Connect with us

News

How far-right minister Itamar Ben-Gvir reshaped Israel’s police

Published

on

How far-right minister Itamar Ben-Gvir reshaped Israel’s police

After a difficult week in which the killings of six Israeli hostages by Hamas sparked protests across Israel, the country’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir headed to the beach.

In a suit despite the oppressive heat, the ultranationalist arrived on the shoreline of secular, liberal Tel Aviv earlier this month to be met with jeers from bathers. One young woman allegedly threw a handful of sand in his direction, after which the trouble began.

Police officers protecting Ben-Gvir arrested the woman, shackled her hands and legs, and kept her in prison overnight. She was charged with “attacking a public servant”, an offence that can carry a three-year jail sentence.

For many in Israel, the incident was the latest example of how the country’s police force has been transformed under Ben-Gvir’s command over the 20 months since his party joined Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

Former senior police officials, legal analysts and anti-government activists say the 30,000-strong national force is being politicised in line with the agenda of an extreme ultranationalist at a time of high tensions resulting from the war with Hamas in Gaza.

Advertisement

They warn that the reshaping of the force by a man who proudly tells Palestinians that Jews are their “landlords” may have far-reaching ramifications for police conduct, the rule of law, and even Israeli democracy.

Ben-Gvir during a visit to the beach in Tel Aviv, escorted by local police © Matteo Placucci/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

David Tzur, a former senior police chief, said: “This is what’s called an elephant in a china shop . . . They took a convicted criminal and put him into the holiest of holies of the law enforcement system. This is something that is unbelievable.”

Since Ben-Gvir took on oversight of the country’s police, the force has been accused of lax policing of settler violence in the occupied West Bank, of aggressive tactics against anti-government protesters, and of failing to halt far-right attacks on aid convoys to besieged Gaza. At the same time, Ben-Gvir has sought to unilaterally change long-standing rules governing Jerusalem’s most combustible holy place, the al-Aqsa mosque compound, known to Jews as the Temple Mount.

The 48-year-old rabble rouser, repeatedly convicted in the past on charges relating to anti-Arab activism, would until recent years have been viewed as an impossible candidate to take on responsibility for law enforcement.

As a teenage disciple of the late Jewish extremist rabbi Meir Kahane, Ben-Gvir first came into public view in 1995 when he broke an ornament off then-prime minister Yitzhak Rabin’s car.

Advertisement

“Just like we got to this symbol, we can get to Rabin,” Ben-Gvir said in a TV interview as he held up the Cadillac mascot. Weeks later, Rabin was shot dead by a far-right Jewish extremist opposed to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

Ben-Gvir, who lives in the Kiryat Arba settlement in the southern West Bank, previously kept a framed picture in his living room of Baruch Goldstein, who in 1994 murdered more than two dozen Palestinian worshippers at the nearby Ibrahimi mosque.

In later years Ben-Gvir turned to the law, specialising in defending Jewish settlers suspected of attacking Palestinians. Israeli media turned to him for interviews, and his public profile grew, resulting in a successful run for parliament in 2021 as the head of the Jewish Power party.

Netanyahu, himself a rightwinger, promised publicly at the time that Ben-Gvir would not become a minister in his government. Yet, a year later, the long-serving premier needed Ben-Gvir and his party to garner enough support to form his current governing coalition.

The masked protesters hold placards. An Israeli flag is being waved in the background
Ultranationalists protesting at the arrest of reservists alleged to have tortured Palestinian detainees. Two military bases were broken into in July © Matan Golan/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

The price of Ben-Gvir’s backing was the grandly renamed “national security” ministry — formerly just “internal security” — with expanded powers over the police.

Ben-Gvir, who campaigned on a “law and order” platform, has said his goal is to “increase governance and sovereignty” while strengthening police with bigger budgets.

Advertisement

Yet, according to police data made public by the Movement for Freedom of Information, overall crime has soared on his watch. In particular, violent crime within Arab-Israeli towns and villages has reached record highs, rising from 116 murders in 2022 to 244 in 2023, according to data seen by the FT. Almost 170 Arab-Israelis have been murdered so far in 2024.

The Israel police said that “addressing violence in the Israeli-Arab community remains a top priority” to which “substantial resources” have been allocated.

Yet, overall public trust in the police has cratered, polls show. Morale within the force has plummeted, and many mid-ranking and senior officers have resigned or are threatening to do so, according to interviews, media reports and internal communications seen by the Financial Times. Six deputy commissioners have left in the past two months alone.

“Ben-Gvir represents all that is undemocratic — bullying, violence, racism . . . So long as his plans and failures are allowed to continue and deepen, there will no longer be a ‘democratic’ police,” said one former senior police commander. “Police will begin targeting anti-government elements and minorities. You start with the Arabs, but it won’t end there.”

Anti-government activists have taken to calling the force “Ben-Gvir’s militia”.

Advertisement

The minister himself has demanded to act as a “supra-police commissioner” above the top commander, seeking involvement not only in broad policy but also in the specifics of operations and the use of force, said multiple former senior police officers.

The former officers said this contravened not only democratic norms but also Israeli law, which stipulates that the police commissioner must remain independent from political meddling. The Supreme Court has sought to uphold this independence after civil society groups appealed against Ben-Gvir’s extended powers.

Instead, according to the former police officers, Ben-Gvir has wielded influence through the back door.

“The crux of [a minister’s] power lies in building the force — in other words, appointments. That’s where his main power lies,” said Tzur.

Ben-Gvir has deployed that power widely, personally interviewing even mid-ranking commanders for promotion and directly calling district chiefs, said multiple people with knowledge of police operations.

Advertisement

“There is chaos inside the police, and he instils fear in the officers according to his own agenda,” said the former police commander. “He moulds the personalities who command the police, and for all the others it shows them where their loyalties should lie.”

Ben Gvir’s office and Israel’s national security ministry did not reply to repeated requests for comment.

Last month, Ben-Gvir appointed Danny Levy as police commissioner, a shock choice given that Levy had been a district commander for less than a year. He had, over the previous year, overseen the violent dispersal of weekly anti-government protests in Netanyahu’s home town of Caesarea.

“You’re the right person in the right place,” Ben-Gvir told Levy at his appointment ceremony. “Danny comes with a Zionist and Jewish agenda and he will lead the police according to the policy I set for him,” he added.

Tzur argued, however, that attempts to tar Levy as solely beholden to Ben-Gvir were unfair, calling it a “worthy appointment”. “Just because the person who appointed him is a criminal doesn’t invalidate every appointment. [But] the burden of proof is now on [Danny Levy],” Tzur said.

Advertisement

The outgoing police commissioner, Kobi Shabtai, issued a stark warning in July as his term ended. “The fight against the politicisation of the police and its deviation from the professional path is in full swing,” he said.

In Levy’s first week as commissioner in early September, some 125 demonstrators were detained nationally — amid mass protests calling for a deal to release hostages held in Gaza — compared with an average 85 per month in the 20 months before that, according to the Detainee Legal Support Front, a non-profit organisation.

One demonstrator in Tel Aviv, Nadav Gat, was detained this month while simply standing on the pavement, he told the FT. He was held overnight without an arrest report. “There was not even the appearance of professionalism,” he said.

At the same time, far-right activists, who are closely identified politically with Ben-Gvir and the West Bank settlement movement, for the first half of this year blocked aid convoys trying to reach war-torn Gaza, with minimal police intervention. No one was arrested.

An Israeli security source said there were suspicions within the military that police personnel had tipped off the groups on the movement of the convoys. Even the US administration demanded publicly that Israeli authorities do more to stop the attacks.

Advertisement

There are other instances of an apparent soft approach to the far right. In July, ultranationalist gangs broke into two Israeli military bases, in protest at the arrest of several reservists alleged to have tortured Palestinian detainees. As police mounted a lacklustre response, the Israeli military was forced to deploy infantry to protect one of the bases. None of the ultranationalists were arrested.

Several former officers said the worst police indifference was in Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank. Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians have risen sharply, according to data from the UN and Israeli human rights non-profit organisations.

The head of the Shin Bet internal security agency, Ronen Bar, warned in a letter sent to the cabinet — but not to Ben-Gvir — last month that the increase was a result of “the weak hand of the police, and possibly even a sense of support to a certain extent”, according to Israeli media reports.

In response to specific questions from the FT, the Israeli police said it “operates as an apolitical institution dedicated to handling offences with impartiality and professionalism. Allegations suggesting that the police are influenced by political agendas distort the truth and undermine the rule of law.”

Yet, Yoav Segalovich, a former top police officer and former deputy internal security minister from the opposition Yesh Atid party, said the Israeli public was increasingly convinced that the police had become politicised under Ben-Gvir, a perception that, he said, fatally harmed trust.

Advertisement

“This is the biggest damage that can be caused in a democratic system,” Segalovich said. “You need to uphold the law . . . and [in the West Bank] the police simply isn’t present in the places where it needs to be.”

In Jerusalem, the al-Aqsa compound has been the scene of what multiple former and current Israeli officials, including from the police, said were perhaps Ben-Gvir’s most dangerous interventions. The hilltop site has sparked repeated Israeli-Palestinian violence, while for decades a “status quo” has been upheld in which Jews can visit but not pray. Police are central to maintaining order at the flashpoint site.

Yet, Ben-Gvir last month said at the site that he had unilaterally changed the “status quo” — a claim Netanyahu quickly rejected. Video emerged of a beaming Ben-Gvir walking among hundreds of Jewish worshippers prostrating themselves as police looked on passively.

“You have to understand the absurd [situation]: the responsibility to hold the weekly assessment about the Temple Mount . . . and to decide on the security arrangements are on the [national security] minister,” said Tzur.

“He decides on policy with regard to the Temple Mount and he is changing it. We see it . . . the fringe of the fringe have turned into the mainstream.”

Advertisement

Bar, the Shin Bet chief, wrote in his letter that such provocations by Ben-Gvir would “lead to much bloodshed and will change the face of the State of Israel beyond recognition”.

This month, Netanyahu again had to insist there was no change to the rules governing al-Aqsa, and demanded that ministers seek his approval before visiting. Segalovich said the damage was already done.

“Netanyahu allowed all of this,” he said. “If you put an agent of chaos as the minister in charge of the police then don’t be surprised by the results. This is Ben-Gvir’s goal: chaos and mayhem.”

News

Brass bands in Beijing make way for sticker shock at home as Trump returns to escalating inflation

Published

on

Brass bands in Beijing make way for sticker shock at home as Trump returns to escalating inflation

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump returned from the spectacle of a Chinese state visit to a less than welcoming U.S. economy — with the military band and garden tour in Beijing giving way to pressure over how to fix America’s escalating inflation rate.

Consumer inflation in the United States increased to 3.8% annually in April, higher than what he inherited as the Iran war and the Republican president’s own tariffs have pushed up prices. Inflation is now outpacing wage gains and effectively making workers poorer. The Cleveland Federal Reserve estimates that annual inflation could reach 4.2% in May as the war has kept oil and gasoline prices high.

Trump’s time with Chinese leader Xi Jinping appears unlikely to help the U.S. economy much, despite Trump’s claims of coming trade deals. The trip occurred as many people are voting in primaries leading into the November general election while having to absorb the rising costs of gasoline, groceries, utility bills, jewelry, women’s clothing, airplane tickets and delivery services. Democrats see the moment as a political opportunity.

“He’s returning to a dumpster fire,” said Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal think tank focused on economic issues. “The president will not have the faith and confidence of the American people — the economy is their top issue and the president is saying, ‘You’re on your own.’”

The president’s trip to Beijing and his recent comments that indicated a tone-deafness to voters’ concerns about rising prices have suggested his focus is not on the American public and have undermined Republicans who had intended to campaign on last year’s tax cuts as helping families.

Advertisement

Trump described the trip as a victory, saying on social media that Xi “congratulated me on so many tremendous successes,” as the U.S. president has praised their relationship.

Trump told reporters that Boeing would be selling 200 aircraft — and maybe even 750 “if they do a good job” — to the Chinese. He said American farmers would be “very happy” because China would be “buying billions of dollars of soybeans.”

“We had an amazing time,” Trump said as he flew home on Air Force One, and told Fox News’ Bret Baier in an interview that gasoline prices were just some “short-term pain” and would “drop like a rock” once the war ends.

Inflationary pain is not a factor in how Trump handles Iran

Trump departed from the White House for China by saying the negotiations over the Iran war depended on stopping Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. I don’t think about anybody. I think about one thing: We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said.

That remark prompted blowback because it suggested to some that Trump cared more about challenging Iran than fighting inflation at home. Trump defended his words, telling Fox News: “That’s a perfect statement. I’d make it again.”

Advertisement

The White House has since stressed that Trump is focused on inflation.

Asked later about the president’s words, Vice President JD Vance said there had been a “misrepresentation” of the remarks. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the “administration remains laser-focused on delivering growth and affordability on the homefront” while indicating actions would be taken on grocery prices.

But as Trump appeared alongside Xi, new reports back home showed inflation rising for businesses and interest rates climbing on U.S. government debt.

His comments that Boeing would sell 200 jets to China caused the company’s stock price to fall because investors had expected a larger number. There was little concrete information offered about any trade agreements reached during the summit, including Chinese purchases of U.S. exports such as liquefied natural gas and beef.

“Foreign policy wins can matter politically, but only if voters feel stability and affordability in their daily lives,” said Brittany Martinez, a former Republican congressional aide who is the executive director of Principles First, a center-right advocacy group focused on democracy issues.

Advertisement

“Midterms are almost always a referendum on cost of living and public frustration, and Republicans are not immune from the same inflation and affordability pressures that hurt Democrats in recent cycles,” she added.

Democrats see Trump as vulnerable

Democratic lawmakers are seizing on Trump’s comments before his trip as proof of his indifference to lowering costs. There is potential staying power of his remarks as Americans head into Memorial Day weekend facing rising prices for the hamburgers and hot dogs to be grilled.

“What Americans do not see is any sympathy, any support, or any plan from Trump and congressional Republicans to lower costs – in fact, they see the opposite,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday.

Vance faulted the Biden administration for the inflation problem even though the inflation rate is now higher than it was when Trump returned to the White House in January 2025 with a specific mandate to fix it.

“The inflation number last month was not great,” Vance said Wednesday, but he then stressed, “We’re not seeing anything like what we saw under the Biden administration.”

Advertisement

Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 under Biden, a Democrat. By the time Trump took the oath of office, it was a far more modest 3%.

Trump’s inflation challenge could get harder

The data tells a different story as higher inflation is spreading into the cost of servicing the national debt.

Over the past week, the interest rate charged on 10-year U.S. government debt jumped from 4.36% to 4.6%, an increase that implies higher costs for auto loans and mortgages.

“My fear is that the layers of supply shocks that are affecting the U.S. economy will only further feed into inflationary pressures,” said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon.

Daco noted that last year’s tariff increases were now translating into higher clothing prices. With the Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s ability to impose tariffs by declaring an economic emergency, his administration is preparing a new set of import taxes for this summer.

Advertisement

Daco stressed that there have been a series of supply shocks. First, tariffs cut into the supply of imports. In addition, Trump’s immigration crackdown cut into the supply of foreign-born workers. Now, the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has cut off the vital waterway used to ship 20% of global oil supplies.

“We’re seeing an erosion of growth,” Daco said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending