Connect with us

News

Exploding pagers join long history of killer communications devices

Published

on

Exploding pagers join long history of killer communications devices

Israeli spies have a decades-long history of using telephones — and their technological successors — to track, surveil and even assassinate their enemies.

As far back as 1972, as part of their revenge on the Palestine Liberation Organization for the killing of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics, Mossad operatives swapped out the marble base of the phone used by Mahmoud Hamshari, the PLO’s representative in Paris, in his French apartment.

On December 8, when he answered the phone, a nearby Israeli team remotely detonated the explosives packed inside the replica base. Hamshari lost a leg and later died.

In 1996, Israel’s internal security agency, Shin Bet, managed to trick Yahya Ayyash, a skilled Hamas bombmaker responsible for the killing of dozens of Israelis, into accepting a call from his father on a Motorola Alpha cell phone brought into Gaza by a Palestinian collaborator.

Hidden inside the phone was about 50g of explosives — enough to kill anybody holding the phone to their ear. Both instances are now part of Israeli spy legend.

Advertisement

Among former intelligence officials, the cases are considered textbook successes, in which the phones served several crucial purposes: monitoring and surveilling the target ahead of the assassination; identifying and confirming the identity of the target during the assassination; and finally making it possible to use small explosive charges that killed only Ayyash and Hamshari in each case.

A memorial for Hamas bombmaker Yahya Ayyash who was killed in 1996 by Israel via explosives in a phone
A guerilla wearing a hooded face mask, stands on a balcony in the Olympic Village in Munich
On September 5 1972, Palestinian militants took 11 members of the Israeli Olympic team hostage in Munich © Popperfoto/Getty Images

As hundreds of pagers suddenly exploded across Lebanon on Tuesday afternoon, the suspicion has immediately turned to Israel, the only regional power with a spy network capable of carrying out such an audacious, sophisticated and co-ordinated attack.

Hizbollah, the militant group many of whose devices were blown up in the attack, said that “we hold the Israeli enemy fully responsible”.

Israel’s military declined to comment on the attack, though Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was on Tuesday evening consulting with his top security chiefs after the blasts, which killed at least 12 people including a child, and injured thousands.

The Lebanese militant group had turned to the pagers to avoid Israeli surveillance after a public plea by Hizbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, for its operatives to ditch their smartphones as Israel stepped up attacks against its commanders during almost a year of intensifying clashes.

With no GPS capabilities, no microphones or cameras, and very limited text broadcasting, pagers — at least in theory — have smaller “attack surfaces” than smartphones, making them tougher to hack.

Advertisement

Hizbollah appears to have preferred them for the same simplicity: they collect very little data to be siphoned off by Israel’s military intelligence.

But they seem not to have counted on the possibility that the tiny devices, usually powered by single AA or AAA batteries — and in the newest models, lithium — could be forced to explode.

Many of the explosions were captured on CCTV cameras as the targets went through the rhythms of daily life in supermarkets or strolling through southern Beirut.

They appear to have taken place within half an hour of each other, and were preceded either by a message or the beeping of an alert that prompted many to take the old-school communications devices out to look at their LCD screens, according to local media reports and videos posted on social media.

Two Israeli former officials, both with backgrounds in hacking the communications and other operations of the country’s enemies, told the FT that pagers do not usually have batteries large enough to be forced to explode with enough intensity to cause the injuries seen on the videos posted from Beirut hospitals.

Advertisement

Many of the injured in the videos are missing fingers and have facial injuries, while others are bleeding profusely from their upper thighs — near where trouser pockets would normally be — and in some cases from their abdomens.

Both ex-officials said there was not enough publicly available evidence to confirm how exactly the detonations were executed and co-ordinated.

They said two obvious possibilities existed: a cyber attack in which a malware forced the pager’s lithium battery to overheat and then explode, or an intervention known as a “supply chain attack”, in which a shipment of pagers bound for Lebanon may have been intercepted and a tiny amount of explosive surreptitiously inserted.

Given the small size of the explosions, both ex-officials said the cyber attack was possible, if technically complex.

“It’s not easy, but you can do it to a single device remotely, and even then you can’t be sure if it will catch fire or actually explode,” said one of the ex-officials. “To do it to hundreds of devices at the same time? That would be incredible sophistication.”

Advertisement
Police officers inspect a car inside of which a hand-held pager exploded, Beirut, Lebanon
Police officers in Lebanon inspect the inside of a car after a handheld pager exploded © Hussein Malla/AP

As Hizbollah made its switch away from smartphones, sourcing a technology that became largely obsolete in the early 2000s would have required the import of large batches of pagers into Lebanon.

But making them work effectively on existing mobile phone networks would be relatively easy, said one of the Israeli ex-officials.

Even today, a small market exists for pagers in industries where employees need to receive short text messages, from hospitals to restaurants and mail sorting warehouses.

While the text messages themselves could very easily be intercepted by Israeli intelligence, their true intent could be disguised by using codes or pre-arranged signals, making their appeal to Hizbollah obvious, said one of the ex-officials.

Since Hizbollah operatives were the most likely group to be using the pagers in Lebanon, an attacker could be relatively sure that they were mainly engaging with militant targets, the ex-official said.

“Even for Hizbollah, this should be a very easy investigation — were all the devices in question from the same manufacturer, maybe arriving in the same or similar shipments?” said one of the former officials.

Advertisement

“Or were they all kinds of different devices, from all kinds of shipments and given to a varied group of [operatives] — junior, senior, political?”

If they were all from a single batch, or a single supplier, it raises the possibility that the shipments were intercepted and small amounts of modern explosives inserted.

One possibility, the second official said, is that the explosive was hidden within the batteries themselves, a trick that Israeli and western intelligence agencies have long worried that terrorists would try on a commercial airliner.

That is why many airport security checks ask passengers to turn on their laptops to show their functioning screens and batteries, and ensure that the battery compartment has not been swapped out for explosives.

The second ex-official, who has worked on previous Israeli cyber-sabotage operations, said it was relatively simple to create a functioning lithium battery that nestles a small explosive charge within it.

Advertisement

But he said there were risks linked to doing this at scale: “The enemy is not simple, and of course they will carefully check any device before it is allowed anywhere near a senior member.”

News

Under Trump, Green Card Seekers Face New Scrutiny for Views on Israel

Published

on

Under Trump, Green Card Seekers Face New Scrutiny for Views on Israel

For decades, immigrants who have followed the rules and have not broken the law have had hopes of earning a green card, a document that allows them to live legally in the United States and gain a path to citizenship.

But under new guidance issued by the Trump administration, immigrants can now be denied a green card for expressing political opinions, such as participating in pro-Palestinian campus protests, posting criticism of Israel on social media and desecrating the American flag, according to internal Department of Homeland Security training materials reviewed by The New York Times.

The documents, which have not been previously reported, show how expansively the Trump administration is carrying out a directive from last August to vet green card applicants for “anti-American” and “antisemitic” views.

The administration includes criticism of Israel as a potentially disqualifying factor, with the training materials citing as an example of questionable speech a social media post that declares, “Stop Israeli Terror in Palestine” and shows the Israeli flag crossed out.

The materials were distributed last month to immigration officers at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security and handles applications for green cards and other forms of legal status.

Advertisement

They reflect how U.S.C.I.S. — long considered the gateway agency for legal migration — has rapidly transformed under President Trump into another cog in his administration’s deportation machine. The agency has worked to strip naturalized Americans of their citizenship and has hired armed federal agents to investigate immigration crimes.

The administration is also granting permanent legal residency to far fewer applicants. Green card approvals have fallen by more than half in recent months, according to a Times analysis of agency data.

“There is no room in America for aliens who espouse anti-American ideologies or support terrorist organizations,” Joseph Edlow, the agency’s director, told Congress in February.

Critics of Mr. Trump’s approach say the administration is seeking to restrict legitimate political speech, and has conflated opposition to Israeli government policies with antisemitism.

Basing green card decisions on “ideological screenings is fundamentally un-American and should have no place in a country built on the promise of free expression,” said Amanda Baran, a senior agency official under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Advertisement

Administration officials said they were defending American values.

“If you hate America, you have no business demanding to live in America,” said Zach Kahler, a spokesman for U.S.C.I.S.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said the administration’s policies had “nothing to do with free speech” and were meant to protect “American institutions, the safety of citizens, national security and the freedoms of the United States.”

The administration has moved aggressively against immigrants for expressing political views that officials have deemed anti-American, making ideology a central part of its immigration vetting process. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has revoked the visas of pro-Palestinian student activists, including one who wrote a column criticizing her university’s response to pro-Palestinian demands.

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed reviewing the social media histories of tourists seeking to visit the United States.

Advertisement

Immigration officers have significant discretion in deciding whether to grant foreigners long-term permanent residence. They have long considered a variety of factors, including criminal records, national security threats, family ties to the United States and employment histories.

Ideology has also traditionally been one of those factors. In some cases, U.S. law forbids officers from granting green cards to people who have belonged to a Communist or other “totalitarian” political party, have promoted anarchy or have called for the overthrow of the U.S. government by “force or violence or other unconstitutional means.”

But in the past, immigration officers have focused on statements that could incite or encourage violence, given concerns about infringing on constitutionally protected speech, former U.S.C.I.S. officials said.

The new training materials reviewed by The Times guide immigration officers through the factors they should consider when ruling on green card applications. They discourage officers from granting green cards to people with a history of “endorsing, promoting or supporting anti-American views” or “antisemitic terrorism, ideologies or groups.”

Immigration officers have been told to weigh those factors as “overwhelmingly negative.”

Advertisement

The documents list support for “subversive” ideologies as among other factors that could lead to an application being rejected. As an example, the materials point to someone “holding a sign advocating overthrow of the U.S. government.”

In addition, the guidance describes the desecration of the American flag as a negative factor, citing Mr. Trump’s executive order last year directing the Justice Department to prosecute protesters who burn the flag. The Supreme Court has ruled that flag burning is a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

Immigration officers have also been told to scrutinize applicants who encourage antisemitism “through rhetorical or physical actions.” They were instructed to “focus particularly on aliens who engaged in on-campus anti-American and antisemitic activities” after the Hamas attacks against Israel in 2023, the documents show.

Further examples in the documents of conduct characterized as antisemitic include a social media post showing a map of Israel with the nation’s name crossed out and replaced with the word “Palestine.” Another illustrative post suggests that Israelis should “taste what people in Gaza are tasting.”

Immigration officers must elevate all cases involving “potential anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideology” to their managers and to the agency’s general counsel’s office for review, according to the documents.

Advertisement

In recent months, the agency has also changed the way it refers to the employees who adjudicate green card applications, long known as “immigration services officers.” In job postings, it now calls them “homeland defenders.”

“Protect your homeland and defend your culture,” one posting says.

Steven Rich contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

America’s bid for energy supremacy is being forged in war

Published

on

America’s bid for energy supremacy is being forged in war

Additional work by Jana Tauschinski

Oil and gas tanker location and destination data are from Kpler. The map shows the latest position for vessels with an active AIS signal on April 19–20, filtered by minimum capacity thresholds: crude tankers of at least 50,000 deadweight tonnage (DWT); oil product tankers of at least 55,000 DWT; oil/chemical tankers of at least 40,000 DWT; LNG carriers of at least 150,000 cubic metres; and LPG carriers of at least 50,000 cubic metres. Net fossil fuel import data by country are based on Ember analysis of the IEA World Energy Balances 2023.

Continue Reading

News

Roommate faces murder charges in deaths of 2 University of South Florida doctoral students

Published

on

Roommate faces murder charges in deaths of 2 University of South Florida doctoral students

A 26-year-old man is facing two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of two University of South Florida doctoral students who went missing last week, local authorities said Saturday. 

The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office in Florida said that evidence presented to the state attorney’s office resulted in the charges against Hisham Abugharbieh, the roommate of Zamil Limon, one of the doctoral students. 

Abugharbieh is accused of premediated murder with a weapon. He was arrested on Friday, the same day Limon was found dead. 

The family of Nahida Bristy, the other doctoral student, told CBS News that police said she is also likely dead. That is based on the volume of blood discovered at Abugharbieh’s residence, which he shared with Limon.

“Police told us she is no longer with us,” Bristy’s brother, Zahid Prato, said early Saturday.

Advertisement

The family was told her body may never be found and police believe she may have been dismembered, according to Prato. 

CBS News has reached out to police for more information.

Authorities said in a statement Saturday they were still searching for Bristy.

Limon’s remains were found on the Howard Franklin Bridge in Tampa Friday morning, Chief Deputy Joseph Maurer with the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office said. His cause of death was pending autopsy results.

Deputies with the sheriff’s office took Abugharbieh into custody on Friday after responding to a domestic violence call at a home in the Lake Forest Community, a neighborhood near USF’s Tampa campus, officials said. He also faces charges of domestic violence and evidence tampering, as well as a charge of failing to report a death to law enforcement.

Advertisement

Limon and Bristy, both 27, had last been seen in the Tampa area on April 16. 

Limon was studying the use of AI in environmental science and was set to present his doctoral thesis this week, his family said. Bristy is studying chemical engineering. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending