Connect with us

News

How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump

Published

on

How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump

Since President Trump’s first term, Brad S. Karp, the chairman of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, championed himself as a bulwark against what he saw as an unlawful and unpredictable presidency.

Mr. Karp, who has a long history of fund-raising for Democrats, sought to unite major law firms in “a call to arms” to fight Mr. Trump in court on issues like his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents. He publicly said lawyers were obligated to defend the rule of law.

He hosted a “Lawyers for Biden” fund-raiser in 2023, and one of his top partners prepared Vice President Kamala Harris for her debates with Mr. Trump.

So it was not surprising that Mr. Trump targeted Paul Weiss with an executive order last week that created a potential existential threat for the firm, although the order was legally dubious and undercut fundamental principles of the justice system. In response, Mr. Karp began discussions with another big firm about presenting a unified and bipartisan front and challenging the order in court.

But on Wednesday, Mr. Karp walked into the Oval Office around 8:30 a.m., leaving behind the adversarial approach.

Advertisement

Now, he wanted to make a deal.

A day later, Mr. Trump announced that Mr. Karp had agreed to pledge $40 million in pro bono legal services to issues the president has championed, including a task force being run by the Justice Department aimed at combating antisemitism “and other mutually agreed projects.”

The White House said the firm had committed to stop using diversity, equity and inclusion policies. And Mr. Trump said Mr. Karp had acknowledged to him that a former partner of the firm who had worked as a prosecutor in Manhattan and had pushed for Mr. Trump to be charged criminally had committed “wrongdoing.” These assertions appear inconsistent with a copy of the statement that Mr. Karp shared with his firm.

In deciding to bend to Mr. Trump, Mr. Karp likely saved his law firm, which had $2.63 billion in revenue last year and represents corporate clients like Exxon Mobil and Apollo Global Management, from hemorrhaging clients and lawyers.

But in doing so, Mr. Karp, who had positioned himself as a spokesman and advocate for the legal profession, left other firms even more vulnerable to Mr. Trump’s retribution campaign by demonstrating that his intimidation tactics could lead even a powerhouse like Paul Weiss to make public concessions, according to interviews with lawyers at other firms and legal experts.

Advertisement

In fact, a White House official said on Friday that despite the deal reached with Paul Weiss, Mr. Trump would continue to target law firms with executive orders, including some the president could sign as early as next week.

In the Oval Office on Friday, Mr. Trump asserted that law firms “did bad things” and had attacked him “ruthlessly, violently, illegally.” But now, he said, they “want to make deals.”

Mr. Karp’s decision left many in the legal world, including some in his own firm, reeling, concerned that other firms would now face a choice between bowing to Mr. Trump or abandoning their principles or political beliefs to avoid financial calamity.

Before reaching the deal, Mr. Karp, who has led Paul Weiss for nearly two decades, talked to some of the firm’s 200 partners to weigh their options, according to three people with knowledge of the matter. The group decided to seek a meeting with Mr. Trump to try and reach a deal, rather than engage in what could be a drawn-out legal battle, the people said. Those people and others who spoke for this story did so on the condition of anonymity to talk about discussions that were supposed to remain private.

Some of the firm’s corporate partners were particularly adamant that the firm should not sue the administration, the people said. That put them at odds with other partners who work on high-profile litigation and had been arguing that the firm should fight, some of whom expressed displeasure internally on Friday that Mr. Karp had settled, according to four people familiar with the matter.

Advertisement

The deal, while supported by the vast majority of the firm’s partners, also drew swift condemnation from lawyers outside the firm and critics of Mr. Trump.

And while many of the firm’s clients were relieved by the deal, some senior lawyers at large financial institutions began to privately express dismay, two people with knowledge of the matter said. Some of these lawyers suggested they would consider pulling business from the firm.

Mr. Trump has put law firms at the center of his efforts to seek revenge against enemies real and perceived, especially those linked to any efforts to investigate him or hold him legally accountable.

Before targeting Paul Weiss, Mr. Trump had issued executive orders imposing penalties on two other firms, Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie. Last week a federal judge barred the order against Perkins Coie from going into effect on the grounds that it would likely be found to be illegal.

Many within the legal community had hoped that Mr. Karp, with his firm’s resources, would fight Mr. Trump in court as aggressively as did Perkins Coie, which was targeted by a nearly identical executive order earlier this month.

Advertisement

Paul Weiss employs many prominent Democrats and has expressed pride in its long history at the forefront of the fight for civil rights. It has trumpeted how it was the first major New York City firm to have Jewish and non-Jewish lawyers working alongside each other, to hire a Black associate and to have a female partner.

According to two people briefed on the matter, it initially appeared that Mr. Karp was headed down the path of suing Mr. Trump’s administration.

Last week, a federal judge in Washington temporarily barred enforcement of the executive order Mr. Trump had directed at Perkins Coie, saying, “It sends little chills down my spine” to hear arguments that a president can punish individuals and companies like this.

The judge’s decision relieved many in the legal community by suggesting that the courts would serve as a check against Mr. Trump and that the big firms would not have to confront him directly.

But two days after that decision, Mr. Trump signed a nearly identical executive order against Paul Weiss. That action deeply unnerved the big firms by showing that Mr. Trump would not be deterred by the courts. And it demonstrated that he was willing to try to target firms that had years-old ties to lawyers on his enemies list, like Mark F. Pomerantz, a former Paul Weiss partner. Mr. Pomerantz had tried to build a criminal case against Mr. Trump several years ago while working at the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

Advertisement

The executive order against Paul Weiss barred the firm from dealing with the government and suggested that clients of the firm could lose their government contracts. Those provisions were intended to drive business away from Paul Weiss, which employs more than 1,000 lawyers and has offices around the world.

Last Saturday and Sunday, Mr. Karp began discussions with William Burck, the co-managing partner of the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, about Mr. Burck joining Paul Weiss in bringing a court challenge against Mr. Trump’s order, people familiar with the talks said.

The discussions with Mr. Burck were notable given that Mr. Burck is one of the few lawyers at a major firm that represents the Trump Organization. He has also helped some of Mr. Trump’s nominees through their confirmation process. And bringing Paul Weiss together with Quinn Emanuel would signal to the industry that firms across the partisan divide were coming together to address what they saw as an all-out assault on their business.

Earlier this month, Mr. Burck declined to represent Perkins Coie, believing that it was not worth taking on Mr. Trump to help that firm. But with Mr. Trump undeterred by the judge’s ruling in the Perkins Coie case and moving against another firm, Mr. Burck agreed to help Paul Weiss and put his firm’s name on the suit against Mr. Trump.

At the same time, Mr. Karp weighed another possibility. With the help of Mr. Burck and other Trump-friendly contacts Mr. Karp had in the business world, Mr. Karp sought to determine whether it would be possible to cut a deal with Mr. Trump to resolve his firm’s problems.

Advertisement

Mr. Karp, whose firm has represented the N.F.L., had the New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, an ally of Mr. Trump’s, reach out to the president.

Mr. Burck began working the phones to the White House, reaching out to officials to signal that Mr. Karp was open to making a deal. During those conversations, Mr. Burck concluded that one of the White House’s biggest issues with Paul Weiss and other big firms was that they had refused to represent clients like Mr. Trump on the right — especially after the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the Capitol — whom they viewed as politically unsavory.

Mr. Burck relayed to the White House that Paul Weiss was willing to make some sort of public statement that they would represent clients no matter their political views.

Two days later, Mr. Trump called Mr. Karp and invited him to come to the White House. The following day, Mr. Karp went to visit Mr. Trump, where they met in the Oval Office for three hours. Mr. Trump’s adviser on negotiations, Steve Witkoff, joined the meeting, which was cordial, and both sides believed they had a potential framework for a deal.

At the same time, there was pressure on Mr. Karp. The lawyers at his firm who were preparing to sue Mr. Trump wanted to go to court as soon as possible, concerned that a judge might not give them a temporary restraining order because they waited too long.

Advertisement

In the day that followed, proposed language went back and forth between the White House, Mr. Burck and Mr. Karp.

Pursuing a deal represented a stark shift for Mr. Karp, who until recently was helping to marshal support for Perkins Coie. Mr. Karp was among the prominent lawyers working behind the scenes to persuade other law firms to sign a friend of the court brief on behalf of Perkins Coie, according to four people with knowledge of the matter. It is now unclear whether the brief — which was drafted by Donald B. Verrilli Jr., a solicitor general during the Obama administration and a partner at Munger Tolles & Olson — will be filed.

The ordeal with Mr. Trump came at a personally trying time for Mr. Karp, who had suffered a heart attack just a few months earlier and was still easing his way back into his normally frenetic work schedule of nonstop meetings and client calls.

On Thursday evening, Mr. Karp sent a firm-wide email justifying the decision, writing that he had really just “reaffirmed” the firm’s statement of principles outlined in 1963 by one of Paul Weiss’s original named partners, Judge Simon H. Rifkind.

“Thank you all for your patience during this time,” Mr. Karp told the staff at the firm. “With this behind us, we can devote our complete focus — as we always do — to our clients, our work, our colleagues and our firm.”

Advertisement

But it was a bitter pill for some to swallow as lawyers knew the outside world would view the deal as capitulating to Mr. Trump, especially at a time when other institutions, like universities and media companies, have begun to settle with Mr. Trump rather than fight, infuriating and demoralizing Mr. Trump’s critics.

George Conway, a conservative lawyer and frequent critic of Mr. Trump, posted on social media, “This Paul Weiss capitulation is the most disgraceful action by a major law firm in my lifetime, so appalling that I couldn’t believe it at first.”

By the time Mr. Trump made his announcement on Thursday, there were already signs that Paul Weiss had been burned in making a deal with Mr. Trump.

The copy of the agreement that Mr. Karp shared with Paul Weiss differed in some ways from Mr. Trump’s characterization of the deal in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Although Mr. Trump said the law firm had specifically agreed to not follow any diversity, equity and inclusion policies in its hiring practices, there is no reference to D.E.I. in the agreement that Mr. Karp shared. Mr. Trump has mounted an aggressive campaign against diversity initiatives in the federal government, labeling it as a form of workplace discrimination.

Advertisement

There also was no mention of Mr. Pomerantz, the former Paul Weiss partner, in the copy of the agreement circulated by Mr. Karp. Five people briefed on the matter said Mr. Karp said he did not criticize Mr. Pomerantz with the president, in spite of Mr. Trump’s assertion to the contrary.

In a statement issued on Thursday evening, Mr. Pomerantz denied he had done anything wrong.

Jonah E. Bromwich and William K. Rashbaum and Tyler Pager contributed reporting, and Sheelagh McNeill contributed research.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Daily Briefing: Trump’s Chicago threat

Published

on

Daily Briefing: Trump’s Chicago threat

Welcome to the week!🙋🏼‍♀️ I’m Nicole Fallert. Too early to think about “falling back”?

Quick look at Monday’s news:

Trump threatens troops in Chicago

It’s not clear where troops might head next: President Donald Trump recently suggested he could send them to Chicago and New Orleans. Governors traditionally decide when to deploy troops short of an insurrection, and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has opposed the move in Chicago while Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry welcomed the possibility.

Why it matters: Trump’s threat to send National Guard troops to Chicago comes amid D.C. protests and a continuing lawsuit against the deployment in Los Angeles.

  • Trump’s plans for deploying the National Guard to Chicago have been mixed. He said Sept. 2 he would send troops after a violent Labor Day weekend, before cautioning that he only wanted deployments where governors welcomed them — then paraphrased a movie.
  • Meanwhile, protests — and National Guard deployments — continue. Several thousand protesters marched in Washington over the weekend to demand an end to the guard deployment, which features 2,000 troops from six Republican-led states. Crowds also gathered in Chicago.

Amy Coney Barrett says ‘I’m nobody’s justice’

When Amy Coney Barrett was nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court five years ago, her supporters assumed and her critics feared she would be a reliable vote for President Trump. But in an interview with USA TODAY about her new book, “Listening to the Law,” Barrett declared: “I’m nobody’s justice.” Barrett discussed how she views her role, how being a working mother helped her better understand some cases, and why she turned up the heat on one of her liberal colleagues. Read takeaways from USA TODAY’s conversation with Barrett.

More news to know now

What’s the weather today? Check your local forecast here.

Advertisement

Hear boos at the US Open?

ABC and ESPN did not mute the full-throated chorus of boos that occurred when President Trump was shown Sunday at the U.S. Open. This came despite the U.S. Tennis Association’s request that broadcasters “refrain from showcasing any disruptions to the President’s attendance in any capacity.” USA TODAY’s Sports Columnist Nancy Armor writes that rather than Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, the focus of the match became on the USTA’s clumsy attempt at censorship.  

  • Back to the tennis: The sport’s top rivalry met for the third Grand Slam in a row, an Open Era first, and it was Alcaraz who took home the title at the US Open final with a 6-2, 3-6, 6-1, 6-4.

So why are so many moms leaving their jobs?

‘I feel like, a lot of women, we’re educated, and we have the ability to work, and we want to contribute to the workforce. It’s just, you know, circumstances. It doesn’t make it sustainable. It doesn’t allow us to navigate working and being a mom.’

~ Miya Walker, 25, is among a growing share of mothers with young children in America are exiting the workforce, chipping away at gains made during the COVID-19 pandemic. They told USA TODAY why they’re leaving work.

Today’s talkers

A bright day for Ariana Grande

After about seven years of not attending the MTV VMAs, Ariana Grande took home multiple major awards at this year’s awards show. The “Eternal Sunshine” singer won the coveted Moon Person statue Sunday for video of the year for her song, “Brighter Days Ahead,” off her latest album. Grande beat tough competition, including Kendrick Lamar, Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars, Sabrina Carpenter and The Weeknd.

  • We danced to Sabrina Carpenter’s “Tears”: Read USA TODAY’s recap of every VMA performance (including Carpenter’s ode to trans rights).
  • Polka dots, sheer looks and Labubus shined on the red carpet.
  • A somber moment for Ozzy Osbourne: The rock icon was honored by Steven Tyler and son Jack in an emotional tribute.
  • Mariah Carey said “fun is eternal” as she accepted the MTV Video Vanguard Award.

Photo of the day: A Week 1 wonder

The Buffalo Bills trailed by 15 points with less than five minutes to play — and still won against the Baltimore Ravens Sunday night. Here are 32 things we learned in NFL Week 1.

Advertisement

Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@usatoday.com.

Continue Reading

News

Has Trump kept his campaign promises to American workers? Here's what some say.

Published

on

Has Trump kept his campaign promises to American workers? Here's what some say.

Good morning. You’re reading a special Labor Day edition of the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get the newsletter delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day.

Checking in with the labor movement

by Andrea Hsu, NPR labor and workplace correspondent

At this time last year, President Trump was courting America’s workers, promising them a renaissance if they helped send him back to the White House. Now seven months into his second term, he says he’s on track to keep that promise.

“Every policy of the Trump administration is designed to lift up the American worker, promote great-paying blue-collar jobs and to rebuild the industrial bedrock of our nation,” Trump said at a meeting of his Cabinet last week.

Many labor leaders could not disagree more.

Advertisement

Protesters gather on the National Mall for the nationwide “Hands Off!” protest against President Donald Trump and his advisor, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in Washington, D.C., on April 5, 2025.

Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images

“By every measure, this has been the most hostile administration to workers in our lifetimes,” AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler told me in an interview ahead of Labor Day. “Working people are really not feeling secure in this economy.”

If you simply look at the numbers, workers appear to be in pretty decent shape. As of July, average wages were up 3.9% over the last year, outpacing inflation. Unemployment remains low, at just over 4%. Most people in America who want a job are working.

But behind these numbers, there’s a lot of uncertainty and tension.

Advertisement

On the campaign trail, Trump often warned American workers that immigrants were taking their jobs. The Trump administration is now not only cracking down on people who are in the U.S. illegally, it has also ended programs that provided hundreds of thousands of people relief from unsafe conditions in their home countries. People who were previously allowed to stay and work in the U.S., sometimes for decades, have suddenly had their legal status revoked.

These new immigration policies are affecting workers and employers, forcing people out of jobs on farms in rural America, in factories in the Midwest, and in the homes of elderly people who need help – places that have long welcomed immigrants. In agriculture and long-term health care, Americans are not exactly lining up for jobs. Workers who are left behind after immigrant colleagues leave say they’re now working longer hours or having to train inexperienced newcomers.

Unions representing blue-collar workers, including those Trump considers his base, have additional concerns. They fear that big infrastructure projects launched when Joe Biden was president will be deprived of federal funds or even stopped all together.

“It’s chaos, it’s uncertainty, it’s unpredictability,” Brent Booker, general president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, told me.

Booker is especially riled up right now about the Trump administration’s stop-work order on Revolution Wind, a wind farm under construction off the coast of Rhode Island. The administration paused the project last month, citing national security concerns. Booker points out that the project was permitted long ago, and it is 80% done. But now, several hundred workers who were out over the water, working to get it up and running, have been idled.

Advertisement

Booker worries about what this signals to the entire renewable energy industry – and moreover, what it means for American workers who were counting on those jobs. “It runs contrary to everything that [Trump] promised to our members and to the American people,” he says.

There’s another topic I’ve spent a lot of time covering since January: the upheaval in the federal workforce. The Office of Personnel Management recently revealed that by year’s end, the government will have shed about 300,000 federal employees, most of them voluntary departures.

In an interview on CNBC, OPM director, Scott Kupor, described this as an opportunity — a chance to change the government to reward efficiency. This is something I’ve heard even Trump’s staunchest critics say is needed. But others warn that the mass exodus of federal employees, including several senior leaders at the CDC just last week, is leaving agencies ill-positioned to deliver the services Americans need. We have the next three-plus years to see who’s right.

Labor Day reads and listens

When you're stuck at the airport, you need the right soundtrack.

When you’re stuck at the airport, you need the right soundtrack.

Alex Wong/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Alex Wong/Getty Images

When you're stuck at the airport, you need the right soundtrack.

When you’re stuck at the airport, you need the right soundtrack.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Advertisement

If you took advantage of the holiday weekend to travel, I hope your return trip goes off without a hitch. But if you find yourself dealing with a flight delay, don’t fret — Pop Culture Happy Hour has three songs to help you through those stressful travel moments.

Missouri workers are campaigning to reinstate mandated sick leave after state lawmakers repealed part of a voter-approved law. Proposition A, the voter-approved measure, was set to increase the minimum wage and allow workers to earn sick days. Since it was a statutory change, lawmakers were able to overturn the paid sick leave portion, with many citing the cost it would add to businesses. This time around, voters want it back as a constitutional amendment lawmakers can’t repeal. (via KCUR)

Visitation at all of Utah’s national parks has decreased this summer after a couple of record-setting years. The slump reflects a broader travel trend. International tourism has taken a dip due to economic uncertainty, fluctuating tariffs, and political rhetoric, which has led some foreign travelers to reconsider plans to visit the U.S. This shift could have big implications for local economies that rely heavily on tourism. (via KUER)

Movie-goers will get a chance to revisit a classic with fresh eyes when Jaws returns to theaters for its 50th anniversary this year. The movie takes place on Amity Island. To prepare for the event, NPR network station WBUR produced a three-part series called Jaws Island. The podcast brings the listeners to the real-life “Amity Island” at Martha’s Vineyard and explores the legacy of the blockbuster movie. Check out all three episodes here and photos of the “finatics” who ventured to the island for the anniversary.

U.S.-made sunscreens have not been updated for decades, which is a reason why Korean and European sunscreens are hyped for their superior protection against UV radiation. But are U.S.-made sunscreens really subpar? Chemist and science communicator Michelle Wong joins Short Wave to discuss the research on UVA and UVB rays and provide advice on how to maximize your sun protection, regardless of which sunscreen you use.

Advertisement

This newsletter was edited by Suzanne Nuyen.

Continue Reading

News

A community gathers for the first Mass after tragedy as questions still remain | CNN

Published

on

A community gathers for the first Mass after tragedy as questions still remain | CNN
Advertisement

Father Dennis Zehren struggled to hold back tears as he addressed his Minneapolis congregation, drawing on Jesus’ parable of humility to reflect the community’s grief after this week’s deadly shooting.

“Jesus says… sit with me in this low place,” the Annunciation Catholic Church pastor told the packed auditorium on Saturday, just days after a shooter fired through the church’s stained-glass windows at students in prayer.

The Mass, held in the school auditorium just steps away from the parish’s now-closed sanctuary, marked the first such gathering for the congregation since the attack. The church that three days before was filled with excited students and watchful teachers at the start of a new school year is now a crime scene.

“This is not our normal seat, this is not where we usually gather, this is not our usual worship place,” Zehren said as he joined his parishioners in turning to prayer, music and shared silence in a room overflowing with both people and grief.

Advertisement

The shooting left two children dead — 8-year-old Fletcher Merkel and 10-year-old Harper Moyski — and wounded 18 others, including 15 students and three elderly parishioners.

“It will never be the same, but it’s a call to begin again,” Zehren said.

Outside the church, a memorial of flowers, stuffed animals and signs grew. A note from Fletcher’s mother read, “I love you always and forever.”

Zehren said the tragedy has brought an outpouring of support from around the world. “We will be sitting in a different pew for a long time to come,” he said, urging parishioners to seek mental health resources as they begin to heal from something “far beyond what we’ve experienced before.”

Police identified the now-deceased shooter as a 23-year-old former Annunciation student whose mother once worked at the parish. Investigators are still searching for a motive.

Advertisement

With classes suspended, children have already lost cherished traditions such as Spirit Day and a butterfly release. The sanctuary is now missing the familiar sounds of hymns and the children’s voices that once echoed through its halls.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara described the attack as “slaughter,” noting the shooter was “standing outside of the building firing through very narrow church windows on the level where they would line up with the pews.”

Ten-year old Weston Halsne recalled he was two seats away from the windows when the shots rang out and his friend dove on top of him, saving him but getting hit in the back: “He’s really brave.”

Families mourn and call for change

Outside the church, Jesse Merkel, Fletcher’s father, mourned the loss of his son. “We will never be allowed to hold him, talk to him, play with him, and watch him grow into the wonderful young man he was on the path to becoming,” he said.

“While the hole in our hearts and lives will never be filled, I hope that in time our family can find healing,” Merkel said, holding back tears.

Advertisement

He asked the community to “remember Fletcher for the person he was” – a boy who loved his family and friends, “fishing, cooking, and any sport that he was allowed to play,” and “not the act that ended his life.”

Harper Moyski’s parents described their daughter as “bright, joyful, and deeply loved,” urging leaders to take meaningful action to address gun violence and the “mental health crisis in this country.”

“Change is possible, and it is necessary—so that Harper’s story does not become yet another in a long line of tragedies,” they said. “As a family, we are shattered, and words cannot capture the depth of our pain.”

A view of a memorial outside the Annunciation Church in Minneapolis Saturday.

Among the wounded, Endre Gunter, 13, survived surgery after being shot twice.

“Yet we still have our child. Unlike others, we are blessed to hold onto him,” said Endre’s mother, Danielle Gunter.

He showed “strength and faith beyond his years,” his aunt said, as he recovers surrounded by loved ones.

Advertisement

Community members in Minneapolis say they are finding ways to support victims of the senseless tragedy, but that online fundraisers are simply not enough, reported CNN affiliate WCCO.

Residents are supporting victims by tying blue and green ribbons on street poles and distributing yard signs reading, “Our hearts are with Annunciation.”

Linda Nucci, who organized the signs, said, “You want to take that energy or that grief and figure out what you can do with it.”

“When anything like this happens, you just want to feel useful. You want to take that energy or that grief or that, you know, uncomfortability and figure out what can you do with it,” Nucci said.

Sarah Henning, another community member leading memorial efforts across the city, told the outlet that 300 volunteers helped her group tie nearly 3,000 ribbons on street poles and trees.

Advertisement

“We were able to get ribbons into Fletcher’s neighborhood yesterday, and we’ve had several neighbors reach out about what that meant,” she told WCCO.

“I want them to experience unbelievable love after unbelievable tragedy,” Henning said. “That’s why we’re doing it.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending