” Lee stated. “I used to be working towards with the T65 assault rifle, and I solely shot about 40 rounds throughout your complete coaching interval.

“I’m involved that many individuals who underwent the coaching with me gained’t even have the ability to function a rifle with confidence.”

Advertisement
Reservists take part in military training at a base in Taoyuan, Taiwan, on March 12, 2022.

Below the present guidelines, the four-month service interval is often divided into two components: 5 weeks of primary coaching, and 11 weeks of floor coaching at a army base.

Through the floor coaching interval, conscripts are sometimes assigned specialties – however even then some say they obtain solely probably the most cursory of insights.

Dennis, a 25-year-old engineer from Taichung metropolis who served final 12 months, stated whereas he was assigned to focus on cannons, he by no means realized tips on how to hearth them as a result of trainers had been frightened the recruits would possibly get harm. He requested solely to be recognized by his first title as a result of he stays a reservist.

“We had been assigned easy duties, and we spent more often than not serving to with cleansing and washing the cannon carts,” he stated. “If warfare breaks out at the moment and I’m advised to work as an artilleryman, I believe I’ll simply develop into cannon fodder.”

Adam Yu, a 27-year-old designer from the northern Keelung metropolis who served in 2018 and specialised in mortars and grenade launchers, stated whereas he had been proven tips on how to put together the weapons, he had by no means been given any ammunition or practiced firing them.

Advertisement

“I’m undecided if I may even function these weapons,” stated Yu, including, “I nonetheless don’t know the way these weapons are supposed for use within the battlefield.”

That sentiment was echoed by one other former conscript surnamed Liu. The 28-year-old salesman specialised in information processing with the air power and acquired coaching within the southern Pingtung county in 2015. He too requested for his first title to be withheld, saying he should be known as upon for extra reservist coaching.

“Our commanders barely taught something throughout our floor coaching, as a result of they felt we might solely be right here for a number of months and it wouldn’t make a lot of a distinction for them,” he stated.

New recruits practice with bayonets at a military training center in Hsinchu County, northern Taiwan on April 22, 2013.

Taiwan has knowledgeable volunteer army power that as of final 12 months was made up of 162,000 full-time troops, in accordance with a report by the Legislative Yuan. On high of this, an estimated 70,000 males full a interval of obligatory army service yearly.

Conscripts should bear a interval of bodily coaching and are taught to shoot rifles and use bayonets.

Advertisement

A number of of those that spoke to CNN questioned the period of time spent on bayonet coaching, arguing it was outdated, though some militaries proceed to show it in recruitment coaching applications.

“I believe bayonet coaching was only a waste of time, as a result of I actually couldn’t assume how we might put that into follow,” Frank Liu stated.

“Simply have a look at the Russia-Ukraine warfare, there are such a lot of varieties of weapons used. When does a soldier ever should resort to a bayonet to assault their enemy? I believe that was actually outdated.”

Yu, from Keelung, stated his commanders had put large emphasis on bayonet coaching as a result of it made up a part of the end-of-term examination.

“We had been ordered to memorize a collection of slogans,” he stated. “After we had been working towards bayonet, we had been required to observe the directions of the squad chief with a particular chant for every motion, and we needed to repeat it within the examination.”

Advertisement

A few of these criticisms had been acknowledged, tacitly or in any other case, when Tsai introduced the lengthening of the conscription interval and within the subsequent information briefing by the Protection Ministry in early January.

The ministry stated that when the brand new coverage begins in 2024, all conscripts will shoot a minimum of 800 rounds throughout their service, and they are going to be skilled with new weapons corresponding to anti-tank missiles and drones. Bayonet coaching will likely be modified to incorporate different types of shut fight coaching, it added, and conscripts might also take part in joint army drills with skilled troopers. In the meantime, primary coaching will rise from 5 to eight weeks.

Su Tzu-yun, a director of Taiwan’s Institute for Nationwide Protection and Safety Analysis, which is funded by the federal government, stated he’s assured the reform will increase the island’s fight capabilities.

He additionally thinks there may be worth in holding bayonet coaching within the curriculum.

“It helps increase a soldier’s braveness and aggressiveness,” he stated. “If troopers interact in a mission that isn’t appropriate for firing weapons, they could additionally use bayonet in its place possibility.”

Advertisement
A CH-147F Chinook takes part in drills to show combat readiness ahead of the Lunar New Year holidays at a military base in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, on January 11.

Su added that whereas trendy weapons will likely be included within the new coaching curriculum, it will be impractical for each soldier to follow firing them as a result of this may merely be too expensive.

“Within the US, the coaching of Javelin [anti-tank missiles] is performed by way of simulation, as a result of every missile prices $70,000 and it’s not potential for everybody to fireside them,” he stated. “Normally, the entire unit finishes the simulation, then the commander will choose a number of troopers to follow firing it.”

Taiwan’s Protection Ministry stated in a press release to CNN that it has invited specialists to quite a few tutorial seminars on reforming the conscription system, and that it accepted lots of their options to spice up coaching depth.

Even so, not everybody’s satisfied.

“I don’t assume the lengthening of service alone will result in higher nationwide protection,” stated Lin Ying-yu, an assistant professor at Tamkang College’s Institute of Worldwide Affairs and Strategic Research.

Advertisement

He stated the “extra vital questions” concerned clarifying intimately the kind of coaching new conscripts would obtain.

And on this level, the previous conscripts who spoke to CNN stay skeptical.

“After I noticed they wished so as to add drones to the coaching, my query was – are we going to have one drone per individual and a number of possibilities to follow flying it?” Yu stated.

“In the event that they persist with their previous approach of educating, they’ll simply inform us to observe their directions and memorize its weight and flight distance, and we won’t be able to function it.”

The concern for conscripts is that the brand new type of obligatory service would possibly find yourself trying just about just like the previous kind, solely longer.

Advertisement

“Throughout my service, more often than not we had been simply requested to carry out tedious duties like transferring weapons round to indicate our commanders, and we spent plenty of time ready,” stated Dennis, the engineer.

It stays to be seen if conscripts’ time will likely be spent extra fruitfully when the brand new guidelines are available subsequent 12 months, however all sides agree the stakes are excessive.

“Energetic residents are the inspiration and the bedrock of our will to withstand,” stated Enoch Wu, founding father of the civil protection assume tank Ahead Alliance and a member of Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Get together.

“If the general public decides our dwelling will not be value combating for – or that we don’t stand an opportunity – then you may have probably the most skilled army and it’ll nonetheless be too little too late.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

Published

on

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

The Pentagon and U.S. Naval Academy are proceeding with actions in support of the Trump administration’s push to eliminate “woke” initiatives throughout the federal government.

The U.S. Naval Academy said it had ended its use of affirmative action in admissions, reversing a policy it previously defended as essential for diversity and national security, according to a federal court filing on Friday. And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s office has ordered the Naval Academy to identify books related to so-called diversity, equity and inclusion themes that are housed in the school’s Nimitz Library, and to remove them from circulation.

This week, according to a defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy decisions, Mr. Hegseth’s office became aware that the nation’s military service academies did not believe that President Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order to end “radical indoctrination” in kindergarten through 12th-grade classrooms applied to them, as they are colleges. The defense secretary’s office informed the Naval Academy that Mr. Hegseth’s intent was for the order to apply to the academies, and that the secretary expected compliance.

“The U.S. Naval Academy is fully committed to executing and implementing all directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president and is currently reviewing the Nimitz Library collection to ensure compliance,” said Cmdr. Tim Hawkins, a Navy spokesman. “The Navy is carrying out these actions with utmost professionalism, efficiency, and in alignment with national security objectives.”

The academy’s library in Annapolis, Md., houses roughly 590,000 print books, 322 databases, and more than 5,000 print journals and magazines, Commander Hawkins said.

Advertisement

The court filing on the admissions policy, submitted by the Naval Academy, the Department of Defense, Mr. Hegseth and other officials, states that the Naval Academy changed its admissions policy in February in response to federal directives prohibiting the practice of considering race, ethnicity and sex during the admissions process.

The Naval Academy superintendent issued revised internal guidance on Feb. 14, stating that would not be happening, according to the filing. The superintendent, Vice Admiral Yvette M. David, reaffirmed this change on Wednesday, when she testified before a subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“At no time are race, sex or ethnicity considered in the qualification of a candidate,” she said. The Naval Academy did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the admissions policy on Friday.

Thus far, the review of Nimitz Library’s holdings has identified 900 books that may run afoul of the defense secretary’s verbal order. According to a second defense official, they include “The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr.,” “Einstein on Race and Racism,” and a biography on Jackie Robinson.

Mr. Hegseth is scheduled to visit the Naval Academy on Tuesday and to speak to the Brigade of Midshipmen. It is unclear whether the secretary expects the books to be removed before his arrival.

Advertisement

Defense officials said they were unaware whether the United States Military Academy at West Point, the United States Air Force Academy or the United States Coast Guard Academy had received similar orders, or whether the military’s graduate schools, such as the Naval War College and the Army’s Command and General Staff College, were expected to comply.

Continue Reading

News

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Published

on

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Perhaps there is one simple reason why Donald Trump’s agenda is so hostile to Europe. Trump responds to flattery. Europe offers him almost none.

Even as European leaders sometimes try to massage the world’s most thin-skinned man, their publics make no secret of their contempt. Among voters in France, Germany and Spain, two-thirds say that Trump’s election has made the world less safe. Europe is too rowdy for sycophancy.

Trump surely notices this, just as he surely noticed the balloon of a giant orange baby flown on his state visit to London in 2019. His policies — imposing tariffs, threatening Greenland, shredding climate action, betraying Gaza and Ukraine — could hardly be better targeted as payback.

Advertisement

The temptation for Europeans is to go further: to vent not only at him, but America itself. It’s a short jump from decrying the US president as a dictatorial moron to decrying the public who elected him. In February, Canadian ice-hockey fans booed the US national anthem; “Make America Go Away” has made a great baseball cap. But otherwise, anti-Americanism has been notable by its absence.

Compare this to the years of George W Bush, the president who claimed he was misunderestimated before choking on a pretzel, when Americans were routinely mocked as fat, ignorant and arrogant. New Yorkers on holiday were made to feel personally responsible for war crimes. On the eve of the Iraq war, Europeans joked about the difference between yoghurt and Americans. The punchline: after a while, yoghurt develops some culture. 

The then French president, Jacques Chirac, liked to say that he had a simple principle in foreign affairs: “I see what the Americans are doing and I do the opposite. That way, I’m sure to be right.” How they chuckled. This was the zenith not just of anti-American Islamist terrorism, but of anti-imperialist Latin American populists such as Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales.

But anti-Americanism has changed in 2025. Jokes about nationality don’t land as comfortably now. It’s rightly unfashionable to blame citizens for their governments, especially if the Americans we are most likely to encounter are despairing Democrats. 

Anyway, Netflix and social media have bound us all together. You can’t really dismiss American culture when you choose to consume it daily. Go to Paris today, and see how readily people speak English. Go to London, and puzzle at the number of NFL fans. Judging by JD Vance’s and Pete Hegseth’s Signal messages, the Trump team is more anti-European than Europeans are anti-American.

Advertisement

Those repelled by Elon Musk’s X have moved to another West Coast-based network, Bluesky. European car buyers boycott Tesla but would buy a good American alternative. Just as the most effective takedowns of Bush came from an American filmmaker, Michael Moore, the best critiques of Trump and Musk will probably also come from the US itself. America is both thesis and antithesis. 

Diplomatically too, anti-Americanism doesn’t fit the moment. Trump has reconciled with one regime that was fanatically anti-American under Bush — that is, Putin’s Russia — and even makes sporadic gestures to chavista Venezuela. Europeans are hardly in anti-imperial mood: they want American protection, not withdrawal.

The lesson of the Bush years is that presidential idiocy is temporary. Five and a half years after invading Iraq, America elected Barack Obama as president. Anti-Americanism is akin to amputating your broken leg, instead of waiting for it to heal. 

But if it’s wrong to conflate Americans and their president, it’s wrong to disentangle them entirely. Trump reflects half of America. He reflects a society where a democratic majority is prepared to tolerate mass shootings and a warped political system. America provides so much of the world’s cultural backdrop that we sometimes mistake it for our own country. It is not, even when a Democrat is president. 

Just last spring, during Joe Biden’s presidency, the US was seen unfavourably by at least half the public in Greece, Singapore and Australia, and by more than 40 per cent in Britain and Canada. The next time pollsters ask the question, they will doubtless find record western disillusion. 

Advertisement

Europeans — and Canadians and others — are realising that we have our own values and not long to stand up for them. Boycott Philadelphia cream cheese if it makes you feel better. But most Europeans see that the times are now too serious for knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

Henry Mance is the FT’s chief features writer

Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Published

on

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Protesters showed up outside a Tesla showroom and service center in the North Hollywood area of Los Angeles on Saturday, March 15, 2025.

Richard Vogel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Richard Vogel/AP

Tesla facilities worldwide have been the target of protests objecting to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s influential role in the Trump administration. This weekend, organizers who have been leading peaceful protests in recent weeks are staging what they hope to be their biggest day yet.

As part of the “Tesla Takedown” campaign, hundreds of nonviolent demonstrations are planned to take place across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers are calling it a “global day of action” with a goal of 500 protests worldwide.

For weeks, the movement’s organizers have been encouraging people to boycott the EV maker by selling their Tesla cars and stocks. According to Tesla Takedown, thousands of grassroots groups and individuals worldwide are driving the decentralized effort.

Advertisement

Tesla Takedown organizers say the movement is fueled by anger over Musk’s slashing of the federal government, and that it aims to hit the billionaire where it hurts — the electric vehicle company that’s become his main source of wealth.

Joel Lava, who has been helping lead Tesla Takedown protests in Los Angeles, says Musk’s work to dismantle government agencies and workforce through the unofficially named DOGE initiative is the primary motivator for the movement’s members.

“He’s spearheading DOGE, which is spearheading our country’s destruction — literally destroying our country’s infrastructure,” Lava said. “Therefore, we are taking direct aim at his power, which is his wealth, which is Tesla.” 

Musk critics point to a litany of other grievances, including his attacks on diversity, a gesture he made on the Inauguration Day stage that was widely interpreted to be a Nazi salute, and his support for far-right parties.

Musk and the White House did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Since Musk’s political turn, Tesla sales have slumped, and investors have grown uneasy. But market analysts question how much the dip in Tesla sales and shares can be pinned on its CEO’s actions. Tesla has been losing market share to EV competitors for years. And the stock price has fallen in anticipation of auto tariffs. But Trump administration’s recently announced 25% import tariffs on cars made outside the U.S. could give the stock a welcome boost; auto industry analysts say that among domestic carmakers, Tesla will be the least impacted by the tariffs.

Some of the anti-Musk backlash has been violent. Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations across the U.S. and in Europe have been the target of arson and vandalism. Some have taken to spray-painting swastikas on Tesla sedans and Cybertrucks.

Tesla Takedown movement, organizers say its participants are exercising their right to peacefully protest and that they oppose violence and property destruction.

But Musk did not make that distinction when he went after Valerie Costa, a community activist who has helped organize recent peaceful protests in the Seattle area as part of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations.

Musk, in a post on X earlier this month, accused Costa of “committing crimes,” without giving evidence or specific allegations. That was after he claimed that an environmental activist group she cofounded was backed by the ActBlue, a fundraising platform for Democrats.

Advertisement

Costa told NPR that the accusations were false, and that Musk supporters subsequently targeted her in direct messages that included threats of physical violence.

“When one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful person in the world is saying you’ve committed a crime, it doesn’t matter what the truth is,” Costa said.

Tesla Takedown organizers who say they want to chip away at Musk’s power, and that starts with tarnishing Tesla’s brand.

“Trump only likes [Musk] because he’s rich,” Lava, the LA-based organizer, said. “If suddenly Musk becomes just another boring, low-end billionaire, Trump will dump him too, and that will also show the power we have as people to effect change.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending