Connect with us

News

Digital nomads bound for south-east Asian sunshine face visa dilemma

Published

on

Digital nomads bound for south-east Asian sunshine face visa dilemma

For the past 18 months, marketing expert Angela Wong has criss-crossed south-east Asia working from Airbnbs, hotels and beaches — so in theory, new digital nomad visas from a region famous for warm weather and cheap living costs should be a boon. 

In May, Thailand extended visas for self-employed remote workers from 60 days to five years, with each stay limited to 180 days, also allowing visa holders to bring spouses and children. Indonesia has offered a one-year temporary residence permit for remote workers. The Philippines has promised to introduce a digital nomad visa this year.

But for those able to rock up on a tourist visa, formal applications were not worth the effort, Wong said. “Why go through an application process that requires forms, evidence of employment, bank statements that take time to complete and months to approve when I could be on my next flight to Bangkok tomorrow morning?” she said. 

Wong’s experience highlights the difficulties faced by countries seeking to take advantage of the uptick in people wanting to work remotely. Digital nomads should boost local economies with their spending, but many stay for short periods of time. Governments are keen to entice skilled foreign workers to stay — and spend — for longer.

While Italy, Portugal, Estonia, Greece, Malta and Spain all offer digital nomad visas, south-east Asia, a popular tourist destination long attractive to budget travellers, has lagged behind, said Brittany Loeffler, co-founder of Nomads Embassy, an online organisation promoting and assisting aspiring digital nomads. 

Advertisement

“The region has fairly challenging approval systems compared to countries in Europe,” she said. “South-east Asian governments have been picky, processing times are long and things like tax rules are unclear or change suddenly.” Precise data on the uptake of digital nomad schemes is scarce as governments do not consistently publish numbers, she added.

Indonesia’s E33G remote worker visa allows an individual to work for one year and bring family members. Under normal business or social visas, travellers could stay for up to six months in total, assuming they leave and re-enter every two months. 

Bas de Jong, an Indonesia-based founding partner for law firm PNB, said most digital nomads interested in the popular holiday destination of Bali opted for a single-entry business or tourist visa, and then did a visa run every two months to reset the clock.

© Made Nagi/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

“We have had some requests, [but it is] not overwhelming. The main struggling point for most [with the E33G visa] is the annual salary requirement of $60,000.”

Thailand’s new relaxed rules are expected to be similar to the six-month, multiple-entry visa, whose requirements include $5,500 in a bank account and reserved accommodation. 

Advertisement

Nikorndej Balankura, director-general of Thailand’s information department and foreign ministry spokesperson, said adapting the visas would facilitate economic development and promote tourism. The government added that other measures, such as an e-visa system and the establishment of a visa policy committee, would improve efficiency.

But Sutharm Valaisathien, a Bangkok-based senior partner at international law firm ILCT, said that they had not seen much demand. Thailand wants “to attract more foreign experts in tech, which Thailand is missing”, he added. 

While Malaysia launched the Rantau Nomad Pass in 2022, the rules have been stringently applied. “The application has to be really strong and they specifically want people in IT and digital services,” said Sarah Huang, a partner at Peter Huang & Richard in Malaysia.

Malaysia Digital Economy Corp, a government agency, said it expanded the eligibility criteria in June from tech and digital professionals to include fields such as legal counsel, technical writers, business development managers, public relations professionals and accountants. The minimum income requirement for these non-digital talents is $60,000 per year.

MDEC said the Nomad Pass had received 3,218 applications, of which 1,506 were approved. The top five countries of origin were Russia, Pakistan, the UK, Japan and Australia.

Advertisement

“This move enhances the accessibility of the DE Rantau Nomad Pass to a broader range of professionals, putting Malaysia on par with other countries that offer digital nomad visas,” the agency said.

The governments of Indonesia and the Philippines did not respond to requests for comment.

Faustine Schricke, who has been living and working in Bali for 14 years, said Indonesia’s government had struggled to find a proper solution for people wanting to work remotely. “You still see a lot of visa runs as a lot of the rules are confusing,” she said. Many Russians arrived in the wake of the Ukraine invasion, most on tourist visas.

Ee Ming Toh, a 32-year-old Singaporean freelancer, became a digital nomad after facing high rental prices in the city-state. While Singapore is her base, she has worked in Malaysia and Vietnam this year and intends to head to Cambodia, Thailand, Japan and Nepal in the next few months.

“This arrangement works best for me,” she said, complaining of the hassle of “more complicated visas”.

Advertisement

Wong, the marketing expert, holds a similar view. “What digital nomads really want is a visa that is valid for six to 12 months and is effectively a long-term tourist visa. They are happy to pay a [reasonable] fee . . . and complete a simple application form.

“The minute you have to start providing proof of income, background checks and the like — forget it.”

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending