Connect with us

News

How Rishi Sunak shocked Westminster with a snap general election

Published

on

How Rishi Sunak shocked Westminster with a snap general election

When Rishi Sunak told his cabinet, after weeks of agonising, that he would hold a surprise July 4 general election, he immediately won the effusive support of his housing minister, Michael Gove.

“Who dares wins,” Gove said on Wednesday afternoon, quoting the SAS regiment’s motto. “You dared — and you will win.”

Gove would have received odds of 25-1 at Ladbrokes if he was prepared to back his assertion about a Sunak election victory with hard cash; the prime minister has embarked on a six-week campaign with his Conservatives trailing the opposition Labour party by more than 20 percentage points in opinion polls.

Not every minister backed his decision to call a snap election: Esther McVey said he should have waited longer to let the fruits of economic recovery feed through to voters. Ominously, McVey is the “minister for common sense”.

But Sunak received an enthusiastic show of ministerial support — loud banging on the cabinet table — as he prepared to venture out into the Downing Street rain to announce the July 4 election to the nation shortly after 5pm.

Advertisement

“We’d been checking the weather forecast for days,” said one Number 10 staffer, after the prime minister was drenched giving his statement. “But Rishi was only ever going to announce the election in the street. It was very British.”

Michael Gove arrives at Downing Street for the meeting at which Rishi Sunak let his cabinet know about the election date © Getty Images

Sunak’s decision to hold a summer election sparked an angry backlash from some despairing Tory MPs bemused by his move to go to the country when the party is so far behind in the polls.

One former minister branded the decision “insane”, while another Conservative MP said they felt “resigned” to losing their seat.

Lashing out at Sunak and his ability to jet off to California if he is defeated at the election, one arch Tory critic fearful of losing their seat said bitterly and with some exaggeration: “I don’t own a ranch in California.” (Sunak owns an apartment in Santa Monica.)

Other Conservatives insisted they did support Sunak’s decision. The mood among cabinet ministers was “up for it”, said one, who described the reaction to Sunak’s move as “a mixture of surprise and excitement”.

Advertisement

His allies said he had been increasingly minded to call a summer election over the past six weeks, with the decision crystallising in his mind over the past fortnight.

Crucially Sunak consulted chancellor Jeremy Hunt and they agreed that waiting until the autumn would bring little additional economic cheer, not least because the public finances could not withstand further tax cuts.

There were fierce debates inside Sunak’s inner circle about the timing of polling day; campaign chief Isaac Levido had long favoured the autumn, while chief of staff Liam Booth-Smith was thought to back an early election.

“In the end, they all agreed that it was Rishi’s decision and they would back whatever he wanted to do,” said an ally of the prime minister. “It was finely balanced, but this showed strength and courage — that’s what the public want from their politicians.”

Some backbench Tory MPs agreed. One said the decision showed “boldness”, while another said they were prepared to take the argument to voters. Positive sentiments were also aired on Conservative WhatsApp groups.

Advertisement

Speaking at a rally held at the ExCel Centre in London on Wednesday evening, Sunak told supporters that the past few years had been tough but he had delivered on his first priority. “To drive back inflation to normal.”

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks to delegates and party members, as he launches the Conservative Party general election campaign at the ExCel Centre on May 22, 2024 in London, England
Rishi Sunak speaks to delegates and party members at the ExCel Centre in London: ‘We Conservatives have got a clear plan with bold action to secure a better future’ © Getty Images

Ministers lined up around Sunak — who was still wearing rain soaked trousers — as he said that the “penny had dropped” around Europe that the government’s Rwanda asylum scheme was the way to tackle illegal immigration.

“We Conservatives have got a clear plan with bold action to secure a better future,” he said.

What Tory MPs admitted they could agree on was that the snap election had caught them by surprise. Sunak’s decision was so tightly held that even his closest cabinet allies were kept in the dark until the eleventh hour.

It was only at the unusually timed cabinet meeting on Wednesday afternoon that Sunak revealed his plan — less than an hour before he announced it to the country.

While ministers are normally permitted to miss the weekly cabinet meeting to attend to other pressing business, on this occasion Number 10 issued the instruction that all must be present.

Advertisement

That forced Lord David Cameron, the foreign secretary, to cut short a visit to Tirana where he had travelled to discuss immigration with Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama.

Grant Shapps, the defence secretary, was meanwhile forced to delay a planned visit to the Baltics.

These moves and others — including chancellor Hunt’s decision to pull out of a television interview — fuelled speculation at Westminster on Wednesday morning that Sunak was about to call a summer election.

MPs, advisers and journalists frantically appealed to each other — both in the corridors of the Palace of Westminster and on WhatsApp — for concrete details about what Sunak planned, as the rumours reached fever pitch.

Just after midday, Sunak was challenged at prime minister’s questions in the House of Commons about the speculation by Stephen Flynn, the Scottish National party leader at Westminster. Sunak failed to rule out a snap poll, and his press secretary also declined to stamp out the possibility.

Advertisement

By early afternoon, most MPs believed a general election was likely. “It looks like it’s on,” said one Labour MP, who claimed the party was ready.

A despondent Tory MP said they believed that any Conservative colleagues with a majority below 15,000 were at risk.

The first clue that Sunak was considering cutting and running emerged last week, when Conservative bosses convened to discuss money and fundraising for a potential July poll.

Senior Tory figures were instructed to reach out discreetly to megadonors to see if large-scale donations could be elicited at short notice.

The crunch talks were first reported by the Financial Times, though Conservative officials dismissed the significance of the conversations at the time.

Advertisement

Shortly after cabinet ministers traipsed into Downing Street at about 4pm, senior Conservative figures confirmed the prime minister would announce the general election would take place on July 4.

Storm clouds hovered over Number 10 as journalists crammed into the press area waiting for Sunak to make his statement. The prime minister will hope the climate for the Conservatives improves in the next six weeks.

News

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

Published

on

Trump Says Israel and Lebanon Agree to Extend Cease-Fire by Three Weeks

President Trump announced a three-week extension of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon that had been set to expire in a few days, after hosting a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese diplomats at the White House on Thursday.

Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that has been attacking Israel from southern Lebanon, did not have representatives at the meeting and did not immediately comment on the announcement. The prime minister of Israel and the president of Lebanon also did not comment.

A successful peace agreement would hinge upon Hezbollah halting attacks, which Lebanon’s government has little power to enforce because it does not control the militia. Lebanon’s military has mostly stayed out of the fighting and is not at war with Israel.

The cease-fire, which was scheduled to end on April 26, would last until May 17 if it takes effect as Mr. Trump described it. Before the cease-fire was brokered last week, nearly 2,300 people were killed in Lebanon and 13 in Israel. Since then, the number of Israeli airstrikes and Hezbollah attacks have been dramatically reduced, though the two sides have continued exchanging fire.

The Lebanese Ambassador to the United States, Nada Hamadeh, credited Mr. Trump for extending the cease-fire, saying that “with your help and support, we can make Lebanon great again.” Mr. Trump replied, “I like that phrase, it’s a good phrase.”

Advertisement

Asked about the potential of a lasting peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, Mr. Trump said that “I think there’s a great chance. They are friends about the same things and they are enemies on the same things.”

But Lebanon and Israel have periodically been at war since Israel’s founding in 1948. Israel has invaded Lebanon for the fifth time since 1978, incursions that have destabilized the country and the delicate balance of power between Muslim, Christian and Druze communities.

In the hours before the president’s announcement on social media, Israel and Hezbollah were trading attacks in southern Lebanon, testing the existing cease-fire.

Mr. Trump said the meeting at the White House had been attended by high-ranking U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the U.S. ambassadors to Israel and Lebanon.

Earlier on Thursday, an Israeli strike near the southern Lebanese city of Nabatieh killed three people, according to Lebanon’s health ministry. Hezbollah claimed three separate attacks on Israeli troops who are occupying southern Lebanon, though none were wounded or killed.

Advertisement

Hezbollah set off the latest round of fighting last month by attacking Israel soon after the start of the U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign in Iran. Israel responded to Hezbollah’s attacks by launching airstrikes across Lebanon and widening a ground invasion of the country’s south.

Continue Reading

News

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Published

on

U.S. soldier charged with suspected Polymarket insider trading over Maduro raid

Smoke rises from Port of La Guaira in Venezuela on Jan. 3, 2026 after U.S. forces seized the country’s president, Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jesus Vargas/Getty Images

Federal prosecutors on Thursday unsealed an indictment against a U.S. Army soldier, accusing him of using his insider knowledge of the clandestine military operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January to reap more than $400,000 in profits on the popular prediction market site Polymarket.

The Justice Department says Gannon Ken Van Dyke, 38, who was stationed at Fort Bragg, in North Carolina, was part of the team that planned and carried out the predawn raid in Caracas earlier this year that resulted in the apprehension of Maduro.

The Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed the actions against Van Dyke, the first time U.S. officials have leveled criminal charges against someone over prediction market wagers.

Advertisement

According to the indictment, Van Dyke now faces counts of wire fraud, commodities fraud, misusing non-public government information and other charges.

Trading under numerous usernames including “Burdensome-Mix,” Van Dyke allegedly traded about $32,000 on the arrest of Maduro, resulting in profits exceeding $400,000.

“Prediction markets are not a haven for using misappropriated confidential or classified information for personal gain,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Those entrusted to safeguard our nation’s secrets have a duty to protect them and our armed service members, and not to use that information for personal financial gain.”

Van Dyke’s defense lawyer is not yet publicly known. Polymarket did not return a request for comment.

The charges against Van Dyke come at a sensitive time for the prediction market industry, which has been growing exponentially, despite calls in Washington and among state leaders for the sites to be reined in.

Advertisement

Van Dyke is the first to be charged in the U.S. for suspected Polymarket insider trading, but Israeli authorities in February arrested several people and charged two on suspicion of using classified information to place bets about military operations in Iran on Polymarket.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

Published

on

Senate Adopts GOP Budget, Laying the Groundwork to Fund ICE and Reopen DHS

The Senate early Thursday morning adopted a Republican budget blueprint that would pave the way for a $70 billion increase for immigration enforcement and the eventual reopening of the Department of Homeland Security.

Republicans pushed through the plan on a nearly party-line vote of 50 to 48. It came after an overnight marathon of rapid-fire votes, known as a vote-a-rama, in which the G.O.P. beat back a series of Democratic proposals aimed at addressing the high cost of health care, housing, food and energy. The debate put the two parties’ dueling messages on vivid display six months before the midterm elections.

Republicans, who are using the budget plan to lay the groundwork to eventually push through a filibuster-proof bill providing a multiyear funding stream for President Trump’s immigration crackdown, used the all-night session to highlight their hard-line stance on border security, seeking to portray Democrats as unwilling to safeguard the country.

Democrats tried and failed to add a series of changes aimed at addressing cost-of-living issues, seizing the opportunity to hammer Republicans as out of touch with and unwilling to act on the concerns of everyday Americans.

Here’s what to know about the budget plan and the nocturnal ritual senators engaged in before adopting it.

Advertisement

The budget blueprint is a crucial piece of Republicans’ plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security and end a shutdown that has lasted for more than two months. After Democrats refused to fund immigration enforcement without new restrictions on agents’ tactics and conduct, the G.O.P. struck a deal with them to pass a spending bill that would fund everything but ICE and the Border Patrol. Republicans said they would fund those agencies through a special budget bill that Democrats could not block.

“We can fix this with Republican votes, and we will,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and the Budget Committee chairman. “Every Democrat has opposed money for the Border Patrol and ICE at a time of great peril.”

In resorting to a new budget blueprint, Republicans laid the groundwork to deny Democrats a chance to stop the immigration enforcement funding. But they also submitted themselves to a vote-a-rama, in which any senator can propose unlimited changes to such a measure before it is adopted.

The budget measure now goes to the House, which must adopt it before lawmakers in both chambers can draft the legislation funding immigration enforcement. That bill will provide yet another opportunity for a vote-a-rama even closer to the November election.

Democrats took to the floor to criticize Republicans for supercharging funding for federal immigration enforcement rather than moving legislation that would address Americans’ concerns over affordability.

Advertisement

“This is what Republicans are fighting for,” said Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the Democratic leader. “To maintain two unchecked rogue agencies that are dreaded in all corners of this country instead of reducing your health care costs, your housing costs, your grocery costs, your gas costs.”

Democrats offered a host of amendments along those lines, all of which were defeated by Republicans — and that was the point. The proposals were meant to put the G.O.P. in a tough political spot, showcasing their opposition to helping Americans afford high living costs. Fewer than a handful of G.O.P. senators crossed party lines to support them.

The G.O.P. thwarted an effort by Mr. Schumer to require that the budget measure lower out-of-pocket health care costs for Americans. Two Republicans who are up for re-election this year, Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, voted with Democrats, but the proposal was still defeated.

Republicans also squelched a move by Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Democrat of New Mexico, to create a fund that would lower grocery costs and reverse cuts to food aid programs that Republicans enacted last year. Ms. Collins and Mr. Sullivan again joined Democrats.

Also defeated by the G.O.P.: a proposal by Senator John Hickenlooper, Democrat of Colorado, to address rising consumer prices brought on by Mr. Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran; one by Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, to require the budget measure to address rising electricity prices, and another by Mr. Markey to create a fund to bring down housing costs.

Advertisement

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat who is up for re-election in Georgia, also sought to add language requiring the budget plan to address health insurance companies denying or delaying access to care, but that, too was blocked by Republicans.

While Republicans had fewer proposals for changes to their own budget plan, they also sought to offer measures that would underscore their aggressive stance on immigration enforcement and dare Democrats to vote against them.

Mr. Graham offered an amendment to allocate funds toward a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to the apprehension and deportation of adult immigrants convicted of rape, murder, or sexual abuse of a minor after illegally entering the United States. It passed unanimously.

Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, sought to bar Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood, which provides abortion and other services, and criticized the organization for providing transgender care to minors. Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, also attempted to tack on the G.O.P. voter identification bill, known as the SAVE America Act. Both proposals were blocked when Democrats, joined by a few Republicans, voted to strike them as unrelated to the budget plan.

The Republicans who crossed party lines to oppose their own party’s proposals for new voting requirements were Ms. Collins along with Senators Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Advertisement

Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski also opposed the effort to block payments to Planned Parenthood.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending