Connect with us

News

How a Weekend of Media and Memes Shaped Six Voters’ Thoughts About the Debate

Published

on

How a Weekend of Media and Memes Shaped Six Voters’ Thoughts About the Debate

The first presidential debate served as a flashpoint for an election season that was hurtling toward a showdown between President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump. Many were excited for the bout, others dreaded it and some were not sure it would even happen.

We wanted to understand voters’ reflections on the debate through the lens of their weekend news consumption. To do this, we asked six voters around the country to log all the debate-related media they saw or heard in the days after the event.

Aaron Hernandez

26

Democrat

Advertisement

California

Lauren Waits

56

Democrat

Georgia

Advertisement

Arina Trotter

20

Independent

Indiana

Jonathon Ballard

Advertisement

35

Independent

Wisconsin

Jim Hauersberger

71

Advertisement

Independent

Iowa

David Carlson

21

Republican

Advertisement

Georgia

During the weekend, they noted news articles, social media posts on X, Instagram and Reddit, podcasts on YouTube, newsletters, clips from broadcast TV, and even texts with friends. They didn’t report seeing vastly different sentiments across these platforms and outlets — instead, there was somewhat remarkable unity over just how bad it all felt.

Here are the themes that emerged after a weekend of scrolling.

Biden’s Poor Performance

All six voters said they felt confronted with the reality of the president’s age in the content they saw.

Advertisement

Lauren Waits, a member of the state committee for the Democratic Party of Georgia, realized through her weekend reading how broadly her concerns about Mr. Biden’s performance were shared among fellow Democrats.

Most of her media consumption centers around reading articles from local and national news outlets on her phone. She also reads three or four politics-focused newsletters almost every day.

What stood out most to David Carlson, the treasurer of the Georgia Young Republicans, was the mainstream media’s reaction to Mr. Biden’s performance.

“Their shock comes as a surprise,” he said. “It’s not like they weren’t aware of the alleged health problems for President Biden.” What he saw after the debate only deepened his belief that the mainstream media is a “deeply unserious enterprise.”

Most of Mr. Carlson’s news comes from X, not from official news outlets, but from individuals whose analysis and commentary he trusts. He regularly watches podcast shows from Breaking Point and The People’s Pundit on Youtube.

Advertisement

Distaste for Both Choices, and Despair

Social media posts that expressed distaste for both candidates resonated especially with the younger voters in our group who plan to vote Biden.

Aaron Hernandez, a California voter, said that even though Trump performed better, he would not change his mind.

“I feel like I have a good grasp of his true character and dark agenda if he got a second term,” he said. “Both parties made poor choices with their nominees.”

“I would describe the Democratic establishment as frantic, in frenzy, in panic,” he added, after a weekend of seeing dozens of memes about the debate. “This is really bad because it seems like they don’t know what they’re doing. And they’re scrambling to come up with Plan B since they didn’t have one in place. I think they’ll be trying to convince Biden to step out but if he doesn’t, then what?”

Advertisement

Arina Trotter, a 20-year-old student from Bloomington, Ind., who is registered as an independent, tuned into the debate feeling fairly sure she would vote for Mr. Biden, but with little enthusiasm. She was surprised that she ended up feeling even more disappointed with the choices than she had been previously.

“I haven’t seen anything positive really,” she said. Instead, there were many posts about “a lack of faith in our democracy” and the “two-party system altogether, specifically because of the age of the two candidates and the repeat lineup, and a lot of disappointment with Biden’s performance.”

Jim Hauersperger, 71, of Unionville, Iowa, voted for Mr. Trump in 2016, but quickly soured on him, and was appalled by the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Now, he said, “I don’t want to join the Democratic Party, but I left the Republican Party.”

A retired auto-manufacturing plant employee, Mr. Hauersperger gets nearly all of his news from network television. He doesn’t have cable T.V. or a smartphone. He has had only an internet connection at his house since December, and he does not read news online. “I don’t use it for anything other than if I need to go on and figure out how to fix my mower — stuff like that,” he said.

Over the three days immediately following the debate, he watched several network news segments. The coverage had left him more or less where he started. “I’m wishy-washy either way,” he said. “I’m not going to vote for Trump. But I don’t think I can vote for Biden either” — unless the race was close, in which case he thought he would vote for Biden. “What can you do?”

Advertisement

Few Issues, Many Memes

With focus on Biden’s poor performance, few issues or policies that came up during the debate surfaced in our voters’ media diets. The younger voters in our group saw many memes and jokes that entertained them.

Jonathon Ballard, 35, an assisted living facility staff coordinator from Green Bay, Wis., voted for Mr. Biden in 2020, but has since turned against him, mostly on account of inflation and, later, immigration. Mr. Ballard said he plans to vote for Mr. Trump this year. He went to a Trump rally for the first time this spring. Still, he said, “I’m not that much into politics.”

Mr. Ballard saw only the last half-hour of the debate, and missed the next-day coverage on the evening news because he got home late from his job on Friday. What he saw about the debate over the weekend consisted of a handful of pro-Trump memes and videos he came across while scrolling through his mostly apolitical Facebook and Instagram feeds, or in texts from friends.

The videos — from a conservative religious account, a right-wing meme maker with a large online following, and a Republican congressman from Alabama — all focused on Mr. Biden’s visible struggles in the debate, with only one touching briefly on a policy issue, immigration.

Advertisement

“I already had my mind set on Trump” before the debate, Mr. Ballard said. “But coming out of it, I was like, ‘Biden’s done.’”

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

Published

on

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

The U.S. and Israel have been conducting strikes against targets in Iran since Saturday morning, with the aim of toppling Tehran’s clerical regime. Iran has fired back, with retaliatory assaults featuring missiles and drones targeting several Gulf countries and American bases in the Middle East.

“All six aircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered, and are in stable condition. Kuwait has acknowledged this incident, and we are grateful for the efforts of the Kuwaiti defense forces and their support in this ongoing operation,” Central Command said.

“The cause of the incident is under investigation. Additional information will be released as it becomes available,” it added.

In a separate statement later Monday, Central Command said that American forces had been killed during combat since the strikes began.

“As of 7:30 am ET, March 2, four U.S. service members have been killed in action. The fourth service member, who was seriously wounded during Iran’s initial attacks, eventually succumbed to their injuries,” it said.

Advertisement

Major combat operations continue and our response effort is ongoing. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification,” Central Command added.

This story has been updated.

Continue Reading

Trending