Connect with us

News

For Canadians Visiting Myrtle Beach, Trump Policies Make the Vibe Chillier

Published

on

For Canadians Visiting Myrtle Beach, Trump Policies Make the Vibe Chillier

Canadians have long flocked to the South Carolina beach town. This year, many are offended by the president and threatening to stay away.

WHY WE’RE HERE

We’re exploring how America defines itself one place at a time. At one popular South Carolina beach town, locals are hoping that Southern charm can offset hard feelings among Canadian tourists.


The Southerners at the Myrtle Beach Welcome Center had brewed Tim Hortons coffee for their northern guests. They were giving away cookies adorned with maple leaves, and lapel pins featuring the twinned flags of Canada and South Carolina.

It was Monday morning at the kickoff party for Can-Am Days, the annual ritual that honors the Canadians who have long bolstered the city’s tourist economy in the winter months. For more than 60 years, it had been the most easygoing of international summits: The local Lions Club would welcome Lions from Canada. There were garden tours and golf tournaments. In pre-internet days, the local paper would print the Canadian news.

Now it had gotten complicated and weird, a result of the trade war being waged against Canada by a capricious American president whose image is all over the Myrtle Beach T-shirt shops, his famous fist pump as popular as sea gulls and sunsets.

Advertisement

Along with brandishing ever-changing tariff policies — threatening, imposing, rescinding them — President Trump has repeatedly asserted that he wants to make Canada the 51st state, leaving many Canadians astonished and furious. Some have canceled plans to visit conservative Myrtle Beach, part of a broader grass-roots travel boycott that is threatening to put a dent in the $20.5 billion that Canadian visitors spend in the United States each year.

Amy Gleiser, who works at an academic teaching hospital in Ontario, is among those who have taken a stand. Reached by telephone on Wednesday, Ms. Gleiser, 47, said that she and her family had canceled their trip to Myrtle Beach, losing the deposit on their condo, and were heading instead to the Yucatan Peninsula. All because of Mr. Trump.

“It’s bullying,” she said of his treatment of Canada. “That’s how we feel.”

No one in Myrtle Beach is quite sure what the bad blood means for their community, which offers a less stuffy alternative to Hilton Head Island, down the coast. With its beachwear superstores, go-kart tracks and mini golf, Myrtle is the kind of laid-back beach town where the Hooters restaurant chain’s tongue-in-cheek motto — “Delightfully Tacky, Yet Unrefined” — could very well appear on the city seal. And it takes a certain pride in offering affordable vacations to the working and middle classes of the American South.

Canadians, too, have been charmed by Myrtle Beach’s sunshine and comparatively low prices — as well as by the crucial fact that it is much closer than Florida when traveling by minivan.

Advertisement

Tracy Conner, interim president of the area chamber of commerce, said it was too early to tell whether a significant number of Canadians stayed home for this year’s Can-Am Days, which run from March 8 to March 16. Tourism officials noted that there were still plenty of license plates from Ontario and Quebec in restaurant parking lots.

On Monday morning, a few dozen Canadians, most of them retirees, had stopped by the visitors center for the kickoff party. Mayor Brenda Bethune, in a short speech, tried to put some distance between Myrtle Beach and the White House — a challenge given Mr. Trump’s lopsided November victory in Horry County, which includes the city.

“I know there is a lot of tension right now, and we can’t help that, on those levels,” said Ms. Bethune, who, as it turns out, supported Nikki Haley in last year’s Republican primary. “We have to accept what we are given. And we are going to do that graciously, with a smile on our faces, with Southern hospitality, and say, ‘Welcome.’”

A local musician, of the mellow sort found on the patios of beach-adjacent seafood restaurants, played a cover of “Everybody Wants to Rule the World,” following it up with a James Taylor paean to friendship. (The Burlington Teen Tour Band of Ontario, which had been scheduled to march from the welcome center to the beach, had canceled in protest).

The snowbirds mingled. And, through the veil of politeness for which they are renowned, they vented.

Advertisement

Patricia Cape, 80, a retired pharmacy worker from Hamilton, Ontario, said her children had been trying to persuade her and her husband, Gary, to cut their vacation short for patriotic reasons. She was giving it some thought. “I am very disappointed by President Trump,” she said. “Why would he want to alienate Canada? I love the United States.”

Arthur and Kathy Jadischke, of Mississauga, Ontario, had already changed their plans and were heading home early. Mr. Jadischke, 82, said he did not know if he would return to Myrtle Beach. He compared Mr. Trump with Hitler and Vladimir Putin. “If this stuff keeps happening, I can’t see myself coming,” he said. “Because I’d be ashamed.”

Wayne Gray, a Myrtle Beach native and former city councilman, said that Can-Am Days were more crucial for the local economy a few decades ago, when the influx of Canadians between January and April gave a boost to local businesses before the big crush of American visitors between Memorial Day and Labor Day.

These days, Mr. Gray said, Canadians’ contributions to the economy have diminished in importance as the population of Horry County has exploded, and as the area became a destination not just for vacations but for events like youth travel sports tournaments.

“I think we’re all very appreciative of the Canadian visitors who come here,” Mr. Gray said. “But the Canadian American Days are just not as impactful as they once were.”

Advertisement

The visitors bureau estimates that international travelers, the bulk of whom were Canadian, contributed about 2 percent of the $1.9 billion spent by tourists in 2023, the last year such data was available.

Some business owners said they have not felt a drop in business this year, at least so far. Others say they have noticed missing Canadians. Judith Davies, chairwoman of the Horry County Democratic Party, said that a number of local rental property owners had called her, worried about Canadians canceling their vacation rentals.

Many Canadians are repeat visitors who come to Myrtle Beach for weeks or months at a time. This week, some were further offended by the Trump administration’s decision to enforce a law requiring Canadians who stay in the United States for 30 days or more to register with the authorities.

But the affronts all seemed to be coming from the top. Canadians reported no hostility from pro-Trump locals. It was the same relaxed hospitality they had experienced for years.

Even so, Rick McCall, 74, a retired car dealer from Simcoe, Ontario, said that he no longer felt comfortable in the United States. Mr. McCall describes himself as a conservative but said he considers Mr. Trump “unstable” and a “madman.”

Advertisement

For the past five years, Mr. McCall said, he has owned a vacation house in North Myrtle Beach. Mr. Trump’s war of words, he added, had him seriously considering selling it.

“I’ve got to tell you, it’s just not a welcoming thing. I think it’s really changed the dynamics,” he said. “I think it’s tragic. I really do.”

On Tuesday, behind the counter of a kite store that had been partially transformed into a Trump-themed emporium, David Sandifer was listening to classic rock and offering merchandise like a “White Privilege Card,” vaguely modeled on an American Express card. There was also a fake dollar bill featuring what was advertised as “Hillbilly Veep” JD Vance clutching an assault rifle.

Mr. Sandifer, 75, a former electrical contractor, said that he could see the nation losing a significant number of Canadians avoiding the United States if Mr. Trump kept the pressure on. But he did not seem to mind. God, he said, was working through Mr. Trump.

The Canadians, he suggested, should heed the collective advice of many a beach-themed T-shirt, and chill out.

Advertisement

“You can’t let things like that get in the way of your life,” he said. “You still have to have a good time.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

Published

on

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

The U.S. and Israel have been conducting strikes against targets in Iran since Saturday morning, with the aim of toppling Tehran’s clerical regime. Iran has fired back, with retaliatory assaults featuring missiles and drones targeting several Gulf countries and American bases in the Middle East.

“All six aircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered, and are in stable condition. Kuwait has acknowledged this incident, and we are grateful for the efforts of the Kuwaiti defense forces and their support in this ongoing operation,” Central Command said.

“The cause of the incident is under investigation. Additional information will be released as it becomes available,” it added.

In a separate statement later Monday, Central Command said that American forces had been killed during combat since the strikes began.

“As of 7:30 am ET, March 2, four U.S. service members have been killed in action. The fourth service member, who was seriously wounded during Iran’s initial attacks, eventually succumbed to their injuries,” it said.

Advertisement

Major combat operations continue and our response effort is ongoing. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification,” Central Command added.

This story has been updated.

Continue Reading

Trending